00:00:01
[CALL TO ORDER]
00:00:13
[ROLL CALL]
00:00:36
>> THANK YOU.
00:00:38
>> OKAY. SO WE'RE GOING TO MOVE ONTO
00:00:41
PUBLIC COMMENT. DO WE HAVE ANY MEMBER
00:00:43
OF THE PUBLIC THAT WOULD LIKE TO
00:00:45
COMMENT ON ANY OF OUR CLOSED
00:00:47
ITEMS?
00:00:48
>> I HAVE AN E COMMENT UNDER THIS
00:00:51
RIGHT NOW MAYOR.
00:00:52
>> OKAY. GO AHEAD READ PLEASE.
00:00:55
>> IT IS FROM THE TRUTH. STATES I
00:00:58
WONDER HOW MUCH COLLISION IS
00:01:01
HAPPENING BETWEEN THE MAYOR CITY
00:01:02
MANAGER AND MR. ROBERT SANTA CLARA
00:01:04
NEWS THE BLOG SUPPORTS NOTHING BUT HATE
00:01:06
RACISM, CLASSISM, AND HOMOPHOBIA AS
00:01:09
WELL AS MISINFORMATION. SO THE CITY
00:01:11
MANAGER RESPONDED ABOUT THE WEEKLY NEWS
00:01:13
STORY PROVES A LOT BECAUSE THEY DON'T
00:01:15
DO THIS ONE MR. ROBERT LIES DAILY.
00:01:18
THE GAME IS RIGGED AND NEEDS TO BE AN
00:01:19
IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION INTO THE COLLUSIONS
00:01:21
BETWEEN THE MAYOR CITY MANAGER
00:01:22
AND MR. ROBERT SANTA CLARA NEWS END
00:01:24
OF COMMENT. AND THAT'S ALL I HAVE
00:01:26
MAYOR.
00:01:27
>> OKAY. THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE
00:01:29
HERE IN PERSON THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE
00:01:31
A COMMENT? ANY OTHER BESIDES AN E
00:01:34
COMMENT?
00:01:37
>> I DON'T SEE ANY HANDS.
00:01:38
>> OKAY. IF NOT WE'RE GOING TO
00:01:40
ADJOURN TO CLOSE SESSION. THANK YOU.
00:01:42
(CLOSE SESSION)
00:02:42
>> WE ARE BACK NOW. COULD YOU PLEASE
00:02:45
STAND FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND
00:02:47
REMAINING STANDING FOR STATEMENT OF
00:02:49
VALUES?
00:02:51
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
00:03:07
>> AS WE ARE TOGETHER. WE ACT WITH
00:03:12
STRETCH AND OBLIGATION TO OUR PEOPLE TO
00:03:15
JUSTICE FOR ALL. LET US SEEK WISDOM
00:03:21
BEST INTEREST OF THE NEIGHBOR AND
00:03:24
COUNTRY. ALL ASK SERVE THE COMMUNITY
00:03:26
WITH FAIRNESS AND RESPECT PUTTING THEIR
00:03:30
NEEDS BEFORE ALL.
00:03:31
>> THANK YOU PLEASE BE SEATED.
00:03:35
>> MADAM MAYOR READ THE ANNOUNCEMENT?
00:03:39
>> YES PLEASE.
00:03:41
>> SANTA CLARA AND HOUSING AUTHORIZE
00:03:46
$30 FOR EACH MEETING. BEHAVIOR
00:03:49
STANDARDS. A CODE OF ETHICS AND VALUE
00:04:00
AND MAINTAIN HIGH BUSINESS IN EFFICIENT
00:04:05
MANNER. AS A PROCEED OFFICER MANAGE IN
00:04:12
QUORUM USE OF THE GABBLE COME TO ORDER.
00:04:23
>> GOOD WELCOME. GO AHEAD I FORGOT.
00:04:27
>> THANK YOU. FOR THOSE WHO ARE
00:04:31
SPEAKING AS REGISTER LOBBYIST YOU ARE
00:04:34
REQUIRE TO IDENTIFY YOURSELF AND THE
00:04:37
CLIENTS AND THE ORGANIZATION YOU HELD
00:04:40
WITH CITY OFFICIALS AND CITY 2.55.15 O.
00:04:47
THANK YOU.
00:04:48
>> THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING EVERYONE.
00:04:51
THIS IS THE LAST MEETING OUR MEETING OF
00:04:55
2021.
00:04:57
FOR TODAY'S MEETING THE CITY 'S
00:05:00
CONTINUE TO USE ZOOM MEETING TO ALLOW
00:05:03
SAFETY FROM YOUR HOME OR OFFICE.
00:05:05
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC JOIN VIA THE LINK
00:05:09
OR CALL INTO THE ZOOM MEETING DISPLAYED
00:05:12
ON THE SCREEN NOW.
00:05:14
IF YOU LIKE TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEM FOR
00:05:19
PUBLIC PRESENTATION PLEASE RAISE YOUR
00:05:21
HAND ON THE ZOOM APPLICATION OR PRESS
00:05:25
STAR 9 ON THE PHONE.
00:05:28
PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND WHILE THE ITEM
00:05:31
IS SPEAKING. STAFF WILL LIST YOUR NAME
00:05:34
OR LAST FOUR DIGITS OF THE PHONE CALL.
00:05:38
I WILL CALL ON YOU. YOU HAVE 3
00:05:42
MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS AND 3
00:05:46
MINUTES OF PRESENTATION THOSE ARE
00:05:48
TOPICS NOT ON THE AGENDA.
00:05:51
STAFF WILL LOWER EACH HAND TO ASSURE
00:05:54
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC UNDER THE
00:05:57
APPROPRIATE AGENDA ITEM.
00:05:59
YOU MAY ALSO SUBMIT ON THE E COMMENT ON
00:06:05
THE LEGISLATOR PAGE OR PUBLIC COMMENT
00:06:09
AT SANTA CLARA TO THE RECORD.
00:06:14
LET'S MOVE ON TO THE COUNCIL AGENDA.
00:06:17
WE WILL START WITH REPORTS OF ACTION IN
00:06:25
CLOSED SESSION.
00:06:27
OUR ASSISTANCE CITY ATTORNEY SUE DO YOU
00:06:30
HAVE SOMETHING FOR US?
00:06:33
>> ASKED ITEM 1B NO CLOSED ACTION IN
00:06:36
CLOSED SESSION.
00:06:37
>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH ON THAT.
00:06:43
CONTINUOUS AND RECONSIDERATION. I --
00:06:46
WE HAVE --
00:06:54
>> MAYOR ITEM 1A NO ACTION?
00:06:57
>> NO ACTION FOR 1A.
00:07:00
CHEF [KH-F] >> CHEF THANK YOU.
00:07:05
>> CONTINUOUS AND RECONSIDERATION. I
00:07:07
KNOW WE HAVE A REQUEST TO DEFER CITY
00:07:11
MANAGER WOULD YOU LIKE TO GO?
00:07:14
>> SURE. I CAN DO MY NORMAL REPORT.
00:07:17
WE HAVE RECEIVED A REQUEST FROM THE
00:07:24
DIVERSITY ENCLOSE 2A AND 11 TO JANUARY
00:07:26
25.
00:07:29
FOR PURPOSES OF...
00:07:30
>> CAN WE START WITH THAT? CAN I HAVE
00:07:35
A MOTION TO DEFER THAT?
00:07:38
>> DEFER THAT.
00:07:40
>> SECOND.
00:07:41
>> WHO MADE THE MOTION?
00:07:47
>> COUNCILMEMBER CHAIN.
00:07:49
>> ANY OTHER FROM THE CITY COUNCIL OR
00:07:55
PUCK LICK.
00:07:58
PUBLIC. CITY ROLL CALL VOTE?
00:08:05
>> COUNCILMEMBER WAN? YES.
00:08:10
COUNCILMEMBER PARK? COUNCIL JANE?
00:08:20
COUNCILMAN BECKER. COUNCILMEMBER
00:08:22
GILMORE.
00:08:24
>> AS MY NORMAL REPORT FOR 7, E, D, H,
00:08:40
I, K, O AND M4 AND 9 ARE TIME ACTION.
00:08:46
>> FOUR AND NINE. WE WILL DO ALL THOSE
00:08:50
FIRST AND GO BACKWARDS LIKE WE NORMALLY
00:08:54
DO.
00:08:55
THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THERE IS ANY
00:08:58
CONTINUOUS OR RECONSIDERATION OR
00:09:01
EXCEPTIONS?
00:09:03
FROM THE PUBLIC DO WE HAVE ANYTHING?
00:09:07
WE ARE GOING TO MOVE ON TO SPECIAL
00:09:11
ORDER OF BUSINESS. 2A IS JANUARY 25.
00:09:15
OUR NEXT ITEM TO BE VERBAL REPORT
00:09:21
REGARDING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC.
00:09:25
>> YES MAYOR I WANT TO SHARE THE SANTA
00:09:31
CLARA HONOR CHEF LISA SHOA WITH 2021
00:09:40
YEAR AND SERVICE PROFESSION THROUGHOUT
00:09:44
SANTA CLARA COUNTRY. AMONG YOUR
00:09:50
CONTRIBUTIONS HER VALUE COVID UPDATES
00:09:53
WERE NOTED AMONG THE CONTRIBUTIONS.
00:10:01
FOR PURPOSES CONGRATULATION.
00:10:04
>> CONGRATULATION LISA.
00:10:10
>> VERY WELL DESERVED.
00:10:12
>> THE STATUS IS PROVIDE FOR SECTION
00:10:17
8630. THE DCD STILL CATEGORIES
00:10:24
TRANSMISSION RATES HIGH SUBSTANTIAL
00:10:28
MODERN AND LOW. CALIFORNIA HAS A HIGH
00:10:32
TRANSMISSION RATE.
00:10:39
COUNTRY SARAH APPEARS FIFTH SEARCH OF
00:10:42
COVID-19 AND THE DATA REFLECT THIS.
00:10:46
LAST WEEK AVERAGE INCREASED OVER 100
00:10:50
CASES A DAY.
00:10:54
DECEMBER 13 THE ARRANGE WAS 240. THE
00:11:00
POSITIVE 1.6 YESTERDAY AND ONE MONTH IT
00:11:03
WAS 1.4 PERCENT. HOSPITALIZATION HAVE
00:11:07
INCREASED NOT AS THE SAME RATE WITH THE
00:11:10
OTHER DATA I SHARED.
00:11:12
WE ARE SHOWING AS SUNDAY 131 BEING
00:11:16
TREATED FOR COVID. VACCINATE RATES ARE
00:11:27
GREAT. 75 % HAVE COMPLETED AS OF
00:11:30
YESTERDAY. IN TERMS OF OMICRON IT IS
00:11:43
CAUSING GLOBAL CERTAIN.
00:11:52
OMNICOM. SYMPTOMS IN SOUTH AFRICA WERE
00:11:57
REPORTED MILD TO MODERN THIS AMONG
00:12:01
YOUNGER THAT ARE HEATHER TO BEGIN WITH.
00:12:12
DR. FRAUGHT THEY EMPHASIZE MUCH
00:12:14
UNKNOWN AND THAT WAS REINFORCED WE ARE
00:12:19
STILL IN UNCERTAIN TIMES.
00:12:24
MULTI-LAYER VACCINATION, BOASTER AND
00:12:33
INDOOR MASK WEARING IN CROWDED SETTINGS
00:12:43
AND VENTILATOR AREA.
00:12:48
THIRD BOASTER ARE STILL AVAILABLE OR
00:12:53
CALL 211 HELP IS AVAILABLE WITHOUT
00:12:57
INTERNET ACCESS OR DIFFERENT LANGUAGE.
00:12:59
IT'S AVAILABLE FOR 16 AND 17.
00:13:03
THE AGENDA RECOMMENDS ADOPT A
00:13:06
RESOLUTION FOR RESOLUTION BODY TO
00:13:09
CONTINUE REMOTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH
00:13:13
AB361 AND HEALTH RECOMMENDATION.
00:13:16
VALID REASON TO NOT MAKE CHANGE THIS
00:13:18
TIME AND REMOTE FIFTH SURGE OF COVID.
00:13:22
WE DON'T KNOW THE IMPACT DURING THE
00:13:25
HOLIDAY SEASON OUR PLAN MENTION
00:13:29
LAST TIME IS VERY MUCH RECOMMENDED.
00:13:32
COVID TESTING RETURNS TO THE LIBRARY
00:13:35
DECEMBER 22 AT 9:30 TO 3 P.M.
00:13:42
APPOINTMENTS MADE FCC FREE TEST WARD IS
00:13:46
ALSO AVAILABLE.
00:13:48
COVID TESTING FOR JANUARY 12 AND 26 AND
00:13:52
THAT CONCLUDES THE COVID UPDATE. LISA
00:13:55
AND I ARE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
00:14:00
>> THANK YOU FOR THAT REPORT. IT'S
00:14:03
EASY TO GET ON THE COUNTRY WEBSITE AND
00:14:06
GET A BOASTER.
00:14:08
THEY HAVE A LOT OF APPOINTMENTS
00:14:13
AVAILABLE ESPECIALLY DURING THE
00:14:15
HOLIDAY.
00:14:16
IT'S HE'S TO DO THAT. I WANT TO THANK
00:14:28
EMERGENCY LISA SHONA. NOT JUST ON THE
00:14:31
REPORTS WHAT SHE HAS DONE NOT THE
00:14:34
PANDEMIC I WOULD MAKE THE 2021
00:14:39
EMERGENCY MANAGER OF THE YEAR.
00:14:41
BECAUSE ANY OF EVENT OF ANY QUESTION OR
00:14:47
ANY SITUATION THAT HAS COME UP THROUGH
00:14:50
THIS PANDEMIC IN THESE UNCHARTED
00:14:56
TERRITORIES LISA WAS THERE TO HELP.
00:14:59
IF SHE DIDN'T HAVE THE ANSWER SHE WOULD
00:15:02
GET BACK TO US TO HELP THE COMMUNITY
00:15:05
247.
00:15:08
I DON'T KNOW HOW WE WOULD GET THROUGH
00:15:11
THIS WITHOUT YOU LISA.
00:15:13
BECAUSE IN THE WAY YOU DID YOU NEVER
00:15:17
SEEM TO PANIC ON US EVEN THOUGH WE WERE
00:15:23
PANICKING. YOU SO PROFESSIONAL. I'M
00:15:27
SO PROUD WITH THE DEPARTMENT AND YOU TO
00:15:30
PRO TECH THE COMMUNITY AND REALLY
00:15:33
REPRESENT US WITH HONOR.
00:15:36
CONGRATULATION ON THAT VERY WELL
00:15:39
DESERVED AWARD.
00:15:40
>> THANK YOU.
00:15:41
>> YOU ARE A HERO TO US BUT WE REALLY
00:15:47
ARE SO GRATEFUL FOR WHAT YOU HAVE DONE
00:15:50
FOR THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA.
00:15:53
>> I WAS GOING TO ADD MAYOR YOUR
00:15:57
COMMENTS ARE SPOT ON.
00:16:01
LISA IS THE ULTIMATE PROFESSIONAL WITH
00:16:05
THIS CITY AND THIS PROFESSION. IT'S
00:16:08
NOT UNCOMMON IN EARLY DAYS OF COVID FOR
00:16:11
THE STATE THE COUNTRY AND OTHER
00:16:15
COLLEAGUES TO CALL HER FOR ADVICE TO
00:16:18
PROCEED.
00:16:20
LISA WENT OVER AND BEYOND AS MANY STAFF
00:16:27
TO DO TO NAVIGATE THROUGH THIS TIME.
00:16:30
LISA SO WELL DESERVED THANK YOU SO MUCH
00:16:35
FOR THE SERVICE.
00:16:37
>> YES AND ALL YOUR COLLEAGUES. I HAVE
00:16:44
HANDS UP COUNCILMAN HARDER.
00:16:46
>> LISA WE ARE LUCKY TO HAVE YOU.
00:16:50
THERE IS ANOTHER TESTING SITE IN SANTA
00:16:54
CLARA IT'S IN THE CORNER OF CALABASAS
00:17:02
AND THERE IS ANOTHER TEST WILLING SITE.
00:17:07
>> VICE MAYOR JAW?
00:17:12
>> THANK YOU FOR THE COVID REPORT. I
00:17:16
WOULD ALSO GIVE A SHOUT OUT TO LISA.
00:17:20
YOU HAVE BEEN TREMENDOUS HELP TO THE
00:17:24
COMMUNITY AS REPORTING.
00:17:26
LAST YEAR OF THAT IS COVID
00:17:32
PANDEMIC.
00:17:33
PEOPLE MAY HAVE NOT HEARD OF THE EOC.
00:17:38
NOW THE HELP YOU HAVE PROVIDE YOU AND
00:17:42
THE TEAM IT'S GREAT FEEDBACK.
00:17:46
>>CONGRATULATION ON YOUR AWARD-WINING
00:17:53
THANK YOU FOR THE REPORT COVID-19. AT
00:17:58
THE SAME TIME I WOULD LIKE TO SAY THANK
00:18:01
YOU FOR LISA. I'VE SEEN TWO SIDES OF
00:18:05
YOU I WAS A RESIDENCE BEFORE THIS.
00:18:08
I GOT TO SEE YOUR REPORTS AND YOUR
00:18:11
GUIDANCE WHAT IS HAPPENING IN
00:18:14
COMMUNICATION. NOW I GET TO SEE YOU AS
00:18:20
ELECTIVE OFFICIAL. IT'S GREAT TO BE
00:18:23
WORKING WITH YOU. CONGRATULATION ON
00:18:25
THE AWARD YOU EARNED IT.
00:18:33
>> COUNCILMAN WASTINE.
00:18:35
>> THANK YOU. ALSO THE UPDATES ON
00:18:41
COVID I'VE TAKEN EVERY OPPORTUNITY WHEN
00:18:47
THERE IS TESTING ESPECIALLY WE ARE OUT
00:18:50
IN THE PUBLIC A LOT MORE NOW AND EVEN
00:18:54
THOUGH I MAY BE VACCINATED I WILL NOT
00:19:01
TAKE ANY CHANCES.
00:19:04
YOU HEAR PEOPLE BEING VACCINATED AND
00:19:11
STILL BEING DIAGNOSED WITH COVID. I
00:19:14
REALLY APPRECIATE THESE OPPORTUNITIES.
00:19:17
I TIME I GO THERE IS NOT ONE TABLE WITH
00:19:22
SOMEBODY DOING THE SELF-TEST. IT'S
00:19:25
WONDERFUL TO HAVE IT HERE LOCALLY.
00:19:33
>> COUNCILMEMBER JANE.
00:19:35
>> THANK YOU FOR BEING BOASTER. I'M
00:19:40
IMPRESSED HOW ON TOP YOU ARE WITH UFF
00:19:44
BROWN UNIVERSITY AND THE CDC I
00:19:48
APPRECIATE GETTING THE LATEST
00:19:51
SCIENTIFIC DATA AND HOW EFFECTIVE THESE
00:19:54
ARE. THANK YOU.
00:19:56
>> LISA DID YOU WANT TO SAY ANYTHING
00:19:59
AFTER THAT?
00:20:00
>> THANK YOU FIRST OF ALL MAYOR
00:20:09
GILMORE AND COUNCILMEMBERS. I'M
00:20:11
RARELY AT A LOSS FOR WORDS.
00:20:15
I'M FEELING QUITE EMOTIONAL RIGHT NOW
00:20:18
WITH YOUR KIND AND GRACE REPORTS.
00:20:28
THIS AWARD SEEMS LIKE ME. IT'S A
00:20:32
LITTLE BIT ABOUT ME BUT LESS ABOUT ME.
00:20:36
I'M ABLE TO DO MY JOB WITH LEADERSHIP
00:20:41
WITH SANTA THE LEADER OF EMERGENCY. A
00:20:51
COMPETITIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM TALENT
00:20:54
PEOPLE. THE STAFF WHO SHOWED UP WITH
00:20:57
ME EVERY DAY FOR MONTHS AS WE WERE
00:21:02
HEARING DR. CODE EVERY TIME WE LEAVE
00:21:05
OUR HOUSES WE RISK OUR LIVES.
00:21:11
I CAN'T FORGOT THE FIRST SPONSORS THE
00:21:15
POLICE DEPARTMENT OR FIRE DEPARTMENT
00:21:16
AND ALL THE DISASTER WORKERS WHO JUST
00:21:20
ROSE TO THE OCCASION WENT THE EXTRA
00:21:23
MILE.
00:21:26
SOMETIMES I WOULD SAY WE ARE DO IT
00:21:30
AFRAID. PEOPLE WORKING IN THE
00:21:33
DISTRIBUTION IT WAS JUST... I'M SO
00:21:38
HONORED AND SO BLESSED TO WORK WITH
00:21:43
THIS CT TEAM.
00:21:45
I CAN'T EVEN EXPRESS THE WITH TEAM I
00:21:57
WORK WITH. I HOPE I DIDN'T FORGET
00:21:59
ANYTHING.
00:22:01
>> YOUR WORDS ARE CORRECT BECAUSE IT
00:22:06
TAKES A TEAM AROUND YOU AND BEHIND YOU
00:22:09
IT'S THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AND THE
00:22:13
AMAZING PEOPLE WE HAVE WORK HERE IT'S A
00:22:17
TESTAMENT WHO WE ARE.
00:22:19
YOU ARE THE FACE OF THE EMERGENCY
00:22:22
SERVICES. WE KNOW IT'S A VILLAGE IT
00:22:26
TOOK A VILLAGE TO GET THIS DONE.
00:22:32
VILLAGES NEEDS LEADERS AS WELL. THANK
00:22:35
YOU TO CITY MANAGER AND YOU LISA TAKING
00:22:40
ON THE LEAD ROLE WITH THE PANDEMIC AND
00:22:42
BEING THE FACE WITH THE COMMUNICATION
00:22:44
WITH ALL OF US.
00:22:46
WE ARE NOT THROUGH IT YET.
00:22:49
>> WE ARE NOT THROUGH IT YET.
00:22:52
>> WE WILL HEAVILY RELY ON YOU AND
00:22:56
OTHERS TO GUIDE OUR COMMUNITY THROUGH
00:22:57
THIS.
00:22:59
IT WAS INTERESTING I WAS AT AN EVENT
00:23:03
THIS WEEKEND WITH OTHER COUNCILMEMBERS.
00:23:06
WE HAD TO RAPIDLY TESTED BEFORE GOING
00:23:11
INTO THE EVENT. WE HAD TO SIT AND WAIT
00:23:15
FOR THE TEST BEFORE YOU WENT INTO THE
00:23:17
EVENT.
00:23:19
EVERYBODY DROVE UP. THINGS ARE
00:23:24
CHANGING RAPIDLY FOR US AND THE
00:23:27
PANDEMIC AND WHAT IS FORCING US TO DO
00:23:31
WITH PUBLIC GATHERS.
00:23:32
I CAN ONLY IMAGINE WITH ALL THE
00:23:40
OUTLETS YOU ARE GETTING FROM.
00:23:43
YOU WILL CONTINUE TO DO FOR US. WE ARE
00:23:46
GRATEFUL FOR YOU AND YOUR TEAM AND THE
00:23:50
CITY EMPLOYEES TO MAKE OUR CITY A
00:23:58
WONDERFUL PLACE.
00:24:00
NEXT WE HAVE CITY MANAGER WITH THE
00:24:06
LOCAL DROUGHT.
00:24:07
>> THIS IS PROVIDED FOR TUBE CODE 8730.
00:24:13
THE SANTA CLARA WATER DISTRICT WITH
00:24:17
SANTA CLARA PREVIOUS A DROUGHT
00:24:20
EMERGENCY. THE SAN FRANCISCO
00:24:23
COMMISSION DID DECLARE WATER EMERGENCY
00:24:26
NOVEMBER 22 COMMISSION MEETING.
00:24:28
WHICH WILL RESULT IN 32 PERCENT USE
00:24:35
REDUCTION FOR SANTA CLARA EARLY 2022.
00:24:40
DROUGHT EFFORTS AND REGULAR MEETINGS
00:24:44
WITH SANTA CLARA BAY AREA AND
00:24:56
CONSERVATION. RESERVOIR DESPITE THE
00:24:57
RECENT RAIN. IT WILL PUSH ON THE WATER
00:25:01
SUPPLIES. THE CITY CONTINUES OUTREACH
00:25:04
REGARDING THE IMPORTANCE OF
00:25:09
CONSERVATION THROUGH BLOGS AND NEWS
00:25:11
LETTERS.
00:25:13
E NEWS AND PLATFORMS. THE EFFORTS OF
00:25:17
SANTA CLARA ARE REACHING THE CERTAIN
00:25:20
GOAL OF 15 PERCENT.
00:25:23
IN NOVEMBER WATER DEMAND WAS DEDUCED 23
00:25:31
PERCENT AND 23.6 COMPARE TO 2013. WE
00:25:35
URGE TO CONSERVE WATER TO THE MAXIMUM
00:25:40
EXTENT POSSIBLE DURING THE DROUGHT.
00:25:44
YOU REDUCE WATER BY FOLLOWING THESE
00:25:46
SUGGESTIONS.
00:25:58
ARROGATION TIME, OUTDOOR WATERING REDUCE
00:26:03
FIX LEAKS. WE ENCOURAGE TO VISIT WATER
00:26:08
CONSERVATION PAGE IT'S LISTED. SANTA
00:26:19
CLARA CA.GOV/SAFE OUR WATER. THIS
00:26:23
CONCLUDES THE WATER. WE ARE HERE FOR
00:26:25
QUESTIONS.
00:26:27
>> ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE COUNCIL ON
00:26:29
THAT?
00:26:30
ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC?
00:26:35
ON THIS? I DON'T SEE ANY ASSISTANCE
00:26:40
CITY CLERK?
00:26:41
>> I DO NOT SEE HANDS AND NO WRITTEN
00:26:44
COMMENTS.
00:26:46
>> THANK YOU CITY MANAGER FOR THAT
00:26:51
REPORT. MOVING ON TO THE AGENDA WE
00:26:55
HAVE ITEM 3A THESE ARE AGENDA DEFERRED
00:26:58
FROM DECEMBER 7.
00:27:01
ADAPTATION OF RESOLUTION APPROVE WILL
00:27:04
FOR CLASSIFIED AND UP CLASSIFIED
00:27:08
EMPLOYEES CITY MANAGER COAST OF THE
00:27:11
LIVING INCREASES DECEMBER 26, 2021.
00:27:14
WHO WAS GOING TO GIVE THE REPORT ON
00:27:16
THIS?
00:27:18
CITY MANAGER?
00:27:19
>> YES GOOD EVENING COUNCIL. I WANT TO
00:27:23
ADVICE THE COUNCIL I DO NOT EXCUSE
00:27:30
DETERMINE I DO NOT HAVE CONFLICT OF
00:27:33
INTEREST. THE LAST WEEK WAS OVERLY
00:27:38
CONSERVATIVE.
00:27:41
I'M COUNCIL MEMOS FROM STAFF OUTSIDE
00:27:45
ATTORNEYS AND MY OWN ATTORNEYS
00:27:47
REGARDING THIS ACTION.
00:27:49
THOSE MATERIALS SUFFICIENT OR MORE THAN
00:27:52
SUFFICIENT INFORMATION FOR YOUR
00:27:53
UNDERSTANDING AT THE ACTION BEFORE THE
00:27:55
COUNCIL.
00:27:58
AS PART ON BEHALF OF THE
00:28:04
ADMINISTRATION THE RECKLESS BY
00:28:06
COUNCILMEMBERS AND MORE IMPORTANTLY
00:28:10
MEMBERS ABOUT BARGAIN UNIT AND MYSELF.
00:28:15
TO UNIT 9 THE RECORD IS VERY CLEAR AND
00:28:18
THE COMMENTS ARE ON RECORD.
00:28:21
IT IS ALSO DEMONSTRATES LACK BEFORE THE
00:28:27
COUNCIL IT'S NOT ABOUT COAL.
00:28:30
THE COMMENTS LAST WEEK REGARDING UNIT 9
00:28:37
OF COLLUDE ARE FALSE. BOTH THE CITY
00:28:40
STAFF TEAM AND UNIT 9 HAVE NOT ACTION
00:28:49
ACCUSED LAST WEEK GOOD FAITH
00:28:52
NEGOTIATE.
00:28:53
THIS IS A NEW LOW WORKFORCE
00:29:00
INTIMIDATION AND HOSTILITY. IT WAS
00:29:07
SCARE HOW INSULTED AND DE MORALIZES.
00:29:15
MY 30 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE THIS IS THE
00:29:19
MOST COMMITTED CITY TEAM I HAVE EVERY
00:29:21
WORKED WITH.
00:29:23
OUR TEAM WORKS WITH SUFFICIENT NEEDED
00:29:29
AND STILL FINDS A WAY TO THE COMMUNITY.
00:29:34
PUBLIC 247 WORK ETHICS AND BE READY TO
00:29:40
WORK. WE DO THAT HIGH LEVEL OF
00:29:44
CUSTOMER SERVICE AND GO BEYOND THE CALL
00:29:47
OF DUTY.
00:29:48
I WANT TO APOLOGIZE THAT HAS THESE LAST
00:29:55
WEEK. THEY WERE HURTFUL COMMENTS AND
00:29:59
INAPPROPRIATE ACTIONS AND THEY TOOK A
00:30:02
TARGET AT OUR ETHICS.
00:30:05
YOU DO NOT DESERVE WITH MEAN STRICT
00:30:07
COMMENTS IN THIS WORK PLACE.
00:30:10
CITY STAFF WORKING IN FEAR WE WILL
00:30:15
REGARDLESS OF ILLEGAL CONDUCT. THIS
00:30:17
HAS HAPPENED FAR TOO OFTEN. PLEASE
00:30:18
STOP MAKING OPTIONS TO US IN TEXT
00:30:22
MESSAGE OR LOCAL MEDIA OR SHAPE OR
00:30:26
FORM.
00:30:30
CITY STAFF IS AWARE HOW YOU ARE
00:30:34
CONDUCTING YOURSELF. YOUR ACTIONS ARE
00:30:37
HARMFUL.
00:30:39
I REASON BELIEVE THAT MY CONFIDENT MEMO
00:30:45
HAS THERE IS AN ARTICLE ALREADY. IT
00:30:50
SHOWS ADDITIONAL HARM.
00:30:52
BACK TO THE MATTER LAST WEEK IS
00:31:00
COUNCIL APPROVAL. NO NEED TO NEED TALK
00:31:04
ACTION WHICH IS NOT A COAL. A PUBLIC
00:31:10
APOLOGIZE HOW WE WERE TREATED LAST WEEK
00:31:13
AND FALSELY ACCUSED.
00:31:14
IF YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND STAFF AND OUR
00:31:17
ATTORNEY ARE HERE TO RESPOND.
00:31:21
WHAT WILL NOT HAPPEN TONIGHT IS FURTHER
00:31:33
DISPERSE OR LOFTING ALLEGATION TOWARDS
00:31:35
US.
00:31:37
I WILL ASK THE MAYOR TO RECONVENE AND
00:31:45
WORK ON THIS MANNER.
00:31:50
WE HAVE A PRESENTATION.
00:31:53
>> LET'S GO TO THEM.
00:31:55
>> THANK YOU COUNCIL. IF I CAN HAVE
00:31:59
THE PRESENTATION UP PLEASE.
00:32:02
THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING COUNCILMEMBER
00:32:09
AND MAYOR. DEANNA THANK YOU FOR YOUR
00:32:12
COMMENTS. THE ITEM BEFORE YOU APPROVAL
00:32:15
OF RESOLUTION THE SALARY PLANS WITH
00:32:20
NEGOTIATION COST LIVING ADJUSTMENTS BY
00:32:23
PER.
00:32:26
THE COALS ARE APPROVED AND WILL BE ON
00:32:32
DECEMBER 27. IT GOES TO THE CITY
00:32:37
MANAGEMENT NO LONGER REQUIRED WE HAVE
00:32:40
REVIEW WITH OUTSIDE LEGAL COUNSEL AND
00:32:41
IT WAS DETERMINED IT'S NOT NECESSARY
00:32:43
BECAUSE WE ESTABLISH PAST PRACTICE THE
00:32:48
SAME THAT UNIT 9 RECEIVED.
00:32:51
AND ALSO THE UNIT THE SAME MANAGER
00:32:56
CONTRACT HAS A PROVISION PROVIDES THE
00:32:59
CITY MANAGER THE COST OF LIVING THAT
00:33:02
UNIT 9 RECEIVES.
00:33:04
I WANT TO BE VERY CLEAR ON THE ITEM
00:33:07
BEFORE YOU.
00:33:09
THIS ITEM DOES NOT WITHHOLD THE COST OF
00:33:12
LIVING THAT IS THE CITY OBLIGATION
00:33:17
IMPLEMENT. THEY WILL BE IMPLEMENTED ON
00:33:19
DECEMBER 26.
00:33:21
THE ITEM BEFORE YOU DOES NOT OPEN IN
00:33:25
THE MOU WITH THE CITY MANAGER.
00:33:29
AGAIN THE RECOMMENDATION BEFORE YOU
00:33:32
APPROVAL TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION THAT
00:33:36
UPDATE THE SALARY PLAN FOR THE CLASS
00:33:40
REPRESENTING UNIT 9, AND 798 THIS IS
00:33:48
REQUIRED BY CALPERS. THIS DOES
00:33:52
CONCLUDE THE PRESENTATION AND HERE TO
00:33:55
ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
00:33:56
ALSO WITH US IS SAKI CAN ANSWER ANY
00:34:04
QUESTIONS AND LEGAL ADVICE TO THE
00:34:06
COUNCIL.
00:34:08
>> THANK YOU. QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL.
00:34:13
COUNCILMEMBER BECKER.
00:34:14
>> THIS IS MORE OF CLARIFICATION RIGHT
00:34:17
NOW AND FOLLOWING UP WHAT THE CITY
00:34:21
MANAGER SPOKE ABOUT. I WANTED TO
00:34:23
ADDRESS THIS AS WELL.
00:34:25
LAST WEEK I DID MAKE COMMENTS. I THINK
00:34:29
THESE COMMENTS ARE MISS MISINTERPRET.
00:34:43
THIS IS E-MAIL TO MY OFFICE AND
00:34:47
DECEMBER 13, 2021. I WOULD LIKE TO
00:34:51
ADDRESS YOUR ACCURACY.
00:34:56
ANY QUESTIONS ARE QUESTIONS TO APPROVE.
00:34:59
IN FACT THE VICE HALL SECTION ONE AND
00:35:02
CONTINUE SECTION 2 OF THE ITEM.
00:35:06
UNIT 9 COAL WOULD HAVE BEEN APPROVED
00:35:11
BUT WE KEEP THE ITEMS TOGETHER SINCE
00:35:16
THE SECOND ITEM WAS COLA. I VOICE IN
00:35:23
SECTION 2 OR ANY CONCERNS UNIT 9 IN
00:35:28
SECTION 1.
00:35:29
I WAS PREPARED TO SECOND VICE HALL OF
00:35:35
APPROVAL THE ITEM.
00:35:37
THE ONLY ITEM I WAS DISCUSSING WAS THE
00:35:42
COLA CITY MANAGER.
00:35:44
SECONDLY I SAY HERE THANK YOU FOR THE
00:35:47
MEMO ADDRESS THIS ISSUE.
00:35:49
I HOPE ALL THE CITY SANTA CLARA THE
00:35:56
EXCELLENCE AND DILIGENCE AS WELL PEOPLE
00:35:58
IN THE CITY.
00:36:01
ALL NINE MEMBERS FEASIBLE THIS
00:36:07
MORNING. THAT IS MY RESPONSE TO UNIT
00:36:11
9. I SHOULD HAVE NOT SAID "THEIR " I
00:36:17
SHOULD SAY "CITY MANAGER " WE CAN
00:36:23
RENEGOTIATING IT'S DISAPPOINTING IT'S
00:36:25
CHANGED FROM TWO ITEMS TO ONE.
00:36:28
I FIND IT VERY INSULTING THE CITY
00:36:35
MANAGER LEAKING INFORMATION ON CONSTANT
00:36:38
BASIS. THIS IS ABSORBED I TAKE OFFENSE
00:36:44
WITH THE ACCUSATIONS.
00:36:47
I WOULD LOOK AT THE LINKS OF THE CITY
00:36:53
OFFICE.
00:36:54
I'M GOING BY THE CITY. HERE IS THE
00:36:57
OTHER FACT I INHERITANCE THIS CONTACT.
00:37:04
DID NOT VOTE ON IT. IT DOESN'T
00:37:07
MEAN I HAVE TO AGREE EVERYTHING. I
00:37:13
HAVE EVERY RIGHT WHAT SANTA CLARA AGREE
00:37:17
THAT IS HIGH SALARY.
00:37:19
THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH TALKING
00:37:21
ABOUT THAT.
00:37:23
THE ONLY THING I WANT SEPARATE BASED ON
00:37:27
THE CONTACT. HERE WE ARE LAST WEEK I
00:37:32
MADE CERTAIN REMARKS I ASKED ARUSHA I
00:37:38
WAS SAYING OUTLINE WITH UNIT 9 MAYBE
00:37:43
SOMEONE SHOULD HAVE SAID I'M OUT OF
00:37:45
LINE.
00:37:46
I'M A NEW COUNCILMEMBER AND SOME WILL
00:37:50
MAKE MISTAKES. WE ARE NOT PROFESSIONAL
00:37:55
POLITICIANS OR POLITICAL GENIUS.
00:37:58
WE ARE TRYING TO GET UNDERSTANDING.
00:38:01
WHEN MANIPULATION ON A SPECIFIC
00:38:05
BASIS IT'S HARD TO MAKE DECISION
00:38:08
ESPECIALLY IF YOU ARE MAKING ACCUSATION
00:38:13
ON WEEKLY BASIS.
00:38:15
ON WEEKLY BASIS SOME COUNCILMEMBER HAS
00:38:18
TO EXPLAIN THEIR SELF OF SOME WRONGDOING
00:38:21
THIS IS NOT RIGHT.
00:38:24
I MADE THAT... I'M NOT GOING TO
00:38:27
APOLOGIZE IT WAS DIRECTED AT THE CITY
00:38:30
MANAGER. IT WAS NOT DIRECTED TO UNIT 9
00:38:34
AND I EXPLAINED THAT TO MR. JACKSON.
00:38:38
CITY MANAGER I'M SORRY YOU TOOK OFFENSE
00:38:41
TO THAT I'M GOING BASED ON THE
00:38:43
CONTRACT.
00:38:46
I'M DISAPPOINTED THAT TWO ITEMS DOWN TO
00:38:50
ONE ITEM. VERY DISAPPOINTED IN THAT.
00:38:55
>> CHARLES I WOULD LIKE CALL ON YOU.
00:38:59
>> I WANT TO CLARIFY THE ACTION IS TO
00:39:05
ADOPT THE SALARY SCHEDULES. THERE IS
00:39:09
NO ACTION HERE WITH APPROVAL IT IT'S
00:39:13
ALREADY DONE.
00:39:14
THERE IS NO ACTION TO CHANGE SALARY
00:39:17
THOSE WILL GO IN AFFECTS. THIS IS
00:39:22
ADMINISTER ACTION THAT IS WHY IT'S
00:39:25
SIMPLE ITEM IT APPLIES WITH THE
00:39:28
CALIFORNIA REGULATION.
00:39:29
>> THANK YOU. CITY MANAGER.
00:39:34
>> PUBLIC DISCUSSION ABOUT MY AGREEMENT
00:39:38
AND COUNCIL CHANGES REQUIRES UNDER 7.2
00:39:42
TO THE PUBLIC NOTICING TO ME IN WRITING
00:39:45
PER MY AGREEMENT.
00:39:48
ADDITIONAL ANY COMMENTS OR FAILING
00:39:52
PARTIES STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH ANY TERM
00:39:54
UNDER TAKING OF THIS AGREEMENT
00:39:57
SHALL NOT BE DEEMED A WAIVER OF SUCH
00:40:00
TERM.
00:40:01
I HAVE NOT BEEN NOTICED BY
00:40:05
COUNCILMEMBER BECKER OF HIS CHANGES TO
00:40:10
MY CONTACT NOR HAVE A WAVED IN WRITING
00:40:15
LEGAL AGREEMENT NOR HAS THIS COUNCIL
00:40:18
ANY CHANGES OF MY CONTRACT TERM BREACH
00:40:22
AND WRITES OF
00:40:26
AGREEMENT.
00:40:28
>> THANK YOU CITY MANAGER. VICE MAYOR.
00:40:34
>> THANK YOU MAYOR. THANK YOU MR. CHAHAL
00:40:42
ABOUT THIS ITEM FROM TWO TO ONE. I
00:40:47
STILL HAVE RESOLUTIONS ABOUT IT.
00:40:49
LET ME TELL YOU WHY THE COUNCIL AND
00:40:53
EVERYBODY.
00:40:55
AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THE
00:41:02
CITY MANAGEMENT CLOSE WITH UNIT 5, 7, 8
00:41:06
AND 9 AND OTHER UNITS.
00:41:10
WE NEEDED TO SAVE MONEY FOR THE CITY.
00:41:15
I RECOMMEND BUT EACH AND EVERY EMPLOYEE
00:41:18
AND MEMBERS FOR ACCEPTING FINANCIAL IN
00:41:21
MANY WAYS.
00:41:23
PLEASE NOTE, THESE WERE NOT PERFORMANCE
00:41:27
USED FOR NEGOTIATES TO AGREE TO CUTS TO
00:41:32
HELP CITY DURING THE TOUGH FINANCIAL
00:41:34
TIMES.
00:41:36
WE WERE RUNNING MULTIPLE DEFICITS.
00:41:41
ALMOST EVERYWHERE I GO IS PART OF
00:41:44
NEGOTIATION THAT IS GOING ON FOR SOME
00:41:47
UNITS.
00:41:49
AS CITY COUNCIL WE SHOULD HAVE DONE THE
00:41:54
SAME NEGOTIATES WITH THREE
00:41:56
APPOINTMENTS. CITY MANAGER, CITY
00:41:59
ATTORNEY AND AUDITOR.
00:42:02
THE ONLY POINT WE HAVE CITY MANAGER.
00:42:06
WE SHOULD HAVE STARTED. 3.2 OF THE
00:42:12
CITY EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT.
00:42:17
CLAUSE 3.2 ADJUSTMENTS. THE CITY
00:42:21
COUNCIL SHALL MEET IMPLY FOR THE
00:42:25
EXPRESS PURPOSE DETERMINING ANY
00:42:30
ADJUSTMENT IN REGARD TO THE TIMING AND
00:42:32
THE AMOUNT OF ANY ADJUSTMENT THE SOUL
00:42:40
DISCRETION OF THE COUNCIL.
00:42:42
SECOND PAIR OF 3.2 WHICH IS BEING
00:42:46
MENTIONED IN VARIATION MEMOS.
00:42:49
3.2 IS NOT BEING MENTIONED. THE SECOND
00:42:56
PART MENTIONS ALTO IS NOT UNIT 9.
00:43:00
EMPLOYEES SUBJECT ALL COST OF LIVING TO
00:43:02
SALARY AND BENEFIT UNCLASSIFIED
00:43:10
MANAGEMENT IN UNITY 9.
00:43:13
I SEE CONFLICTING BY ITSELF. WHEN WE
00:43:17
STARTED THE NEGOTIATION UNDER CITY
00:43:23
MANAGEMENT UNDER CITY COUNCIL WITH THE
00:43:25
UNITS TO SAVE MONEY I THINK WE HAVE
00:43:29
MORAL AND FISCAL DUTY WITH THE
00:43:35
APPOINTMENTS.
00:43:38
THOSE POINTS NEGOTIATE WITH ANYBODY
00:43:40
ELSE OTHER THAN THE CITY COUNCIL
00:43:42
BASICALLY.
00:43:44
THAT IS WHERE I'M COMING FROM. IT'S
00:43:47
NOT QUESTION OF ANY PERFORMANCE BUT A
00:43:51
QUESTION OF PROCESS WHICH WE SHOULD
00:43:53
HAVE FOLLOWED.
00:43:56
THE CLAUSE MENTIONED SOLE DISCRETION TO
00:44:00
MEET WITH EMPLOYEE WITH THE ADJUSTMENT.
00:44:03
AS SUCH I'M REQUESTING MAYOR GILMORE
00:44:11
OF 3.2 OF ARGUMENT. ONCE WE HAVE THAT
00:44:15
WE CAN DECIDE COUNCIL MAKES ABOUT COLA
00:44:20
OR COUNCIL DECIDES ON CITY MANAGEMENT.
00:44:26
I'M NOT ASKING TO REVIEW BUT SIMILAR WE
00:44:32
HAVE BEEN SUBJECTED.
00:44:35
ALMOST EVERY EMPLOYEE IN THE CITY HAS
00:44:40
BEEN SUBJECTED. I'M ASKING FOR THAT.
00:44:45
AFTER THOSE DELEGATION WITH COUNCIL
00:44:49
APPROVES THE COLA FROM 12-26. THIS IS
00:44:54
NOT PERFORMANCE OF YOU AND NO WAY WE
00:44:57
WILL MAKE A DECISION ON CITY MANAGEMENT
00:45:01
PERFORMANCE.
00:45:02
JUST LIKE OTHER UNITS FOR THE CITY 'S
00:45:08
FINANCIAL HELP.
00:45:12
IT'S OUR FIDUCIARY DUTY. WITH THAT I
00:45:23
ALSO WANT TO CLARIFY ON DECEMBER 7 I
00:45:27
DID SAY BY MISTAKE CITY MANAGERS
00:45:34
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT IS RENEWED EVERY
00:45:38
YEAR. I SHOULD HAVE SAID REVIEWED
00:45:43
EVERY YEAR.
00:45:44
THAT IS MY CLARIFICATION.
00:45:48
WITH THAT SAID I WOULD LIKE TO PLACE A
00:45:52
MOTION THAT WE ADOPT
00:46:00
RESOLUTION FOR THE ANNUAL PLANNING FOR
00:46:06
UNITY 578 AND UNIT 9 THE VARIATION TO
00:46:11
SATISFY THE REQUIREMENT OF CALIFORNIA
00:46:18
SECTION 57.5 EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 26,
00:46:20
2021.
00:46:22
THAT IS MY RESOLUTION. I'LL COME BACK
00:46:27
WITH THE RESOLUTION LATER ON.
00:46:35
>> I'LL SECOND.
00:46:37
>> I WILL GO TO CHARLES. I WAS GOING
00:46:50
TO RECOMMEND CLOSE SESSION OR OUTSIDE
00:46:58
COUNSEL FOR UNDERSTANDING.
00:47:03
MR. IKEZI COULD YOU HELP US. I'M
00:47:07
GETTING UNCOMFORTABLE WITH THIS
00:47:08
DISCUSSION. I WANT TO MAKE SURE WE ARE
00:47:11
PROTECTED.
00:47:14
I'M CONCERNING WITH THESE CONVERSATIONS
00:47:16
ARE GOING.
00:47:18
>> I APPRECIATE THAT. I WANT TO BE
00:47:20
CLEAR THIS ITEM IS NOT TO IMPLEMENT
00:47:25
COLAS. THEY ARE AGREEMENTS THAT ARE
00:47:28
MADE WITH THE CITY.
00:47:31
>> CAN I STOP YOU ALREADY? HAS THIS
00:47:35
COUNCIL APPROVED THE COLAS.
00:47:38
OKAY.
00:47:40
>> SO CITY COUNCIL APPROVED THE COLAS
00:47:47
AND MIUS AND IT LINKS TO UNIT 9. THOSE
00:47:54
WILL GO IN AFFECT WHETHER YOU PASS IT
00:47:58
OR NOT.
00:47:59
IT WAS A MINSTER ACTION TO ALLOW
00:48:04
ADVISABILITY OF THE SALARIES.
00:48:06
AS PART OF BELL REFORMED AND CALPURSE
00:48:11
WE NEED TO MAKE THEM PUBLIC. THEY WERE
00:48:16
AGREE PREVIOUS TO THE COUNCIL.
00:48:18
THERE IS A BINDING WITH THIS CITY.
00:48:23
WHAT YOU ARE DOING TONIGHT IS ADOPTING
00:48:26
A DOCUMENT THE PUBLIC WILL VIEW WHAT
00:48:31
THE SALARIES ARE FOR THESE WITH THE
00:48:33
INDIVIDUALS.
00:48:36
IT'S NOT ADOPTION OF THE COLAS YOU DID
00:48:41
NOTHING THE COLAS WILL GO INTO EFFECT.
00:48:45
WE ARE TALKING ABOUT THE CITY MANAGER
00:48:49
AND APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL.
00:48:51
THEY WILL BE EFFECTIVE. THE ONLY THING
00:48:56
YOU ARE TONIGHT IS PUTTING OUT FOR THE
00:48:59
PUBLIC AND ARE ON THE WEB PAGE.
00:49:06
>> MR. IKEZI IF WE DON'T APPROVE WHAT
00:49:09
HAPPENS?
00:49:12
>> EFFECTIVELY THE PUBLIC NEEDS TO VIEW
00:49:16
THE SALARY SCHEDULE THAT IS PART OF
00:49:19
TRANSPARENCY AND MAKE IT PUBLIC. THE
00:49:25
SALARIES WILL GO INTO EFFECT ONE
00:49:33
WAY OR NOT.
00:49:34
>> WHEN THE COUNCIL APPROVE THE MOU 'S
00:49:40
WE APPROVED THE COLAS?
00:49:44
>> YES. CORRECT.
00:49:46
>> OKAY. THANK YOU FOR THAT
00:49:51
CLARIFICATION. OKAY. SO THAT PUTS IT
00:49:54
IN PERSPECTIVE I'M STILL THINKING WE
00:49:57
NEED MIGHT NEED SOME OUTSIDE
00:50:00
ASSISTANCE.
00:50:02
LET'S GO THROUGH AND SEE HOW PEOPLE ARE
00:50:08
REACTING TO THIS?
00:50:10
>> MORE DISCUSSION. I'M ONE VOTE. IT
00:50:14
COMES DOWN TO ALSO I'VE SEEN WITH THE
00:50:20
PANDEMIC ANY CITY LEADERS HAVE YIELD
00:50:23
IT.
00:50:25
GOING BACK TO ME BEING ONE VOTE DID I
00:50:28
VOTE ON THIS ITEM?
00:50:30
DID I AGREE TO THIS?
00:50:32
WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT GOVERNMENT ACTIONS
00:50:36
IS ONE PERSON HELD TO SOMETHING? YOU
00:50:40
DON'T AGREE WITH IT YOU HAVE TO ABIDE
00:50:44
BY IT YOU ARE GOVERNING BODY THAT MAKES
00:50:49
THOSE LEGAL DECISION?
00:50:51
I THOUGHT WE HAVE ABILITY LEGAL
00:50:56
DECISION CONCERN THE ROLE.
00:50:59
I'M CONCERN WITH DISCUSSING OUT IN
00:51:02
PUBLIC THAT IS WHY I ASKED IN CLOSED
00:51:06
SESSION MORE APPROPRIATE.
00:51:08
I THINK WE WANT THE PUBLIC DISCUSSION
00:51:15
AS TRANSPARENCY. I'M TRYING TO FIGURE
00:51:18
WHAT I'M SUPPOSED TO DO AND WHAT I WANT
00:51:23
TO DO.
00:51:26
IF I'M BEING TOLD I CAN'T MAKE ANY
00:51:31
DECISIONS BECAUSE OF CONTACT THEN WHAT
00:51:33
IS THE POINT OF GOVERNING IT? I'M
00:51:42
CERTAIN WITH THE CITY MANAGER BEING
00:51:44
HERE.
00:51:45
I'M AFRAID FOR RETALIATION OF WHAT WE
00:51:51
SAY.
00:51:53
I'M NOT SAYING ANYTHING WILL DO
00:51:55
ANYTHING BUT THIS IS A MAJOR CONCERN I
00:51:58
HAVE IN MY HEART THIS MIGHT RETALIATION
00:52:04
AT THIS MOMENT.
00:52:06
SOME ARE NEW ELECTIVES AND WE MAY HAVE
00:52:11
NOT AGREE TO THESE THINGS WITH PRIOR.
00:52:14
ISN'T THAT WHAT HAPPENS IN PRIOR
00:52:19
PRESIDENCY SOMEONE COMES AND CHANGES
00:52:21
SOMETHING.
00:52:23
I SEE THIS HAPPEN MANY TIMES.
00:52:26
CAN YOU CLARIFY THAT?
00:52:29
>> IT'S NOT TO SAY YOU CAN'T MAKE
00:52:34
CHANGES. YOU ENTER INTO AGREEMENT
00:52:38
LEASE FOR FIVE YEARS.
00:52:41
ONCE THAT AGREEMENT IS ENTERED IN THE
00:52:45
COUNCIL BOUND THAT LEASE A NEW COUNCIL
00:52:48
CANNOT SAY WE WANT LESS RENT TOMORROW.
00:52:55
THAT IS DIFFERENT FOR TODAY. ALL THIS
00:52:58
BEFORE YOU IS MAKE PUBLIC THE SALARY
00:53:04
SCHEDULES WHICH REFLECT WAS ALREADY
00:53:06
ADOPTED.
00:53:08
ALL YOU ARE DOING IS SHOWING THE LEASE
00:53:12
INCREASE FROM THIS YEAR. THAT IS
00:53:16
DIFFERENT NEGOTIATION.
00:53:18
>> I'M THINKING A LOT OF IT'S IN PAIN
00:53:23
INK. VICE HALL WAS TALKING ABOUT
00:53:26
SECTION 3.2.
00:53:28
I'M STILL SEEING THAT HOW DO I IGNORE
00:53:31
THAT?
00:53:32
>> YOU DON'T HAVE TO IGNORE THAT.
00:53:35
THERE TWO PIECES. THERE IS A MERIT
00:53:38
INCREASE AND THE COLA WHICH IS LINKED
00:53:45
TO UNIT 9 THOSE ARE TWO DIFFERENT
00:53:47
PIECES.
00:53:51
ONE IS LINKED TO UNIT 9.
00:53:56
WE ARE DEALING WITH MERIT. WE ARE
00:54:01
REFLEXING THAT IN A DOCUMENT. TONIGHT
00:54:05
IS REFLECT THE EXISTING AGREEMENTS IN
00:54:10
PUBLIC DOCUMENT.
00:54:12
>> CHARLES CAN YOU CLEAR THIS FOR ME.
00:54:17
I THINK PAUL ALTO THEY CONCEDE OF THE
00:54:26
COLAS AND CUTS TO SALARIES I'M JUST
00:54:30
CURIOUS IF WE WANTED THOSE QUESTIONS TO
00:54:34
LEGALLY ASK THOSE QUESTIONS HOW DO WE
00:54:37
DO THAT?
00:54:40
ARE WE ALLOWED TO ASKED YIELD
00:54:42
QUESTIONS?
00:54:43
>> THAT IS NOT PART OF THAT ITEM DO
00:54:48
THAT. I WOULD NOTE... WHAT I
00:54:51
UNDERSTAND FROM THE AGREEMENTS HERE ON
00:54:55
THE CITY MANAGERS THERE IS TWO YEARS OF
00:55:01
COLAS.
00:55:03
UNIT 9 NOTED THAT. EVERY CITY ACTS
00:55:07
DIFFERENTLY.
00:55:09
EVERY CITY HAS DIFFERENT CONCESSIONS.
00:55:13
SO UNIT 9 WILL BE REFLECTED FOR YOUR
00:55:17
CITY MANAGER.
00:55:19
>> CAN I CLARIFY UNIT 9 TWO YEARS OF
00:55:33
ZERO COLAS. I DID SELF-PARTICIPATE OF
00:55:36
TWO YEARS OF ZEROS.
00:55:39
YOUR QUESTION WHETHER CITY MANAGER HAS
00:55:44
CONCEDED.
00:55:45
>> THANK YOU FOR ELABORATING.
00:55:49
>> THE CITY MANAGER WILL TAKE ZERO FOR
00:55:54
MERIT AS WELL.
00:55:56
THE COUNCIL FREEZE MERIT FOR THE CITY
00:56:01
MANAGER SIMILAR TO UNIT 9.
00:56:05
TO 2021 AND 2022 THIS CITY MANAGER FOR
00:56:13
MERIT INCREASE BECAUSE THEY TOOK ACTION
00:56:18
TO NOT EXTEND TO THE CITY MANAGER.
00:56:24
>> I WANT TO ADD THE CITY HAS THOUSANDS
00:56:30
OF CONTACTS AND THEY ARE LEGALLY
00:56:34
BINDING.
00:56:35
THE ROLE OF NEW COUNCILMEMBERS THAT IS
00:56:39
NOT INDICATOR THAT THE CONTRACTS ARE
00:56:41
VOID.
00:56:42
THEY COME UP THE COUNCIL HAS AN
00:56:46
OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE DIRECTION IN ANY
00:56:49
CHANGES IT WOULD LIKE.
00:56:50
ALL THE CONTRACTS IN TIME HAVE TO BE
00:56:57
HONOR. THAT GOES BEFORE THE BOARD I
00:57:00
MEAN THE COUNCIL TONIGHT.
00:57:03
>> THAT IS TRUE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
00:57:06
WHERE THEY HAVE BINDING CONTACTS WITH
00:57:11
MULTIPLE YEARS EVEN IN THE
00:57:13
ADMINISTRATION THE CONTACT IS STILL
00:57:15
BINDING.
00:57:16
>> THANK YOU.
00:57:26
>> COUNCILMEMBER CHERKURA.
00:57:27
>> THANK YOU. I KNOW THEY MADE A
00:57:30
COMMENT BEING A PART OF NEW COUNCIL. I
00:57:34
KNOW WHEN I FIRST ELECTED IN 2016 I DID
00:57:38
A LOT OF LISTENING BECAUSE THERE IS A
00:57:42
LOT TO LEARN.
00:57:44
IT'S A LEARNING CURVE. IT'S NOT
00:57:47
SOMETHING THAT COMES TO DISCUSSION VERY
00:57:51
OFTEN ONLY WHEN IT'S NECESSARY.
00:57:56
WHAT I WAS GOING TO PROPOSAL I KNOW
00:58:00
THERE IS A SECOND ON THE FLOOR BY MAYOR
00:58:04
HALL. I WAS GOING TO OFFER A
00:58:09
SUBSTITUTION TO BRING THIS DISCUSSION
00:58:12
TO CLOSE SESSION IN ORDER TO OBTAIN A
00:58:16
LEGAL OPINION ON WHAT IS BEING
00:58:18
DISCUSSED AND HAVING OUTSIDE COUNCIL
00:58:22
CONTINUE TO PROVIDE THE INFORMATION
00:58:24
THAT IS NECESSARY IN ORDER FOR ALL OF
00:58:28
US AS A COUNCIL TO UNDERSTAND WHAT THIS
00:58:31
DISCUSSION IS ABOUT AND WHAT NEEDS TO
00:58:34
BE DONE WHEN IT DOES COME FORWARD.
00:58:37
THAT IS MY SUBSTITUTE MOTION.
00:58:41
>> DOES IT HAS TO BE A CLOSE SESSION
00:58:45
MANNER? CAN BE OPEN SESSION?
00:58:49
>> IF OPEN SESSION THAT'S FINE.
00:58:53
>> THE TOPIC IS POST THE SALARY THAT IS
00:59:00
NOT QUALIFY CLOSED SESSION.
00:59:02
ALL THE MATTERS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED AN
00:59:06
APPROVED.
00:59:08
CHARLES YOU MAY ACT YOUR LEGAL OPINION.
00:59:12
>> THIS IS SIMPLE ACTION TO MOST THE
00:59:18
SALARY SCHEDULES THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN
00:59:21
APPROVED BY THE MOU 'S AND THE
00:59:25
CONTRACT.
00:59:26
THERE IS NO OTHER ACTION THAT CAN BE
00:59:30
TAKEN EITHER WE DON'T APPROVE THE
00:59:33
SALARY SCHEDULES AND POST THEM AND OUT
00:59:37
OF REGULATIONS.
00:59:39
OR YOU DO AND YOU ARE IN REGULATIONS
00:59:42
AND THE COLAS WILL GO INTO PLACE.
00:59:44
THERE IS NOTHING TO DISCUSS IN TERMS OF
00:59:48
WHETHER YOU ADOPT THESE ARE NOT.
00:59:50
THERE IS NO REASON FORECLOSED SESSION.
00:59:54
>> MY PURPOSE IS SUGGESTING CLOSED
00:59:57
SESSION TO GET A LEGAL OPINION. IF
01:00:01
IT'S OPEN SESSION THAT IS PERFECTLY
01:00:04
FINE TOO BECAUSE IT'S IMPORTANT TO BE
01:00:08
OPEN AND TRANSPARENCY.
01:00:13
>> THIS ADMINISTRATION ACTION WITH THE
01:00:17
CODE OF REGULATION TO PUBLIC POST THE
01:00:22
ALREADY AGREED UPON SALARIES THAT IS
01:00:25
ALL THIS IS.
01:00:27
THERE IS NO FURTHER ACTION WITH ITEM.
01:00:33
>> IT'S MORE FOR UNDERSTANDING.
01:00:35
>> I HAVE A QUESTION I DON'T KNOW IF I
01:00:38
WILL SECOND THE MOTION.
01:00:40
ARE WE ABLE TO HAVE A SESSION IN
01:00:46
EDUCATION SESSION WITH OUTSIDE COUNCIL
01:00:48
ON THE TABLE OBLIGATED TO DO? I THINK
01:00:56
THAT IS WHAT IS MISSING IN THIS
01:00:59
DISCUSSION?
01:01:02
I THINK THESE WERE APPROVED IN 2020
01:01:06
WITH THIS COUNCIL.
01:01:08
WHAT IS APPROVED MORE EDUCATIONAL
01:01:10
SESSION IS THAT WHAT YOU ARE ASKING
01:01:20
COUNCILMEMBER KALYM?
01:01:21
>> YES IT CAN.
01:01:23
>> I WILL SECOND THAT. NO MATTER I
01:01:26
THINK WE NEED TO DO THAT. I WILL
01:01:30
SECOND THAT MOTION BECAUSE THERE IS BY
01:01:32
THE DISCUSSION THE QUESTIONS AND THE
01:01:35
COMMENTS I THINK WE NEED SOME HELP
01:01:37
HERE.
01:01:38
I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE MORE THOROUGH
01:01:43
SESSION IN CLOSE SESSION IF WE HAVE OR
01:01:49
WHATEVER IT IS DISCUSSION THAT WAY.
01:01:58
VICE MAYOR WATANABE I WILL SECOND.
01:02:05
>> HE IS AHEAD OF ME.
01:02:07
>> I HAVE YOU FIRST. DO YOU WANT TO
01:02:11
SPEAK? YOU ARE DEFERRING.
01:02:14
COUNCILMEMBER JANE.
01:02:16
>> I THINK I WOULD LIKE MR. SAKI
01:02:23
EXPLAIN BECAUSE I DO SEE IN~
01:02:33
INCONSISTENT IN 3.2. I DO SEE A
01:02:36
CONFLICT IN THE TWO PARAGRAPHS.
01:02:42
BEFORE IKEZI IS MERIT INCREASES BUT DOES
01:02:48
NOT SAY THAT.
01:02:51
>> ARE WE GOING TO HAVE DISCUSSION?
01:02:56
>> I THINK THE SUBSTITUTION MOTION IS
01:03:02
TAKE THE ENTIRE DISCUSSION TO CLOSED
01:03:05
SESSION OR SPLIT OUT THE TWO
01:03:11
DISCUSSIONS.
01:03:12
>> THE ENTIRE DISCUSSION?
01:03:17
>> ONE TO PUBLISH UNIT 9 VERSUS
01:03:23
INCREASES FOR CITY MANAGER.
01:03:27
>> TO BE CLEAR THAT DOES NOT SEEM CLEAR
01:03:32
THE INCREASES WILL GO INTO
01:03:36
EFFECT.
01:03:39
THE CLOSED SESSION IS WHAT IS UNDER THE
01:03:43
AGREEMENT. IT WILL STILL BE APPROVED.
01:03:51
>> OKAY. THAT IS THE QUESTION I HAD.
01:03:53
>> THANK YOU. COUNCILMEMBER PARK.
01:03:57
>> I FEEL IN THIS CASE THE SITUATION IS
01:04:01
ACTUALLY STRAIGHT FORWARD WHICH IT'S
01:04:03
THE ADOPTION OF THE RESOLUTION SALARY
01:04:08
PLAN WHICH IS ALREADY AMENDED.
01:04:12
THIS WOULD WILL AS DISCUSSED WHICH IS
01:04:15
JUST MAKE THEM CONSISTENT.
01:04:18
THAT SAID, I MEAN I WOULD MAKE A
01:04:23
SUBSTITUTION MOTION TO APPROVE THE
01:04:27
UPDATED SALARY PLAN FOR CLASSIFY AND
01:04:30
UNCLASSIFIED FOR CITY MANAGER.
01:04:34
FOR CALIFORNIA CODE 570 EFFECTIVE
01:04:39
DECEMBER 26, 2021 AND CLOSED SESSION
01:04:44
SALARY ADJUSTMENTS FOR CITY MANAGER AS
01:04:47
APPROPRIATE.
01:04:48
THOSE ARE THE TWO ACTIONS THAT SATISFY
01:04:52
EVERYTHING THAT IS ALL THE DISCUSSION
01:04:53
ON THE TABLE.
01:04:57
>> I WOULD SECOND THAT.
01:05:00
>> THAT IS THE ITEM THAT IS ON THE
01:05:03
AGENDA RIGHT NOW?
01:05:05
>> WITH THE ADDITION OF THE SCHEDULING.
01:05:12
>> OH ADDITION TO THE SCHEDULING THE
01:05:18
CLOSED SESSION.
01:05:21
I'M SORRY I WASN'T FOLLOWING YOU 100 %
01:05:27
IS YOUR MOTION RECOMMENDATION AGENDA
01:05:33
PLUS CLOSE SESSION?
01:05:34
>> YES.
01:05:35
>> THAT IS THE SUBSTITUTE BY
01:05:40
SUBSTITUTE. A SECOND BY WHO?
01:05:43
>> COUNCILMEMBER JANE.
01:05:45
>> THANK YOU. NOW VICE MAYOR.
01:05:55
>> THANK YOU MAJOR. SO OUTSIDE COUNCIL
01:06:05
MR. SKI DISCUSSION ABOUT 3.2 I DON'T
01:06:11
THINK IT MENTIONED IT INCREASED.
01:06:16
IT MENTIONED ANY DETERMINATION OF
01:06:22
APPROPRIATE. I HAVE A DIFFERENCE OF
01:06:24
OPINION ON THAT.
01:06:28
AND WHEN I THINK WHEN WE APPROVE UNIT
01:06:33
578 AND UNIT 8 WE APPROVE SPECIFICALLY
01:06:39
9 AND 578. I KNOW IT'S A SEPARATE
01:06:46
CONTACT. WHEN I'M SAYING SEPARATE
01:06:50
CONTRACT I'M NOT TRYING TO PARTICULAR
01:06:53
TO CITY MANAGER I'M TRYING TO BE
01:06:57
PARTICULAR CITY ATTORNEY CITY AUDITOR
01:07:03
ALL THREE IN THE BASKET.
01:07:05
I DON'T WANT TO BE SPECIFIC ABOUT ONE
01:07:10
PERSON. MY UNDERSTANDING IS WE APPROVE
01:07:15
578 UNIT 9 SEPARATELY.
01:07:18
WHEN WE APPROVED THOSE THEY WERE
01:07:22
NEGOTIATE NOT JUST COLA BUT FOR VARIETY
01:07:26
REASONS.
01:07:28
MEDICAL OR THIS JOB OR MERIT INCREASE
01:07:33
OR SOME OTHER BENEFIT OR BONUS.
01:07:38
WE APPROVED THAT. THAT IS THE
01:07:43
DISTINGUISH BETWEEN EMPLOYEE UNIT
01:07:49
DISCUSSIONS.
01:07:51
BECAUSE I THINK WE APPLY THOSE UNITS
01:07:57
PER ACTION OF COUNCIL. COUNCIL HAS A
01:08:02
FISCAL DUTY WITH OUR THREW APPOINTEES.
01:08:13
WE DID NOT DO THAT. WHETHER IT'S COLAS
01:08:18
OR WHATEVER WE DECIDE THAT SHOULD BEEN
01:08:23
THE CORRECT PROCESS.
01:08:25
ANY CONTRACT BEING REVIEW BY THE
01:08:28
COUNCIL BY THE OTHER UNITS BEING
01:08:32
REVIEWED YOU COULD DECIDE SOMETHING
01:08:33
ELSE.
01:08:35
YOU CAN COME TO THE SAME CONCLUSION.
01:08:39
I'M SAYING WE HAVE NOT REACHED THAT
01:08:41
PROCESS.
01:08:43
MY QUESTION IS WE SHOULD HAVE DONE THAT
01:08:47
PROCESS EVEN WITH THE EMPLOYEE. THAT
01:08:53
IS WHAT I'M STUCK WITH.
01:08:56
WHEN I WORK FOR UNIT 9 I WANTED FOR
01:09:01
THOSE SPECIFIC UNITS.
01:09:03
I VOTED FOR THOSE SPECIFICS UNIT I
01:09:09
CANNOT VOTE FOR (INAUDIBLE) I KNOW IT
01:09:11
CAN BE INCLUDED.
01:09:14
3.2 SAID SOMETHING BUT I THINK WE
01:09:17
SHOULD HAVE SEPARATE DISCUSSION BECAUSE
01:09:20
CITY IS DEFICIT.
01:09:22
WE ARE TRYING TO SAVE SOME MONEY AND WE
01:09:26
HAVE DISCUSSION ALMOST EVERY EMPLOYEE
01:09:30
ALMOST EVERYTHING IS NOT FINALIZES.
01:09:36
FINANCIAL THING FOR THE CITIES TO COVER
01:09:42
THE DEFICIT.
01:09:43
THAT IS WHERE I'M COMING FROM. I'M NOT
01:09:46
TALKING ABOUT THE PERFORMANCE OF CITY
01:09:50
MANAGER. I WANT TO BE REALLY CLEAR.
01:09:53
THIS IS NOT THE PERFORMANCE OF CITY
01:09:57
MANAGER. FOR ME IT'S A PROCESS ISSUE
01:10:00
WE SHOULD HAVE DONE THAT.
01:10:04
I'M DEFERRING 3.2 HAS TWO PARAGRAPHS
01:10:07
WHICH ARE COMPATIBLE TO EACH OTHER.
01:10:11
WE CAN DO THE REVIEW WITH CITY COUNCIL
01:10:16
OF CITY MANAGER.
01:10:18
I ACCEPT THAT. IF THE COLA DOCUMENTED
01:10:24
I'M OKAY WITH THAT. THAT IS NOT A
01:10:27
PROBLEM. THAT IS WHERE I'M COMING
01:10:29
FROM. THAT IS WHY I MAKE A MOTION.
01:10:32
LET'S BRING THIS 3.2 CLARIFICATION AND
01:10:37
THE NEGOTIATE IN A CLOSED DOOR AND THEN
01:10:41
WE CAN WORK FOR CITY MANAGERS ISSUE AT
01:10:47
THAT TIME.
01:10:48
THAT IS REASON I'M SAYING IT. I'M
01:10:52
TRYING TO FIX WHATEVER WE CAN TODAY FOR
01:10:56
5, 6, 7 AND 9.
01:10:58
AND THEN PICK UP THE CITY MANAGERS
01:11:04
SEPARATELY.
01:11:06
>> I WANT TO CLARIFY ONE ITEM THE CITY
01:11:11
COUNCIL IN 2020 APPROVED OPEN SESSION
01:11:14
TO GIVE ZERO PERCENT IN COLAS FOR TWO
01:11:20
YEARS AND FREEZE MERIT FOR TWO YEARS.
01:11:25
THE CITY COUNCIL OPEN THAT WAS IN
01:11:28
CONSIDERATION BEFORE COUNCIL AND
01:11:31
APPROVE THAT WHICH IS SIMILAR WITH UNIT
01:11:33
9.
01:11:35
THAT HAS BEEN DONE.
01:11:37
>> IF I MAY ASK WAS THAT I HAVE TO GO
01:11:42
BACK. WAS THAT 00.5?
01:11:45
>> IT WAS FOR THE TWO YEARS OF ZERO.
01:11:49
FOR THE CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL
01:11:56
APPOINTS TO GIVE THE ZERO MERIT
01:12:00
INCREASE.
01:12:02
>> I AGREED TO THAT. IT WAS NOT 4.5.
01:12:07
THE 4.5 WE ARE TALKING ABOUT.
01:12:10
>> THAT WAS IN THE ALIGNMENT WITH THE
01:12:15
CITY CONTRACT.
01:12:17
>> WITH ALL DUE RESPECT THAT IS MY
01:12:21
DIFFERENCE. 3.2 HAS TWO PARAGRAPHS
01:12:25
WHICH CONTRADICT EACH OTHER. THE CITY
01:12:30
COUNCIL HAS DISTINGUISH POWER TO TALK
01:12:32
ABOUT IT.
01:12:33
I'M SAYING JUST LIKE OTHER UNITS ARE
01:12:42
CONFIDENT CLOSED DOOR MEETINGS TO
01:12:46
SETTLE LET'S DO THE SAME FOR
01:12:51
APPOINTMENTS.
01:12:52
>> I HAVE TO INTERJECT WITH THE
01:13:06
BARGAINS RECEIVED. YOU HAVE NOT
01:13:08
NOTICED OR ANY INTENTION AND HOW YOU
01:13:13
ARE MAKE COMMENTS PUBLIC. I DESERVE
01:13:17
THAT ANY BARGAINING UNIT WHEN THE
01:13:24
COUNCIL DELIBERATE OF CONTRACT.
01:13:29
I'M CONCERNED THE TERMS BEING FORWARD.
01:13:34
I DESERVE THE DIGIT AND COMPLIANCE WITH
01:13:38
MY AGREEMENT.
01:13:39
WE HEARD THIS CAN BE IN CLOSED SESSION.
01:13:44
TODAY I HAVE GRANTED NO WAVER OR BEEN
01:13:53
NOTICE. COUNCILMEMBER YOU HAVE ASKED
01:13:55
AND STAFF HAS PROVIDED. YOU'VE ALWAYS
01:14:00
HAD THE PRIORITY FOR STAFF FOR MYSELF.
01:14:03
YOU FACT YOU ARE BRINGING UP AFTER THE
01:14:07
AGREEMENT AND STRICT COMPLIANCE IS VERY
01:14:09
CONCERNING TO ME.
01:14:12
I ASK THAT YOU RESPECT MY RIGHT TO
01:14:17
PRIVACY AND GET BACK TO THE ISSUE AT
01:14:19
HAND.
01:14:21
>> I WOULD SAY THE DEBATE OUT OF IS
01:14:27
OUTSIDE THE SCOPE. WE ARE NOT TALKING
01:14:31
ABOUT THE CITY OR ADOPTING COLA THE
01:14:36
CITY MANAGE AGREEMENT. WE ARE TALKING
01:14:42
ABOUT WHAT IS APPROVED WITH CITY
01:14:45
COUNCIL.
01:14:47
WE CAUTION WE DON'T DEBATE THINGS THAT
01:14:53
ARE PASSED. WE ARE NOT HERE TO DO
01:14:58
THAT.
01:15:00
>> SO THE MOTION ON THE FLOOR IS AGENDA
01:15:05
AND CLOSED SESSION LACK OF BETTER TERM
01:15:09
EDUCATIONAL MEETING TO GO OVER THE CITY
01:15:13
CONTACTS THAT ARE CURRENTLY IN PLACE
01:15:17
AND DISCUSSION ABOUT THOSE?
01:15:19
IS THAT THE MOTION ON THE TABLE?
01:15:24
>> MADAM MOTION LET ME READ IT BACK TO
01:15:27
YOU.
01:15:31
>> IT'S ADOPTING FOR CLASSIFY AND UP
01:15:35
CLASSIFIED POSITIONS. INCLUDING THE
01:15:37
POSITIONS OF MANAGER OF CODE 505
01:15:47
DECEMBER 26 TO SCHEDULE CLOSED SESSION
01:15:51
TO 3.2 THAT WAS THE SECOND MOTION ON
01:15:53
THE FLOOR BY COUNCILMEMBER PARK.
01:15:58
>> 3.2 OF WHAT?
01:16:00
>> OF THE CITY MANAGER 'S AGREEMENT.
01:16:07
>> I WAS GOING TO MAKE ONE MORE
01:16:11
COMMENT. THERE IS A COMMENT WITH
01:16:13
RESPECT MY PRESENCE THIS EVENING.
01:16:16
I JUST WANT TO SAY THERE IS NO CONFLICT
01:16:19
OF INTEREST WITH ME PARTICIPATING IN
01:16:20
THIS CONVERSATION. UNIT 9
01:16:23
PARTICIPATING LIKE OUR ASSIST CITY
01:16:25
ATTORNEY. THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST IT
01:16:27
WOULD EXIST OF EVERYONE ELSE IN UNIT 9
01:16:29
WHO IS ATTENDING THIS MEETING.
01:16:31
>> THANK YOU. YOU MADE THAT DISCLOSURE.
01:16:36
>> AS CITY MANAGER YOUR CONTRACT IS
01:16:41
PUBLIC DOCUMENT.
01:16:42
>> WE ARE NOT ASKING THIS DISCUSSION.
01:16:48
WE ARE ADOPTING A SALARY PLAN.
01:16:57
>> VICE MAYOR IF YOU CAN SPEAK TO THE
01:16:59
MOTION WILL BE HELPFUL.
01:17:02
>> I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY WHAT CITY
01:17:06
MANAGER SAID.
01:17:09
>> I HAVE AN ISSUE WITH WAIVER.
01:17:12
>> I DID NOT DISCUSSION ANYTHING. THAT
01:17:16
IS WHY I SAID CLOSED DOOR.
01:17:20
>> WE REALLY SHOULD.
01:17:22
>> A PUBLIC DOCUMENT AND I SAID ANY
01:17:26
DISCUSSION IN CLOSED DOORS. THAT IS
01:17:28
EXACTLY WHAT I SAID.
01:17:30
>> THANK YOU. COUNCILMEMBER BECKER TO
01:17:33
THE MOTION.
01:17:35
>> TO THE MOTION AND IF YOU CAN CLARIFY
01:17:41
CHARLES QUESTIONS I HAVE ABOUT THE.
01:17:44
WHAT I DON'T FEEL COMFORTABLE HOW IT
01:17:48
COMBINED CHANGED FROM THE LAST AGENDA
01:17:50
ITEM.
01:17:52
WHEN I WAS PLANNING COMMISSION AND
01:17:57
POINT CITY COUNCIL YOU USUALLY HAVE TO
01:18:00
KEEP THE AGENDA ITEM TO CONTINUE.
01:18:04
SEEING IT'S NOT THE SAME LANGUAGE AND
01:18:07
SEPARATE I DON'T FEEL COMFORTABLE
01:18:11
FEELING ON A MOTION.
01:18:13
IT LIKE A DOUBLE WHAMMING THEN YOU DON'T
01:18:23
SUPPORT WHICH VICE HALL WANTED TO VOTE
01:18:27
ON TWO.
01:18:29
LET'S TALK ABOUT CLOSED SESSION AND
01:18:31
SEPARATE THE TWO ITEMS IT'S MORE
01:18:34
COMFORTABLE TO VOTE ON.
01:18:37
TO MAKE SOUND AND LOGICAL DECISIONS.
01:18:47
LASTLY FOR ARASELTE DO YOU HAVE A
01:18:49
SPECIFIC DATE IN 2021?
01:18:53
>> YES, IT WAS ON NOVEMBER 20 BUT I CAN
01:19:00
CERTAINLY PULL THAT ITEM.
01:19:02
>> CAN YOU PULL IT UP AND FIND OUT IF
01:19:06
IT WAS UNANIMOUS I THINK COUNCILMEMBERS
01:19:11
NEED TO HEAR THAT.
01:19:13
>> IN RESPONSE WITH THE ITEM THIS IS
01:19:16
ONE ITEM WE ARE ADOPTING THE SALARY
01:19:20
SCHEDULE.
01:19:23
>> UNDERSTAND THAT WAS IT SEPARATE INTO
01:19:26
TWO THINGS AND CHANGE IT?
01:19:29
THAT IS WHY I'M HAVING A HARD TIME.
01:19:33
I REMEMBER PLANNING COMMISSION THERE
01:19:36
WERE TWO WORDS OFF THAT WAS VERY
01:19:38
IMPORTANT. WE HAD TO DITCH THE ITEM
01:19:41
BECAUSE IT WAS AGENDA WRONG.
01:19:43
I WANT TO MAKE SURE.
01:19:45
>> THAT IS FAIR. THE ONLY THING
01:19:49
TONIGHT IS ADOPT THE SALARY PLAN.
01:19:53
YOU ARE THE PLAN TONIGHT IS SLOWLY TO
01:20:08
THE SALARY PLAN.
01:20:11
>> IT WAS ON NOVEMBER 17. I JUST WANT
01:20:19
TO REITERATE THE REASON IT WAS AMEND
01:20:27
AFTER THE CITY MANAGER WAS HIRED IN
01:20:30
2017 AND 2018 THERE WAS A NEW CONTACT
01:20:34
IN UNIT 9 THAT PROVIDED A 9 PERCENT
01:20:38
COLA.
01:20:39
THERE WAS A MEMO THAT IS IN YOUR PACKET
01:20:43
THAT WENT IN FRONT OF THE COUNCIL IT
01:20:46
SPECIFIC THE SAME COLA FOR UNIT 9.
01:20:51
A RESOLUTION OR AMENDMENT WAS NOT
01:20:54
NEEDED AT THAT TIME.
01:20:56
THAT WAS REVIEWED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY
01:20:59
WHO WAS WITH THE CITY AS THE TIME IT
01:21:03
WAS DETERMINED NO FIRST AMENDMENT CITY
01:21:07
MANAGERS WOULD BE REQUIRED.
01:21:09
WHEN WE REVIEWED THAT IT WAS DETERMINE
01:21:13
BECAUSE ESTABLISH PRACTICE WE DID NOT
01:21:15
HAVE TO DO IN THIS CASE AS WELL.
01:21:18
THAT IS WHY THE ITEM GOT AMENDMENT AND
01:21:22
WHY YOU DON'T SEE THE SECOND AMENDMENT
01:21:26
ON THE ITEM BEFORE YOU.
01:21:28
>> THANK YOU FOR CLARIFYING THAT.
01:21:31
IF YOU FOR CLARIFYING THE DATE AS
01:21:36
NOVEMBER 17. I THINK THAT IS 16 SOME
01:21:40
DAYS OR 13 DAYS AFTER I WAS ELECTED.
01:21:44
THAT WAS MY ONLY MAJOR CONCERN.
01:21:50
I WAS NOT PART OF THAT DECISION. I'M
01:21:54
GOING BACK TO I JUST STILL DON'T FEEL
01:21:59
COMFORTABLE.
01:22:01
I WOULD LIKE TO TALK CLOSED SESSION OR
01:22:06
ILLEGAL ISSUE OR CAUSE PROBLEMS GET
01:22:14
PEOPLE ANGRY. I DON'T THINK I CAN
01:22:17
SUPPORT THESE ISSUES. I THINK THESE
01:22:22
TWO SHOULD HAVE BEEN SEPARATED.
01:22:28
>> COUNCILMEMBER PARK.
01:22:31
>> YES TO COUNCILMEMBER BECKER I'M
01:22:36
LOOKING AT ITEM 9 DECEMBER 7 AGENDA AND
01:22:40
THERE ARE TWO RECOMMENDATIONS. ONE IS
01:22:44
EXACTLY AS IT'S WRITTEN HERE.
01:22:49
AND THE SECOND ONE AND TWO ADOPT SECOND
01:22:55
AMENDMENT BY AND THE CITY SANTA CLARA
01:23:00
ZERO COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENT AND BASE
01:23:06
SALARY TO 468 THOUSAND 673 DOLLARS
01:23:15
CENTS DECEMBER 21.
01:23:16
THIS IS CONTINUE ITEM WE SHOULD
01:23:21
CONTINUE BOTH RECOMMENDATION.
01:23:23
IF WE APPROVE WHAT IS HERE WE ARE NOT
01:23:26
ADOPTING THE RESOLUTION THE SECOND
01:23:30
AMENDMENT TO THE APPOINTMENT AGREEMENT
01:23:33
BY SANTA CLARA?
01:23:35
BECAUSE THAT IS NOT WHAT THE
01:23:37
RECOMMENDATION STATES?
01:23:39
>> THAT IS RIGHT. THE CONTACT... THE
01:23:43
CHANGE TO THE SALARY IS CONSIST WITH
01:23:46
THE CONTRACT.
01:23:48
>> HERE WE HAVE AN EXPLICIT DIFFERENCE
01:23:59
TWO DIFFERENT THINGS.
01:24:01
>> THERE IS NO. SORRY.
01:24:05
>> SORRY. YOU ARE SAYING IF WE DON'T
01:24:08
APPROVE IT WILL BE APPROVED. THAT
01:24:11
BRINGS ME BACK TO MY QUESTION AND
01:24:17
COUNCILMEMBER BECKER. IT SEEM WE
01:24:21
NEEDED APPROVE IT SEPARATELY.
01:24:25
THAT WAS THE REASON THAT THIS REASON
01:24:31
WAS CONTINUED. NOW YOU ARE TELLING US
01:24:33
WE DID NOT NEED THAT AT ALL AND
01:24:38
ADOPTION WOULD BE ADOPTED EVEN WITHOUT
01:24:44
AN EXPLICIT.
01:24:46
>> NO THAT IS NOT WHAT I'M SAYING. YOU
01:24:51
ARE NOT AMENDING THE CONTRACT. IT'S
01:25:01
NOT NECESSARY TO AMEND THE CONTRACT.
01:25:04
YOUR MOTION SAYS YOU WILL ADOPT THE
01:25:09
RESOLUTION WHICH ADOPTING THE SALARY
01:25:10
PLAN AND YOU RECOMMEND COUNCIL GOES
01:25:16
INTO CLOSED SESSION.
01:25:18
YOU HAVE EFFECTIVE BROUGHT INTO CLOSE
01:25:21
SESSION THAT SECOND ITEM. THE SECOND
01:25:24
ITEM THE AMENDMENT TO THE CONTACT IS
01:25:28
NOT NECESSARY BECAUSE YOU ARE NOT
01:25:31
CHANGING HER AGREEMENT.
01:25:33
>> WE WILL NOT ZERO COST ON MEMORIZE
01:25:37
IT'S NOT AN ACTION PER SE.
01:25:58
IT MAY BE AMEND CHANGED. WHAT WOULD
01:26:03
BE THE CHANGE TO THE C MANAGER SALARY
01:26:06
IS BASED ON THE UNIT 9 SCHEDULE OR
01:26:10
SOMETHING ELSE?
01:26:12
IT SOUNDS LIKE I MEAN CLOSED SESSION IS
01:26:16
SPECIFIED IN 3.2?
01:26:18
>> CORRECTLY THE CHANGE THAT IS ALREADY
01:26:21
THAT WILL ALREADY GO IN EFFECT IS THE
01:26:28
CHANGE UNIT MOU.
01:26:30
IT'S CHANGING THAT COLA IS THE SAME TO
01:26:35
SALARY. IT'S REFLECTED IN THE
01:26:38
AGREEMENT IT'S NOT NECESSARY TO AMEND
01:26:42
IT'S BY THE TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT
01:26:44
TODAY.
01:26:46
>> I THINK THAT IS WHERE THE PROBLEM
01:26:50
COMES IN. WE DENY THE ONE AND ACCEPT
01:26:53
ONE WHAT IS THE EFFECT?
01:26:56
>> THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE. THE SAME
01:26:59
EFFECT TONIGHT. THE COLAS HAVE BEEN
01:27:02
APPROVED.
01:27:04
THEY ARE APPROVED FOR 5, 7 AND 8 AND
01:27:11
9.
01:27:14
UNIT 9 IS GETTING A COLA. THEY ARE
01:27:19
TAKING IN 2020 WE HAVE TO PUT IT ON
01:27:23
PAPER AND PUT ON THE WEBSITE.
01:27:25
>> UNDERSTOOD. I WOULD LIKE TO PRESS
01:27:27
THE COUNCIL AND PEOPLE TO UNDERSTAND I
01:27:30
DON'T WANT TO HOLD UP THE AMENDMENT
01:27:35
PLAN UNIT 9 BASED ON CITY MANAGER.
01:27:39
I THINK THE ACTION OF TAKING THE ACTION
01:27:42
WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE SECOND
01:27:47
RECOMMENDATION AS SUGGESTED LAST WEEK
01:27:51
ACTUALLY DOESN'T HAVE NO VALUE.
01:27:54
THEN HAVING A CLOSE SESSION MEETING TO
01:27:58
ADDRESS THE OTHER COUNCILMEMBERS
01:28:03
CONCERNS FOR SPECIFIC ADJUSTMENTS TO
01:28:07
SALARY.
01:28:09
FOR THE ISSUES IN 3.2 WHICH SAY NOW AND
01:28:14
AGAIN WE SHOULD DO A REVIEW TO HAVE
01:28:19
CLOSED SESSION. I THINK THAT WOULD
01:28:21
COVER ALL THE DESIRES THAT I HAVE HEARD
01:28:25
IN CITY COUNCIL SO FAR WITHOUT ANY
01:28:28
DISCUSSION. THAT IS MY UNDERSTANDING.
01:28:30
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
01:28:34
>> COUNCILMEMBER BECKER.
01:28:37
>> YEAH CHARLES CAN YOU EXPLAIN. OKAY
01:28:41
SO I LIKE WHAT COUNCILMEMBER PARK WAS
01:28:44
TALKING ABOUT.
01:28:46
I'M GOING BACK IT WAS TWO BEFORE I KNOW
01:28:50
I'M A BROKEN RECORD. IT WAS TWO BEFORE
01:28:54
SO ARE WE SAYING THAT STAFF OR AGENDA
01:28:58
ITEM WAS MESSED UP?
01:29:01
ARE WE SAYING THERE IS A MISTAKE AND WE
01:29:03
DID NOT DO IT CORRECTLY? WHAT CHANGED?
01:29:07
IT SEEMED WHAT CHANGED WE WILL DO THAT
01:29:11
DIRECTION LAST WEEK BUT THE DIRECTION
01:29:14
ABOUT GOING IS BEING TAKEN AWAY.
01:29:18
I DON'T KNOW THE RIGHT TERM. WAS THERE
01:29:22
A REAL SCREW IN THE AGENDA ITEM
01:29:26
NOTICING LAST WEEK?
01:29:28
I DON'T KNOW TECHNICAL LOOPHOLE.
01:29:35
PLEASE EXPLAIN TO ME. THERE IS A BIG
01:29:39
DIFFERENCE HERE OF LAST WEEK.
01:29:40
I DID NOT HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY OF COLA
01:29:44
LAST WEEK AND SAME TIME YOU ARE TAKING
01:29:47
AWAY THAT ABILITY.
01:29:53
>> THE CONTACT LAST WEEK WAS NOT
01:29:54
NECESSARY. THE AMENDMENT WAS NOT
01:29:56
NECESSARY YOU ARE COMPLYING WITH THE
01:29:59
EXISTING AGREEMENT. THAT IS
01:30:02
WHAT WILL HAPPEN REGARDLESS OF
01:30:05
YOUR VOTE TONIGHT.
01:30:08
>> I REMEMBER WHEN WE WERE
01:30:10
GOING THROUGH THIS WITH THE
01:30:12
ROUNDABOUT LAST WEEK, WE WERE
01:30:13
TRYING TO SEPARATE THE TWO AND
01:30:16
VICE-MAYOR CHAHAL SAID I WANT
01:30:17
TO SEPARATE THE TWO AND THE
01:30:22
ASSISTANT SAID I HIGHLY
01:30:23
RECOMMEND YOU DON'T SEPARATE
01:30:24
THE TWO AND WE KNOW YOUR
01:30:27
RECOMMENDATION, BUT WE JUST
01:30:29
WANT TO KNOW WHAT'S GOING. SO,
01:30:31
THAT'S WHERE I'M KIND OF
01:30:34
GETTING CONFUSED. WE WERE GOING
01:30:35
TO GO IN ONE DIRECTION AND NOW
01:30:37
THE AGENDA ITEM HAS COMPLETELY
01:30:39
CHANGED FROM WHAT THE LANGUAGE
01:30:42
ACTUALLY WAS. FROM A GOVERNMENT
01:30:44
STANDPOINT, I'M VERY
01:30:45
DISAPPOINTED THE LANGUAGE HAS
01:30:46
CHANGED WHEN WE WERE BASICALLY
01:30:47
GOING AROUND AND AROUND LAST
01:30:52
WEEK ABOUT THIS.
01:31:02
>> DO YOU WANT TO SPEAK TO THIS
01:31:06
FIRST?
01:31:07
>> I HAVE SOME BACKGROUND AND
01:31:08
HOPEFULLY THAT WILL SHED SOME
01:31:11
LIGHT ON IT IF THAT'S OKAY,
01:31:14
CHARLES?
01:31:15
>> OF COURSE.
01:31:16
>> FROM OUR PERSPECTIVE FROM
01:31:18
WHAT OCCURRED FROM THE LAST
01:31:20
MEETING AND THIS MEETING WAS
01:31:22
ADDITIONAL RESEARCH WE DID THAT
01:31:23
STAFF DID. WHICH IS WHEN WE
01:31:31
DISCOVERED PRIOR TO COLA'S THAT
01:31:34
HAD BEEN DONE WITHOUT AN
01:31:39
AMENDMENT. AS ARACELY MENTIONED
01:31:42
THERE WERE UNITS GRANTED TO THE
01:31:46
UNIT 9 AND CITY MANAGER. THOSE
01:31:49
COLAS BACK IN 2018 AND 2019,
01:31:53
THOSE COLA'S DID NOT
01:31:54
NECESSITATE AN AMENDMENT. I WAS
01:31:56
UNDER THE OPERATION THAT THEY
01:32:20
HAD NEEDED AN AMENDMENT AND
01:32:24
THAT'S WHEN WE MADE THE CHANGE
01:32:26
FROM THE TWO COMPLETE ITEMS
01:32:27
FROM DISCOVERING FROM THE
01:32:28
ACTION THAT WAS TAKEN THAT WE
01:32:30
DIDN'T KNOW BEFORE THE LAST
01:32:34
AGENDA.
01:32:44
DOES THAT MAKE SENSE?
01:32:46
>> YES, IT MAKES SENSE BUT IT
01:32:48
LOOKS LIKE WE DON'T CARE ABOUT
01:32:52
UNIT 9.
01:32:53
I'M TRYING TO WALK THE TIGHT
01:32:56
ROPE HERE AND TRYING TO REALLY
01:32:57
GET AROUND THIS BECAUSE I DON'T
01:32:59
FEEL COMFORTABLE WITH THE
01:33:00
CHANGES THAT QUICKLY AND WE ARE
01:33:02
BUNCHING THINGS TOGETHER WHEN
01:33:03
THERE IS A SPECIFIC WAY THE
01:33:05
THINGS WERE GOING TO BE DONE
01:33:10
LAST WEEK. I FEEL LIKE I'M ON
01:33:16
AN EPISODE OF THE TWILIGHT ZONE
01:33:19
AND RERUN. I WANT TO GET AROUND
01:33:22
THAT LANGUAGE. I JUST DON'T
01:33:29
FEEL COMFORTABLE.
01:33:30
>> ALL RIGHT.
01:33:32
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR:
01:33:34
VICE-MAYOR CHAHAL AND THEN
01:33:36
WE'LL GO TO THE PUBLIC.
01:33:37
>>VICE MAYOR RAJ CHAHAL: LET'S
01:33:42
DO WHAT IS CLEAR AND GET IT
01:33:46
DONE WITH AND WHAT IS THE ITEM
01:33:49
ON DECEMBER 7TH, I DON'T WANT
01:33:51
TO DISCUSS ANY LEGALITIES OF
01:33:55
THOSE, BUT WE ARE GOING TO
01:33:57
CLOSE THE DOOR ANYWAY. SO
01:33:58
WHATEVER QUESTIONS WE HAVE, WE
01:34:00
CAN ALWAYS GET THOSE THINGS
01:34:01
DONE AND WE CAN COME BACK WITH
01:34:03
A MOTION. AND THAT'S THE REASON
01:34:07
I MADE THAT FIRST MOTION.
01:34:09
WHATEVER IS CLEAR RIGHT NOW,
01:34:11
CLEAR IT OFF, GET DONE WITH IT
01:34:12
AND THEN WE CAN DECIDE ABOUT
01:34:14
ITEM NO. 2 AS PER THE LAST
01:34:18
MOTION.
01:34:19
I WOULD STILL SAY THAT'S THE
01:34:22
BEST OPTION AS TO MY ORIGINAL
01:34:24
MOTION. WE CAN ASK FOR UNIT 578
01:34:28
AND UNIT 9 AND TAKE THE SECOND
01:34:31
ITEM AS DECEMBER 7TH SEPARATELY
01:34:35
BASICALLY.
01:34:40
>> WE DON'T HAVE A DECEMBER 7TH
01:34:43
ITEM ON THE AGENDA THIS
01:34:46
EVENING.
01:34:47
>> I'M SAYING WHAT WAS BROUGHT
01:34:50
FORWARD SHOULD BE STILL
01:34:51
CONSIDERED ALTHOUGH WE DON'T
01:34:52
HAVE IT BUT WE CAN ALWAYS BRING
01:34:55
IT BACK.
01:34:56
>> I'M GOING TO THE PUBLIC NOW.
01:34:57
IS THERE ANY MEMBER OF THE
01:34:58
PUBLIC THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK
01:35:00
ON THIS ISSUE? PLEASE COME
01:35:04
FORWARD NOW.
01:35:05
ASSISTANT CITY CLERK, DO YOU
01:35:06
SEE ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC
01:35:07
THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON
01:35:08
THIS ISSUE?
01:35:09
>> I DO NOT, MAYOR.
01:35:11
>> CHARACTER DO WE HAVE ANY E
01:35:19
COMMENTS? THERE ARE NO E
01:35:23
COMMENTS.
01:35:28
>> OKAY, COULD YOU PLEASE READ
01:35:31
THE MOTION ON THE FLOOR.
01:35:32
>> THE SECOND MOTION ON THE
01:35:35
FLOOR IS STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION
01:35:37
AND SCHEDULE A CLOSED SESSION
01:35:39
TO ADDRESS PARAGRAPH 3.2 OF THE
01:35:41
CITY MANAGER'S AGREEMENT.
01:35:42
>> OKAY.
01:35:43
SO WE HAVE A MOTION AND SECOND
01:35:45
ON THAT.
01:35:48
COUNCIL MEMBER BECKER?
01:35:49
>> I RAN AWAY TO USE THE
01:35:51
BATHROOM AND I HEARD EVERYONE
01:35:53
TALKING SO I RAN BACK. I HEARD
01:35:56
COUNCIL MEMBER VICE-MAYOR
01:35:57
CHAHAL SAYING IT. THEN I
01:35:58
BASICALLY WANT TO GO AND MAKE A
01:36:01
SUBSTITUTE MOTION OF THE
01:36:03
ORIGINAL AGENDA ITEM. I WANT TO
01:36:04
GO THAT DIRECTION AND VOTE ON
01:36:07
THEM SEPARATELY. THAT'S MY
01:36:08
MOTION.
01:36:09
>> I SECOND THAT.
01:36:12
>>> THAT'S A THIRD SUBSTITUTE
01:36:21
MOTION FROM ITEM ON DECEMBER
01:36:22
7TH. I DON'T HAVE THAT IN FRONT
01:36:25
OF ME. COUNCIL MEMBER BECKER,
01:36:27
CAN YOU READ THAT MOTION?
01:36:29
>> LET ME PULL IT UP.
01:36:30
>> YOU CAN'T PLACE ON THE
01:36:32
COUNCIL AGENDA TONIGHT AN
01:36:34
APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT
01:36:35
AMENDMENT THAT IS NOT ON YOUR
01:36:37
AGENDA THAT HASN'T BEEN
01:36:39
PROPERLY NOTICED. I UNDERSTAND
01:36:40
YOU MAY NOT WANT TO APPROVE
01:36:41
THAT.
01:36:42
>> WE ARE ALLOWED TO MAKE ANY
01:36:44
MOTION.
01:36:45
>> CAN YOU LISTEN TO THE
01:36:47
ATTORNEY PLEASE, COUNCIL MEMBER
01:36:49
BECKER. NO, NO, COUNCIL MEMBER
01:36:51
BECKER, LET'S HEAR FROM THE
01:36:53
ATTORNEY SO WE KNOW WHAT YOU
01:36:55
CAN LEGALLY OR NOT LEGALLY DO.
01:36:57
I DON'T WANT YOU TO BE DOING
01:37:02
SOMETHING THAT IS NOT LEGAL. SO
01:37:06
PLEASE.
01:37:07
>> OKAY.
01:37:08
>> I WILL DEFER TO YOU AS WELL,
01:37:11
BUT THE ITEM IS SIMPLY FOR
01:37:13
CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF
01:37:16
THE SALARY PLAN. BY BRINGING
01:37:17
INTO IT THE AMENDMENT OF A
01:37:19
CONTRACT WHICH HAS NOT BEEN
01:37:23
PROPERLY NOTICED, THAT WOULD
01:37:29
SUBEVERT THE BROWN ACT THAT YOU
01:37:31
WOULD MODIFY THE CONTRACT. SO I
01:37:34
DO NOT BELIEVE YOU CAN PLACE
01:37:36
THAT IN A VOTE TONIGHT.
01:37:41
>> BUT -- OKAY. LET'S SEE --
01:37:43
>> TO THE EXTENT THAT YOU COULD
01:37:45
HAVE VOTED ON IT LAST WEEK,
01:37:47
THAT MAY BE TRUE.
01:37:48
>> WHY WAS IT OKAY TO VOTE ON
01:37:55
IT LAST WEEK?
01:37:56
>> IT'S NOT ON AGENDA.
01:37:57
>> I MAKE A SUBSTITUTE MOTION
01:37:58
TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM TO THE
01:38:00
NEXT MEETING BECAUSE I KNOW WE
01:38:03
SIGNED THESE CONTRACTS IN
01:38:04
JANUARY BEFORE. I MAKE A
01:38:05
SUBSTITUTE MOTION TO CONTINUE
01:38:08
THIS TO JANUARY. TO END UP
01:38:10
GOING BACK TO THE ORIGINAL
01:38:11
LANGUAGE OF THIS RIGHT HERE
01:38:13
BECAUSE I WANT THIS SEPARATED.
01:38:14
>> I DO WANT TO BE CLEAR AND I
01:38:16
HOPE I HAVE BEEN THAT BY DOING
01:38:20
SO, NOURT CHANGING THE COLA'S.
01:38:26
YOU ARE NOT CHANGING IT FOR
01:38:37
UNIT 578 OR UNIT 9. WILL ALL
01:38:45
YOU ARE DOING IS PROOUFG THE
01:38:50
CITY MANAGER. THAT'S ALL YOU
01:38:51
ARE GOING TO DO.
01:38:54
>> THAT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE.
01:38:55
>> IF YOU VOTE IN 2020 AND
01:38:57
COMES BACK IN 2021, YOU HAVE
01:39:00
ALREADY DONE THAT.
01:39:01
TONIGHT YOU DO NOT HAVE
01:39:02
ANYTHING ON THE AGENDA THAT
01:39:04
WOULD ALLOW YOU TO UNDUE THE
01:39:07
ACTION ON 2020.
01:39:12
>> SO IT'S A LOOPHOLE.
01:39:15
>> IT'S NOT A LOOPHOLE. THIS IS
01:39:16
AN APPROVED ACTION THAT YOU
01:39:17
HAVE ALREADY TAKEN. THAT'S
01:39:19
GOING TO HAPPEN NO MATTER WHAT.
01:39:20
ALL YOU ARE DOING TONIGHT IS
01:39:22
POSTING ON YOUR WEBSITE
01:39:24
EVIDENCE OF AN APPROVED ACTION
01:39:25
WHICH HAPPENED IN 2020. YOU ARE
01:39:28
NOT TONIGHT MAKING A CHANGE TO
01:39:29
THE ACTION THAT HAPPENED IN
01:39:31
2020 THAT IS NOT ON THE AGENDA,
01:39:33
THAT IS NOT SOMETHING WHICH YOU
01:39:37
CAN APPROVE TONIGHT. ALL YOU
01:39:39
CAN APPROVE IS A POSTING WHAT
01:39:40
YOU HAVE ALREADY APPROVED IN
01:39:45
2020. IF YOU CHOOSE NOT TO POST
01:39:48
IT, IT'S ALREADY HAPPENING
01:39:50
BECAUSE YOU HAVE ALREADY
01:39:51
APPROVED WHAT IS HAPPENING.
01:39:52
>> I DON'T UNDERSTAND THAT A
01:39:53
WEEK AGO IT'S OKAY, A WEEK
01:39:56
LATER IT'S NOT.
01:39:57
>>
01:39:58
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR: WE ARE
01:40:00
JUST REPEATING.
01:40:01
>>CITY MANAGER DEANNA J.
01:40:03
SANTANA: IT WAS A MISTAKE AND
01:40:04
YOU SHOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER
01:40:06
SERVED BY OUR CITY ATTORNEY'S
01:40:08
OFFICE, BUT PLEASE RECOGNIZE
01:40:09
THEY ARE DOING THE BEST THAT
01:40:15
THEY CAN.
01:40:16
>> WITH OUR ASSISTANT ATTORNEY.
01:40:17
>> I DID NOT WANT TO SAY THAT,
01:40:20
IT'S NOT MY STYLE, BUT IT WAS A
01:40:22
MISTAKE AND THE 2ND AMENDMENT
01:40:24
WAS NEVER NOTICED, IT WAS NEVER
01:40:26
WAVED. SO THAT WAS CORRECTED BY
01:40:29
PUTTING IT IN PLACE AS IT HAD
01:40:31
BEEN DONE IN THE PAST.
01:40:32
>> YEAH, I KNOW. I JUST WISH WE
01:40:34
WOULD HAVE DONE THIS LAST WEEK
01:40:36
BECAUSE WE COULD HAVE DONE THE
01:40:37
ONE THING ON THE ONE HAND, THE
01:40:41
SECOND AND CLOSED SESSION WHERE
01:40:42
I COULD HAVE BEEN MORE
01:40:44
COMFORTABLE TO DISCUSS THIS.
01:40:46
>> P COUNCIL MEMBER BECKER, THE
01:40:48
LAST WEEK WOULD HAVE BEEN AN
01:40:51
ILLEGAL ACTION AND A BREACH OF
01:40:54
CONTRACT BECAUSE IT WASN'T
01:40:56
NOTICED OR WAIVED AS IN MY
01:40:58
AGREEMENT.
01:40:59
STAFF CORRECTING IT AND DOING
01:41:00
MORE RESEARCH IS ACTUALLY
01:41:01
BETTER BECAUSE IT GETS THE CITY
01:41:04
BACK INTO ALIGNMENT WITH THE
01:41:08
PROPER AGREEMENT TERMS.
01:41:09
>> OKAY.
01:41:14
>> AND THE ADMINISTRATION OF IT
01:41:18
IS.
01:41:19
>> I APPRECIATE CORRECTING THIS
01:41:20
BUT BEING CONCERNED THAT IT
01:41:21
COULD HAVE BEEN AN ILLEGAL
01:41:24
ACTION. THIS IS CONCERNING AND
01:41:27
WE SHOULD REALLY DOT MY I'S AND
01:41:31
CROSS MY T'S. I'M TRYING TO
01:41:33
FIGURE OUT WHAT'S GOING ON HERE
01:41:35
AND I JUST WANT TO DO THE RIGHT
01:41:38
THING.
01:41:39
I JUST DON'T FEEL COMFORTABLE
01:41:40
WITH THIS MOTION ON THE FLOOR.
01:41:41
I STILL WISH IT WAS TWO
01:41:43
SEPARATE ISSUES THAT WE CAN
01:41:47
DISCUSS. I KNOW I'M BEATING THE
01:41:49
DEAD HORSE AND I WON'T BEAT IT
01:41:51
ANYMORE. SO THANK YOU.
01:41:55
>> COUNCIL MEMBER PARK?
01:42:02
>> I DID WANT TO SAY THE
01:42:05
WORDING DID SAY ADOPT THE PLANS
01:42:13
AND THE OTHER WORDING CHANGES
01:42:16
THE BASE OF THE CLASSIFIED
01:42:20
POSITIONS. I LIKE THE WORDING
01:42:23
BETTER AND UNLESS I'M MISS
01:42:36
INFORMED, I UNDERSTAND NOW. I
01:42:41
DON'T SEE WHY THE OTHER UNITS
01:42:43
SHOULD HAVE TO WAIT FOR THE
01:42:45
INCREASES THAT THEY HAVE BEEN
01:42:46
ALREADY GRANTED. I THINK THAT
01:42:49
IS SOMETHING I WOULD NOT LIKE
01:42:51
TO HOLD ON AT ALL. AND I WOULD
01:42:54
LIKE TO HOLD A CLOSED SESSION
01:42:58
MEETING TO ADDRESS SECTION 3.2
01:42:59
WHICH I BELIEVE IS WHAT THE
01:43:01
OTHER CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
01:43:02
WOULD LIKE TO DO.
01:43:05
>>
01:43:06
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR: OKAY.
01:43:07
WE HAVE A MOTION AND SECOND ON
01:43:09
THAT.
01:43:10
I HAVE SOME COMMENTS.
01:43:11
I THINK EVEN BY THOSE LAST
01:43:15
STATEMENTS, FIRST OF ALL, I
01:43:18
WANT TO THANK CHARLES SACKAI
01:43:22
FOR PROFESSIONALLY REPEATING
01:43:23
OVER AND OVER AGAIN ABOUT THE
01:43:27
ACTION TAKEN TONIGHT IS.
01:43:28
I WANT TO APOLOGIZE TO OUR
01:43:31
UNITS FOR ANY OF THE COMMENTS
01:43:33
THAT WERE MADE BY THIS CITY
01:43:36
COUNCIL EITHER LAST WEEK,
01:43:38
MAINLY LAST WEEK. I AS THE
01:43:41
MAYOR DO NOT CONDONE THOSE AND
01:43:43
I JUST WANT TO SAY THAT I
01:43:46
PERSONALLY APPRECIATE
01:43:47
EVERYTHING THAT OUR EMPLOYEES
01:43:48
DO FOR THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA.
01:43:51
I VALUE WHAT YOU DO. IN FACT
01:43:53
YOU ARE WHAT MAKE OUR CITY A
01:43:57
WONDERFUL PLACE TO BE. OUR
01:44:00
RESIDENTS LOVE OUR EMPLOYEES.
01:44:02
THEY CONNECT WITH OUR
01:44:04
EMPLOYEES. OUR EMPLOYEES REALLY
01:44:06
REALLY MAKE SANTA CLARA, AND
01:44:08
THE COMMENTS MADE LAST WEEK I
01:44:12
THINK ARE EMBARRASSING AND
01:44:13
UNPROFESSIONAL AND I JUST WANT
01:44:15
TO SAY AS MAYOR, I DON'T AGREE
01:44:17
WITH ANY OF THEM. I THINK YOU
01:44:23
ARE ABSOLUTELY WONDERFUL.
01:44:25
I KNOW THESE HAVE BEEN REALLY
01:44:27
TOUGH TIMES AND I UNDERSTAND
01:44:28
THAT WE HAVE NEW COUNCIL
01:44:31
MEMBERS, AND WE HAVE SOME
01:44:34
PREVIOUS COUNCIL MEMBERS, BUT
01:44:35
WHAT I DON'T UNDERSTAND IS WHEN
01:44:37
WE HAVE CONTRACTS IN THE CITY
01:44:43
THAT OUR COUNCIL MEMBERS WHO
01:44:45
ARE CHARGED WITH MANAGING THOSE
01:44:47
CONTRACTS THAT THEY DON'T
01:44:49
UNDERSTAND THOSE CONTRACTS, AND
01:44:50
WHAT IT MEANS WHEN YOU MAKE A
01:44:57
CONTRACT AND YOU MAKE
01:44:59
ARRANGEMENTS AND AGREE TO MOU'S
01:45:01
AND OTHER THINGS, WHAT EXACTLY
01:45:03
DOES THAT MEAN?
01:45:04
AS COUNCIL MEMBERS, IF YOU
01:45:06
DON'T UNDERSTAND THAT, IT'S
01:45:07
YOUR DUTY TO GO AND ASK
01:45:11
QUESTIONS, AND FIGURE IT OUT.
01:45:13
I JUST THINK THAT EVERYONE
01:45:15
HERE, WE ARE ALL TRYING TO DO
01:45:16
OUR VERY VERY BEST FOR THE
01:45:19
RESIDENTS OF OUR CITY. WE
01:45:21
REALLY ARE.
01:45:22
BUT HERE WE ARE AGAIN SPENT ALL
01:45:24
KINDS OF TIME LAST MEETING AND
01:45:27
WE ARE ALMOST NOW GOING ON 2
01:45:29
HOURS ON THIS ITEM ALONE.
01:45:32
THE OUTSIDE COUNSEL HAS
01:45:33
EXPLAINED OVER AND OVER AND
01:45:38
OVER WHAT THIS ACTUALLY MEANS.
01:45:43
BUT I STILL DON'T THINK OUR
01:45:45
COUNCIL MEMBERS UNDERSTAND IT
01:45:46
OR THEY DON'T WANT TO
01:45:50
UNDERSTAND IT BECAUSE IT'S
01:45:51
JUST, IT'S REALLY DISAPPOINTING
01:45:52
FOR ME THAT WE HAVE TO GO
01:45:54
THROUGH ALL THIS. IT REALLY S
01:45:57
IT'S DISAPPOINTING BECAUSE I
01:45:59
THINK PEOPLE LOOK TO US TO
01:46:02
PROVIDE LEADERSHIP AND TO
01:46:03
PROVIDE GOOD FAITH FOR THE
01:46:05
COMMUNITY AND FOR OUR
01:46:09
EMPLOYEES, AND WHEN WE DON'T DO
01:46:10
THAT, IT REALLY SETS A BAD
01:46:15
TONE, A BAD PLACE. IT SETS A
01:46:19
TOXIC ENVIRONMENT WHEN THERE IS
01:46:23
NAME CALLING AND IT SETS A
01:46:26
TOXIC ENVIRONMENT FOR OUR
01:46:27
EMPLOYEES
01:46:28
WHAT I WANT IS A STABLE CITY
01:46:30
COUNCIL AND STABLE CITY HALL
01:46:31
AND STABLE COMMUNITY. I DON'T
01:46:33
KNOW HOW YOU CAN HAVE THIS
01:46:37
UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES, I
01:46:38
REALLY DON'T.
01:46:39
I THINK THIS IS A MESS.
01:46:44
MR. SACKAI HAS TOLD US WHAT
01:46:48
THIS EXACTLY MEANS. THIS IS A
01:46:50
DISCLOSURE OF THE SALARY PLAN.
01:46:51
THIS IS A DISCLOSURE WHAT WE
01:46:52
ARE REQUIRED TO DO BY LAW. NO
01:46:56
MATTER WHAT ANY COUNCIL MEMBER
01:46:59
SAYS, THOSE VOTES HAVE ALREADY
01:47:01
TAKEN PLACE WHETHER YOU VOTE
01:47:02
YES OR NO OR WHATEVER ON THE
01:47:04
ITEM. HE SAID IT AT LEAST FOUR
01:47:07
TIMES THAT THE COLA IS GOING TO
01:47:09
TAKE PLACE NO MATTER WHAT.
01:47:11
THE CITY MANAGER HAS CLEARLY
01:47:12
STATED TO US, IF WE ARE
01:47:14
UNHAPPY, WE HAVE TO TAKE OTHER
01:47:16
ACTIONS. THAT'S A FACT, BUT TO
01:47:18
TAKE THIS OUT IN PUBLIC NOW AND
01:47:21
START WIDDLING DOWN AND MAKING
01:47:28
ACCUSATIONS ABOUT LOOPHOLES AND
01:47:30
COLLUSION AND OTHER THINGS FROM
01:47:32
LAST WEEK ARE REALLY
01:47:35
UNNECESSARY AND PROVIDE AN
01:47:36
UNSTABLE ENVIRONMENT FOR OUR
01:47:39
COMMUNITY. OUR COMMUNITY
01:47:40
DOESN'T WANT THIS. THEY WANT
01:47:42
ACTION, THEY WANT
01:47:43
REPRESENTATION, THEY WANT
01:47:45
LEADERSHIP, THEY WANT
01:47:46
POSITIVITY AS WELL, AND TO HAVE
01:47:48
THIS, I'M JUST EMBARRASSED. I'M
01:47:51
EMBARRASSED. I'M EMBARRASSED IN
01:47:54
FRONT OF OUR EMPLOYEES, I'M
01:47:58
EMBARRASSED IN FRONT OF OUR
01:47:59
COMMUNITY. WE NEED TO DO THE
01:48:01
RIGHT THING AND DISCLOSE IT AND
01:48:03
BE OUT FRONT AND SUPPORT OUR
01:48:05
SYSTEM SO WE CAN PROVIDE THE
01:48:06
SERVICES THAT OUR COMMUNITY
01:48:07
NEEDS. I'M NOT HERE TO LISTEN
01:48:09
TO ALL OF YOUR DEBATES NOW
01:48:12
ABOUT WHAT I SAY. YOU'VE ALL
01:48:14
HAD PLENTY OF TIME TO TALK.
01:48:15
SO NOW I WOULD LIKE TO GO TO
01:48:19
THE VOTE PLEASE. THE ASSISTANT
01:48:21
CITY CLERK ON THE MOTION.
01:48:23
>> MAYOR CAN I ADDRESS THE
01:48:25
GASLIGHTING THAT YOU JUST
01:48:28
STATED?
01:48:29
>> NO.
01:48:31
>> MAYOR, EXCUSE ME.
01:48:32
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR:
01:48:35
COUNCIL MEMBER BECKER?
01:48:36
>> NO.
01:48:37
>> I'M TAKING A BREAK.
01:48:41
>> YOU GASLIGHTED ME.
01:48:44
>> WE ARE GOING TO A BREAK.
01:48:49
COUNCIL MEMBER BECKER? ALL
01:48:50
RIGHT.
01:48:51
ASSISTANT CITY CLERK, ROLL CALL
01:48:54
VOTE, PLEASE.
01:48:56
>> THIS IS ABSURD. YOU GAS
01:49:00
LIGHTED ME.
01:49:01
>> COUNCIL MEMBER BECKER, YOU
01:49:03
KNOW YOUR NAME. STOP.
01:49:04
I'M CALLING FOR A VOTE. YOU'VE
01:49:06
ALL HAD PLENTY OF TIME TO TALK.
01:49:09
I'M SORRY.
01:49:13
>>VICE MAYOR RAJ CHAHAL: MAYOR
01:49:17
GILMOR, IT'S ABOUT THE MOTION.
01:49:19
COUNCIL MEMBER KEVIN PARK, DID
01:49:20
HE CHANGE THE MOTION?
01:49:23
>> NO HE DIDN'T.
01:49:25
>> WHAT IS THE MOTION. WILL
01:49:26
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR: LET'S
01:49:28
HAVE THE ASSISTANT CITY CLERK
01:49:31
EXPLAIN THE MOTION ONE MORE
01:49:34
TIME.
01:49:35
>>
01:49:36
>>CLERK: LET ME EXPLAIN RIGHT
01:49:37
NOW. WE HAVE FOUR MOTIONS ON
01:49:38
THE FLOOR. WE NEED TO GO
01:49:42
BACKWARDS. THE LAST ONE IS FROM
01:49:44
COUNCIL MEMBER BECKER TO
01:49:46
CONTINUE THIS TO JANUARY 2022.
01:49:47
>> I DID SECOND.
01:49:49
>> YOU DID SECOND IT? OKAY,
01:49:51
THAT'S THE MOTION ON THE FLOOR.
01:49:53
>> THE MOTION IS GOING TO BE
01:49:54
WHETHER OR NOT WE MOVE TO VOTE
01:49:57
ON THAT.
01:49:58
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR: OKAY.
01:49:59
SO IT'S TO CONTINUE THIS TO
01:50:04
JANUARY, THE WHOLE, EVERYTHING.
01:50:06
>> THE MOTION ON THE FLOOR IS
01:50:07
GOING TO BE DOES THE COUNCIL
01:50:09
WANT TO MOVE FORWARD WITH
01:50:10
VOTING ON THAT MOTION FIRST?
01:50:14
IF IT PASSES, WE THEN VOTE ON
01:50:16
THAT. IF IT DOESN'T, WE WILL
01:50:17
MOVE THEN TO THE THIRD
01:50:22
SUBSTITUTE MOTION.
01:50:23
>> OKAY, IT'S JUST TO CONTINUE
01:50:25
IT?
01:50:26
>> NO, WHETHER OR NOT COUNCIL
01:50:27
WOULD LIKE TO MOVE ON THAT
01:50:29
MOTION.
01:50:30
>> THE MOTION IS TO CONTINUE?
01:50:31
>> YES.
01:50:32
>> AND IF WE DO VOTE IN A
01:50:35
POSITIVE WAY, THEN WE VOTE ON
01:50:36
THE MOTION TO CONTINUE?
01:50:39
>> CORRECT.
01:50:40
>> ALL RIGHT.
01:50:41
MOTION TO CONTINUE.
01:50:42
WHETHER OR NOT WE WANT TO VOTE
01:50:45
ON THE MOTION TO CONTINUE.
01:50:49
>>CLERK:
01:50:50
>>COUNCIL MEMBER KATHY
01:50:51
WATANABE: NO.
01:50:52
>>VICE MAYOR RAJ CHAHAL: YES.
01:50:57
>> VICE-MAYOR HARDY: NO.
01:50:59
>>COUNCIL MEMBER KEVIN PARK:
01:51:00
NO.
01:51:02
>>COUNCIL MEMBER SUDSHANSHU
01:51:03
JAIN: NO.
01:51:04
>>COUNCIL MEMBER ANTHONY
01:51:05
BECKER: YES.
01:51:07
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR: YES.
01:51:10
>> DID YOU SAY YES?
01:51:14
>> YES.
01:51:15
I DIDN'T KEEP TRACK, I'M SORRY.
01:51:17
>> THE MOTION FAILS.
01:51:20
>> OKAY, NEXT MOTION.
01:51:23
>> THE NEXT MOTION IS WHETHER
01:51:25
OR NOT WE VOTE OR THE COUNCIL
01:51:28
VOTES ON THE THIRD SUBSTITUTE
01:51:29
MOTION WHICH IS TO ADOPT THE
01:51:31
ORIGINAL MOTION WHICH COUNCIL
01:51:34
MEMBER VICE-MAYOR CHAHAL PUT ON
01:51:37
THE FLOOR OF RESOLUTION
01:51:39
APPROVING 5, 7, 9 AND HE SAID A
01:51:41
LOT OF OTHER THINGS WHICH I
01:51:42
DON'T HAVE IN FRONT OF ME RIGHT
01:51:44
NOW.
01:51:45
>> DO YOU HAVE THAT VICE-MAYOR
01:51:47
CHAHAL?
01:51:48
>>VICE MAYOR RAJ CHAHAL: MY
01:51:52
MOTION WAS ADOPT STAFF
01:51:54
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR UNIT 9 AND
01:51:59
UNIT 578 AND THE CALIFORNIA
01:52:11
CODE REGULATIONS SECTION 570.5.
01:52:12
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR: IS
01:52:13
THAT THE STAFF'S
01:52:15
RECOMMENDATION?
01:52:16
>> NO, IT'S NOT THE FULL STAFF
01:52:20
RECOMMENDATION. I'M SAYING FOR
01:52:25
UNIT 578 AND 9.
01:52:30
COUNCIL MEMBER BECKER WAS
01:52:31
SAYING THAT.
01:52:32
>> NO, IT HAS TO BE YOUR
01:52:34
MOTION.
01:52:35
>> SHE'S NOT TALKING ABOUT MY
01:52:37
MOTION.
01:52:38
>> YES, SHE IS.
01:52:40
>> YES, THE THIRD SUBSTITUTE
01:52:43
MOTION VICE-MAYOR CHAHAL WAS
01:52:45
YOURS GOING BACK TO YOUR
01:52:48
ORIGINAL MOTION WHICH WAS
01:52:50
APPROVING UNITS 578 AND UNIT 9.
01:52:52
>> I SECONDED IT. I REMEMBER I
01:52:55
SECONDED IT.
01:52:56
>>CLERK: YES, YOU DID.
01:52:57
>> BASICALLY THE FIRST MOTION
01:52:59
CAME BACK AGAIN. OKAY, I WILL
01:53:01
STANDBY THAT.
01:53:02
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR: IT'S
01:53:05
TO APPROVE 578 AND 9?
01:53:08
>> THAT IS CORRECT.
01:53:10
>> WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? CAN I
01:53:13
ASK MR. SACKAI WHAT DOES THAT
01:53:17
MINE?
01:53:18
>> MY UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT YOU
01:53:19
JUST PROPOSED IS YOU WOULD ONLY
01:53:22
POST THE SALARY PLANS FOR UNIT
01:53:25
578, UNIT 9 AND NO OTHER
01:53:31
EMPLOYEE AFFECTED BY THE
01:53:32
CHANGE. THE COLA'S WOULD ALL GO
01:53:37
INTO EFFECT, BUT YOU WOULD NOT
01:53:41
POST PUBLICLY THE SALARY PLAN
01:53:42
FOR INSTANCE THE CITY MANAGER.
01:53:44
THAT'S MY UNDERSTANDING.
01:53:48
>> OKAY.
01:53:51
>> BECAUSE THAT WAS THE
01:53:56
SEPARATE PART OF IT.
01:53:59
>> IS THAT CONSISTENT WHAT YOU
01:54:02
THOUGHT YOUR MOTION WAS?
01:54:06
>> THAT'S MY MOTION.
01:54:07
>> WE ARE GOING TO VOTE ON THAT
01:54:08
MOTION.
01:54:09
>>
01:54:10
>>COUNCIL MEMBER KATHY
01:54:11
WATANABE: NO.
01:54:12
>>VICE MAYOR RAJ CHAHAL: YES.
01:54:17
>> VICE-MAYOR HARDY: NO.
01:54:19
>>COUNCIL MEMBER KEVIN PARK:
01:54:20
NO.
01:54:21
>>COUNCIL MEMBER SUDSHANSHU
01:54:22
JAIN: NO.
01:54:23
>>COUNCIL MEMBER ANTHONY
01:54:24
BECKER: YES.
01:54:25
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR: NO.
01:54:30
SO THAT MOTION FAILS.
01:54:32
SO NOW WE MOVE TO THE SECOND
01:54:34
SUBSTITUTE MOTION WHICH WAS BY
01:54:37
COUNCIL MEMBER PARK, SECONDED
01:54:40
BY COUNCIL MEMBER JAIN FOR
01:54:41
STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND TO
01:54:43
SCHEDULE A CLOSED SESSION TO
01:54:45
ADDRESS PARAGRAPH 3.2 OF THE
01:54:47
CITY MANAGER'S AGREEMENT. THE
01:54:48
MOTION ON THE FLOOR WILL BE
01:54:50
WHETHER OR NOT TO VOTE ON THAT.
01:54:53
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR: OKAY,
01:54:55
SO THERE IS A MOTION TO WHETHER
01:54:57
OR NOT WE ARE GOING TO VOTE ON
01:55:00
COUNCIL MEMBER PARK'S MOTION.
01:55:01
ALL RIGHT. IS THAT CLEAR?
01:55:03
>> MAYOR, YOU ALL BROKE UP. CAN
01:55:06
YOU REPEAT THAT PART AGAIN.
01:55:08
>> WELL, THE MOTION THAT
01:55:10
ASSISTANT CITY CLERK JUST
01:55:11
STATED WHICH WAS COUNCIL MEMBER
01:55:13
PARK'S MOTION.
01:55:14
>> OKAY, THANK YOU.
01:55:17
>>
01:55:18
>>CLERK:
01:55:19
>>COUNCIL MEMBER KATHY
01:55:20
WATANABE: YES.
01:55:22
>>VICE MAYOR RAJ CHAHAL: NO.
01:55:24
>> VICE-MAYOR HARDY: YES.
01:55:26
>>COUNCIL MEMBER KEVIN PARK:
01:55:27
YES.
01:55:28
>>COUNCIL MEMBER SUDSHANSHU
01:55:29
JAIN: YES.
01:55:31
>>COUNCIL MEMBER ANTHONY
01:55:32
BECKER: NO.
01:55:33
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR: YES.
01:55:38
THAT PASSES 5-2.
01:55:39
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR: SO NOW
01:55:40
WE ACTUALLY VOTE ON THAT
01:55:44
MOTION.
01:55:46
>>CLERK: THAT'S CORRECT.
01:55:50
>> OKAY.
01:55:52
ALL RIGHT.
01:55:53
WE DON'T HAVE TO HAVE SOMEONE,
01:55:58
OKAY.
01:55:59
WE ARE VOTING ON THE MOTION?
01:56:02
>> YES.
01:56:03
>> OKAY.
01:56:05
>>CLERK:
01:56:06
>>COUNCIL MEMBER KATHY
01:56:07
WATANABE: YES.
01:56:08
>>VICE MAYOR RAJ CHAHAL: YES.
01:56:12
>> VICE-MAYOR HARDY: YES.
01:56:14
>>COUNCIL MEMBER KEVIN PARK:
01:56:15
YES.
01:56:16
>>COUNCIL MEMBER SUDSHANSHU
01:56:17
JAIN: YES.
01:56:20
>>COUNCIL MEMBER ANTHONY
01:56:21
BECKER: YES.
01:56:22
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR: YES.
01:56:25
>> OKAY, THAT PASSES
01:56:27
UNANIMOUSLY.
01:56:28
THANK YOU VERY MUCH AND THANK
01:56:30
YOU TO OUR CITY STAFF AND
01:56:32
COUNSEL.
01:56:40
I'M GOING TO ASK THAT WE TAKE A
01:56:41
5-MINUTE BREAK TO 7:30. THANK
01:56:44
YOU SO MUCH.
01:56:48
[BREAK]
01:57:04
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR: I WANT
01:57:05
TO MAKE SURE WE GET TO ALL THE
01:57:08
ITEMS FOR TONIGHT.
01:57:09
ITEM NO. 4. ACTION ON THE
01:57:12
AMENDMENT NO. 1 AGREEMENT FOR
01:57:14
ACCELA INC. FOR THE LAND
01:57:16
MANAGEMENT AND THIS ITEM WAS
01:57:20
CONTINUE FROM DECEMBER 7TH.
01:57:21
>>CITY MANAGER DEANNA J.
01:57:23
SANTANA: YES, MAYOR, THIS WAS
01:57:25
CONTINUED FROM LAST WEEK. I DID
01:57:27
SEND AN EMAIL TO CITY COUNCIL
01:57:29
LAST THURSDAY I BELIEVE ABOUT
01:57:32
THE STATUS OF THOSE
01:57:33
CONVERSATIONS, BUT WE DO HAVE
01:57:39
ANDREA HERE AND I KNOW TIME IS
01:57:44
OF THE ESSENCE. WE DID SUPPLY
01:57:46
INFORMATION TO COUNCIL ABOUT
01:57:48
THE LOW COST WE ARE ALREADY
01:57:50
RECEIVING.
01:57:51
ANDREW, I KNOW WERE YOU TRYING
01:57:53
TO GET TWO MORE EXAMPLES OF THE
01:57:55
LOW COST BUT YOU MAY WANT TO
01:57:57
ADVERBIALS COMMENT.
01:57:58
>> YES, I HAVE A BRIEF
01:58:00
PRESENTATION. SHOULD I GO
01:58:01
THROUGH THAT THEN.
01:58:02
>> IF YOU CAN GO THROUGH IT
01:58:05
REALLY QUICKLY AS WE SEE YOU
01:58:06
GOT US THE BEST PRICE. SO,
01:58:08
YEAH, GO AHEAD.
01:58:09
>> VERY GOOD. THANK YOU. YES.
01:58:12
AS MENTIONED THIS IS A PURCHASE
01:58:17
AGREEMENT, AMENDMENT OF OUR
01:58:21
AGREEMENT WITH ACCELA AND
01:58:22
LOOKING TO AMEND LICENSES TO
01:58:24
HAVE MORE USERS IN THE SYSTEM.
01:58:27
SO JUST BRIEFLY, IT'S A PERMIT
01:58:29
TRACKING SYSTEM THAT WE USE FOR
01:58:32
INTERNAL COORDINATION. THERE
01:58:33
ARE EIGHT CITY DEPARTMENTS THAT
01:58:34
ARE INVOLVED IN IT, AND IT DOES
01:58:37
HELP US PROVIDE BETTER CUSTOMER
01:58:40
SERVICE AS WELL AS BETTER
01:58:44
PUBLIC ACCESS TO INFORMATION.
01:58:45
IT'S BEEN REALLY A 3-4-YEAR
01:58:48
PROCESS TO NEGOTIATE THE
01:58:49
CONTRACT TO IMPLEMENT IT. IT'S
01:58:51
HIGHLY CUSTOMIZED TO OUR CITY
01:58:54
AND WE'VE RECENTLY GONE LIVE
01:58:56
WITH OUR BUILDING AND PLANNING
01:58:58
COMMISSION DIVISION AND SOME
01:59:00
FUNCTIONS EARLIER AS WE ROLLED
01:59:02
IT OUT. THERE IS GROWING
01:59:03
INTEREST IN USING IT FOR OTHER
01:59:05
PARTS OF THE CITY AND WHY WE
01:59:08
ARE ASKING FOR MORE LICENSES.
01:59:10
SO, AT THE LAST COUNCIL
01:59:12
MEETING, THE CITY COUNCIL ASKED
01:59:15
US A COUPLE QUESTIONS. ONE IS
01:59:17
THERE A SIGHT LICENSE OPTION
01:59:20
AVAILABLE RATHER THAN BUYING A
01:59:23
LICENSE FOR EACH NAMED USER IN
01:59:24
THE SYSTEM AND WE ARE
01:59:25
REQUESTING TO DO AND HOW DO OUR
01:59:30
PRICES COMPARE WITH OTHER
01:59:31
ACCELA CUSTOMERS.
01:59:32
SO WE DID CONTACT OUR ACCELA
01:59:36
REPRESENTATIVE AND ASKED FOR A
01:59:39
CONFIRMATION AROUND OUR
01:59:41
UNDERSTANDING THAT ACCELA DOES
01:59:43
NOT OFFER A STATE LICENSE
01:59:45
OPTION AND THEY CONFIRMED THAT
01:59:46
IS NOT SOMETHING IN THEIR
01:59:49
BUSINESS MODEL. SO THAT'S NOT A
01:59:50
POSSIBILITY FOR US AND THIS IS
01:59:52
A QUOTE FROM THE EMAIL FROM THE
01:59:55
REPRESENTATIVE TO THAT EFFECT.
01:59:57
AND SHE ALSO NOTES IN THAT THAT
02:00:01
WE HAVE NEGOTIATED WITH HER
02:00:03
SUCCESSFULLY TO KEEP OUR
02:00:05
HISTORIC PRICE THAT WE HAD
02:00:06
NEGOTIATED BACK A COUPLE YEARS
02:00:10
AGO FOR THESE ADDITIONAL
02:00:12
LICENSES AND WE'LL BE BE ADDING
02:00:17
NEW LICENSES AS WE HAVE
02:00:18
DISCUSSED IN THE PAST AND THEY
02:00:21
HAVE INCREASED THE AMOUNT FOR
02:00:25
LICENSES.
02:00:26
IF YOU LOOK AT THE ACCELA
02:00:38
PRICING INFORMATION, AND IT'S
02:00:39
3,000 PER SEAT. WE DID SPEND
02:00:45
TIME NEGOTIATING WITH THEM TO
02:00:47
GET THE BEST PRICE AND THEY
02:00:51
AGREED TO THE $2104 PER SEAT.
02:00:58
JUST FOR SOME COMPARISONS, FORT
02:01:00
LAUDERDALE IS A LARGER USER AND
02:01:02
A LESS EXPENSIVE PART OF THE
02:01:04
COUNTRY AND THEY ARE PAYING
02:01:06
MORE. LOCALLY MENLO PARK IS
02:01:10
PAYING MORE AND CUPERTINO IS
02:01:12
ALSO PAYING MORE. I WASN'T ABLE
02:01:14
TO GET INFORMATION FOR OTHER
02:01:16
CITIES BUT THIS WAS WHAT I WAS
02:01:18
ABLE TO GET FOR TONIGHT. WITH
02:01:23
THAT, I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE THE
02:01:26
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL TO
02:01:30
ALLOW US TO MAKE AN AGREEMENT
02:01:33
FOR THE PURCHASES OF THE
02:01:36
LICENSES AND AS THE NEED
02:01:40
ARISES. I'M AVAILABLE FOR
02:01:42
QUESTIONS.
02:01:43
>> THANK YOU.
02:01:44
>> I DON'T KNOW IF THERE ARE
02:01:46
ANY COMMENTS? COUNCIL MEMBER
02:01:47
JAIN?
02:01:48
>>COUNCIL MEMBER SUDSHANSHU
02:01:49
JAIN: I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A
02:01:50
MOTION. I THINK ANDREW DID A
02:01:53
GREAT JOB WITH ANSWERING MY
02:01:55
QUESTIONS AND ALL OF MY
02:01:57
QUESTIONS WERE SATISFIED AND
02:01:58
WOULD LIKE TO MAKE THAT
02:01:59
RECOMMENDATION.
02:02:00
>> I WE HAVE A MOTION AND
02:02:04
SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER JAIN
02:02:07
AND HARDY.
02:02:08
>> VICE-MAYOR HARDY: I WOULD
02:02:10
LIKE TO SUPPORT THE
02:02:11
RECOMMENDATION AS WELL AND
02:02:14
THANK YOU ANDREW FOR GOING
02:02:15
THROUGH ALL OF THAT TROUBLE TO
02:02:19
GET THAT INFORMATION AND WHAT
02:02:21
WAS REPRESENTED LAST WEEK IS A
02:02:23
GREAT EXAMPLE OF THE GREAT WORK
02:02:24
THAT OUR STAFF DOES AND REALLY
02:02:26
WHY WE SHOULD NOT BE
02:02:28
QUESTIONING OUR STAFF. WE
02:02:30
SHOULD NOT BE MICRO MANAGING
02:02:31
OUR STAFF. THANK YOU FOR GOING
02:02:34
THROUGH THAT TROUBLE AND
02:02:35
BRINGING IT FORWARD TONIGHT. I
02:02:37
WILL SUPPORT THE
02:02:39
RECOMMENDATION. THANK YOU.
02:02:40
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR: THANK
02:02:43
YOU, VICE-MAYOR CHAHAL.
02:02:44
>>VICE MAYOR RAJ CHAHAL: THANK
02:02:45
YOU, ANDREW FOR THE DETAILS. I
02:02:47
APPRECIATE YOU GOING BACK AND
02:02:48
TRYING TO FIND OUT THE BEST
02:02:51
PRICES POSSIBLE. I APPRECIATE
02:02:53
THAT.
02:02:54
DOWN THE LINE, I WOULD LIKE TO
02:02:56
FIND OUT WHAT OTHER BIGGER --
02:02:59
BECAUSE WE ONLY COMPARED 3 OR 4
02:03:02
CITIES. WHAT OTHER CITIES IF
02:03:05
POSSIBLE ARE DOING SET ASIDE
02:03:07
LICENSE, WHAT ARE THEIR
02:03:08
EXPENSES EVEN IF THEY ARE A
02:03:10
DIFFERENT VENDOR, HOW MUCH THEY
02:03:12
ARE SPENDING BUT I WILL SUPPORT
02:03:13
THE MOTION RIGHT NOW. THANK
02:03:15
YOU.
02:03:16
>>
02:03:17
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR: THANK
02:03:21
YOU.
02:03:22
IS THERE ANY MEMBER OF THE
02:03:23
PUBLIC THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK
02:03:27
ON THAT ISSUE?
02:03:28
ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A MOTION AND
02:03:29
SECOND ON THE FLOOR. I KNOW
02:03:32
WITH THE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT
02:03:33
DEPARTMENT WE ASKED TO YOU
02:03:35
BRING TECHNOLOGY INTO THE
02:03:36
DEPARTMENT TO TRY TO MAKE
02:03:38
THINGS WORK MORE SMOOTHLY AND
02:03:39
TO TRY TO MOVE THINGS ALONG AND
02:03:41
THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF US
02:03:45
SUPPORTING THAT EFFORT.
02:03:46
SO, THANK YOU FOR GOING THROUGH
02:03:48
ALL THE TROUBLE TO BRING BACK
02:03:50
ALL OF THIS INFORMATION. I'M
02:03:51
SURE YOU HAD OTHER THINGS TO
02:03:55
DO, BUT AS USUALLY YOU BROUGHT
02:04:05
US THE BEST PRICE AND BEST
02:04:07
CONTRACT.
02:04:08
>> ROLL CALL, PLEASE.
02:04:12
>>CLERK: [ROLL CALL]
02:04:30
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR: YES,
02:04:32
THAT PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.
02:04:33
I'M GOING TO THE CONSENT
02:04:35
CALENDAR. WE ARE GOING TO GET
02:04:38
THROUGH ALL THE ITEMS FIRST
02:04:39
UNLESS SOMEONE WANTS TO PULL AN
02:04:43
ITEM FOR DISCUSSION.
02:04:46
COUNCIL MEMBER JAIN?
02:04:47
>>COUNCIL MEMBER SUDSHANSHU
02:04:52
JAIN: I THINK STAFF HAD
02:04:53
CLARIFICATION ON B AND I WOULD
02:04:55
LIKE TO PULL 7 H AND 7 J.
02:05:01
>> OKAY. H IS SOMETHING THAT
02:05:04
HAS TO GO TONIGHT. SO WE'LL,
02:05:06
WHEN WE COME BACK, WE'LL COME
02:05:12
BACK TO THAT ONE FIRST.
02:05:14
>>COUNCIL MEMBER ANTHONY
02:05:15
BECKER: YEAH, I WOULD LIKE TO
02:05:16
MAKE A MOTION FOR THE REMAINING
02:05:18
BALANCE.
02:05:19
>> OKAY, WE HAVE A MOTION FOR
02:05:21
THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT
02:05:25
AGENDA.
02:05:27
>> SECOND.
02:05:29
>> MAYOR GILMOR, I AM MAKING
02:05:33
CLARIFICATION TO ITEM 7B FOR
02:05:35
SEPTEMBER 8TH MINUTES WHICH WAS
02:05:37
THE JOINT MEETING. COUNCIL
02:05:42
MEMBER JAIN'S RECUSAL WAS
02:05:43
DIRECTLY NOTED IN THE MEETING.
02:05:46
THE RECUSAL WILL REFLECT THAT
02:05:47
IT WAS NOT DUE TO HIS PROPERTY
02:05:50
THAT WAS CLOSE TO THE DOWNTOWN
02:05:55
BUT RATHER HIS WIFE'S FORMER
02:05:58
EMPLOYER AT SANTA CLARA
02:05:59
UNIVERSITY. THAT WILL BE
02:06:00
REFLECTED IN THE MINUTES.
02:06:01
>> THANK YOU FOR NOTING THAT
02:06:03
CORRECTION. WE HAVE
02:06:11
A MOTION AND SECOND.
02:06:13
ANY MEMBER FROM THE PUBLIC
02:06:14
WOULD LIKE TO PULL AN ITEM FROM
02:06:15
THE CONSENT CALENDAR OR MAKE A
02:06:18
COMMENT ON ANY ITEM? DID WE
02:06:21
HAVE ANY WRITTEN COMMENTS,
02:06:22
ASSISTANT CITY CLERK ON THE
02:06:24
CONSENT CALENDAR?
02:06:25
>>CLERK: I DO NOT SEE ANY
02:06:27
COMMENTS ON THE CONSENT
02:06:28
CALENDAR.
02:06:29
>> OKAY, WE HAVE A MOTION AND
02:06:34
SECOND FOR THE BALANCE ON THE
02:06:41
CONSENT CALENDAR WITH 7B AND 7
02:06:47
H.
02:06:49
WITH 7B CORRECTION.
02:06:52
>>CLERK: [ROLL CALL]
02:07:06
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR: YES,
02:07:09
THANK YOU.
02:07:10
THAT PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.
02:07:11
NOW I'M GOING TO PUBLIC
02:07:12
PRESENTATIONS AND COME BACK TO
02:07:15
7H, AND THEN GO TO 9, AND START
02:07:18
THE AGENDA FROM THE BEGINNING.
02:07:21
AFTER 9, WE'VE COMPLETED ALL
02:07:22
THE THINGS THAT WE HAVE TO DO
02:07:24
FOR THIS EVENING BECAUSE WE
02:07:26
HAVE TO MAKE SURE THOSE GET
02:07:28
DONE.
02:07:29
LET'S GO TO PUBLIC
02:07:31
PRESENTATIONS.
02:07:32
ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC HAS A
02:07:33
PUBLIC PRESENTATION ON AN ITEM
02:07:35
THAT IS NOT ON THE AGENDA.
02:07:38
ASSISTANT CITY CLERK, DO YOU
02:07:42
HAVE ANY?
02:07:43
>>CLERK: I ACTUALLY HAVE ONE.
02:07:44
THIS IS A PUBLIC COMMENT EMAIL.
02:07:49
SUBMITTED BY LEE BROMAN.
02:07:51
DEAR MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL, I
02:07:53
CONTINUE TO SEE GLARING
02:07:55
EXAMPLES OF LACK OF GOVERNANCE
02:07:59
AND CITY STAFF THINK ITS IT'S
02:08:02
OWN CITY STAFF AND CITY COUNCIL
02:08:05
MEMBERS CONTINUE TO FLOOD THE
02:08:06
COUNCIL MEETING WITH THEIR OWN
02:08:08
AGENDA WITH LITTLE REGARD FOR
02:08:11
THE STAFF COST AND TIME TO THE
02:08:13
CITY AND I SUPPORT THE MAYOR
02:08:20
AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBER
02:08:26
WATANABE. THE FIVE CITY COUNCIL
02:08:28
MEMBERS SHOULD NOT BE MEETING
02:08:30
WITHOUT PUBLIC INPUT. THE CITY
02:08:34
COUNCIL SHOULD REPRESENT THE
02:08:35
CITY'S INTEREST BUT I HAVE
02:08:40
NOTED THE COUNCIL MAJORITY HAVE
02:08:44
STOPPED SEEKING REVENUE
02:08:48
INTEREST IF THE 49ERS ARE IN
02:08:50
AGREEMENT AND THEY HAVE BROKEN
02:08:53
THE COMMENTS AND NOT PROTECTING
02:08:55
THE RESIDENTS. WHY SHOULD THE
02:08:57
COUNCIL TRUST THEM AND THIS
02:09:04
SEEMS UNETHICAL.
02:09:06
THAT'S ALL I HAVE, MAYOR.
02:09:08
>> COUNCIL MEMBER BECKER?
02:09:09
>>COUNCIL MEMBER ANTHONY
02:09:12
BECKER: CAN SUE JUMP IN OR THE
02:09:15
CITY MANAGER WHERE I WAS
02:09:17
REQUESTING TO SPEAK OR
02:09:19
ACKNOWLEDGE OR CORRECT AN
02:09:20
ISSUE.
02:09:21
>> I CAN HELP.
02:09:22
>>CITY MANAGER DEANNA J.
02:09:24
SANTANA: COUNCIL MEMBER BECKER
02:09:26
REQUESTED THAT WE ADVISE HIM ON
02:09:28
MAKING PUBLIC CLARIFICATIONS TO
02:09:29
COMMENTS ON MATTERS THAT HAVE
02:09:31
BEEN RECENTLY REFLECTED IN THE
02:09:34
SANTA CLARA NEWS AND ROBERT
02:09:36
HAW. HE IS GOING TO MAKE A
02:09:39
PRESENTATION UNDER PUBLIC
02:09:40
PRESENTATION AT HIS OPTION. WE
02:09:41
HAVE PROVIDED TWO OPTIONS TO
02:09:43
HIM AND AS MAKING A
02:09:45
PRESENTATION UNDER PUBLIC
02:09:47
PRESENTATION HE IS MAKING A
02:09:48
PRESENTATION AS A MEMBER OF THE
02:09:50
PUBLIC WHICH ARE HIS OWN AND
02:09:53
THAT HAS BEEN CONFIRMED BY SUE
02:09:55
TO COUNCIL MEMBER BECKER.
02:09:57
DID WE MISS ANYTHING, COUNCIL
02:10:01
MEMBER BECKER?
02:10:02
>> THAT'S IT.
02:10:03
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR:
02:10:04
INSTEAD OF WAITING FOR COUNCIL
02:10:05
MEMBER REPORTS, YOU WANT TO DO
02:10:07
IT UNDER THIS, COUNCIL MEMBER
02:10:10
BECKER? BECAUSE OTHERWISE YOU
02:10:11
ARE GOING TO BE SUBJECT TO THE
02:10:13
3 MINUTES.
02:10:14
>>COUNCIL MEMBER ANTHONY
02:10:15
BECKER: YOU KNOW WHAT
02:10:16
CONSIDERING WHAT THE CITY
02:10:17
MANAGER JUST SAID, I DON'T
02:10:18
THINK IT'S THE PROPER TIME TO
02:10:19
SPEAK ABOUT IT AT THIS TIME SO
02:10:21
I WILL WAIT UNTIL LATER.
02:10:23
>> SO YOU CAN COMMIT TO COUNCIL
02:10:26
MEMBER COMMENTS? ALL RIGHT.
02:10:27
THANK YOU. I DON'T SEE ANY
02:10:28
OTHER MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC.
02:10:30
LET'S GO BACK TO ITEM 7H UNDER
02:10:34
THE CONSENT CALENDAR. THAT IS
02:10:37
ACTION, COUNCIL MEMBER JAIN,
02:10:39
ACTION ON A RESOLUTION
02:10:40
DELEGATING AUTHORITY TO THE
02:10:41
CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE NATURAL
02:10:43
GAS PURCHASE CONTRACTS AND
02:10:45
RELATED DOCUMENTS FOR DELIVERY
02:10:49
TO 2034.
02:10:50
>> COUNCIL MEMBER JAIN, YOU
02:10:51
PULLED THAT?
02:10:52
>>COUNCIL MEMBER SUDSHANSHU
02:10:53
JAIN: YES, I DID.
02:10:56
THIS ITEM GIVES THE CITY
02:11:03
MANAGER THE AUTHORITY TO A
02:11:12
CONTRACT FOR 40,000 MILLION
02:11:13
BTU'S OF NATURAL GAS TO 2034.
02:11:15
AND WE KNOW WITH S. B. 100 AND
02:11:21
WITH OUR RECENTLY ADOPTED
02:11:24
COUNCIL GOALS OF 80% CARBON
02:11:26
REDUCTION BY 2035, THAT WE
02:11:28
SHOULD BE MOVING OFF OF NATURAL
02:11:31
GAS, AND I UNDERSTAND THAT
02:11:33
HAVING LONG-TERM CONTRACTS
02:11:35
GIVES US THE BEST PRICE, BUT
02:11:42
THOSE LONG-TERM CONTRACTS ALSO
02:11:44
OBLIGATE US TO PURCHASING A
02:11:46
CERTAIN AMOUNT OF NATURAL GAS
02:11:47
TO GET THOSE GOOD PRICES. THE
02:11:49
LONGER THE CONTRACT, THE BETTER
02:11:51
PRICES. BUT IT DOESN'T MAKE
02:11:52
SENSE TO ME THAT WE HAVE A
02:11:55
FIXED AMOUNT ALL THE WAY TO
02:12:00
2034.
02:12:01
SO I WOULD LIKE TO UNDERSTAND
02:12:02
HOW MUCH WE ARE CURRENTLILY
02:12:05
USING AND I ALREADY ASKED THIS
02:12:09
QUESTION OF STAFF. FOR EACH OF
02:12:12
OUR FACILITIES THAT WOULD BE
02:12:18
DON, THE COGENERATION AND LEC.
02:12:29
I WOULD LIKE US TO COMMIT TO
02:12:31
HAVE A DECLINING AMOUNT OF
02:12:33
NATURAL GAS USE TO MEET THE
02:12:36
OBLIGATIONS UNDER S. B. 100.
02:12:37
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR: DO WE
02:12:38
HAVE THE CITY MANAGER OR
02:12:40
DIRECTOR OF THE ELECTRIC
02:12:43
UTILITY MANUEL, DOES SOMEONE
02:12:46
WANT TO ADDRESS THIS?
02:12:47
>>CITY MANAGER DEANNA J.
02:12:48
SANTANA: MANUEL IS ABLE TO
02:12:49
RESPOND.
02:12:50
>> THANK YOU.
02:12:51
>> CAN YOU HEAR ME?
02:12:53
>> YES, WE CAN.
02:12:56
>> GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND THE
02:13:00
COUNCIL. I'M MANUEL PINEDA.
02:13:05
I WANT TO NOTE THE 40,000 IS
02:13:10
NOT IN AGREEMENT, IT'S THE
02:13:12
ABILITY TO ENTER INTO AFTERNOON
02:13:14
AGREEMENT. TO GIVE YOU A
02:13:15
PERSPECTIVE, RIGHT NOW WE HAVE
02:13:17
THREE AGREEMENTS FOR PURCHASES.
02:13:19
ONE IS FOR 5,000, THE OTHER ONE
02:13:22
FOR 10,000 AND THE OTHER FOR
02:13:24
5,000. THE 40,000 IS NOT A
02:13:26
REQUIREMENT, IT'S NOT AN
02:13:27
AGREEMENT WE ARE ENTERING INTO.
02:13:29
IT'S JUST GIVING US
02:13:31
FLEXIBILITY.
02:13:32
WITH REGARD TO THE FACILITY,
02:13:33
DBR AND THIS IS I BELIEVE FOR
02:13:36
OCTOBER. WE CAN'T GIVE YOU
02:13:39
EXACTLY WHAT'S HAPPENING TODAY.
02:13:41
THE AVERAGE OF BTR IS ABOUT
02:13:47
20,000, THE AVERAGE IS 1750 AND
02:13:52
THE AVERAGE IS 2100 FOR 3500.
02:13:55
TYPICALLY WE END UP BETWEEN 40
02:13:58
AND 30,000 BUT WE DON'T HEDGE
02:14:01
ON 30 OR 40,000 TYPICALLY. AS
02:14:02
YOU CAN TELL RIGHT NOW WE ARE
02:14:05
HEDGED FOR ABOUT 20,000, FOR
02:14:06
ABOUT HALF OF THAT AND THE REST
02:14:09
WE EITHER PURCHASE ON THE SPOT
02:14:13
MARKET OR LOOK FOR
02:14:16
ADDITIONAL PURCHASES IN THE
02:14:18
FUTURE.
02:14:19
COMBROO WANT TO NOTE THAT
02:14:20
OBVIOUSLY SBC HAS DONE A GREAT
02:14:22
JOB OF MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS
02:14:23
OF THE STATE AND OF COURSE ANY
02:14:27
POLICY DECISIONS THE COUNCIL
02:14:28
MAKES WILL SEE THOSE AS WELL AN
02:14:31
THE STAFF DOES A WONDERFUL JOB
02:14:35
OF DOING THAT.
02:14:38
TODAY I HAD MY MONTHLY
02:14:41
RESOURCES PG & E MEETING AND WE
02:14:43
GO THROUGH GAS PRICES AND WHERE
02:14:45
WE ARE AT.
02:14:46
I HAVE THE SLIDE IF IT COMES
02:14:50
UP.
02:14:51
INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH WE SEE HOW
02:14:52
OUR HEDGING IS DOING AND THE
02:14:56
ACTUAL PRICE. WE ARE SAVING
02:14:59
ABOUT $25 MILLION BY THE
02:15:03
CONTRACTS THAT WE ENTERED INTO.
02:15:06
IT'S GIVING US FLEXIBILITY AND
02:15:09
STAFF IS COMMITTED AND AHEAD OF
02:15:10
THE CURVE ON THE REQUIREMENTS
02:15:13
AND WE DO THE MODEL AS IT
02:15:16
RELATES TO THE GAS WE WILL
02:15:18
NEED. WE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THE
02:15:19
ABILITY TO GO TO THE 40,000
02:15:24
BECAUSE THAT'S WHERE WE HAVE
02:15:26
BEEN AT WE HAVE WON'T BUY
02:15:28
SOMETHING WE DON'T NEED AND IF
02:15:30
WE DON'T NEED IT, WE WILL SELL
02:15:33
IT BACK TO THE MARKET AND IT
02:15:39
KEEPS THE PRICES LOW. WE ARE
02:15:42
PRETTY HAPPY AND WE KEEP TRACK
02:15:44
OF IT EVERY MONTH AND WE SAVED
02:15:47
AROUND $26 MILLION BASED ON THE
02:15:50
CURRENT MARKET. IT'S A LITTLE
02:15:52
BIT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO
02:15:54
CLARIFY SOME POINTS. THAT
02:15:55
ANSWERS THE QUESTION ABOUT HOW
02:15:57
MUCH EACH ONE USES AND OF
02:15:58
COURSE COMMITTING TO THE
02:16:01
REQUIREMENTS AND THAT IS THERE.
02:16:02
WE HAVE THE TEAM THAT DOES
02:16:06
THAT. ULTIMATELY, THE STAFF
02:16:11
HOLDS THE MODELING AND SHOWS
02:16:12
SAVINGS FOR THE FUTURE AS WELL.
02:16:17
AS A REMINDER, DBR BONDS RUN TO
02:16:22
2022 AND LBC BONDS RUN TO 2040.
02:16:30
WILL THIS CONCLUDES MY
02:16:31
PRESENTATION.
02:16:32
I'M AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS.
02:16:36
>> THANK YOU, MR. PINEDA FOR
02:16:38
THE UPDATE. THE ONLY QUESTION
02:16:39
IDENTIFY IS DO THEY HAVE ANY
02:16:41
MINIMUM LET'S SAY IN A MONTH OR
02:16:44
A CRITICAL TIME PERIOD WHERE
02:16:46
OUR RISING OF HEDGING IS NOT
02:16:49
GOOD FOR THE CURRENT PRICING.
02:16:50
DO WE HAVE A MINIMUM LIKE 5,000
02:16:53
OR 2,000? BECAUSE WE ARE ONLY
02:16:58
ASKING UP TO ONLY 10,000?
02:17:00
>> THERE IS NO MINIMUM.
02:17:02
>> WE DO NOT BUY ANYTHING FOR A
02:17:10
PARTICULAR.
02:17:11
>> THE MARKET IS AND THERE IS
02:17:20
NO MINIMUM. ONE IS 5,000 AND
02:17:30
10,000. THE 40,000 IS BASED ON
02:17:31
THE PLANS THAT WE HAVE TO
02:17:34
SERVE. WE ONLY BUY WHAT WE NEED
02:17:37
AND NO MINIMUM. IT'S BASED ON
02:17:38
THE MARKET RATE AT THAT TIME.
02:17:41
>> IT'S BASICALLY A WIN-WIN
02:17:43
SITUATION. THE PRICING, IF WE
02:17:44
ARE GETTING IT, IN THE MARKET
02:17:46
IF IT'S LOWER, WE CAN BUY THAT
02:17:48
OTHERWISE WE HAVE A LONG-TERM
02:17:50
CONTRACT.
02:17:51
>> THAT'S WHAT WE TRY TO DO.
02:17:53
OBVIOUSLY ANYTIME YOU HEDGE
02:17:54
THERE IS A RISK BECAUSE YOU ARE
02:17:55
BUYING AT A FUTURE PRICE AND IF
02:17:57
THE PRICE GOES DOWN FROM WHERE
02:18:00
YOU BOUGHT IT, IT'S NOT GOOD.
02:18:02
WE TRACK IT EVERY MONTH TO SEE
02:18:05
HOW OUR NUMBERS ARE DOING. WE
02:18:07
ARE DOING PRETTY GOOD RIGHT NOW
02:18:08
BUT THERE IS ALWAYS A RISK.
02:18:10
STAFF HAS ALWAYS BEEN VERY
02:18:12
SUCCESSFUL AND WE ARE
02:18:13
CONSERVATIVE AND WE ARE TRYING
02:18:15
TO PICK THOSE POINTS AND WE
02:18:16
KNOW WHAT WE NEED SO WE ARE NOT
02:18:19
OVER BUYING AND UNDER BUYING
02:18:20
AND TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHERE
02:18:23
THE MARKETS ALREADY. I DO WANT
02:18:26
TO ACKNOWLEDGE, THERE IS A
02:18:28
HEDGE AND ALWAYS ASSOCIATED
02:18:31
WITH IT.
02:18:32
>> I DON'T GET IT BECAUSE IF WE
02:18:34
DO NOT HAVE A MINIMUM, WE
02:18:35
SHOULDN'T BE AT RISK. WE ARE
02:18:38
NOT BUYING THIS PER MONTH, PER
02:18:46
DAY. BUT IF THE PRICE COMES
02:18:48
DOWN.
02:18:49
>> LET ME ANSWER THAT. WE ARE
02:18:51
NOT ENTERING INTO AN AGREEMENT
02:18:53
TO 40,000 RIGHT NOW. THIS IS AN
02:18:56
AUTHORITY FOR THE CITY MANAGER
02:18:57
TO BE ABLE TO ENTER INTO AN
02:18:59
AGREEMENT. IT DOESN'T HAVE TO
02:19:02
BE 40,000, IT COULD BE 1,000,
02:19:07
10,000, 5,000. RIGHT NOW WE ARE
02:19:10
NOT MAKING A COMMITMENT. IT'S
02:19:12
JUST ASKING FOR AUTHORITY. ONCE
02:19:14
WE ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT, SAY
02:19:15
WE ARE GOING TO BUY THIS 5,000
02:19:20
FOR THE NEXT 3 YEARS, AT THIS
02:19:24
PRICE, THAT NEXT 5,000 WE ARE
02:19:26
COMMITTING. I WOULD LIKE TO
02:19:27
NOTE WE ARE TRACKING IT ON A
02:19:32
MONTHLY BASIS. THAT'S ONE OF
02:19:34
THE THINGS WE DO. WE DO SEE HOW
02:19:36
OUR HEDGING IS LINING UP WITH
02:19:39
THAT ACTUAL PURCHASE PRICE AT
02:19:40
THAT POINT. FOR 2022, IT'S
02:19:42
LOOKING PRETTY GOOD. WE ARE
02:19:43
OVER 20 MILLION IN THE
02:19:51
POSITIVE. IS ALWAYS A RISK AND
02:19:55
WE ARE TRYING TO BE
02:19:58
CONSERVATIVE AND WE ARE TRYING
02:19:59
TO WATCH THE MARKET AND WE CAN
02:20:01
SELL IT BACK TO THE MARKET.
02:20:05
>> WHAT IS THE TIME FOR
02:20:08
HEDGING, 1 YEAR, 2 MONTHS?
02:20:13
>> I DON'T HAVE THE DATES, ONE
02:20:17
FROM 2021 TO 2025, THE OTHER
02:20:21
ONE FROM 2022 TO 2025, THE
02:20:23
OTHER ONE TO 2026. IT COULD BE
02:20:29
SHORTER AND AVERAGE DEPEND ON
02:20:35
THE LENGTH AND BASED ON THE
02:20:39
MODELING AND IT'S SHOWING THAT
02:20:40
THE NEED WILL GO DOWN. OF
02:20:43
COURSE WE TRY TO GIVE OUR
02:20:47
RESIDENTS THE BEST INFORMATION
02:20:48
WE HAVE.
02:20:50
>> THANK YOU FOR THAT.
02:20:51
>> YES, THIS IS JUST THE
02:20:53
AUTHORITY. IT COULD BE 0. WE
02:20:56
COULD DECIDE NOT TO DO ANYTHING
02:20:57
FOR THE NEXT FEW YEARS.
02:20:59
>> GOT IT. THANK YOU.
02:21:00
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR:
02:21:03
COUNCIL MEMBER JAIN?
02:21:04
>>COUNCIL MEMBER SUDSHANSHU
02:21:05
JAIN: YEAH, I JUST WANTED TO
02:21:09
APPRECIATE THAT WE ARE SAVING
02:21:12
$25 MILLION THROUGH THESE
02:21:14
CONTRACTS. I BELIEVE THESE
02:21:15
LONG-TERM CONTRACTS DO GIVE US
02:21:17
ADVANTAGE, AND I'M PLEASE TODAY
02:21:18
SEE THAT WE HAVE A STRONG
02:21:21
COMMITMENT TO MEETING OUR
02:21:22
OBLIGATION. SO I WOULD LIKE TO
02:21:24
MOVE ADOPTION OF THIS
02:21:26
RESOLUTION.
02:21:28
>> THAT'S A MOTION FOR ADOPTING
02:21:30
THE RESOLUTION. WE HAVE A
02:21:35
SECOND.
02:21:36
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION?
02:21:37
IS THERE ANY MEMBER OF THE
02:21:38
PUBLIC THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK
02:21:41
ON THIS? OKAY, SEEING NONE,
02:21:42
WE'LL COME BACK.
02:21:44
IF THERE IS NO OTHER COUNCIL
02:21:47
COMMENTS, CITY CLERK,
02:21:51
>> ROLL CALL, PLEASE.
02:21:56
>>CLERK: [ROLL CALL]
02:22:07
>> YES, AND THAT PASSES
02:22:08
UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU SO MUCH
02:22:10
FOR YOUR EXPLANATION ON THIS.
02:22:11
ALL RIGHT. I'M MOVING ALONG TO
02:22:12
OUR ITEMS WE HAVE TO GET
02:22:14
COMPLETED. WE ARE GOING NOW TO
02:22:17
ITEM NO. 9.
02:22:20
>> THAT IS ACTION ON FISCAL
02:22:41
YEAR 2021 BUDGET YEAR-END
02:22:43
REPORT AND APPROVE THE RELATED
02:22:45
BUDGET AMENDMENTS.
02:22:46
>>CITY MANAGER DEANNA J.
02:22:47
SANTANA: YES, WE WANT TO SPEND
02:22:52
A LITTLE BIT TIME TO GO OVER
02:22:55
THE PRESENTATION.
02:22:56
>> THANK YOU, CITY MANAGER.
02:22:58
DIRECTOR LEE, WELCOME.
02:22:59
>> THANK YOU, HONORABLE MAYOR
02:23:02
AND CITY COUNCIL.
02:23:04
KEN LEE, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE. I
02:23:06
APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO
02:23:10
PRESENT THIS ITEM. THE CLOSE
02:23:13
OUT OF THE BUDGET YEAR FOR
02:23:16
2021. FOR EVERYONE'S
02:23:24
INFORMATION, FISCAL YEAR ENDING
02:23:26
JUNE 30, 2021.
02:23:28
I WILL PROVIDE A PRESENTATION
02:23:29
OF THE OVERVIEW OF THE RESULTS
02:23:31
AND SOME OF THE RECOMMENDED
02:23:32
ADJUSTMENTS THAT ARE INCLUDED
02:23:33
IN THE REPORT AND AS WE LOOK,
02:23:35
WE HAVE OUR FORECAST AND OUR
02:23:38
BUDGET DEVELOPMENT AND FILLING
02:23:39
THIS IN ON WHERE WE ARE AT FOR
02:23:43
THAT JOURNEY.
02:23:44
WITH REGARDS TO THE FINANCIAL
02:23:49
PERFORMANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR
02:23:51
2021. IT CONTINUES TO BE
02:23:55
DIRECTED BY 2019 AND WE HAD A
02:23:59
PARTIAL IMPACT. REVENUES WERE
02:24:00
SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACTED WITH THE
02:24:02
LOSS OF THE TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY
02:24:07
TAX AND EXPENDITURES WERE ALSO
02:24:09
DOWN WITH ACTIVITIES AND
02:24:10
PROGRAMS OFFERED AS WELL AS OUR
02:24:12
COST CONTROLS THAT HAVE BEEN
02:24:14
PUT IN PLACE ADMINISTRATIVELY.
02:24:16
THE BUDGET ADJUSTED TO ACCOUNT
02:24:18
FOR IMPACTS AS PART OF THE
02:24:21
MARCH REBALANCING AT THAT TIME.
02:24:23
I HAD SAID THAT REVENUES WERE
02:24:25
GOING TO BE DOWN ABOUT $23
02:24:27
MILLION OR SO AND WE DID SOLVE
02:24:33
ABOUT $17 MILLION OF THAT. IN
02:24:35
THIS REPORT AS WE HAD PROJECTED
02:24:37
IN MARCH, WE ENDED THE YEAR
02:24:40
SHORT IN OUR REVENUES.
02:24:43
FUNDS ON AN OVERALL BASIS
02:24:47
GENERALLY ENDED WITH
02:24:48
EXPECTATIONS THIS YEAR.
02:24:49
IN THIS REPORT, I DO WANT TO
02:24:52
POINT OUT SEVERAL ITEMS. THERE
02:24:54
ARE SEVERAL LONG ATTACHMENTS
02:24:56
AND VERY DETAILED SUMMARY OF
02:24:58
HOW THE GENERAL FUND PERFORMED
02:25:00
WITH THE REVENUE AND EXPENSE
02:25:01
SIDE AS WELL AS OTHER FUND
02:25:03
PERFORMANCE.
02:25:04
THIS REPORT RECONCILES THE
02:25:06
BUDGET ACTIONS AND RESULTED IN
02:25:09
A MODEST FUND BALANCE AT THE
02:25:10
END OF THE YEAR WHICH I WILL
02:25:13
GET INTO IN THE NEXT COUPLE
02:25:15
SLIDES AND THE RECOMMENDATIONS
02:25:16
ON THOSE ALLEGATIONS. IT DOES
02:25:18
INCLUDE IN ATTACHMENT 1 AND
02:25:21
ITEMIZATION OF THE BUDGET
02:25:23
APPROPRIATIONS THAT DID EXCEED
02:25:24
THEIR BUDGET FOR THE MOST PART
02:25:27
DUE TO TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE
02:25:32
AND TRACKING.
02:25:33
ITEMIZATION OF 21-22 BUDGET
02:25:35
AMENDMENTS ARE INCLUDED IN THIS
02:25:41
REPORT, ATTACHMENT 2, IT
02:25:44
INCLUDES LINE ITEMS OF CARRY
02:25:50
OVERS, DONATIONS AND GRANTS TO
02:25:51
CARRY OVER TO THIS YEAR.
02:25:54
WITH THE ADVICE OF OUR INTERNAL
02:26:00
CITY DORT AND GUIDELINES, WE
02:26:01
HAVE ESTABLISHED THE AMERICAN
02:26:05
RESCUE PLAN AND STIMULUS
02:26:06
DOLLARS. THIS IS FROM THE
02:26:07
COUNTY AND DID APPROVE THE USE
02:26:09
AND THE ALLOCATION OF THOSE
02:26:10
DOLLARS AND THE GENERAL FUND.
02:26:11
SO WE ARE JUST SEPARATING THAT
02:26:14
OUT FROM A REPORTING BASIS
02:26:17
BASED ON AUDITOR
02:26:18
RECOMMENDATIONS.
02:26:19
IN THE GENERAL FUND, WE ENDED
02:26:21
THE YEAR, THESE ARE GROSS
02:26:22
NUMBERS AND I WILL TALK ABOUT
02:26:24
SOME OF THE ADJUSTMENTS TO GET
02:26:26
TO THE TRUE NET NUMBERS. OUR
02:26:29
REVENUES ENDED THE YEAR ABOVE
02:26:33
BUDGET OF.4 MILLION AND THE
02:26:36
BUDGET BY $11.3 MILLION. A LOT
02:26:40
OF THOSE REVENUES AND EXPENSES
02:26:42
ENDED UP WITH THE DEVELOPMENT
02:26:45
PROGRAM AND PLANNING, FEE AREA,
02:26:49
WE SEGREGATE OUT INTO A
02:26:51
SEPARATE RESERVE. THOSE
02:26:52
ADJUSTMENTS ARE REQUIRED BASED
02:26:53
ON THE LEGAL USE OF THOSE FUNDS
02:26:57
AND THOSE TOTAL FUND ON A
02:27:00
MILLION DOLLARS.
02:27:01
THOSE WE TRUE UP WITH THE
02:27:02
CAPITAL PROJECTS WITH THE
02:27:04
DIFFERENT FUNDS. WE ARE
02:27:06
INCLUDING TRANSACTIONS THAT
02:27:08
WOULD RETURN FUND BALANCE BACK
02:27:10
TO THE CAPITAL PROJECT RESERVE
02:27:11
AND IN ORDER TO MEET THE
02:27:15
COUNCIL POLICY RESERVE FOR
02:27:16
CAPITAL PROJECTS AT $5 MILLION.
02:27:18
I DO WANT TO NOTE THAT'S A VERY
02:27:21
MODEST AMOUNT AS WE ENTER INTO
02:27:25
THE 2-YEAR CAPITAL BUDGET
02:27:26
DEVELOPMENT THAT WILL BE
02:27:28
PRESENTED TO THE COUNCIL EARLY
02:27:30
NEXT YEAR.
02:27:31
DURABLE FUND BALANCE IN THE
02:27:32
GENERAL FUND, THIS IS THE NET
02:27:34
OF THE REQUIRED ADJUSTMENTS OF
02:27:39
$3.3 MILLION AND TALK ABOUT
02:27:40
STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION AND HOW
02:27:42
THAT'S ALLOCATED. TYPICALLY AT
02:27:43
THIS PART OF THE TIME, IF THERE
02:27:45
ARE SURPLUS FUNDS FOR OTHER
02:27:58
RESERVES SUCH AS THE FUND BUT
02:28:00
THAT'S NOT INCLUDED THIS
02:28:02
TODAY'S REPORT.
02:28:03
ON THE REVENUE SIDE ON THE
02:28:04
GENERAL FUND, I TALKED ABOUT
02:28:05
OUR GROSS LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE
02:28:10
.4 MILLION ABOVE WITHIN THE
02:28:14
ESTIMATE, ABOVE.2% OF THE
02:28:18
BUDGET. AFTER THE REVENUES
02:28:20
BUDGET OUT, THE DEVELOPMENT
02:28:22
PROGRAM AND INTEREST EARNINGS
02:28:26
FROM OUR PENSION TRUST FUND AND
02:28:30
WERE AT BELOW BUDGET BY $6
02:28:32
MILLION. ROUGH LY THE SAME
02:28:37
NUMBER WE PROJECTED IN MARCH.
02:28:41
A VERY LOW PERFORMING MONTH
02:28:44
LARGELY DUE TO COVID- 19 AND
02:28:45
TALKS ABOUT THE TRANSIENT
02:28:51
OCCUPANCY TAX AND OTHER
02:28:52
ACTIVITIES, STADIUM ACTIVITIES
02:28:54
AND CLASSES WERE POSTPONED AND
02:28:59
RENTS.
02:29:00
HIGHER REVENUE PERFORMANCE AND
02:29:03
I WILL GET INTO THE SPECIFIC
02:29:07
NUMBERS AND THE SALES TAX AND
02:29:13
PROPERTY TAX AND INTEREST.
02:29:23
I WANT TO SPEND A MOMENT ON
02:29:25
THIS SLIDE AND SHOW THE GENERAL
02:29:28
CATEGORIES. I WANTED TO SHOW
02:29:31
18-19 ON THIS COLUMN BECAUSE
02:29:32
THAT WAS THE LAST YEAR
02:29:34
PRECOVERED. WE DID HAVE SOME
02:29:36
COVID IMPACTS IN FISCAL YEAR
02:29:38
19/20 AND THE FULL EFFECT OF
02:29:41
COVID IN 20/21. AS YOU CAN SEE
02:29:43
THE PROPERTY TAX CONTINUE TO
02:29:45
PERFORM WELL, 5% GROWTH EVERY
02:29:48
YEAR.
02:29:49
SALES TAX, 1.6% GROWTH FROM THE
02:29:51
PRIOR YEAR, HOWEVER STILL
02:29:53
REMAIN BELOW THE FULL YEAR
02:29:57
PRECOVID OF ACTIVITY.
02:29:59
STRONG PERFORMANCE FROM
02:30:02
CONTRIBUTIONS FROM OUR ELECTRIC
02:30:04
UTILITY REFLECTING HIGHER
02:30:06
USAGE. THEN THE SIGNIFICANT
02:30:07
DROP IN THE TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY
02:30:09
TAX YEAR. END OF THE YEAR WITH
02:30:14
$2.9 MILLION COMPARED TO 22
02:30:18
$1/2 MILLION. OTHER FEES FOR
02:30:20
SERVICES HERE. THE $35 MILLION
02:30:23
OR SO ROUGHLY DOWN 15% HERE
02:30:25
YEAR OVER YEAR. WHEN YOU LOOK
02:30:26
AT THE NUMBERS COMPARED TO
02:30:29
PRECOVID LEVEL IS OVER $30
02:30:32
MILLION LOST IN JUST THOSE
02:30:33
CATEGORIES. SO A SIGNIFICANT
02:30:35
IMPACT TO OUR BUDGET.
02:30:37
P ON THE EXPENSE SIDE, BECAUSE
02:30:44
WE DID TAKE MEASURES TO CONTROL
02:30:47
OUR COST AND DUE TO THE
02:31:05
SHORTFALL AND THE MODEST FUND
02:31:08
AND END OF YEAR BALANCE AND LED
02:31:16
TO THE ACTIVITIES AT OUR
02:31:19
STADIUM EVENTS.
02:31:23
THE ITEM BEFORE YOU DOES
02:31:25
INCLUDE HANDFUL OF ATTACHMENTS
02:31:27
TO REPORT ON THE DATA. AS I
02:31:30
MENTIONED EARLIER,
02:31:31
APPROPRIATIONS AND SEVERAL
02:31:32
FUNDS THAT HAVE EXCEEDED THE
02:31:34
APPROPRIATION CONTROL LIMIT IS
02:31:37
INCLUDED IN THE BUDGET
02:31:39
ATTACHMENTS FOR ATTACHMENT 1
02:31:44
AND FISCAL YEAR 21/22 BUDGET
02:31:46
ADJUSTMENTS WHICH INCLUDES
02:31:49
HUNDREDS OF TECHNICAL
02:31:50
TRANSACTIONS AROUND FUND
02:31:54
BALANCES AND PROJECTS AND
02:31:56
TRUEING UP AND REVENUES AND
02:31:59
APPROPRIATIONS. IT ALSO
02:32:04
INCLUDES FUND ADJUSTMENTS FOR
02:32:07
FUND BALANCE AND THE REQUIRED
02:32:09
RESERVES FOR USES AND THE FUND
02:32:12
BALANCE.
02:32:13
FROM THE NON-GENERAL FUND AREA,
02:32:14
LOOKING INTO THE CIP GRANTS,
02:32:16
DONATIONS AND OTHER FUNDS, WE
02:32:18
DO TRUE UP EVERY APPROPRIATION
02:32:21
IN THOSE FUNDS, EVERY PROJECT,
02:32:23
EVERY GRANT, EVERY DONATION AND
02:32:25
CARRY THOSE DOLLARS FORWARD.
02:32:27
THOSE ARE INCLUDED IN THE
02:32:31
ADJUSTMENTS BEFORE YOU.
02:32:32
TAKING THE LOOK AT THE FUND
02:32:34
BALANCE, I MENTIONED SOME OF
02:32:36
THE GROSS NUMBERS AND WE ENDED
02:32:40
THE YEAR ROUGHLY $8.8 MILLION
02:32:44
IN GROSS FUND BALANCE WHICH A
02:32:46
GOOD PORTION OF THAT IS
02:32:49
RESTRICTED AND $5.5 MILLION OF
02:32:52
REQUIRED ADJUSTMENTS MAINLY
02:32:57
GOING TO OUR THREE PROGRAMS AND
02:32:59
USING THE FUND BALANCE.
02:33:02
AS FAR AS REQUIRED ADJUSTMENTS,
02:33:05
OUR BUILDING SERVICES PROGRAMS
02:33:06
AND REVENUES THAT EXCEED THE
02:33:09
BUDGET AND THE EXPENDITURE
02:33:11
SAVINGS AND WE ALLOCATED THAT
02:33:15
TO A BUILD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
02:33:17
FUND WITH THE FUND BALANCE WITH
02:33:18
THE TRANSFER THERE AND FROM A
02:33:21
PLANNING PERSPECTIVE AND THAT
02:33:30
RESERVE OF.7 MILLION AND TRUED
02:33:35
UP THE BUDGET STABILIZATION
02:33:37
WITH $5 MILLION ADJUSTMENTS TO
02:33:40
TECHNICALLY ADJUST THAT
02:33:41
RESERVE.
02:33:42
THEN WITH REGARDS TO THE $3.3
02:33:45
MILLION OF THE FUND BALANCE
02:33:49
THAT IS AVAILABLE, OUR
02:33:51
RECOMMENDATIONS BEFORE YOU
02:33:53
INCLUDE AN ADJUSTMENT FOR ADA
02:33:55
IMPROVEMENTS AS PART OF A
02:33:57
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT THAT IS
02:33:58
REQUIRED BY THE CITY TO PERFORM
02:34:00
WITHIN A RELATIVELY SHORT TIME.
02:34:02
SO BASED ON THE LATEST
02:34:11
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE TO ALLOCATE
02:34:13
THE $1.1 MILLION FOR THE LATEST
02:34:18
ESTIMATES.
02:34:19
I TALKED ABOUT THE CAPITAL
02:34:20
POLICIES AS WE ENTER THE 2-YEAR
02:34:23
CAPITAL BUDGET FOR THE
02:34:25
DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. THIS IS A
02:34:26
VERY SMALL AMOUNT WITH REGARDS
02:34:28
TO OUR NEEDS. THE
02:34:29
RECOMMENDATION HERE IS TO FUND
02:34:30
THAT RESERVE UP TO THAT POLICY
02:34:34
AND THEN SUBSEQUENT BUDGETS
02:34:36
WILL CONSIDER THE ALLOCATIONS
02:34:38
OF THAT.
02:34:39
THE THIRD LINE ITEM HERE. THE
02:34:41
COVID- 19 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND
02:34:42
COMMUNITY RESPONSE. THIS IS A
02:34:44
SEPARATE FUND, A SEPARATE
02:34:45
ALLOCATION WHERE WE ARE
02:34:47
TRACKING ALL THE COSTS RELATED
02:34:48
TO THE PANDEMIC AND ATTEMPTING
02:34:51
TO GET REIMBURSEMENTS FROM
02:34:53
FEMA, BUT IT WILL TAKE YEARS
02:34:55
AND YEARS AND A LOT OF
02:35:00
DOCUMENTATION IN ORDER TO
02:35:01
ACHIEVE ANY KIND OF
02:35:02
REIMBURSEMENT, BUT IN THE
02:35:03
MEANTIME, WE DO NEED TO
02:35:06
CONTINUE TO FUND THOSE
02:35:07
ACTIVITIES AND THIS IS A MODEST
02:35:12
AMOUNT OF A MILLION VERSUS $3.3
02:35:16
MILLION ON THE EXPENSES WE
02:35:19
SPENT LAST YEAR.
02:35:20
THEN WE HAVE TO ALLOCATE THE
02:35:24
SET ASIDE FUNDS TO COUNCIL
02:35:26
INITIATIVES. THERE WERE SEVERAL
02:35:27
INITIATIVES THAT HAVE BEEN ON
02:35:28
THE PRIORITY SETTING LIST AS
02:35:30
WELL AS DISCUSSED AND DIRECTED
02:35:32
AT VARIOUS CITY COUNCIL
02:35:35
MEETINGS. SO, SOME OF THOSE
02:35:37
ITEMS ARE HERE LISTED ON THIS
02:35:41
SLIDE. THE NEED HOWEVER FOR
02:35:44
THOSE ITEMS ARE IN EXCESS OF
02:35:48
THE ALLOCATION, THE $400,000
02:35:51
ALLOCATION. SO STAFF'S
02:35:52
RECOMMENDATION HERE IS IF THERE
02:35:53
IS ANY DIRECTION FROM THE CITY
02:35:56
COUNCIL TO FUND SOME OF THESE
02:35:58
AT THIS TIME THAT'S AN OPTION
02:36:01
AND INCLUDED IN THE
02:36:02
RECOMMENDATION. HOWEVER, THE
02:36:03
CONTENTS OF THE BROADER POLICY
02:36:05
SETTING IN FEBRUARY AS WELL AS
02:36:07
THE BUDGET, IT'S RECOMMENDED
02:36:09
THAT SOME OF THOSE DISCUSSION
02:36:11
ITEMS IF THE COUNCIL SHOULD
02:36:13
CHOOSE, TO HAVE THE FULL
02:36:15
CONTEXT THAT THOSE DECISIONS
02:36:16
COULD BE CONSIDERED AS PART OF
02:36:20
THAT PRIORITY SETTING SESSION.
02:36:21
I DO WANT TO TALK ABOUT OUR
02:36:23
RESERVES ON THIS SLIDE AND HOW
02:36:25
WE ENDED THE YEAR FOR SOME OF
02:36:29
THE SELECT RESERVES.
02:36:30
THIS IS THE YEAR-ENDING
02:36:34
BALANCE. SO THE BUDGET
02:36:37
STABILIZATION RESERVES, THE
02:36:38
CAPITAL PROJECTS RESERVE, AND I
02:36:40
DO WANT TO NOTE FOR THE LAND
02:36:46
BUDGET AND 2-YEAR BUDGET
02:36:48
DOMINATED FOR JULY 1ST, THE
02:36:54
COUNCIL ADOPTED THAT BUDGET FOR
02:36:56
YEAR TWO. AS FAR AS THOSE
02:37:06
BUDGET RELATED ADJUSTMENT, WE
02:37:08
HAVE 2 YEARS VERSUS THE POLICY
02:37:11
LEVER OF 13%.
02:37:12
THE RECOMMENDATIONS BEFORE YOU
02:37:14
IS TO NOTE AND FILE BUDGETARY
02:37:17
YEAR-END REPORT, APPROVE THE
02:37:18
FISCAL YEAR TO 21 BUDGET
02:37:21
AMENDMENTS AND FISCAL YEAR 2122
02:37:23
BUDGET AMENDMENTS AND DIRECTION
02:37:25
OF ANY BY THIS CITY COUNCIL
02:37:28
REGARDING INITIATIVES TO BE
02:37:32
FUNDED BY THE $400,000
02:37:34
ALLOCATION INCLUDED IN THIS
02:37:35
REPORT AND I DO WANT TO MENTION
02:37:37
AS FAR AS NEXT STEPS, THIS IS
02:37:39
THE CLOSE OUT OF LAST YEAR. WE
02:37:41
ARE UNDERWAY WITH UPDATING OUR
02:37:45
10-YEAR FORECAST. I DO WANT TO
02:37:48
CAUTION THAT IN OUR FORECAST,
02:37:49
THE LAST YEAR WE WERE FACING
02:37:56
$17.6 MILLION WITH ON GOING
02:37:59
DEFICIT WITH DELTA AND THE
02:38:26
OMICRON VARIANT, WE WILL
02:38:28
SCHEDULE THE BUDGET FOR EARLY
02:38:30
MAY FOR COUNCIL DELIBERATIONS
02:38:31
LATER THIS FISCAL YEAR.
02:38:32
WITH THAT, I WILL PAUSE HERE
02:38:35
AND CITY STAFF AND AS WELL AS
02:38:40
MYSELF ARE AVAILABLE FOR
02:38:46
QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. WILL
02:38:57
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR: I WAS
02:39:00
MUTED. I'M SORRY.
02:39:03
THANK YOU DIRECTOR LEE.
02:39:04
>>CITY MANAGER DEANNA J.
02:39:05
SANTANA: IF YOU CAN JUST GO TO
02:39:06
THE SLIDE. I WANT TO BE CLEAR
02:39:10
FOR THE COUNCIL'S
02:39:11
UNDERSTANDING, IS THAT IN THE
02:39:12
REPORT YOU WILL SEE A LISTING
02:39:18
OF ALL THE DIFFERENT COUNCIL
02:39:33
ISSUES WHERE THERE IS
02:39:35
DIRECTIONS FOR FUNDING. AND I
02:39:36
KNOW YOU DIRECTED US TO COME
02:39:40
BACK WITH $115 FOR THE VISUAL
02:39:42
PLAN WHICH HAS BEEN ON THE
02:39:44
CAPITAL BUDGET LIST BEFORE. WE
02:39:45
NOTE IN THE MEMO THAT IT'S
02:39:47
ABOUT 80% OF WHAT YOU HAVE
02:39:49
AVAILABLE. SO I JUST WANT TO
02:39:51
HIGHLIGHT THAT FOR YOU IN THAT
02:39:52
IF YOU WANT TO MAINTAIN THAT
02:39:54
DIRECTION, THAT'S FINE. IF YOU
02:39:56
WANT TO LOOK AT THE 400,000 AS
02:40:02
AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVISIT
02:40:03
FEBRUARY 8TH WHEN WE COME BACK
02:40:05
WITH MORE INFORMATION AND THEN
02:40:07
YOU WILL HAVE THE BIGGER
02:40:12
PICTURE TO UNDERSTAND THE
02:40:14
COMPETING PRIORITIES FOR THE
02:40:15
BUDGET.
02:40:16
>> THANK YOU FOR THAT
02:40:17
CLARIFICATION AND THAT PUTS IT
02:40:18
INTO PERSPECTIVE.
02:40:19
COUNCIL MEMBER JAIN?
02:40:20
>>COUNCIL MEMBER SUDSHANSHU
02:40:21
JAIN: YES, THANK YOU, DIRECTOR
02:40:23
LEE.
02:40:27
I JUST WANTED TO ADVOCATE, I
02:40:29
BELIEVE THAT OF ALL OF THESE
02:40:30
INITIATIVES, MOST OF THEM I
02:40:32
THINK COULD WAIT UNTIL OUR
02:40:35
PRIORITY SETTING MEETING, BUT I
02:40:36
WOULD LIKE TO -- I BELIEVE IT
02:40:40
WAS $75,000 FOR THE HOMELESS
02:40:42
TASK FORCE, AND I WOULD LIKE TO
02:40:43
GET THAT STARTED AS SOON AS
02:40:47
POSSIBLE. VICE-MAYOR CHAHAL?
02:40:57
>>VICE MAYOR RAJ CHAHAL: I
02:40:58
WOULD JUST LIKE TO MAKE A
02:41:00
COMMENT.
02:41:01
THANK YOU FOR THE PRESENTATION.
02:41:02
AND I'M SO IMPRESSED WHEN YOU
02:41:05
MENTIONED THE VARIANTS THAT IS
02:41:09
PROJECTED FOR.1%. I KNOW IT
02:41:18
SHOWS THE DEPARTMENT THAT IS
02:41:21
REALLY GREAT WORK DONE BY THIS
02:41:23
CITY. THAT MEANS A LOT TO ME
02:41:27
AND YOUR TECHNICALITIES ON
02:41:28
THAT.
02:41:29
I KNOW THIS WAS A TOUGH YEAR
02:41:32
AND WE GOT OVER IT, AND
02:41:35
FORTUNATELY IT DIDN'T DO WHAT
02:41:42
WE THINK IT WERE.
02:41:44
I'M WORRIED ABOUT THE $6
02:41:47
MILLION UNDER PENSION LIABILITY
02:41:48
WE HAVE. BUT WHATEVER WE CAN
02:41:50
DO. I KNOW WE DON'T HAVE MUCH
02:41:56
FUNDING ON THAT. BUT HAVING
02:41:59
INCREASED THOSE AND I'M WORRIED
02:42:00
ABOUT THE AMOUNT OF THE
02:42:06
UNFUNDED LIABILITY WE HAVE.
02:42:09
AND SOME GOING FORWARD, I KNOW
02:42:11
THE REVENUE SOURCES AND I WILL
02:42:15
COME BACK AGAIN AND ONE OF THE
02:42:18
RESOURCES ON WHY THE
02:42:21
CORPORATION TAX BASICALLY AND
02:42:23
HOPEFULLY WE CAN PUT IT ON THE
02:42:26
NEXT YEAR BALLOT AND WE WIN
02:42:31
THAT. THE OTHER THING WAS
02:42:33
PRETTY DISTURBING AND BECAUSE
02:42:37
OF THE PANDEMIC THE TOT WAS
02:42:40
REALLY DOWN AND HOPEFULLY WE
02:42:41
CAN GET SOME NEW NUMBERS AND
02:42:43
IMPROVE OUR BUDGET.
02:42:44
ONE THING I NOTICED FOR SBP FOR
02:42:51
THE TOTAL REVENUES OF $485.6
02:42:53
MILLION WAS UP BY 5 MILLION
02:42:55
THAT WAS REALLY GREAT. NOT ONLY
02:43:03
THAT, OUR EXPENDITURES WE WERE
02:43:10
UP BY $35 MILLION AS WELL.
02:43:15
DIRECTOR PINEDA MENTIONED
02:43:16
EARLIER THE $30 MILLION THAT
02:43:18
ARE THE PRODUCTION SAVINGS OF
02:43:20
28 MILLION. SO I THINK THEY
02:43:21
HAVE DONE A WONDERFUL JOB AND
02:43:24
THAT ADDS TO THE REVENUE FROM
02:43:26
SBP. THOSE ARE MY COMMENTS. I
02:43:27
WILL BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO MAKE
02:43:30
A MOTION TO APPROVE THE STAFF'S
02:43:34
RECOMMENDATION. THANK YOU.
02:43:35
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR:
02:43:39
COUNCIL MEMBER WATANABE?
02:43:40
>>COUNCIL MEMBER KATHY
02:43:41
WATANABE: THANK YOU, MAYOR AND
02:43:44
THANK YOU FOR THE REPORT, KEN.
02:43:45
THIS IS A NICE WAY TO END THE
02:43:49
YEAR, AND IT'S NICE TO KNOW
02:43:50
THAT THERE IS MONEY IN THE BANK
02:43:53
AND TO SEE EVERYTHING THAT
02:43:54
WE'VE GONE THROUGH AS A CITY
02:43:57
OVER THE LAST 2 YEARS THAT BY
02:44:02
TIGHTENING BELTS AND WATCHING
02:44:04
THE PENNIES THAT THERE WERE
02:44:06
REVENUES ABOVE THE BUDGET THAT
02:44:10
WAS PLANNED AND THAT
02:44:11
EXPENDITURES WERE BELOW THE
02:44:14
BUDGET, SO REALLY KUDOS TO
02:44:16
EVERYBODY IN THE CITY THAT
02:44:18
HELPED MAKE THAT HAPPEN.
02:44:20
I AM GLAD TO KNOW THAT THERE IS
02:44:26
MONEY THAT COULD BE ALLOCATED
02:44:29
FOR COUNCIL INITIATIVES AND I
02:44:31
HAVE TO SAY I AGREE THAT I
02:44:33
THINK IT WOULD BE BEST TO CARRY
02:44:36
THAT OVER TO THE PRIORITY
02:44:39
SETTING SESSION.
02:44:40
TWO QUESTIONS OR MAYBE ONE
02:44:43
COMBINED.
02:44:44
CITY MANAGER, HAVE WE GOTTEN
02:44:45
ANY UPDATES REGARDING THE
02:44:49
INFRASTRUCTURE BILL OR THE BILL
02:44:51
THAT COULD BE POTENTIALLY USED
02:44:53
FOR SOME OF THESE INITIATIVES?
02:44:54
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR: LET'S
02:44:56
GET ALL THE QUESTIONS AND LET
02:44:58
STAFF ANSWER THEM.
02:44:59
>> THANK YOU AND THAT'S ALL I
02:45:00
HAVE AND I WILL BE HAPPY TO
02:45:04
SECOND THAT MOTION THAT IS
02:45:07
STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION. THANK
02:45:08
YOU.
02:45:09
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR: THANK
02:45:10
YOU. WE HAVE A MOTION AND
02:45:12
SECOND FOR STAFF'S
02:45:14
RECOMMENDATION.
02:45:15
COUNCIL MEMBER HARDY?
02:45:16
>> VICE-MAYOR HARDY: THE ONLY
02:45:19
QUESTION I HAVE IS THE $75,000
02:45:24
FOR THE HOMELESS. WOULD HOLDING
02:45:27
THAT TO FEBRUARY BE OKAY
02:45:29
BECAUSE THERE IS NOT A LOT WE
02:45:30
CAN DO OR WOULD IT MAKE ANY
02:45:32
DIFFERENCE IF THAT WAS
02:45:34
ALLOCATED NOW. THAT WOULD BE MY
02:45:35
QUESTION TO STAFF. THANK YOU.
02:45:36
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR: OKAY,
02:45:38
GOOD QUESTION, THANK YOU.
02:45:40
ANY OTHER COUNCIL MEMBER
02:45:43
QUESTIONS? GO AHEAD, CITY
02:45:45
MANAGER, DIRECTOR LEE?
02:45:46
>>CITY MANAGER DEANNA J.
02:45:47
SANTANA: I WILL START. THERE
02:45:51
ARE TWO LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS
02:45:52
WITH RESPECT TO FUNDS
02:45:53
AVAILABLE. THE FIRST IS THE
02:45:54
INFRASTRUCTURE BILL AND WE ARE
02:45:56
WORKING WITH OUR LOBBYIST TO
02:45:58
SORT THROUGH TO SEE WHAT SANTA
02:46:01
CLARA COUNTY OR SANTA CLARA
02:46:03
CITY MAY BE ELIGIBLE FOR. WE
02:46:05
ARE MONITORING THAT AND SHOULD
02:46:07
HAVE THAT REPORT BACK VERY
02:46:10
SOON.
02:46:11
THE SECOND ONE IS OVER THE
02:46:14
WEEKEND THE STATE IS LIKELY TO
02:46:16
END ITS PROJECT YEAR WITH ABOUT
02:46:20
A $30 BILLION SURPLUS. I HEARD
02:46:25
ANYWHERE FROM 30 TO 37 AND IF
02:46:27
YOU ASK CASEY, THERE IS 31. AND
02:46:30
THERE IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR
02:46:32
ADDITIONAL INVESTMENT BACK TO
02:46:33
LOCAL GOVERNMENT AS WELL AS
02:46:34
OTHER CITY SERVICES. WE ARE
02:46:36
WATCHING THOSE TWO ITEMS TO SEE
02:46:38
WHERE WE CAN LEVERAGE, AND AS
02:46:40
SOON AS WE HAVE INFORMATION,
02:46:42
WE'LL GET THAT INFORMATION
02:46:43
BACK.
02:46:44
IN TERMS OF THE HOMELESS
02:46:46
SHORT-TERM ACTION, WE ACTUALLY
02:46:48
RUSHED, I SENT AN EMAIL TO THE
02:46:50
COUNCIL. WE RUSHED TO GET OUR
02:46:52
PROPOSAL OUT AND WE ARE IN
02:46:54
PROCESS TO GO THROUGH THE
02:46:55
PROCUREMENT PROCESS AND WE
02:46:57
WANTED TO GET TO COUNCIL VERY
02:46:59
SOON FOR AWARD OF THE CONTRACT
02:47:02
FOR $75,000 TO START TO PUSH
02:47:09
SHORT-TERM TO THE COUNCIL THAT
02:47:12
YOU HAD EXPRESSED. WE WOULD BE
02:47:16
ABLE TO PROVIDE SERVICES DURING
02:47:19
THESE HARSH WINTER MONTHS IF WE
02:47:22
DON'T WAIT UNTIL FEBRUARY.
02:47:23
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR: VERY
02:47:24
GOOD. THANK YOU.
02:47:25
LET'S GO TO OUR PUBLIC MEMBERS
02:47:26
NOW TO SEE IF THERE IS ANY
02:47:28
MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC THAT WOULD
02:47:29
LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.
02:47:40
I DON'T SEE ANY.
02:47:41
ASSISTANT CITY CLERK, DO YOU
02:47:42
SEE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC?
02:47:45
>>CLERK: I DO NOT MAYOR AND I
02:47:48
HAVE NO WRITTEN COMMENTS.
02:47:49
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR: THANK
02:47:52
YOU VERY MUCH.
02:47:55
OKAY.
02:47:56
LAST CHANCE.
02:47:59
OKAY.
02:48:00
COUNCIL MEMBER HARDY?
02:48:01
>> WITH WHAT WAS JUST TOLD US,
02:48:03
I WONDER IF I CAN MAKE A
02:48:06
FRIENDLY MOTION ON THE TABLE TO
02:48:11
ALLOCATE $75,000 FOR SHORT-TERM
02:48:15
SITUATION FOR OUR HOMELESS
02:48:16
POPULATION.
02:48:17
>> THAT SOUNDS LIKE A GREAT
02:48:23
AMENDMENT.
02:48:25
>> COUNCIL MEMBER HARDY --
02:48:26
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR: EXCUSE
02:48:28
ME VICE-MAYOR, WHO MADE THE
02:48:30
MOTION?
02:48:31
>> I MADE THE MOTION.
02:48:33
>> THAT DO YOU ACCEPT THAT
02:48:36
AMENDMENT?
02:48:39
>> YES, I ACCEPT IT.
02:48:40
>> WHO WAS THE SECOND? COUNCIL
02:48:45
MEMBER WATANABE. THAT'S A
02:48:50
FRIENDLY AMENDMENT TO THE
02:48:54
MOMENT AND ACCEPTED. WE HAVE
02:48:57
STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION BUT TO
02:48:58
ADVANCE FOR THE HOMELESS BUDGET
02:49:01
FOR $75,000. THAT HAS A SECOND.
02:49:03
I WANT TO SAY, YES, I WILL BE
02:49:05
SUPPORTING THE MOTION. I THINK
02:49:07
THAT'S WONDERFUL. THANK YOU
02:49:08
DIRECTOR LEE, CITY MANAGER FOR
02:49:11
THAT REPORT.
02:49:12
I FOUND IT A LITTLE INTERESTING
02:49:16
THAT OF COURSE PROPERTY VALUES
02:49:21
ARE UP, SO TAXES ARE UP AND
02:49:24
STARTING TO SEE THE INCREASE IN
02:49:25
SALES TAX THAT HOPEFULLY WE'LL
02:49:28
BE RECOVERING SOON BECAUSE OUR
02:49:29
BIG ISSUE IS SALES TAX AND TOT.
02:49:33
I DON'T SEE THAT RECOVERING BUT
02:49:36
HOPEFULLY IN 2022 WE'LL BE
02:49:38
RECOVERING AND HOPEFULLY WE ARE
02:49:40
ON THE ROAD TO RECOVERY. THANK
02:49:43
YOU CITY MANAGER AND DIRECTOR
02:49:45
LEE FOR THE END OF YEAR
02:49:52
REPORT. ALTHOUGH I THINK NOT
02:49:53
EXACTLY WHAT WE WOULD LIKE TO
02:49:55
SEE BUT THANKFULLY YOU ARE
02:49:58
PROVIDING SAVINGS FOR THAT.
02:49:59
COUNCIL MEMBER, I WILL CALL FOR
02:50:01
THE VOTE. IS THERE ANYTHING
02:50:02
ELSE YOU WOULD LIKE TO SAY?
02:50:06
>> JUST A QUICK QUESTION.
02:50:07
IF YOU HAVE THE NUMBERS OF WHAT
02:50:10
WE GOT FROM 2021 FROM INTERNET
02:50:12
SALES, DOWN THE LINE THAT WILL
02:50:14
BE HELPFUL BECAUSE I THINK THAT
02:50:17
SHARE MIGHT HAVE INCREASED AND
02:50:18
REASON WE ARE ABLE TO GET MORE.
02:50:27
>> WE CAN INCLUDE THAT IN THE
02:50:30
NATIONAL NEXT REPORT.
02:50:41
>>CLERK: JUST TO RECAP. THAT IS
02:50:44
TO INCLUDE THE SHORT-TERM FUND
02:50:48
FOR THE HOMELESS FUND. IS THAT
02:50:53
CORRECT?
02:50:57
>> YES.
02:50:58
>> [ROLL CALL]
02:51:08
>> YES, THAT PASSES
02:51:09
UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU VERY
02:51:12
MUCH FOR THAT.
02:51:19
NOW WE HAVE COVERED EVERYTHING
02:51:21
WE NEEDED FOR THE EVENING. WE
02:51:22
WILL GO BACK TO THE AGENDA. WE
02:51:25
ARE GOING TO START WITH ITEM
02:51:29
5A.
02:51:43
INFORMATION AND UPDATE ON THE
02:51:47
ADD HOC COMMITTEE ON THE
02:51:49
APOLOGY LETTER RELATING TO THE
02:51:52
CITY'S CALIFORNIA VOTING RIGHTS
02:51:54
ACT LITIGATION.
02:51:55
>>CITY MANAGER DEANNA J.
02:51:56
SANTANA: YES, THE AD HOC
02:52:00
COMMITTEE HAD ITS FIRST
02:52:02
MEETING. IT'S BEEN A WHILE PUT
02:52:05
DURING THAT CONVERSATION THERE
02:52:08
WAS INTEREST IN EXPANDING THE
02:52:09
SCOPE OF THE ADD HOC COMMITTEE
02:52:12
TO APPROVING A CITY LOG THAT
02:52:15
HAD BEEN REFERENCED BY THE
02:52:16
COUNCIL BEFORE AND THERE WAS AN
02:52:18
EXPRESSION OF GETTING THAT MORE
02:52:21
COMPLETE FOR THE PUBLIC SO THE
02:52:27
INFORMATION REFLECTS THAT AS
02:52:28
THE COUNCIL MEMBERS AND THE
02:52:31
PURPOSE FOR PREPARING A LETTER
02:52:32
AND INTEREST IN COMMUNITY
02:52:34
ENGAGEMENT SO THAT COMMENTS
02:52:35
COULD BE REFUND WITH RESPECT TO
02:52:38
THE LETTER AND THE ACTION THAT
02:52:42
THE COUNCIL TOOK AND INTEGRATED
02:52:43
IT INTO THE LETTER AND WHATEVER
02:52:49
MANNER THAT COUNCIL MEMBER
02:52:51
BECKER SOUGHT INPUT. WITH THAT,
02:52:58
IT DID STAND THE SCOPE AND WE
02:53:01
WOULD NEED TO COME BACK BECAUSE
02:53:03
IT WOULD REQUIRE MUCH MORE
02:53:05
RESOURCES AND MAKING SURE THE
02:53:07
COUNCIL WAS OKAY WITH THE
02:53:10
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES.
02:53:11
>> OKAY, COUNCIL MEMBER BECKER,
02:53:13
PARK, YOU WERE ASSIGNED TO THIS
02:53:15
COMMITTEE. THE FLOOR IS YOURS.
02:53:17
>> THANK YOU, MAYOR.
02:53:19
SO, YEAH, I AGREE THAT I THINK
02:53:21
WE SHOULD EXTEND THIS. THERE IS
02:53:23
A LOT MORE TO COVER. I KNOW
02:53:25
THAT THERE IS SOME CONCERNS. I
02:53:27
ALSO HAD THERE IS A LOT OF
02:53:31
CONFIDENTIALITY STILL ON A LOT
02:53:33
OF THE CASE AND I HAVE BEEN
02:53:35
KIND OF CURIOUS ABOUT HOW WE
02:53:36
CAN GET THAT WAVED SOMEHOW
02:53:38
BECAUSE I THINK THIS IS
02:53:39
IMPORTANT THAT THE PUBLIC GETS
02:53:41
TO SEE. I THINK THE PUBLIC'S
02:53:43
RIGHT TO KNOW OUT WAYS
02:53:45
EVERYTHING ELSE. SO I REALLY
02:53:46
WANT THE PUBLIC TO BE ABLE TO
02:53:48
DO THIS. I REALLY WANT THE
02:53:50
PUBLIC TO BE MORE INVOLVED IN
02:53:52
THAT PROCESS. I THINK THOSE ARE
02:53:54
BASICALLY A LOT OF MY COMMENTS.
02:53:56
I KNOW IT'S BEEN A WHILE SINCE
02:53:58
IT HAPPENED AND AT LEAST OVER 2
02:54:01
MONTHS AND TRYING TO REFRESH MY
02:54:05
MEMORY AS I CAN. IF YOU WOULD
02:54:07
LIKE TO ADD ANYTHING ELSE IN
02:54:12
THERE TOO.
02:54:40
>> YES, I HAVE A FEW ISSUES. I
02:54:47
KNOW THAT VERY FEW PEOPLE
02:54:48
SHOWED YOU THE BECAUSE THERE
02:54:51
WAS NOT ENOUGH NOTICING AND
02:54:54
WITH THE LAWSUIT AND
02:54:55
REPERCUSSIONS TO OUR INTEREST
02:54:56
IN THE CITY WAS VERY IMPORTANT
02:54:58
TO THAT ACTION AND WE WANTED TO
02:55:00
BE SURE THAT WAS LAID STRAIGHT
02:55:03
PRIOR TO HAVING DISCUSSIONS
02:55:05
WITH THE PUBLIC.
02:55:06
COUNCIL MEMBER BECKER WANTED TO
02:55:09
POST AS ORIGINAL LETTER ONLINE
02:55:12
AND A LAWSUIT AND LINK TO THE
02:55:16
APOLOGY LETTER BEFORE WE
02:55:18
SOLICITED FROM THE PUBLIC AND
02:55:20
SCHEDULED THE NEXT MEETING WITH
02:55:21
FULL SUPPORT AS STATED IN THE
02:55:25
MEETING AGENDA WHICH WAS -- ON
02:55:29
ZOOM, ONLINE, PROPER NOTICING
02:55:33
AND DURING THE TIME AT WHICH
02:55:35
THE PUBLIC COULD ATTEND. IT WAS
02:55:36
NOT IN THE MIDDLE OF THE
02:55:40
AFTERNOON ON A WORKDAY.
02:55:42
I THINK WE NEEDED FULL SUPPORT
02:55:43
FROM THE COUNCIL FOR THE
02:55:45
HISTORY ISSUE. I THINK THE
02:55:47
FORMER CITY ATTORNEY HAD COME
02:55:48
UP WITH A TIMELINE BUT BE
02:55:52
WANTED TO UPDATE THAT TIMELINE.
02:55:54
THERE WERE SOME ISSUES THAT
02:55:57
COUNCIL HAD, COUNCIL MEMBERS
02:55:59
HAD WITH THAT TIMELINE SO WE
02:56:00
WOULD LIKE TO AMEND THAT, POST
02:56:03
THAT, HAVE SOCIAL MEDIA
02:56:04
NOTICES, SEND OUT COUNCIL
02:56:08
MEMBER BECKER'S ORIGINAL
02:56:11
LETTER, JUST AS A STRAWMAN, AND
02:56:16
SOLICIT A WORKSHOP COMMITTEE
02:56:18
INPUT INCLUDED DEI TASK FORCE
02:56:20
INPUT BUT NOT LIMITED TO DEI
02:56:22
TASK FORCE INPUT AND HAVE A
02:56:25
START TIME OF 7:00 P.M. I
02:56:26
BELIEVE THOSE WERE THE
02:56:27
DECISIONS WE CAME UP WITH AT
02:56:30
THE MEETING.
02:56:31
>> I WAS REMINDED BY NADINE
02:56:35
THAT IT DOES INCLUDE
02:56:36
COMMUNICATION SUPPORT AS WELL
02:56:42
AS THE TELEVISING OR FOR LACK
02:56:43
OF A BETTER WORD FOR TELEVISING
02:56:45
THE MEETINGS AS WE DO COUNCIL
02:56:47
MEETINGS.
02:56:48
>> YES, THE REASON THAT CAME UP
02:56:50
WAS IN THE AGENDA IT WAS STATED
02:56:53
THAT IT WOULD BE TELEVISED AND
02:56:55
ONLINE AND STATED A BUNCH OF
02:56:57
THINGS THAT WE ACTUALLY WEREN'T
02:56:58
PREPARED FOR AND WE DIDN'T DO
02:56:59
AND THAT WAS ONE OF THE ISSUES
02:57:03
BECAUSE I SPECIFICALLY TOLD
02:57:05
PEOPLE, OH YES, YOU DON'T HAVE
02:57:08
TO, YOU CAN, YOU KNOW, ANYWAY.
02:57:14
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR:
02:57:18
COUNCIL MEMBER BECKER?
02:57:19
>>COUNCIL MEMBER ANTHONY
02:57:20
BECKER: THANK YOU, MAYOR.
02:57:21
A LOT OF WHAT COUNCIL MEMBER
02:57:24
PARK WAS JUST SAYING I 100%
02:57:28
AGREE WITH. I'M REALLY 100%
02:57:30
BEHIND THE SOCIAL MEDIA
02:57:31
NOTICES. THAT NEEDS TO BE UP
02:57:33
THERE AND MORE ACCESSIBILITY. I
02:57:34
THINK IT WAS AND I HOPE I'M
02:57:38
RIGHT, BOB OH KEITH SAYS IT
02:57:40
NEEDS TO BE MORE ACCESSIBILITY
02:57:42
AND ADVERTISED MORE AND PEOPLE
02:57:43
SHOULD HAVE MORE INPUT SO I
02:57:47
KIND OF WANT TO GO IN THAT
02:57:50
DIRECTION OF BEING MORE
02:57:52
TRANSPARENT AND DRAFTING A
02:57:54
LETTER FOR AN APOLOGY BECAUSE
02:57:56
WE ARE TRYING TO MODEL WHAT SAN
02:58:00
JOSE DID AND WE WERE EVEN IN
02:58:04
DISCUSSION BEFORE SAN JOSE WITH
02:58:07
AN APOLOGY LETTER TO THE
02:58:09
CHINESE COMMUNITY. I AGREE WITH
02:58:10
COUNCIL MEMBER PARK AND WE NEED
02:58:12
TO HAVE MORE HISTORY OF THE
02:58:16
DETAIL OF THE LAWSUIT AND
02:58:18
NOTICES THAT NEED TO GO OUT
02:58:20
MORE AND ORIGINAL LETTER AND
02:58:21
I'M FINE WITH THAT AND EVEN THE
02:58:25
EDITED LETTER AND TO BE MORE
02:58:28
TRANSPARENT. THE LAST THING IS
02:58:30
CONFIDENTIALITY IS WHERE I KIND
02:58:32
OF AM TRYING TO SEEK A LITTLE
02:58:34
BIT MORE GUIDANCE.
02:58:35
THIS STILL HAS A LOT OF I GUESS
02:58:37
RED TAPE OVER IT AND I'M
02:58:39
WONDERING HOW WE CAN CHANGE
02:58:40
THAT TO BE A LITTLE BIT MORE
02:58:44
TRANSPARENT TO PROVIDE THAT TO
02:58:46
RESIDENTS TO BE MORE OF THE
02:58:48
PEOPLE'S RIGHT TO KNOW.
02:58:52
I SEE SUE'S HAND WENT UP.
02:58:54
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR: I'M
02:58:56
GOING TO OUR ASSISTANT CITY
02:58:59
ATTORNEY SUE.
02:59:00
>> I CAN TAKE THE COMMENT ABOUT
02:59:03
WAVING CONFIDENTIALITY, THERE
02:59:05
IS RECENT INFORMATION SENT TO
02:59:06
COUNCIL MEMBERS ON THIS POINT.
02:59:09
JUST GENERALLY SPEAKING UNDER
02:59:11
THE BROWN ACT. INFORMATION THAT
02:59:12
IS RECEIVED BY COUNCIL MEMBERS
02:59:14
IN CLOSED SESSION IS
02:59:15
CONFIDENTIAL, HOWEVER THAT
02:59:17
CONFIDENTIALITY CAN BE WAIVED
02:59:18
TECHNICALLY BY A VOTE IN OPEN
02:59:20
SESSION OF THE MAJORITY OF THE
02:59:22
COUNCIL.
02:59:23
THERE ARE OF COURSE GOING TO BE
02:59:27
CONSEQUENCES TO WAVING
02:59:28
CONFIDENTIALITY IN A LITIGATION
02:59:30
MATTER.
02:59:31
THAT IS NOT SOMETHING THAT YOU
02:59:35
ARE AGENDAIZED TO VOTE ON TODAY
02:59:37
AND THERE WOULD HAVE TO BE A
02:59:40
SIGNIFICANT DISCUSSION ON THAT
02:59:41
BEFORE YOU CAN TAKE A VOTE ON
02:59:43
SOMETHING LIKE THAT, BUT
02:59:44
TECHNICALLY UNDER THE BROWN
02:59:45
ACT, THAT'S THE PROCESS. IT
02:59:47
WOULD BE AN OPEN SESSION VOTE
02:59:49
BY THE MAJORITY OF THE COUNCIL
02:59:52
TO WAVE CONFIDENTIALITY. THERE
02:59:54
IS A LOT OF CONSEQUENCES AND
02:59:56
REPERCUSSIONS THAT YOU WOULD
02:59:57
HAVE TO WORK THROUGH BEFORE THE
02:59:58
COUNCIL CAN MAKE ANY KIND OF
03:00:00
EDUCATED DECISION ON SOMETHING
03:00:02
AS WEIGHTEY AS THAT KIND OF A
03:00:05
DECISION.
03:00:06
>> SUE, WOULD YOU SAY THAT IN
03:00:07
ORDER FOR THAT TO HAPPEN I
03:00:08
WOULD HAVE TO DO A 0-30 OR WORK
03:00:13
THAT INTO A CLOSED SESSION JUST
03:00:14
TO TALK ABOUT THIS AND ALSO
03:00:16
SEEING TO GET IT OUT THERE.
03:00:18
>>CITY MANAGER DEANNA J.
03:00:19
SANTANA: CAN I ADD?
03:00:21
>> SURE.
03:00:22
>> WE ARE IN PROCESS OF
03:00:23
BRIEFING THE COUNCIL MEMBER ON
03:00:25
ISSUES OF KOFLT
03:00:34
CONFIDENTIALITY AS WELL AS
03:00:35
BRIEFING AND THERE IS A MEMO
03:00:37
ABOUT THAT AND ONCE WE GET TO
03:00:38
THOSE BRIEFINGS AND TALK ABOUT
03:00:39
CONFIDENTIALITY, YOU CAN
03:00:40
CONTINUE TO PROCEED REGARDING
03:00:42
CONFIDENTIALITY OR RELATED TO
03:00:44
ACTIONS THAT TAKE PLACE IN
03:00:46
CLOSED SESSION. I THINK THE
03:00:47
INFORMATION SESSIONS THAT WE
03:00:49
HAVE PLANNED ARE A GOOD FORUM
03:00:50
FOR US TO GO THROUGH THOSE
03:00:53
TOPICS.
03:00:54
>> OKAY, COOL. THANK YOU.
03:00:57
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR:
03:01:01
COUNCIL MEMBER HARDY?
03:01:02
>> THANK YOU, I DO THINK WE
03:01:03
NEED TO BE VERY CAREFUL WITH
03:01:06
WHAT WE SAY AND DON'T SAY AND
03:01:07
ALSO BE SURE THAT WE FULFILL
03:01:08
ALL THE REQUIREMENTS THAT WE
03:01:10
AGREE TO. AND IN THE LETTER THE
03:01:12
LAST SENTENCE IN THE PARAGRAPH,
03:01:14
SAYS THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA IS
03:01:19
THE MINORITY CITY BUT YET DID
03:01:22
NOT HAVE A MINORITY COUNCIL
03:01:28
MEMBER AND THAT SHOULD BE 1852.
03:01:32
THANK YOU.
03:01:34
>> OKAY, CITY MANAGER.
03:01:35
>>CITY MANAGER DEANNA J.
03:01:36
SANTANA: I SHOULD HAVE LOWERED
03:01:39
MY HAND.
03:01:40
>> SO SORRY.
03:01:41
ALL RIGHT. I HAVE SOME
03:01:42
QUESTIONS.
03:01:43
FIRST OF ALL COMPARING THE
03:01:44
BURNING OF CHINATOWN IN SAN
03:01:49
JOSE TO THE CVRA LAWSUIT ARE
03:01:50
TWO SEPARATE THINGS. I DON'T
03:01:54
KNOW WHAT THE CITY OF SAN JOSE
03:01:55
LETTER HAS TO DO WITH THIS
03:01:58
LETTER.
03:01:59
BUT ALSO A FEW WEEKS AGO, THERE
03:02:04
WAS A REPORT THAT CONTAINED A
03:02:07
DOCUMENT THAT WAS WRITTEN BY
03:02:10
THE 49ERS POLITICAL CONSULTANT
03:02:11
AND PRESENTED AS THE WORK OF
03:02:13
THE ASIAN LAW ALLIANCE.
03:02:15
SO I HAVE BEEN GETTING A LOT OF
03:02:17
QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT SINCE THAT
03:02:20
APPEARED.
03:02:21
IT APPEARS TO BE DECEIT FULL
03:02:28
AND DISHONEST EFFORT TO HOLD
03:02:32
THE 49ERS INVOLVEMENT. SO I
03:02:35
WOULD LIKE TO ASK FOR THAT
03:02:38
LETTER IF THE 49ERS HAD A HAND
03:02:39
IN OFFERING YOUR LETTER THAT
03:02:41
YOU SUBMITTED BECAUSE I THINK
03:02:42
THE RESIDENTS OF A RIGHT TO
03:02:44
KNOW. SO THAT'S MY QUESTION.
03:02:45
>> THAT'S ALL MY WRITING IN THE
03:02:47
LETTER AND THAT'S WHY I'M GLAD
03:02:50
THAT COUNCIL MEMBER HARDY
03:02:51
POINTED OUT SOME OF MY
03:02:53
MISTAKES. SORRY IT WAS NOT
03:02:57
1952, IT WAS 1852 AND THAT WAS
03:02:59
A DRAFT LETTER AND THERE WERE A
03:03:00
LOT OF MISTAKES IN THERE AND IT
03:03:02
WAS A VIRTUAL DOCUMENT THAT I
03:03:03
WANTED MY FULL COUNCIL
03:03:05
INCLUDING YOU MAYOR TO WORK
03:03:06
THROUGH AND COME UP WITH A
03:03:08
BETTER DECISION SO I THINK THAT
03:03:10
IS THE DIRECTION WE ARE GOING.
03:03:17
THE 49ERS HAD NO HAND IN THIS.
03:03:19
THIS WAS ALL MY DOING.
03:03:21
>> I THINK THE DRAFT LETTER HAS
03:03:26
FACTUAL ERRORS AND I'M
03:03:27
SURPRISED THE TASK FORCE DIDN'T
03:03:29
POINT THIS OUT WEEKS AGO. I
03:03:32
THOUGHT THERE WAS A COMMITTEE
03:03:35
THAT WAS ASSIGNED TO LOOKING AT
03:03:38
IT.
03:03:39
ALSO THE PLAN THAT YOU ARE
03:03:41
PROPOSING CALLS FOR A MAJOR
03:03:43
STAFF COMMITMENT AND CITY
03:03:44
RESOURCES, AND I DON'T KNOW
03:03:48
HOW MUCH THAT'S GOING TO COST.
03:03:51
YOU ARE ALSO TALKING ABOUT
03:03:55
RELEASING CONFIDENTIALITY. IF
03:03:56
YOU DO THAT, THE OTHER CASE
03:03:58
SHOULD RELEASE IT AS WELL IF
03:03:59
YOU ARE GOING TO GET FULL
03:04:02
DISCLOSURE ON THE
03:04:04
CONFIDENTIALITY, BOTH SIDES
03:04:05
SHOULD AGREE TO RELEASE THAT. I
03:04:06
DON'T SEE WHY THEY SHOULDN'T IF
03:04:09
IT'S ALL ABOUT TRANSPARENCY AND
03:04:13
OPENNESS.
03:04:14
BUT I JUST DON'T KNOW WHAT OUR
03:04:16
LEGAL LIABILITY IS GOING TO BE.
03:04:20
ONE THING THAT DID CONCERN ME
03:04:22
IS THAT THE FORMER CITY
03:04:24
ATTORNEY HAD PUT TOGETHER A
03:04:26
HISTORY OF WHAT HAPPENED FROM
03:04:30
DAY ONE DURING ALL OF THIS
03:04:33
LAWSUIT AND EVERYTHING THAT
03:04:34
HAPPENED. BUT YOU ARE SAYING
03:04:36
YOU WANT TO AMEND THE HISTORY?
03:04:38
YOU WANT TO CHANGE THE HISTORY,
03:04:40
AND I DON'T KNOW HOW YOU ARE
03:04:41
GOING TO DO THAT OR WHAT YOU
03:04:44
ARE PROPOSING TO DO. SO FOR ALL
03:04:46
OF THOSE REASONS, I AM VERY
03:04:49
CONCERNED NOT ONLY WITH WHAT
03:04:50
YOU ARE DOING, BUT HOW THE
03:04:52
LIABILITY THAT YOU MAY BE
03:04:54
PLACING ON THE CITY AND THE
03:04:57
UNCERTAINTIES OF THE COST AND
03:05:00
ALSO THE LEGAL RAMIFICATIONS OF
03:05:04
CHANGING HISTORY AND RELEASING
03:05:05
CONFIDENTIALITY AND ALL THE
03:05:06
THINGS THAT YOU ARE ATTEMPTING
03:05:08
TO DO. SO THOSE ARE MY
03:05:13
COMMENTS.
03:05:14
COUNCIL MEMBER WATANABE?
03:05:15
>>COUNCIL MEMBER KATHY
03:05:16
WATANABE: THANK YOU, MAYOR.
03:05:17
YES, I AGREE WITH A LOT OF THE
03:05:19
POINTS THAT YOU HAVE MADE.
03:05:21
I ALSO WANTED TO ADD THAT THIS
03:05:26
CITY WAS ACTUALLY INCORPORATED
03:05:31
IN 1852. IT HAD NOTHING TO DO
03:05:36
WITH THE CHARTER.
03:05:37
REGARDING THIS LETTER, I HAVE
03:05:41
TO SAY THAT I DON'T SEE THE
03:05:48
COMMUNITY KNOCKING DOWN DOORS
03:05:50
LOOKING TO HAVE THIS APOLOGY
03:05:52
LETTER PUT TOGETHER. I THINK A
03:05:54
LOT OF OUR RESIDENTS ARE
03:05:58
PROBABLY MORE FOCUSED ON
03:06:00
SURVIVING COVID RIGHT NOW AND
03:06:03
MOVING THROUGH IT, AND ACTUALLY
03:06:06
I THINK A BETTER USE OF OUR
03:06:11
CITY STAFF INSTEAD OF
03:06:14
DEDICATING RESOURCES TO THIS
03:06:18
TASK FORCE WOULD BE TO FOCUS ON
03:06:24
CONTINUING TO MOVE THE CITY
03:06:26
FORWARD. WE JUST HAD AN
03:06:28
EXCELLENT REPORT BY OUR
03:06:30
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE KEN LEE
03:06:32
ABOUT THE STATUS OF THE CITY.
03:06:35
YES, WE STILL HAVE A WAYS TO GO
03:06:37
BUT WE'VE MADE A HECK OF A LOT
03:06:40
OF IMPROVEMENTS AND THE CITY
03:06:42
HAS MOVED IN A MUCH BETTER
03:06:43
DIRECTION THAN IT WAS A YEAR
03:06:45
AGO. I TRULY THINK IT'S TIME
03:06:47
FOR US TO MOVE ON.
03:06:52
APOLOGIZING FOR A LAWSUIT THAT
03:06:55
WAS BROUGHT AGAINST OUR CITY
03:06:58
THAT WAS CALLING OUR RESIDENTS
03:07:04
RACIST. WE DEFENDED A LAWSUIT
03:07:06
THAT WAS BROUGHT AGAINST OUR
03:07:09
CITY WHICH CALLED OUR RESIDENTS
03:07:14
RACIST. I THINK OUR DUE
03:07:16
DILIGENCE AND RESPONSIBILITY IS
03:07:18
TO DEFEND OUR CITY AGAINST
03:07:23
UNCALLED FOR AND UNTRUE ATTACKS
03:07:25
LIKE THAT. THAT'S WHY WE
03:07:27
DEFENDED THE LAWSUIT IN
03:07:28
DISTRICT COURT AND WE APPEALED
03:07:34
IT, AND UNFORTUNATELY AS A
03:07:36
RESULT OF THE APPEAL, WE WERE
03:07:37
NOT ABLE TO MOVE IT FORWARD.
03:07:44
WE DEFENDED OUR CITY AGAINST
03:07:50
ATTACKS OF BEING CALLED RACIST,
03:07:51
AND THAT'S WHAT THE LAWSUIT WAS
03:07:53
ABOUT AND THAT'S WHAT WE DID.
03:07:57
AS I STATED BEFORE, I THINK
03:08:01
CITY BUSINESS IS MORE IMPORTANT
03:08:02
RIGHT NOW AND SHOULD BE THE
03:08:07
FOCUS OF OUR STAFF, OUR COUNCIL
03:08:14
AND OUR RESIDENTS.
03:08:16
CREATING REVISION AS HISTORY
03:08:18
AND JUST DRAGGING THIS ISSUE
03:08:21
OUT DOES NOT HELP ANYBODY IN
03:08:24
OUR CITY. IF NOTHING ELSE, IT
03:08:26
DIVIDES. WE ARE SUPPOSED TO BE
03:08:30
WORKING TOGETHER. THIS DOES NOT
03:08:33
RESOLVE ANYTHING.
03:08:35
THANK YOU.
03:08:36
>> THANK YOU.
03:08:40
VICE-MAYOR CHAHAL?
03:08:41
>>VICE MAYOR RAJ CHAHAL: THANK
03:08:42
YOU, MAYOR.
03:08:43
SO I'M GOING TO COMMENT ON
03:08:45
SOMETHING THAT YOU SAID RIGHT
03:08:48
NOW.
03:08:49
SO WHEN COUNCIL MEMBER BECKER
03:08:52
AND COUNCIL MEMBER KEVIN PARK
03:08:53
IS ASKING FOR A HISTORY, THEY
03:08:55
ARE TRYING TO FIX, MAKE IT
03:08:57
RIGHT IF THERE IS SOMETHING
03:08:59
WRONG THAT WAS PRESENTED, THEY
03:09:00
ARE TRYING TO MAKE IT RIGHT.
03:09:02
CORRECTING THE HISTORY WHETHER
03:09:04
IT'S 10 YEARS OR 50 YEARS OR
03:09:09
100 YEARS AFTER THAT, IS NOT A
03:09:13
MISTAKE. IT'S BASICALLY
03:09:14
CORRECTING A MISTAKE. THAT'S
03:09:16
ONE THING.
03:09:17
AS FAR AS THE, I KNOW COUNCIL
03:09:20
MEMBER WATANABE BROUGHT IT OUT
03:09:22
THAT THIS LAWSUIT WAS BROUGHT
03:09:25
AGAINST THE CITY FOR BEING
03:09:27
RACIST. I THINK THAT'S A WRONG
03:09:31
NOTION TO PUT IT.
03:09:35
THIS LAWSUIT, THE SIMILAR
03:09:36
LAWSUIT WAS ONLY A VIOLATION OF
03:09:39
CBRA. SO MANY OF THE CALIFORNIA
03:09:43
CITIES GOT SIMILAR NOTICES. IT
03:09:46
WAS NOT ABOUT RACE, IT WAS NOT
03:09:51
ABOUT THE CITY IS RACIST. SO
03:09:53
MANY OTHER LAWSUITS WERE
03:09:55
BROUGHT AGAINST OTHER CITIES
03:09:57
AND THOSE WERE FISCALLY
03:09:58
RESPONSIBLE AND THEY KNEW THAT
03:09:59
HISTORY WAS NOT ON THEIR SIDE
03:10:01
TO FIGHT THIS. BUT STILL, OUR
03:10:06
CITY FOUGHT THIS THING ONLY
03:10:08
BECAUSE THEY THOUGHT THIS WAS A
03:10:11
RACIST COMMENT. THIS WAS
03:10:13
NOTHING RACIST. IT WAS UNDER
03:10:22
THE CVRA, CALIFORNIA VOTING
03:10:23
RIGHTS ACT AND THAT IS THE CASE
03:10:25
AND THAT'S HOW WE LOST IT. WE
03:10:28
SHOULD HAVE LEARNED FROM OTHER
03:10:30
CITIES MISTAKE AND WE DID NOT
03:10:32
AND IT ENDED UP COSTING US MORE
03:10:37
THAN $6 MILLION ROUGHLY. THAT
03:10:40
WAS A COSTLY MISTAKE AND WE
03:10:42
HAVE DONE IT. THAT'S IT. THANK
03:10:43
YOU.
03:10:44
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR:
03:10:45
COUNCIL MEMBER JAIN?
03:10:46
>>COUNCIL MEMBER SUDSHANSHU
03:10:47
JAIN: YES, SAFE HARBOR UNDER
03:10:49
CALIFORNIA WAS SINGLE MEMBER
03:10:52
DISTRICTS AND THE CITY RESISTED
03:10:54
SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICTS FOR A
03:10:56
LONG TIME. IT WAS PRETTY WELL
03:11:00
KNOWN THAT NO CITY HAD EVER WON
03:11:04
A CVRA LAWSUIT, AND I THINK IT
03:11:08
SHOULD HAVE BEEN RECOGNIZED
03:11:09
THAT THIS WAS A LOSING
03:11:10
PROPOSITION TO SPEND ALL OF
03:11:12
THIS MONEY TRYING TO FIND
03:11:14
SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICTS.
03:11:16
I'M JUST GOING TO STATE FOR THE
03:11:18
-- IT'S PRETTY OBVIOUS THAT
03:11:20
THIS COUNCIL NOW BETTER
03:11:21
REPRESENTS THE RESIDENTS OF
03:11:27
SANTA CLARA.
03:11:28
>>> COUNCIL MEMBER BECKER,
03:11:31
BEFORE I GO TO THE PUBLIC?
03:11:34
>> YES, THIS IS THE REASON WHY
03:11:36
I THINK WE NEED TO APOLOGIZE
03:11:37
BECAUSE THERE IS A LOT OF
03:11:39
GASLIGHTING THAT WE DON'T CARE
03:11:40
ABOUT WHAT'S HAPPENING IN THE
03:11:42
CITY. WE DON'T CARE ABOUT CITY
03:11:44
FUNCTIONS, WE ARE PUTTING AN
03:11:45
EXTRA STRAIN ON STAFF.
03:11:47
NO, THIS IS TO APOLOGIZE FOR
03:11:51
SPENDING TAXPAYERS MONEY ON
03:11:53
APPEALING, WHAT I ALWAYS FELT
03:11:55
WAS A LOST CAUSE. AS VICE-MAYOR
03:12:00
CHAHAL SAID. WE WERE IN A CVRA
03:12:04
VIOLATION. WE WERE IN VIOLATION
03:12:05
AND NOW I WANT TO APOLOGIZE TO
03:12:07
THOSE RESIDENTS FOR SPENDING
03:12:08
THAT MONEY. THAT IS IMPROPER
03:12:11
USE OF PUBLIC FUNDS. THAT IS A
03:12:15
MAJOR IMPROPER USE OF PUBLIC
03:12:17
FUNDS. SO I FEEL IT'S OUR DUTY
03:12:20
TO APOLOGIZE TO THOSE
03:12:22
RESIDENTS, AND ALSO APOLOGIZE
03:12:27
TO THE ASIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY
03:12:32
FOR THE IMPROPER VOTING SYSTEM.
03:12:33
SINCE THAT WAS CHANGED WE HAD A
03:12:36
DIFFERENT CHANGE TO DIVERSITY.
03:12:37
LOOK AT WHAT COUNCIL MEMBER
03:12:39
JAIN JUST SPOKE ABOUT. THAT IS
03:12:42
FACT. IT CHANGED. SO SEEING
03:12:44
WHEN WE SIT HERE AND GASLIGHT A
03:12:47
LOT OF THESE THINGS THAT WE
03:12:48
DON'T CARE, IT WAS THE 49ERS
03:12:51
INVOLVED, IT'S JUST WORDS AND
03:12:53
IT GETS US NO WHERE. WE NEED TO
03:12:56
FIND RESOLVE, WE NEED TO FIND
03:12:57
WAYS TO GET THROUGH THIS, BUT
03:12:59
THE MORE WE KEEP DELAYING THE,
03:13:03
THE MORE THE PUBLIC DOESN'T GET
03:13:05
TO KNOW WHAT REALLY HAPPENED.
03:13:07
THE PUBLIC HAS A RIGHT TO KNOW
03:13:10
WHAT HAPPENED IN THIS CASE.
03:13:11
AND THE REASON WHY YOU TALK
03:13:14
ABOUT THE CONFIDENTIALITY AND
03:13:15
STUFF LIKE THAT, YES, I
03:13:16
UNDERSTAND THOSE ISSUES, BUT
03:13:17
THIS IS PROBABLY GOING TO BE A
03:13:19
CASE THAT 1 DAY IS GOING TO BE
03:13:21
LOOKED INTO. I REALLY WANT THE
03:13:23
RESEARCH DONE OF THESE OTHER
03:13:24
CITIES THAT WERE IN SIMILAR
03:13:28
LAWSUITS IF THEIR
03:13:29
CONFIDENTIALITY HAS BEEN WAIVED
03:13:31
AS WELL.
03:13:33
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR: SORRY.
03:13:35
>> GOING BACK, YOU KNOW, BOB OH
03:13:38
KEITH HAD A MAJOR POINT DURING
03:13:40
THAT FIRST MEETING. THIS WASN'T
03:13:42
NOTICED AS CORRECTLY AS IT
03:13:43
SHOULD HAVE BEEN AND THERE
03:13:45
SHOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER
03:13:48
OUTREACH. I 100% AGREE THERE
03:13:50
SHOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER
03:13:51
OUTREACH. MAYOR, WE STARTED TO
03:13:52
WORKING TOGETHER ON THIS BUT
03:13:53
WHEN WE GOT TO THAT POINT, WE
03:13:56
REALIZED THERE NEEDS TO BE MORE
03:13:58
RESOURCES. WE DON'T WANT TO
03:14:01
CHANGE HISTORY. WHAT FORMER
03:14:03
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY BRIAN
03:14:04
DOYLE BROUGHT US WAS THE
03:14:06
STARTER, THE HISTORY OF FACT
03:14:08
BUT WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT
03:14:10
EVERY FACTOR IS INCLUDED IN
03:14:11
FRONT OF THE PEOPLE.
03:14:14
TRANSPARENT AS POSSIBLE. SO WE
03:14:16
DON'T WANT TO DO ANYTHING
03:14:18
WRONG, WE WANT TO MAKE SURE
03:14:19
THAT WE CORRECT A WRONG AND
03:14:21
MAKE IT A RIGHT.
03:14:23
AND YOU KNOW, WE ARE NOT, THE
03:14:27
GASLIGHTING THING OF COMPARING
03:14:28
THE CHINESE INCIDENT IN SAN
03:14:32
JOSE TO THE CVRA, WE CAN'T KEEP
03:14:36
DOING THESE COMPARISONS OF
03:14:41
APPLES TO ORANGES AND THAT
03:14:43
THERE IS AN APPARENT APOLOGY
03:14:44
THAT NEEDS TO BE MADE. WE NEED
03:14:47
TO APOLOGIZE TO THE RESIDENTS
03:14:49
OF THE SANTA CLARA AND THE CVRA
03:15:00
REMOVED THAT. SO PLEASE LET'S
03:15:01
REMOVE THE POLITICAL STRINGS TO
03:15:03
THIS, THE GASLIGHTING AND FOCUS
03:15:05
ON THE MEAT TO THIS AND THE
03:15:08
APOLOGY TO RESIDENTS OF THE
03:15:09
CITY OF SANTA CLARA AND I
03:15:12
BELIEVE THEY DESERVE AN
03:15:14
APOLOGY. I HAD NOT HAVE SPENT
03:15:17
$6 MILLION OF THEIR TAXPAYER
03:15:18
MONEY TO FIGHT A LOST CAUSE. IT
03:15:21
WASN'T ASSUMING, WE ARE NOT
03:15:24
SAYING THE VOTERS OF SANTA
03:15:27
CLARA ARE RACIST. I WANT THE
03:15:33
BLOGGERS TO NOTE THIS. THE CITY
03:15:35
OF SANTA CLARA IS NOT RACIST.
03:15:40
THEY FOUNTAIN THE CVRA TO BE IN
03:15:42
VIOLATION OF THAT. WE LOST AND
03:15:44
WE PAID THE PRICE. SO SANTA
03:15:50
CLARA DESERVES EVERY APOLOGY.
03:15:51
IF I HAVE TO HEAR SOMEONE'S
03:15:53
APOLOGY BECAUSE SOMEONE IS
03:15:55
OFFENDED OR SOMETHING, I THINK
03:15:57
THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA
03:15:59
RESIDENTS ARE OFFENDED BECAUSE
03:16:00
THEY HAVE SPENT OVER $5 MILLION
03:16:03
OF THEIR MONEY. IT'S UNFAIR AND
03:16:04
THAT'S WHY I THINK WE NEED TO
03:16:06
CONTINUE THIS AND PROVIDE THOSE
03:16:09
BETTER RESOURCES AND THIS
03:16:10
BETTER OUTREACH, SOCIAL MEDIA
03:16:11
AND GETTING PEOPLE TO READ
03:16:13
ABOUT THIS AND RESEARCH ABOUT
03:16:14
THIS AND NOT CHANGE THE
03:16:16
HISTORY. IDENTIFY THE HISTORY
03:16:17
THAT DOYLE PROVIDED US TO MAKE
03:16:19
SURE THAT ALL THE FACTS ARE
03:16:21
CORRECT.
03:16:22
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR: THANK
03:16:23
YOU. WE SENT YOU AND COUNCIL
03:16:24
MEMBER PARK TO GO DO THAT, BUT
03:16:26
YOU DIDN'T DO THAT AND NOW YOU
03:16:29
ARE COMING BACK WITH THE SAME
03:16:30
THING YOU WENT AWAY WITH AND
03:16:32
I'M QUESTIONING WHY DID YOU DO
03:16:36
THAT. I'M GOING NOW TO COUNCIL
03:16:38
MEMBER PARKS BECAUSE YOU HAD
03:16:40
YOUR CHANCE TO DO THAT.
03:16:42
>> BECAUSE YOU TOLD COUNCIL TO
03:16:45
COME BACK.
03:16:46
>> COUNCIL MEMBER PARK?
03:16:47
>> IT'S CLEAR WE DIDN'T GET THE
03:16:49
SUPPORT WE NEEDED WHEN WE HAD
03:16:51
THIS INITIAL DISCUSSION AND
03:16:53
WHEN WE TALKED ABOUT WHAT WE
03:16:57
INCLUDING WHAT HE SUGGESTED FOR
03:17:03
A FUTURE MEETING THAT'S WHEN
03:17:05
STAFF SAID WE NEED TO GET MORE
03:17:10
COUNCIL SUPPORT AND IT'S LARGER
03:17:12
THAN WHAT WE ORIGINALLY TALKED
03:17:13
ABOUT. I WANT TO ADDRESS THE
03:17:18
POINT, THE CVRA LAWSUIT WAS NOT
03:17:22
ABOUT CALLING THE RESIDENTS
03:17:24
RACIST. I THINK THERE IS TOO
03:17:28
MUCH FINGER POINTED OR BLAMING.
03:17:31
IT'S WHAT COUNCIL MEMBER BECKER
03:17:33
STATED THAT THE VOTING POLICY
03:17:36
IN SANTA CLARA DID NOT GIVE
03:17:40
REPRESENTATION TO MINORITIES.
03:17:41
THAT'S A VERY DIFFERENT THING
03:17:44
THAN BEING RACIST AND IT'S
03:17:45
MISSING THE LARGER PICTURE. IN
03:17:48
FACT THE RESIDENTS SHOW THEY
03:17:50
WERE NOT RACIST WHEN VOTING ON
03:17:54
MEASURE A, MEASURE C AND
03:17:57
SUPPORTING COUNCIL MEMBERS AND
03:18:00
NEW WAYS OF VOTING. DURING THE
03:18:02
TIME OF THE HATE PROTEST, THE
03:18:05
COMMUNITY MADE IT VERY CLEAR
03:18:11
ABOUT THE TREATMENT OF MINORITY
03:18:14
WHETHER THEY WERE RESIDENTS OR
03:18:16
COUNCIL. MOST PEOPLE THAT KNOW
03:18:17
ME KNOW THAT I IDENTIFY AS
03:18:19
AMERICAN AND IN FACT I HAVE
03:18:22
LEARNED A LITTLE BIT ABOUT
03:18:25
BEING ASIAN AND WHAT IT MEANT
03:18:27
TO BE DISCRIMINATED AGAINST
03:18:29
JUST THIS YEAR AND BY BEING
03:18:30
OBJECT COUNCIL IN FACT. I HAVE
03:18:32
MED WITH ALL OF THOSE IN
03:18:38
MINORITY COMMUNITIES HERE AND
03:18:42
EVERYWHERE, IN CUPERTINO AND
03:18:44
LOS ANGELES AND IT'S VERY CLEAR
03:18:46
HOW THE ASIAN COMMUNITY FEELS
03:18:47
AND WHETHER PEOPLE ON THIS
03:18:49
COUNCIL OR THERE ARE PEOPLE
03:18:51
THAT EVEN IN THE RESIDENTS WHO
03:18:53
DON'T FEEL THAT WAY DOES NOT
03:18:54
MEAN THAT THEY SPEAK FOR THE
03:18:56
PEOPLE WHO DO FEEL THAT WAY. I
03:19:03
THINK WE SHOULD APOLOGIZE TO
03:19:05
THEM FOR WHAT WE DID AND IN
03:19:08
LARGE PART THE BIGOTRY AND
03:19:10
IGNORANCE THAT WE STILL HOLD.
03:19:11
AND MOVING FORWARD AT LEAST
03:19:13
WITH THE DISCUSSION IS
03:19:15
WARRANTED AND SHOULD BE DONE TO
03:19:17
GET THE WIDEST AMOUNT OF INPUT
03:19:20
AND SUPPORT THAT WE CAN GET.
03:19:24
THANK YOU.
03:19:25
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR: THANK
03:19:26
YOU. I HAVE A SUGGESTION
03:19:27
BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW EXACTLY
03:19:28
WHAT THE COST IS GOING TO BE OR
03:19:30
WHAT YOU ARE ASKING AND WHAT
03:19:38
THE RAMIFICATIONS ARE.
03:19:40
WHY DON'T WE PUT THIS ON THE
03:19:44
COUNCIL AUTHORITY AND DISCUSS
03:19:45
WHETHER THAT IS WHAT THEY WANT
03:19:48
TO SPEND ON MONEY AND OUR
03:19:51
PRIORITIES BECAUSE RELEASING
03:19:52
CONFIDENTIALITY AND ALL OF
03:19:53
THOSE KINDS OF THINGS, IT'S NOT
03:19:55
AS EASY AS YOU THINK AND THERE
03:19:56
ARE A LOT OF CONSEQUENCES IN
03:19:59
DOING THAT AND OF COURSE I
03:20:00
WOULD WANT TO ASK THE OTHER
03:20:03
SIDE TO DO THIS AND WE SHOULD
03:20:05
HAVE FULL TRANSPARENCY, BUT
03:20:08
WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT HAVING
03:20:10
EVENING COUNCIL MEETINGS AND
03:20:11
THOUGHTS KINDS OF THINGS, WE
03:20:12
HAVE TO PUT A COST TO IT.
03:20:14
EITHER GET THE COST AND COME
03:20:16
BACK AND BRINGING TO THE
03:20:18
PRIORITY SESSIONS AND COME
03:20:19
BACK. BUT IF THAT'S WHAT YOU
03:20:22
WANT IS FULL TRANSPARENCY, WE
03:20:26
NEED FULL TRANSPARENCY IN TERMS
03:20:29
OF COST AND LEGAL
03:20:32
RESPONSIBILITIES.
03:20:33
SO THAT WOULD BE MY SUGGESTION.
03:20:36
OKAY.
03:20:39
LET'S GO TO THE PUBLIC NOW AND
03:20:41
THEN WE'LL TRY TO CALL TOGETHER
03:20:43
SOME KIND OF A MOTION.
03:20:44
IS THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE
03:20:46
PUBLIC THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK
03:20:50
ON THIS ISSUE?
03:20:51
ASSISTANT CITY CLERK, WHILE WE
03:20:52
ARE WAITING FOR THE PUBLIC, DO
03:20:54
WE HAVE ANY WRITTEN COMMENTS ON
03:20:57
THIS?
03:20:58
>>CLERK: I'M CHECKING ON OUR
03:21:00
EMAIL RIGHT NOW, MAYOR.
03:21:02
>> IF NOT, THERE ANY MEMBER OF
03:21:06
THE PUBLIC THAT WOULD LIKE TO
03:21:07
SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE?
03:21:08
>> I DO NOT SEE A WRITTEN
03:21:10
COMMENT AND I DO NOT SEE ANY
03:21:12
HANDS.
03:21:13
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR: OKAY,
03:21:14
LET'S SEE IF WE CAN HAVE A
03:21:18
MOTION.
03:21:19
COUNCIL MEMBER BECKER?
03:21:20
>>COUNCIL MEMBER ANTHONY
03:21:21
BECKER: THANK YOU, MAYOR, I
03:21:22
TOTALLY UNDERSTAND YOUR
03:21:23
CONCERN. BUT I REALLY THINK
03:21:24
THAT WE SHOULDN'T WAIT UNTIL
03:21:25
FEBRUARY. I THINK WE NEED TO
03:21:27
GET THE BALL ROLLING ON THIS
03:21:29
BECAUSE IT'S BEEN A YEAR SINCE
03:21:32
THIS WHOLE THING STARTED AND
03:21:34
IT'S ONE THING THAT KEEPS
03:21:35
GETTING KICKED DOWN THE ROAD
03:21:37
LIKE A FEW OTHER THINGS. SO I'M
03:21:39
MAKING A MOTION TO EXPAND THIS
03:21:43
TASK FORCE TO GO AND LOOK INTO
03:21:45
MORE WAYS OF PROVIDING SOCIAL
03:21:53
MEDIA NOTICES INTO FULL COUNT
03:21:54
OF FACTUAL HISTORY OF THE
03:21:58
LAWSUIT INCLUDING FORMER BRIAN
03:21:59
DOYLE'S TIMELINE TO BE SURE WE
03:22:01
HAVE ALL THE FACTS CORRECTLY.
03:22:03
I ALSO WOULD LIKE TO HAVE
03:22:06
INCLUDED MY ORIGINAL LETTER
03:22:07
PROVIDED FOR RESIDENTS TO READ.
03:22:09
I WOULD LIKE A SPECIAL CLOSED
03:22:11
SESSION TO BE MADE FOR
03:22:14
CONFIDENTIAL ISSUES WITH THE
03:22:16
CVRA TO DISCUSS ALL AS COUNCIL
03:22:17
SO WE DON'T HAVE TO DO IT ONE
03:22:19
BY ONE AND WE CAN DISCUSS IT
03:22:21
TOGETHER IN A CLOSED SESSION.
03:22:22
AT THE SAME TIME, I WOULD LIKE
03:22:26
-- LET ME MAKE SURE I HAVE
03:22:29
EVERYTHING HERE.
03:22:30
I WANT THIS TO BE WELL NOTICED
03:22:34
AT A TIME WHERE PEOPLE CAN
03:22:40
ACTUALLY TUNE IN, SO AROUND
03:22:43
6:00 OR 7:00 IF POSSIBLE AND
03:22:48
I'M OPEN TO AMENDMENTS IF
03:22:50
POSSIBLE.
03:22:51
>> I WILL SECOND THAT.
03:22:53
>>
03:22:54
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR: OKAY,
03:22:55
WE HAVE A MOTION AND SECOND.
03:22:59
>>COUNCIL MEMBER SUDSHANSHU
03:23:00
JAIN: YEAH, I WOULD LIKE TO
03:23:05
UNDERSTAND THE COST OF LIKE AN
03:23:07
EVENING MEETING. HOW MUCH DOES
03:23:09
THAT COST IN TERMS OF STAFF
03:23:11
SUPPORT FOR AN EVENING MEETING,
03:23:14
AND MAYBE WE CAN BASED ON THAT
03:23:16
DECIDE IF WE ARE GOING TO HAVE
03:23:20
ONE, TWO, THREE MEETINGS,
03:23:21
WHATEVER WE WANT TO FIT INTO A
03:23:26
REASONABLE BUDGET.
03:23:27
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR: OKAY.
03:23:30
COUNCIL MEMBER WATANABE?
03:23:31
>>COUNCIL MEMBER KATHY
03:23:32
WATANABE: I JUST WANT TO MAKE
03:23:33
THE CORRECTION, COUNCIL MEMBER
03:23:37
BECKER MENTIONED FORMER BRIAN
03:23:39
DOYLE, I THINK HE MEANT FORMER
03:23:43
CITY ATTORNEY BRIAN DOYLE. HE'S
03:23:47
STILL ALIVE. THANK YOU.
03:23:48
>>MAYOR LISA M. GILLMOR: HE IS.
03:23:52
ANYONE ELSE?
03:23:54
I'M GOING TO SAY, I THINK IT
03:24:00
WOULD BE IRRESPONSIBLE TO
03:24:01
SUPPORT THIS MOTION WHEN WE
03:24:02
DON'T KNOW THE COST, THE LEGAL
03:24:06
LIABILITY OR THE ACTIONS OF A
03:24:07
PRODUCT THAT IS REALLY IN FRONT
03:24:09
OF US THAT IS FACTUALLY
03:24:11
INACCURATE. I'M HOPING THAT THE
03:24:12
PEOPLE THAT ARE TRYING TO
03:24:13
ADVANCE THIS EFFORT OR COUNCIL
03:24:16
MEMBERS WILL TAKE
03:24:17
RESPONSIBILITY JUST TO GET IT
03:24:18
RIGHT AND UNDERSTAND THE COST
03:24:20
AND THE LIABILITY WE OWE THAT
03:24:23
TO OUR RESIDENTS.
03:24:24
WE OWE IT TO THEM.
03:24:26
SO I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO
03:24:27
GET THE INFORMATION AHEAD OF
03:24:28
TIME OF WHAT YOU ARE ASKING
03:24:32
FOR. I'M STILL NOT EXACTLY SURE
03:24:34
OF WHAT YOU ARE ASKING FOR, BUT
03:24:39
I THINK IT'S ONLY HALF BAKED
03:24:41
AND THERE ARE TOO MANY
03:24:44
QUESTIONS OUT THERE TO SUPPORT
03:24:50
THIS MOTION AND IT'S
03:24:52
IRRESPONSIBLE. THOSE ARE MY
03:24:53
COMMENTS.
03:25:25
>>I FELT THAT I WANTED TO SEE IT TO
03:25:40
THE END. BECAUSE I THINK THAT ONLY BY
03:25:43
GOING THROUGH THE APPEAL AND GETTING
03:25:45
THE APPEAL COMPLETE, ONLY THEN WOULD
03:25:48
ANYBODY WHO COMPLAINED OR HAD A
03:25:50
COMPLAINT ABOUT A PROCESS, HOW WE
03:25:53
SHOULD DO THINGS WOULD BE SATISFIED AS
03:25:54
WE SAW IT THROUGH TO THE END. WE DIDN'T
03:25:55
AND EARLY EVEN THOUGH THAT WOULD'VE
03:25:59
SAVED US A LOT OF TIME, A LOT OF MONEY
03:26:04
. BECAUSE I KNOW NOTHING ABOUT
03:26:05
MINORITIES, WHICH IS IF IT COSTS US A
03:26:09
LITTLE BIT MORE, I DON'T THINK
03:26:10
MINORITIES WOULD BALK AT SPENDING MORE
03:26:17
MONEY TO INCREASE REPRESENTATION AND
03:26:18
TO INCREASE VOTING RIGHTS. I THINK
03:26:19
THAT'S THE TRUTH THAT PEOPLE NEED TO
03:26:20
UNDERSTAND AND IT COMES DOWN TOSAME
03:26:26
WORK ON OR I SUPPORT THE MINORITYBASIS
03:26:33
OF THEIR DEMOCRACY, THE RIGHT TO VOTEA
03:26:45
HIM AGAIN I THINK THAT IS THIS LACK OF
03:26:51
UNDERSTANDING ON BOTH SIDESBOTH IN
03:26:59
CBRE WHEN IT CAME UP AND NO ONE ASKED
03:27:00
HIM TO ACKNOWLEDGE WHAT WE DID BY
03:27:05
FIGHTING THE CBA LAWSUIT, THE MINORITY
03:27:06
COMMUNITIES. THANK
03:27:13
>>VICE MAYOR TO ALL?
03:27:14
>>THANK YOU.THERE IS A REASONTHERE IS
03:27:25
A REQUEST ABOUT THE CONVERSATION,
03:27:32
MAYOR GILMORE, YOU'RE SAYING I DON'T
03:27:38
KNOW WHAT LEGAL AVENUES THAT WOULD BE,
03:27:39
WE CAN DISCUSS THIS IN CLOSED SESSION
03:27:40
WILL BE DONE AFTER THAT.TO ANSWER YOUR
03:27:44
QUESTION THERE IS NO LEGAL AS OF NOW
03:27:47
AND IF IT'S IN CLOSED SESSIONWE WILL
03:27:52
MAKE OUR DECISION ACCORDINGLY. COST.I
03:27:56
HAVE SEEN COMMITTEES EXPANDINGSO MANY
03:27:59
OF THESE COMMITTEES, I HAVE NEVER
03:28:02
HEARD FROM YOU,BUT WHEN THE SCOPE OF
03:28:06
OTHER COMMITTEESEXPANDED, YOU ARE NOT
03:28:10
THAT VOCAL.
03:28:11
>>EXTENDS ME BUT PLEASE ADDRESS THE
03:28:17
MOTION. I KNOW YOU'RE ATTACKING ME.
03:28:25
IT'S NOT ABOUT HOW I VOTED IN THE
03:28:26
CLASS ON ANYTHING.
03:28:27
>>I'M DISCUSSING WHAT HAS BEEN
03:28:29
DISCUSSED HERE.. COST WISE, WE COULD
03:28:44
HAVE DONE THIS THING WITH THE SIMPLE
03:28:45
AUDIENCE, SO MANY CITIES HAVE DONE IT,
03:28:46
BUT WE DIDN'T LOOK AT THAT. AND THAT,
03:28:49
SUNNYVALE GOT A SIMILAR NOTICEBY JUST
03:28:52
ONE BALLOT MEASURE DIRECTLYAND WE
03:28:55
COULD'VE DONE, THE PEOPLE CITIES HAVE
03:29:01
DONE IT BY ORDINANCEWE CANNOT DO THIS
03:29:16
THING BY HERSELF. THESE ARE THE THINGS
03:29:17
WE NEED TO CLARIFY, THESE ARE THE
03:29:18
THINGS WE NEED TO FIX. WE NEED TO LET
03:29:19
OUR RESIDENTS KNOWAND THESE ARE THE
03:29:22
REASONS FOR APOLOGIZING TO THE
03:29:23
RESIDENCE.
03:29:28
>>COUNCILMEMBER BECKER?
03:29:29
>>THANK YOU, MAYOR. THANK YOU, MR.
03:29:32
CHAHAL, FOR THAT STELLAR EXPLANATION.
03:29:35
ALSOTHANK YOU TO COUNCILMEMBER
03:29:42
WATANABE FOR POINTING OUT THAT I
03:29:43
MISSPOKE. I APOLOGIZE THAT I SAID
03:29:46
BRIAN DOYLE, I APOLOGIZE FOR THAT.
03:29:54
CITY ATTORNEY, BRIAN DOYLE. THANK YOU
03:29:55
FOR THAT CLARIFICATION. I GUESS WHAT I
03:29:56
HAVE TO SAY IS LET'S TAKE A VOTE.
03:29:57
>>IS THERE ANYONE ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE
03:29:58
TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE?
03:30:09
>>I HAVE A CLARIFICATION ON THIS ONE.
03:30:10
>>GO AHEAD, PLEASE.
03:30:11
>>TO THE MAKER OF THE MOTION, YOU
03:30:12
OUTLINED A FEW THINGS THAT WERE ON THE
03:30:13
AD HOC COMMITTEE'SMOTION. WOULD YOU
03:30:18
LIKE ME TO READ THOSE OUT TO YOU?
03:30:19
>>YES. I AM STILL NOT CLEAR. COULD YOU
03:30:20
PLEASE CLARIFY WHAT THIS MOTION IS
03:30:22
ACTUALLY ASKING THE CITY TO DO?
03:30:29
>>I'M GOING TO REDO THE MOTION THAT
03:30:30
WAS PLACED AT THAT MEETING AND YOU CAN
03:30:31
TELL ME WHAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO KEEP.
03:30:51
YOU WOULD LIKE TO EXPAND THE SCOPE OF
03:30:52
THE AD HACK COMMITTEE, SCHEDULE
03:30:53
ANOTHER AD HOC COMMITTEE WITH STAFF
03:30:54
SUPPORT INCLUDING LIVE STREAMING AND
03:30:55
ADVERTISING OF THE MEETING AS THE CITY
03:30:56
COUNCIL, THE AD HOC COMMITTEE MEETING
03:30:57
FOR 7 PM, PROMOTE THE COMMITTEE ON
03:30:58
SOCIAL MEDIA AND THE DI TASK FORCE
03:30:59
PROVIDE INPUT ON THE DRAFT LETTERPOST
03:31:03
THE COMMUNITY WORKSHOP, PLACE A
03:31:04
SERVICE ON THE CITY WEBSITE SEEKING
03:31:05
FEEDBACK ON THE DRAFT APOLOGY LETTER
03:31:06
WITH THE FOLLOWING MATERIALS FOR
03:31:07
REFERENCE, DRAFT APOLOGY LETTER FROM
03:31:08
COUNCILMEMBER BAKKER AND THE CVA
03:31:14
LAWSUIT WHICH IS TO BE DEVELOPED AND
03:31:15
APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE
03:31:16
RECENT CITY OF SAN JOSE RESOLUTION
03:31:17
APOLOGIZING TO THE CHINESE IMMIGRANTS
03:31:18
AND THEIR DESCENDENTS FOR INJUSTICE
03:31:19
AND DISCRIMINATIONAND PAST POLICIES
03:31:26
AND MISDEEDS AND SCHEDULE A CLOSED
03:31:27
SESSION TO DISCUSS LIABILITY REGARDING
03:31:28
CRA.
03:31:39
>>CONFIDENTIALITY.
03:31:40
>>WHAT WAS THAT?
03:31:41
>>AWAITING LEGAL CONFIDENTIALITY.
03:31:42
>>THANK YOU.
03:31:43
>>THAT'S EXACTLY THE MOTION.
03:31:44
>>VICE MAYOR, ON THE MOTION?
03:31:59
>>COUNCILMEMBER JANE ASKED THAT
03:32:00
QUESTION, HOW MUCH IS THIS COSTING FOR
03:32:01
EACH MEETING, I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO
03:32:02
FIND OUT SO THAT WE CAN APPROPRIATELY
03:32:03
THEN PLAN HOW MORNING MORE MEETINGS.
03:32:04
THAT WILL BE A GOOD ANSWER FROM STAFF
03:32:07
FOR THE APPROXIMATE COST. THANK YOU.
03:32:08
>>YOU MADE THE MOTION?
03:32:14
>>BECKER.
03:32:15
>>ARE YOU ASKING THAT HE PUT THAT IN
03:32:16
HIS MOTION?
03:32:17
>>NO, NO.THE QUESTION WAS BEING ASKED
03:32:31
FROM THE STAFF AND IF WE COULD HAVE A
03:32:32
CONCEPT OF THAT QUESTION.
03:32:33
>>THE STAFF IS GOING ONE DIRECTION
03:32:34
FROM US, DO WE WANT THEM TO GET THAT,
03:32:35
RIGHT, STAFF, CITY MANAGER, LET ME ASK
03:32:36
YOU.
03:32:37
>>I WAS GOING TO PROVIDEA RESPONSE IN
03:32:40
THAT WE COULD CALCULATE WHAT THE COST
03:32:41
OF THE MEETING IS AND SEND THAT BACK
03:32:42
TO COUNCIL OR REPORT OUT VERBALLY IN
03:32:43
JANUARY. BUT AS MUCH AS IT IS ABOUT
03:32:53
COST AS WELL, JUST WANT TO TALK A
03:32:54
LITTLE BIT ABOUT STAFF CAPACITY,
03:32:55
PARTICULARLY SINCE THIS LAST MEETING
03:32:56
AND NOW THAT THIS ITEM HAS BEEN HEARD,
03:32:57
WE HAVE LOSTTHREE STAFF MEMBERS AND
03:32:58
THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE THAT
03:32:59
GENERALLYWOULD SUPPORT THESE TYPE OF
03:33:04
COMMITTEES AS WELL AS WE ARE DOWN TO
03:33:05
TWO PART-TIME TELEVISEDSTAFF SUPPORT
03:33:29
FOLKS THAT HELP US WITH TELEVISING
03:33:30
THESE TYPES OF MEETINGS AND SO AS I
03:33:31
MENTIONED IN THE ITEM REGARDING THE
03:33:32
STADIUM TASK FORCE, WE SAID THAT WE
03:33:33
WOULD GET TO IT AS WE CAN WITH RESPECT
03:33:34
TO STAFF AVAILABILITY AND RESOURCE
03:33:35
AVAILABILITY, SO IT IS A MATTER OF
03:33:36
COST BUT IT'S JUST A MATTER OF STAFF
03:33:37
AVAILABILITY TOO.SO HAPPY TO IMPLEMENT
03:33:38
THE COUNCIL DIRECTION, BUT IT WILL
03:33:39
COME WITH SOMESEQUENCING AND STAFF IN
03:33:44
OTHER MEETINGS AND WHEN WE CAN GET OUR
03:33:45
MEETING SCHEDULED AT THE INSTRUCTIONS
03:33:46
OF COUNCIL.
03:33:48
>>THANK YOU, CITY MANAGER.
03:33:49
COUNCILMEMBER BECKER?
03:33:56
>>THANK YOU, CITY MANAGER, FOR
03:33:57
CLARIFYING THAT. I GUESS WHAT I WOULD
03:33:58
SAY IS I THINK, SHOULD PROBABLY BE VERY
03:34:08
FLUID FOR THE DA TASK FORCE TO WHAT
03:34:09
THAT KIND OF COST IS. SIMILAR MODEL. I
03:34:10
THINK THAT BREAKDOWN WOULD BE
03:34:11
SUFFICIENT FOR THAT. AS FOR STAFF, WE
03:34:12
WILL PLAN IT OUT APPROPRIATELY IF
03:34:13
POSSIBLE.
03:34:14
>>COUNCILMEMBER HARDY?
03:34:19
>>I GUESS MY QUESTION IS POSSIBLY TO
03:34:20
THE CITY MANAGER, THE MAYOR MADE THE
03:34:25
COMMENT ABOUT POSSIBLY PUTTING THIS ON
03:34:26
THE PRIORITY SETTING. HOW WOULD THAT
03:34:28
CHANGE THE COSTSIF THAT WAS DONE, OR
03:34:33
WOULD WE JUST HAVE MORE INFORMATION?
03:34:35
THAT'S MY QUESTION.
03:34:53
>>THE OPPORTUNITY TO EVALUATE IT AT
03:34:54
THE PRIORITY SETTING SESSION, I HAD
03:34:55
MENTIONED THIS ABOUT TWO MEETINGS AGO
03:34:56
THAT I WAS GOING TO BRING A LIST OF
03:34:57
ALL THE NEW TASKFORCES OR AD HOC
03:34:58
COMMITTEES THAT HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED
03:34:59
OVER THE PAST YEAR. I THINK WE ARE UP
03:35:00
TO ABOUT 33 NOW AND SO IT GIVES THE
03:35:03
OPPORTUNITY FOR THE COUNCIL TO HAVE A
03:35:04
BIG PICTURE REVIEW OF WHAT TYPE OF
03:35:05
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT WE ARE SUPPORTING
03:35:09
, WHERE THERE IS INVESTMENT
03:35:10
STRATEGICALLY OF OUR RESOURCES AND
03:35:11
FOCUS. I HAVE TO SAY THAT AS YOU HAVE
03:35:18
HEARD THE FISCAL REPORT OUT THERE WE
03:35:19
STILL HAVE THE $17.6 MILLION, AND SO
03:35:20
EVERY STAFF POSITION FOR FILLING IS
03:35:26
BEING VERY SCRUTINIZED BECAUSE
03:35:27
OBVIOUSLY THAT'S A POINT WE HAVE TO
03:35:28
BALANCE THE BUDGET AND SO HIRINGAND
03:35:44
FILLING VACANCIES IS BEING SCRUTINIZED
03:35:45
BECAUSE WE DON'T WANT TO HIRE TO THEM
03:35:46
LAY OFF WHEN WE TRY TO BALANCE THE
03:35:47
BUDGET. THAT'S THE BIG PICTURE
03:35:48
DISCUSSION THAT YOU WOULD HAVE ON
03:35:49
FEBRUARY.
03:35:50
>>THANK YOU. THAT'S WHY I WANTED TO
03:35:51
TAKE IT SO WE CAN LOOK AT A BIG
03:35:52
PICTURE DISCUSSION. I JUST HAVE TO SAY
03:35:53
THATWE ARE SO SHORTSTAFFED AND SO
03:35:55
RESOURCE NEEDING THAT WE HAVEN'T EVEN
03:35:56
BEEN ABLE TO HAVE OUR REGULAR
03:35:57
COMMITTEE MEETINGS, LIKE THE
03:36:07
GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE OR THE ECONOMIC
03:36:08
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE, WE HAVEN'T BEEN
03:36:09
ABLE TO HAVE OUR REGULAR COMMITTEES
03:36:10
AND WE JUST KEEP PILING ON. BUT IN
03:36:11
THIS PARTICULAR SITUATION WITH THIS
03:36:12
COMMITTEEWE HAVE NO COST, WE DON'T
03:36:13
KNOW WHAT IS GOING TO COST, WE HAVE NO
03:36:18
ANALYSIS OF THE LEAGUE OR LIABILITY OF
03:36:19
WHAT IT'S GOING TO ENTAIL. WE ARE
03:36:32
TALKING ABOUT REVISING HISTORY AND WHO
03:36:33
IS GOING TO DO THAT, WE HAVE NO CITY
03:36:34
ATTORNEY, THE CITY ATTORNEY HAS BEEN
03:36:35
FIRED, SO WE DON'T HAVE ANYBODY THAT'S
03:36:36
GOING TO PUT THATTHIS ISHIM HIM
03:39:39
(INAUDIBLE) I DON'T SEE ANYTHING IN
03:39:40
CLOSED SESSION THAT I REALLY THINK WE
03:39:41
NEED TO DISCUSS OR MAKE PUBLIC
03:39:42
(INAUDIBLE) WE ARE TO TALKING ABOUT
03:39:43
MAKING THE PUBLIC A HISTORY OF THE
03:39:44
LAWSUIT KNOWN WITHOUT CITY ATTORNEY'S
03:39:45
CREDITS AND THAT DOESN'T REQUIREANY
03:39:46
RELEASES. I THINK THATTHIS IS ACTUALLY
03:40:01
A LITTLE BIT MORE DEFINED THAN YOU
03:40:02
MAKE IT OUT TO BE, AND IF IT'S NOT
03:40:03
DEFINED, THOSE ARE THE THINGS I THINK
03:40:04
ARE VERY EASY TO GET TO THE HEART OF
03:40:05
AND ACTUALLY MAKE KNOWN. I AM GOING TO
03:40:06
SUPPORT THIS MOTION. I DON'T SEE WHY
03:40:10
YOU WOULDN'T SUPPORT IT OTHER THAN THE
03:40:11
FEARS AND I'M GOING TO USE THIS, IT'S
03:40:13
THE FEARSTHATSTOPPED.
03:40:14
>>THANK YOU. COUNCILMEMBER BECKER?
03:40:30
>>IN REGARDS TO THAT, I BELIEVE THE
03:40:31
PLANNING DIVISION IS I THINK WOEFULLY
03:40:32
UNDERSTAFFED. THEY HAVE BEEN ABLE TO
03:40:47
DO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS, THEY
03:40:48
HAVE BEEN ABLE TO DO OTHER THINGS, YOU
03:40:49
HAVE AND BEEN ABLE TO HAVE COMMUNITY
03:40:50
PASSPORT, DBI COMMUNITY TASK FORCE,
03:40:51
DOWNTOWN TASK FORCE SO WE HAD SOME OF
03:40:52
THESE MEETINGS IN SOME OF THESE OTHER
03:40:53
MEETINGS WERE CANCELEDAND NONE OF US
03:41:02
HAVE THE CONTROL OVER THOSE. SO THOSE
03:41:03
ARE CANCELED. PUT MAYOR GILLMOR, YOU
03:41:04
SAID YOU DON'T KNOW ABOUT THE FULL
03:41:05
PICTURE IN THIS MOTION, THIS IS THE
03:41:06
FULL PICTURE IN THIS MOTION. SOME OF
03:41:07
US MAY SEE A FULL PICTURE, MAYBE YOU
03:41:08
SEE HALF A PICTURE.MAYBE YOU SEE THE
03:41:12
GLASS HALF-FULL OR HALF-EMPTY OR VICE
03:41:13
VERSA. ALL DUE RESPECT I DISAGREE WITH
03:41:14
YOU BUT THIS IS WHAT THE MOTION IS AND
03:41:15
I THINK THIS IS THE WHOLE PICTURE TO
03:41:16
GET THE WHOLE TRANSPARENT ASPECT.
03:41:17
>>THANK YOU. ASSISTANT CITY CLERK, A
03:41:20
ROLL CALL VOTE, PLEASE?
03:41:25
>>
03:41:26
[CALLING ROLL]THAT PASSES 5-2.
03:41:27
OKAY, NEXT ITEM IS THE ACTION ON
03:41:54
FORMALIZATION OF THE BICYCLE AND
03:41:55
PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEEDEFERRED
03:41:57
FROM NOVEMBER 9, 16, AND DECEMBER 7.
03:42:01
CITY MANAGER?
03:42:08
>>YES, WE HAVE GREG WAY BACK TO HAVE
03:42:09
COMMENTS AND TO RESPOND TO QUESTIONS.
03:42:10
>>THANK YOU. WELCOME, DIRECTOR OF
03:42:14
MOBECK.
03:42:15
>>DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS. THIS ITEM
03:42:16
CAME AT THE REQUEST OF THE GOVERNMENT
03:42:27
AN ETHICS COMMITTEE AND TO LOOK AT
03:42:28
FORMALIZING THE BE PACKED. AND SO
03:42:29
STAFF WENT THROUGH A PROCESS AND MET
03:42:30
WITH THE BE PACKED NUMEROUS TIMESBACK
03:42:42
TO THE ETHICS AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE
03:42:43
SEVERAL TIMES AS WELL AND ULTIMATELY
03:42:44
CAME BACK WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS
03:42:45
THAT ARE BEFORE YOU AND THEY DEAL WITH
03:42:46
CHANGES TO THE BE PACK TO SOLIDIFY IT.
03:42:54
IT IS CURRENTLY AN APPROVED COUNCIL
03:42:55
GUIDELINES AND POLICY AND SO WE LOOKED
03:42:56
AT MAKING IT PART OF THE CITY CODE.
03:42:57
AND SO WE MADE RECOMMENDATIONS IN
03:42:58
TERMS OF MEMBERSHIP. THE ELIGIBILITY
03:43:04
TERM LIMITS AND CHANGES TO THE
03:43:05
MEMBERSHIP COMPOSITIONS APPLICATION
03:43:06
PROCESS AS WELL AS HOW THE MEETING IS
03:43:10
CHAIRED. SO ULTIMATELY WE ENDED UP
03:43:11
WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS BEFORE YOU
03:43:12
TONIGHT AND I CAN GO INTO MORE DETAIL
03:43:20
IF THERE ARE MORE QUESTIONS FROM THE
03:43:21
COUNCIL.
03:43:22
>>THANK YOU, DIRECTOR. LET'S SEE IF
03:43:23
THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONSFROM THE
03:43:28
COUNCIL ON THIS BEFORE WE DO THAT.
03:43:30
COUNCIL MEMBER HARDY?
03:43:35
>>THANK YOU. I GUESS I DID LOOK
03:43:36
SPECIFICALLY FOR THE TERM LIMITS, AND
03:43:47
I DIDN'T SEE THOSE CALLED OUT
03:43:48
SPECIFICALLY, ESPECIALLY THE
03:43:49
RECOMMENDATION. I WONDER IF THAT WAS
03:43:50
PART OF JUST MAKING THE DEEPAKA
03:43:51
REGULAR COMMITTEE, IF THAT COVERED THE
03:43:55
IDEA OF TWO TERMS OF THE FOUR-YEAR
03:44:00
TERMS INSTEAD OF THREE YEAR TERMS WITH
03:44:01
NO LIMIT.
03:44:26
>>THAT'S CORRECT. CURRENTLY, SO THE
03:44:27
GOAL OF THIS WAS TO ALIGN IT WITH
03:44:28
OTHER BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS AS WELL
03:44:29
AS WE LOOKED AT OTHER BE PACKS
03:44:30
LOCALLY. BUT THAT'S CORRECT, CURRENTLY
03:44:31
IT IS UNIQUE IN THAT IT IS A THREE
03:44:32
YEAR TERM WITH NO TERM LIMITS. WHAT
03:44:33
STAFF IS RECOMMENDING IS TO ALIGN THAT
03:44:34
WITH OTHER COMMISSIONS TO HAVE
03:44:35
FOUR-YEAR TERMS WITH TWO TERM LIMITS.
03:44:36
THAT'S CORRECT.
03:44:37
>>OKAY, COUNCILMEMBER HARDY?
03:44:38
COUNCILMEMBER JANE.
03:44:39
>>YES, I THINKONE OF THE ISSUESWAS
03:44:41
THAT IT MET SO INFREQUENTLYTHAT THE
03:44:44
MEETING SCOTT REALLY LONG.I DIDN'T SEE
03:44:54
IN THIS FORMALIZATION ANY TYPE OF
03:44:55
MEETING SCHEDULE. ALMOST EVERY
03:44:56
COMMITTEE AND THE CITY HAS A MEETING
03:44:57
SCHEDULEIN MIND. ONCE A MONTH AND SO
03:44:58
ON.I WASN'T SURE WHAT THE ROOM
03:45:04
RECOMMENDATION WAS. AND THEN IN THE
03:45:05
PACKET THEY MENTIONED AN ADVISORY
03:45:06
COMMITTEEAND I DON'T SEE ANY
03:45:10
RECOMMENDATION HERETHAT MIGHT INCLUDE
03:45:14
BUSINESSES OROTHER PEOPLE THAT HAVE
03:45:20
SORT OF STAKEHOLDERS, A STAKE IN THIS,
03:45:25
BUT THEY MAY NOT BE RESIDENTS, MAYBE
03:45:26
NOT THE, I DON'T KNOW, IT COULD BE LIKE
03:45:37
SILICON VALLEY COALITION OR SOMEBODY
03:45:38
ON THIS ADVISORY COMMITTEE.AND THEN
03:45:41
THE LAST THING IS THATFOR ALL OF THE
03:45:45
COMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS WE HAVE A
03:45:49
STANDARD APPLICATION FORMAND I WOULD
03:46:03
LIKE TO SEE A MORE SPECIFIC BICYCLE
03:46:04
ORIENTED APPLICATION FORM FOR MEMBERS
03:46:05
TO TALK ABOUT SPECIFICALLY THINGS LIKE
03:46:06
BIKING HISTORY OR BIKING INTERESTS OR
03:46:07
SOMETHING LIKE THAT.SO THOSE ARE KIND
03:46:08
OF THINGS THATI HAD QUESTIONS ABOUT OR
03:46:13
RECOMMENDATIONS ON.
03:46:19
>>THANKS FOR THE QUESTION. SO
03:46:20
CURRENTLY THE MEETINGS ARE IDENTIFIED
03:46:28
IN THE GUIDELINES FOR THE BE PACKED,
03:46:29
AND SO WE ARE NOT MAKING ANY CHANGES
03:46:30
TO THOSE MEETINGS. CURRENTLY I BELIEVE
03:46:32
WE HAVE FIVE MEETINGS ANNUALLY, WE ARE
03:46:49
STAFFED ACCORDINGLY, WE HAVE ALSO LOST
03:46:50
STAFF AS PART OF THE BUDGET FREEZE AND
03:46:51
WE PICKED UP A LOT OF NEW PRIORITIES,
03:46:52
SO WE ARE NOT LOOKING TO INCREASE
03:46:53
THOSE. THE MEETINGS, NO MATTER WHAT WE
03:46:54
HAVE ON THE AGENDA OR HOW WE TRY TO
03:46:55
MANAGE IT, IT IS A VERY COLLABORATIVE
03:46:56
GROUP AND THOSE MEETINGS DO GO FOR A
03:46:57
LONG TIME. IN TERMS OF ADVISORY GROUP,
03:46:59
THIS EXERCISE WE DID LOOK AT EXPANDING
03:47:08
ANYTHING TO ADD IN VISOR GROUPS TO THE
03:47:09
BE PACK. I THINK THAT'S CERTAINLY
03:47:10
SOMETHING THAT COUNCIL COULD DISCUSS
03:47:11
IF THEY ARE LOOKING FOR THE BE PACKED
03:47:12
TO GETOUTSIDE INFORMATION, BUT THAT
03:47:17
WASN'T PART OF THIS. AND THEN WHAT WAS
03:47:18
YOUR LAST QUESTION THERE?
03:47:25
>>ABOUT THE APPLICATIONS. THE
03:47:26
APPLICATIONS TO APPLY TO BE BACKOR
03:47:33
JUST THE GENERIC, IT'S THE SAME
03:47:34
APPLICATION FOR CULTURAL (INAUDIBLE)
03:47:35
COMMISSION.AND THEN THE OTHER THING
03:47:40
THAT REBECCA ASKED, WHICH IS THAT NOW
03:47:41
WE ARE LOOKING AT SCOOTERSAND SHARED
03:47:45
MOBILITY, DOES THAT COME UNDER THE
03:47:46
PURVIEWOF THAT?
03:47:47
>>WHEN WE WENT THROUGH THE PROCESS OF
03:47:54
SHARED MOBILITY WE DEFTLY WENT THROUGH
03:47:55
THE BE PACK ON THAT BEFORE WE BROUGHT
03:47:56
IT TO COUNCIL. YES.
03:47:57
>>OKAY, THANK YOU.
03:47:58
>>I THINK MAYBE THE BE PACK SHOULD
03:48:07
HAVE A HAND IN WHAT THE APPLICATION
03:48:08
LOOKS LIKE, THAT WOULD BE A NICE THING
03:48:09
TO ASKED THE COMMITTEE TO PUT FORWARD
03:48:10
A DRAFT. ANYWAY, OKAY. ANY OTHER
03:48:11
COUNCIL QUESTIONS ON THIS? ALL RIGHT.
03:48:17
IS THERE ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC
03:48:18
WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS? PLEASE
03:48:19
COME FORWARD NOW.ASSISTANT CITY CLERK?
03:48:24
I DON'T SEE ANY HANDS.
03:48:27
>>NEITHER DO I.
03:48:40
>>AND EE COMMENTS?
03:48:41
>>NO.
03:48:42
>>NO HANDS, NO ANY COMMENTS.
03:48:43
COUNCILMEMBER WATANABE?
03:48:44
>>THANK YOU, MAYOR. I MOVE STAFF
03:48:45
RECOMMENDATION.
03:48:46
>>AND WE HAVE A SECOND FROM OUR BE
03:48:57
PACK REPRESENTATIVE I THINK. THANK
03:48:58
YOU. MOTION AND A SECOND. ANY
03:48:59
DISCUSSION ON THIS? THANK YOU,
03:49:00
DIRECTOR MOBECK, FOR YOUR
03:49:01
PRESENTATION. ASSISTANT CITY CLERK, A
03:49:02
ROLL CALL VOTE, PLEASE?
03:49:04
[CALLING ROLL]
03:49:24
>>THANK YOU, AND THAT PASSAGE
03:49:25
UNANIMOUSLY. I'M GOING TO ASK THE
03:49:26
COUNCIL TO SAY THAT WE ARE GOING TO
03:49:27
TAKE A SEVEN MINUTE BREAK OR A COMFORT
03:49:32
BREAK FOR STAFF MEMBERS, SO PLEASE BE
03:49:33
BACK HERE AT 9:30 P.M. THANK YOU.
03:49:56
THE NEXT ITEM,
03:50:01
FIVE SEE, AND ORDERS TO AMEND CHAPTER
03:50:09
(INAUDIBLE) ENTITLED BOARDING
03:50:12
COMMISSIONS TO UPDATE BOARD AND
03:50:13
COMMISSION MEMBERS QUALIFICATIONS
03:50:16
DEFERRED FROM NOVEMBER 9 AND 16.CITY
03:50:19
MANAGER?OR CITY ATTORNEY?
03:50:23
>>I'M GOING TO DEFER TO SUE ON THIS.
03:50:25
MY UNDERSTANDING WAS ELIZABETH, SHE IS
03:50:26
HERE, SHE IS IN THE ATTENDEES, LIZ
03:50:29
COLES WAS GOING TO DO IT.I BELIEVE
03:50:36
THAT STILL THE CASE. IF I'M WRONG,
03:50:37
SHOUT OUT.
03:50:38
>>YES, THAT'S RIGHT.
03:50:40
>>SHE NEEDS TO BE MOVED TO PANELISTS.
03:50:43
>>MOVING HER OVER.
03:51:10
>>GOOD EVENING, CITY COUNCIL, CAN YOU
03:51:11
HEAR ME?
03:51:12
>>YES WE CAN, WELCOME, THANK YOU,
03:51:13
ELIZABETH.
03:51:14
>>THIS IS ELIZABETH KLASSEN, CITY
03:51:15
ATTORNEY. I'M BRINGING FORWARD IS ITEM
03:51:16
THAT THE CITY COUNCIL DIRECTED TO
03:51:17
STAFF REMOVE THE BOARD COMMISSION
03:51:18
MEMBERS BE MEMBERS OF THE CITY TO
03:51:34
INCLUDE GREATER PARTICIPATION BY
03:51:35
MEMBERS OF THE CITY. THE SANTA CLARA
03:51:36
CITY CHARTER AND CODE REQUIRE ALL CITY
03:51:37
BOARDS AND COMMISSION MEMBERS EXCEPT
03:51:38
FOR YOUTH COMMISSION BE QUALIFIED
03:51:39
ELECTORS OF THE CITY. THE EXISTING
03:51:40
REGULATIONS PROHIBIT A PERSON FROM
03:51:41
SERVING ON A BOARD OR COMMISSION IF
03:51:42
THE PERSON IS NOT 18 AND THE US
03:51:43
CITIZEN. THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE WILL
03:51:44
AMEND THE SECTION 2.120.010 OF THE
03:51:57
CITY CODE TO ALLOW RESIDENTS THAT ARE
03:51:58
18 YEARS OF AGE TO SERVICE MEMBERS OF
03:51:59
THE CITY CHARTER BOARD COMMISSIONS AND
03:52:00
COMMITTEES. THIS ORDINANCE WILL
03:52:01
ELIMINATE THE CURRENT REQUIREMENT THAT
03:52:02
ALL MEMBERS OF NON-CHARTER BOARDS AND
03:52:03
COMMISSIONS BE CALLED QUALIFIED
03:52:04
ELECTORS OF THE CITY. PLEASE KEEP IN
03:52:05
MIND THIS NEW REQUIREMENT WILL NOT
03:52:07
APPLY TO CHARTER COMMISSIONS BECAUSE
03:52:08
WE WILL REQUIRE A BALLOT MEASURE AND
03:52:09
VOTERS TO VOTE ON THAT ITEM. IF THERE
03:52:16
ARE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE LET ME
03:52:17
KNOW.
03:52:18
>>OKAY, THANK YOU, ELIZABETH. LET'S
03:52:19
START WITH COUNCIL QUESTIONS. ARE
03:52:20
THERE ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS?
03:52:21
COUNCILMEMBER HARDY?
03:52:22
>>YES.I SEE THE LIST HERE OF THE
03:52:31
CHARTER ONES. THAT'S PLANNING PARKS
03:52:32
AND REX CIVIL SERVICE AND THE BOARD OF
03:52:33
TRUSTEES. MY QUESTION IS WHAT EFFECT
03:52:39
DOES THIS HAVE ON THE REQUIREMENT WE
03:52:40
HAVE BEEN GIVING, ASKING PEOPLE TO DO
03:52:41
A 700 FORM?
03:52:56
>>THE 700 DETERMINATION DOESN'T
03:52:57
MATTER, IS NOT RELEVANT TO THIS. WE
03:52:58
WOULD STILL HAVE TO DETERMINE WHICH
03:52:59
COMMISSIONS WOULD BE REQUIRED TO FILE
03:53:00
A 700 BUT IT DOESN'T MATTER WITH
03:53:01
REGARDS TO QUALIFICATION RELATED TO
03:53:02
RESIDENCY.
03:53:03
>>THANK YOU.
03:53:04
>>ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL?LET
03:53:08
ME GO TO THE PUBLIC. IS THERE ANY
03:53:09
MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC THAT WOULD LIKE
03:53:10
TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE?ASSISTANT CITY
03:53:14
CLERK, DO WE HAVE ANY E COMMENTS?
03:53:27
>>WE DO NOT, I MET AMIR.
03:53:28
>>OKAY, GOING BACK TO THE COUNCIL, MAY
03:53:29
I HAVE A MOTION FOR THE
03:53:30
RECOMMENDATION, PLEASE? COUNCILMEMBER
03:53:31
JANE?
03:53:32
>>YES, I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION
03:53:33
TO APPROVE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION.
03:53:34
>>SECOND.
03:53:35
>>SECOND BY COUNCILMEMBER PART.HANDS
03:53:36
ON THE MOTION, COUNCILMEMBER BECKER?
03:53:41
>>CURIOUS IF WE CAN INCLUDE AND HAVE
03:53:44
THIS I GUESS JUST INCLUDED.I THINK IT
03:53:52
NEEDS TO BE A LITTLE MORE APPROPRIATE
03:53:53
THAT WE HAVE ON APPLICATIONS FOR
03:53:54
COMMISSIONERS THAT WE APPROVE THATTHE
03:53:58
INFORMATION LISTED THAT THEY SHOULDN'T
03:53:59
HAVE(INAUDIBLE) BUT ALL AREAS SHOULD
03:54:02
BE ACTUALLY INCLUDED, FILLED IN AND
03:54:05
PROVIDED INFORMATIONIN APPLICATIONS.
03:54:12
>>I DON'T THINK WE SHOULD DO THAT.
03:54:16
>>I'M SORRY, COUNCILMEMBER BECKER, I
03:54:17
DON'T UNDERSTAND ARE YOU SAYING THAT
03:54:19
YOU WANT THAT IN THE ORDINANCE?
03:54:28
>>YES. I THINK THAT WE SHOULD HAVE
03:54:29
SOME KIND OF CLARIFICATION THERE, IF
03:54:30
WE DON'T HAVE A FULFILLED APPLICATION
03:54:31
THAT, I MEAN, HE SHOULD HAVE A
03:54:34
FINISHED APPLICATION FILLED OUT
03:54:35
NOTHING LEFT EMPTY, JOB HISTORY OR
03:54:39
SOMETHING LIKE THAT. I'VE SEEN
03:54:40
APPLICATIONS IN THE PASTWHERE
03:54:44
(INAUDIBLE).
03:54:45
>>I AM NOT SO SURE ABOUT THE ORDINANCE.
03:54:57
I DON'T KNOW IF THAT SHOULD GO ON THE
03:54:58
ORDINANCE OR JUST BECOME A PRACTICE, A
03:54:59
LETTER THAT SAYS WHEN THE CITY CLERK'S
03:55:00
OFFICE SENDS IT OUT IT SAYS PLEASE
03:55:01
FILL OUT ALL OF THE QUESTIONS.
03:55:02
>>THANK YOU.
03:55:03
>>JUST HAVE THAT BE DIRECTION TO STAFF
03:55:11
AND WE WILL LEAVE THE ORDINANCE AS
03:55:12
IS.
03:55:13
>>CAN WE USE THAT ORDINANCE AS PART OF
03:55:14
THE MOTION? COUNCILMEMBER JANE, CAN WE
03:55:15
JUST SAY INCLUDE THAT DIRECTION TO
03:55:16
STAFF?
03:55:18
>>YES, INCLUDING THAT DIRECTION.
03:55:19
>>COUNCILMEMBER PART, IS THAT OKAY?
03:55:20
>>YES.
03:55:21
>>WE AGREE WITH ADDING THAT IS
03:55:26
DIRECTION TO STAFF?
03:55:27
>>MAY ASK A FOLLOW-UP QUESTION? ON THE
03:55:28
APPLICATION, IF THERE ARE MISSED AREAS
03:55:31
OR INCOMPLETE, ARE YOU SAYING THAT AN
03:55:32
INCOMPLETEAPPLICATION WOULD DISQUALIFY
03:55:37
SOMEONE? OR YOU'RE JUST ASKING
03:55:54
>>MY CONCERN IS BASICALLY HOW DO WE
03:55:55
KNOW THAT THIS PERSON IS OUR PERSON,
03:55:56
AT THE 700 FORMS, HOW TO WHERE THEY
03:55:57
WERE BECAUSE WE HAD TO FILL OUT FORMS
03:55:58
AS A COMMISSIONER I HAD TO SAY WHERE I
03:55:59
WORK, WHAT KIND OF INCOME I HAVE,
03:56:00
BECAUSE YOU JUST WANTED MAKE SURE YOU
03:56:01
DON'T HAVE ANY CONFLICTSAND YOU'RE NOT
03:56:20
SOMEBODY THAT'S NOT WHO YOU ARE.
03:56:21
>>A 700 FORM IS DIFFERENT THAN AN
03:56:22
APPLICATION TO A COMMISSION. I WOULD
03:56:23
NOT WANT TO DISQUALIFY ANYONE, MAYBE
03:56:24
THEY HAVE A QUESTION, THEY ARE NOT
03:56:25
SURE, THEY CAN ANSWER, THEY DIDN'T
03:56:26
UNDERSTAND, I DON'T WANT TO DISQUALIFY
03:56:27
ANYONE BELIEVING SOMETHING BLANK. BUT
03:56:28
I JUST THINK WE SHOULD ENCOURAGE THEM
03:56:29
TO FILL OUT AS MUCH OF THE FORM AS WE
03:56:30
CAN. YOU WOULD CONCUR WITH THAT,
03:56:32
COUNCILMEMBER BECKER?
03:56:33
>>YES.
03:56:34
>>COUNCILMEMBER JANE?
03:56:35
>>YES, JUST WANT TO SAY THAT WE STILL
03:56:36
HAVE TO VALIDATE THEIR RESIDENTS OF
03:56:37
THE CITY.SO THE CLERK'S OFFICE HAS TO
03:56:38
DO THAT ANYWAY.THAT WOULD APPLY TO
03:56:44
VALIDATE WHO THEY ARE. BUT, YES, I
03:56:45
THINK LEAVING SOMETHING BLANK
03:56:46
INADVERTENTLY SHOULD NOT DISQUALIFY
03:56:47
SOMEBODYBECAUSE WE ALREADY HAVE ENOUGH
03:56:49
TROUBLE SOMETIMES.
03:56:50
>>AGREE. OKAY. ASSISTANT CITY CLERK,
03:57:03
YOU UNDERSTAND THE MOTION NOW, ARE YOU
03:57:04
CLEAR ON THAT?
03:57:05
>>YES, THANK YOU.
03:57:06
>>THANK YOU FOR YOUR QUESTIONS. ALL
03:57:07
RIGHT, WE ARE READY FOR ROLL CALL
03:57:08
VOTE, WHEN YOU ARE READY.
03:57:09
>>
03:57:10
[CALLING ROLL]
03:57:26
>>THAT PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU.
03:57:27
NEXT WE HAVE ITEM NUMBERSIX. UPDATE ON
03:57:38
SUSTAINABILITY PROGRAM AND PROVIDE
03:57:39
FEEDBACK ON 2022 PROGRAM FOCUS AREAS,
03:57:40
AND THIS WAS DEFERRED FROM DECEMBER 7.
03:57:48
RECOMMENDATION NOTE IN FILE THE UPDATE
03:57:49
ON SUSTAINABILITY PROGRAM AND PROVIDE
03:57:50
FEEDBACK ON THE 2022 PROGRAM FOCUS
03:57:51
AREAS. CITY MANAGER?
03:58:02
>>I AM LOOKING FOR MICHELLE TEMPLETON
03:58:03
WHO IS GOING TO PROVIDE THE
03:58:04
PRESENTATION.
03:58:05
>>CAN YOU HEAR ME?
03:58:06
>>HI, MICHELLE.
03:58:07
>>HELLO, WELCOME, THANK YOU FOR
03:58:08
STAYING LATE WITH US.
03:58:09
>>OF COURSE. I WILL SHARE MY SCREEN.
03:58:17
ALL RIGHT. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR,
03:58:18
COUNCIL MEMBERS, MICHELLE (INAUDIBLE)
03:58:19
MANAGER FOR THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA.I
03:58:25
AM HERE TO SHARE SUSTAINABILITY EFFORTS
03:58:27
WITH YOU AND THE PUBLIC.
03:58:39
TONIGHT WE WILL BE REVIEWING STATE AND
03:58:40
LOCAL CIRCUITS PROVIDING UPDATES ON
03:58:41
OUR EFFORTS AND REQUESTING COUNCIL
03:58:43
FEEDBACK FROM THE PROPOSED PROGRAM. TO
03:58:49
BEGIN I WOULD LIKE TO FRAME OUR
03:58:50
DISCUSSION ON WHAT IS INVOLVED. WE
03:58:51
REALLY(INAUDIBLE) THE NEEDS OF OUR
03:58:54
PEOPLE, THE ENVIRONMENTS COMPETING
03:59:05
AGAINST EACH OTHER. IT'S REALLY A
03:59:06
PLACE FOR THESE VARIANCE OVERLAP WE
03:59:07
FIND BALANCE.
03:59:08
>>I'M SORRY, I AM HAVING TROUBLE
03:59:09
UNDERSTANDING YOU. AM I THE ONLY ONE?
03:59:10
>>CAN YOU NOT HEAR ME?
03:59:16
>>MICHELLE, YOU SOUND A LITTLE FUZZY.
03:59:17
IT MAY BE YOUR HEADSET.
03:59:18
>>OKAY. LET ME MAKE SURE.CAN YOU HEAR
03:59:19
ME OKAY? IS THIS CLEAR? CAN YOU HEAR
03:59:26
ME BETTER NOW?
03:59:27
>>I HEAR THE SAME.
03:59:28
>>LET ME PULL MY HEADSET OFF ANDCAN
03:59:33
YOU HEAR ME NOW?
03:59:34
>>OKAY, SAY SOMETHING.
03:59:38
>>CAN YOU HEAR ME OKAY NOW?
03:59:44
>>YES.
03:59:45
>>OKAY. SO CAN YOU HEAR ME OKAY RIGHT
03:59:46
NOW?
03:59:49
>>YES.
03:59:50
>>OKAY. ALL RIGHT, SO TONIGHT, THANK
03:59:51
YOU FOR CALLING THAT OUT. TONIGHT WE
03:59:58
WILL REVIEW STATE AND LOCAL MARKETS,
03:59:59
PROVIDE AN UPDATE ON CITY
04:00:00
SUSTAINABILITY EFFORTS IN DIRECTIVE
04:00:03
AND REQUEST FEEDBACK ON THE PROPOSED
04:00:04
PROGRAM FOR THESE AREAS AND TO BEGIN I
04:00:10
WANT TO TALK ABOUT WHAT'S INVOLVED IN
04:00:11
OUR SUSTAINABILITY WORK, WE REALLY
04:00:12
CAN'T ACHIEVE SUCCESS IN THIS FIELD
04:00:13
WHEN WE HAVEPEOPLE PITTED AGAINST EACH
04:00:14
OTHER, SO IT'S REALLY THE PLACE WHERE
04:00:15
THESE VARIANTS OVERLAP TO WE FIND THE
04:00:16
BALANCE NEEDED TO HAVE IMPACT. WHEN WE
04:00:17
START TALKING ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL
04:00:18
SUSTAINABILITY WE HAVE TO TALK ABOUT
04:00:35
(INAUDIBLE) ECONOMIC ACTIVITY TO
04:00:36
REALLY ADDRESS THE INTERSECTION ALLEY
04:00:37
OF THESE ISSUES AS WE DEVELOP AND
04:00:38
IMPLEMENT OUR SUSTAINABILITY
04:00:39
STRATEGIES. WHILE I AM THE ONLY
04:00:40
OFFICIAL SUSTAINABILITY STAFF FOR
04:00:41
SANTA CLARA I WOULD LIKE TO RECOMMEND
04:00:42
INCREDIBLE HARD WORK TO SUSTAINABILITY
04:00:43
FROM VARIOUS STAFF AND DEPARTMENTS
04:00:44
THAT IS KEY TO ACHIEVING THE WHEN. I
04:00:45
WOULD ALSO LIKE TO RECOMMEND THE
04:00:46
DIRECTIONSTO HELP MOVE THE NEEDLE ON
04:00:55
SUSTAINABLE SANTA CLARA. THANK YOU.
04:00:56
WHILE SUSTAINABILITY WORK IS EVER
04:00:57
EVOLVING IN NATURE AND NEVER FULLY
04:00:58
FORMS A BROAD PICTURE OF WHERE WE NEED
04:00:59
TO BE INVOLVED PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE
04:01:00
IN A WAY THAT MINIMIZES ANY
04:01:01
COMPOUNDING EFFECTS THAT MANY OF THESE
04:01:02
TOWNS HAVE ON OUR COMMUNITY WILL ALSO
04:01:03
WORKING TO MEET REGULATORY TARGETS
04:01:04
AHEAD. FROM A HIGH-LEVEL VIEWIT
04:01:15
INCLUDES BILLETING OF SUSTAINABILITY
04:01:16
LANDS INTO OUR WORK, ESTABLISHING
04:01:17
UNIFIED CITY GOALS AND STRATEGIES IN
04:01:18
ADVANCING AND REPORTING (INAUDIBLE).
04:01:21
ALSO IMPORTANT UNDERSTAND THE
04:01:22
REGULATORY LANDSCAPE, THIS HIGHLIGHT
04:01:27
SOME OF THE SUSTAINABILITY AND CLIMATE
04:01:28
RELATED GOALS THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
04:01:29
HAS AS WELL AS(INAUDIBLE). AS YOU
04:01:31
KNOW, MANY OF THE REGULATIONS WILL
04:01:37
REQUIRE US TO ACT NOW WITH THE
04:01:38
TARGETS. IN ASSESSING THE TARGETS
04:01:39
CRITICALLYIT ENSURES THEY ARE STRONG
04:01:44
ENOUGH TO ACHIEVE HEALTHY FUTURE WHILE
04:01:45
ALSO MEETING THE NEEDS OF OUR
04:01:46
COMMUNITY TODAY.PREPARE THE NEXT FEW
04:02:02
SLIDES I WILL HIGHLIGHT SOME THE
04:02:03
CITY'S SUSTAINABILITY ACCOMPLISHMENTS
04:02:04
ACROSS ALL THE DEPARTMENTS IN
04:02:05
COLLABORATION WITH OUR COMMUNITY OVER
04:02:06
THE PAST YEAR OR SO. THEY CAN COOK
04:02:07
THEY INCLUDE COMPLETE UPDATES OR
04:02:08
ACTION PLAN WHICH WILL APPEAR BEFORE
04:02:09
COUNCIL IN SPRING 2022 AND ARE
04:02:10
RECENTLY APPROVED BUILDING
04:02:19
ELECTRIFICATION AND EV CHARGE
04:02:20
(INAUDIBLE). ALSO INCLUDED THE
04:02:21
IMPLEMENTATION OF (INAUDIBLE) THE
04:02:22
CHARGE CONNECTORS AND TO WALK THE WALK
04:02:23
ON TRANSPORTATION (INAUDIBLE) THE CITY
04:02:24
LAUNCHED IMPLEMENTATION OF OUR CITY
04:02:28
ELECTRIFICATION PLAN WITH OVER 20
04:02:29
ELECTRIC VEHICLES NOW IN FLEETS
04:02:30
ACCOMPANIED BY EV CHARGING
04:02:31
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS WITH MORE TO
04:02:32
COME. WE ARE ALSO EXCITED TO SHARE
04:02:46
(INAUDIBLE) POWER PROGRAM RANK SECOND
04:02:47
PLACE IN THE NATION FOR GREEN POWER
04:02:48
EXCELLENCE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF
04:02:49
ENERGY. THE CITY HAS INTEGRATED
04:02:50
SUSTAINABILITY IN A VARIETY OF WAYS,
04:02:51
THIS INCLUDES IN THE MENTATION OF
04:02:52
COLLECTION PROGRAM TO DIVERT
04:02:53
(INAUDIBLE) AS PART OF SB 1383. THERE
04:03:09
BEEN A VARIETY OF WATER CONSERVATION
04:03:10
CYCLE WATER PROJECTS, WATER OFFSETTING
04:03:11
NEARLY 19% OF POTABLE WATER AND AN
04:03:12
INTEGRATION OF SUSTAINABLE PARK
04:03:13
STRATEGY WITH SMART IRRIGATION, WATER
04:03:14
CONSERVATION, SEAPLANE, LOW WATER
04:03:15
LANDSCAPES, GARDENS AS WELL AS EV
04:03:16
CHARGING.WE ARE ALSO COMPLETED THIS
04:03:19
YEAR INCLUDING THE NORTH SIDE
04:03:20
LIBRARIES SOLAR PROJECT WE RECENTLY
04:03:21
ACHIEVED LEAD SOLAR CERTIFICATION OF
04:03:23
THE BRANCH LIBRARY. AN SEP INITIATEDA
04:03:28
STORE PROJECT. ADDITIONALLY MOBILITY
04:03:29
OPTIONS WERE SUPPORTED WITH(INAUDIBLE)
04:03:31
IMPROVEMENTS.
04:03:41
THIS YEAR HAS ALSO BEEN VERY MUCH
04:03:42
ABOUT COLLABORATION IN CONNECTION WITH
04:03:43
EFFORTS THAT INCLUDE PROVIDING
04:03:44
CUSTOMER WATER CONSERVATION WITH
04:03:46
REPLACEMENT REFLECTION BARREL AND
04:03:47
ENERGY EFFICIENCY REBATES BICYCLES,
04:04:08
HEAT PUMPS, EV CHARGERS, ALL OF WHICH
04:04:09
LED TO A TOTAL ENERGY SAVINGS
04:04:10
EQUIVALENT TO THE ANNUAL ENERGY OF
04:04:11
OVER 2000 (INAUDIBLE). AN INTERNAL
04:04:12
CITY GREEN TEAM WAS ESTABLISHED FROM
04:04:13
COLLABORATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF
04:04:14
NEW OUTREACH AND FINALLY THERE'S A BIG
04:04:15
FOCUS ON COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IN LOCAL
04:04:16
AND REGIONAL PARTNERSHIPS IN THE AREA
04:04:17
THE LACK ACTION AND ELECTRIFICATION.
04:04:18
SO STAFF RECOMMENDS THE FOLLOWING
04:04:19
AREAS TO GUIDE OUR SUSTAINABILITY
04:04:20
PROGRAM AND SEE COUNCIL CONFIRMATION
04:04:25
ON THE FOLLOWING PRIORITIES.
04:04:26
CONTINUING TO WORK ON ALIGNING WITH
04:04:27
IMPLEMENTATION OF CITY PLANS TO
04:04:28
ADDRESS SUSTAINABILITY AND CLIMATE
04:04:29
ACTION PLAN, RESOURCE PLANCOMMUNITY EV
04:04:52
BLUEPRINTS, COMPLETE ELECTRIFICATION
04:04:53
PLAN AND OUR URBAN WATER (INAUDIBLE)
04:04:54
IN THE CITY IS ALSO UNIQUELY PLACED
04:04:55
WITH SILICON VALLEY POWER TO MAKE
04:04:56
IMPACTS RENEWABLE ENERGY ONGOING
04:04:57
ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND ELECTRIFICATION
04:04:58
EFFORTS WITH INCENTIVES, REBATES, AND
04:04:59
OTHER OPPORTUNITIES, ALL OF WHICH
04:05:00
COMPLEMENT THE IMPLEMENTATIONOF ALL
04:05:01
ELECTRIC LEAD SHOW. IT'S ALSO
04:05:02
RECOMMENDED TO CONTINUE TO EXPLORE AND
04:05:03
ESTABLISH TRANSPORTATION POLICIES
04:05:04
INCLUDING THOSE HIGHLIGHTEDIN OUR
04:05:08
UPDATE. AS I MENTIONED, COMING BEFORE
04:05:09
YOU FOR CONSIDERATION IN THE 2022
04:05:14
TIMEFRAME AND ADDITIONALLY TO FOCUS ON
04:05:15
WATER CONSERVATION AND INVESTMENT IN
04:05:16
WATER INFRASTRUCTURE(INAUDIBLE) WHICH
04:05:32
WILL BE KEY AS WE CONTINUE TO FACE
04:05:33
IMPACTS OF THE MULTIYEAR DROUGHT
04:05:34
DEVELOPMENT. ANOTHER AREA IS TO LOOK
04:05:35
AT NATURE-BASED SOLUTIONS THAT FOCUS
04:05:36
NOT JUST ON (INAUDIBLE) BUT PREPARING
04:05:37
AIR QUALITY AND WATER QUALITY AND WE
04:05:38
ALSO RECOMMEND CONTINUING TO HAVE
04:05:39
SUSTAINABILITY INCORPORATED INTO OUR
04:05:40
CITY POLICIES OPERATIONS AND
04:05:44
FACILITIES. WHAT THAT MIGHT LOOK LIKE
04:05:45
IN PRACTICE WOULD BE TO EXPANDING OUR
04:05:46
PURCHASING POLICY TO ADDRESS
04:05:47
REGULATIONSON SB 13 MECHANICS MANDATE
04:05:56
(INAUDIBLE) PURCHASES AND SELECTING
04:05:57
PRODUCT SUSTAINABILITY. IT COULD ALSO
04:05:58
INCLUDE CONTINUING TO LOOK AT
04:05:59
OPPORTUNITIES AS RENOVATIONS
04:06:00
FACILITIES AND PARKS ARE NECESSARY.
04:06:01
AND TO MOVE FORWARDWE DO SO IN
04:06:33
COLLABORATION WITH COMMUNITY AND
04:06:34
PARTNERSHIPS THAT CONTINUE THE
04:06:35
EXPANSION OF OUR OUTREACH PROGRAMS AND
04:06:36
ACROSS SUSTAINABILITY AREAS AND WE
04:06:37
WOULD ALSO CONTINUE TO WORK FOR
04:06:38
EDUCATION PARTNERS ACROSS THE GRADES
04:06:39
AND DISCIPLINES AND WITH OUR
04:06:40
RESIDENTS. AND WE CERTAINLY SEE THE
04:06:41
INCREDIBLE VALUE IN PARTNERSHIP WITH
04:06:42
EXPANDING WHAT WE CAN ACHIEVE IN WE
04:06:43
PROPOSE TO CONTINUE TO DEDICATE TIME
04:06:44
TO THE OPPORTUNITIES THAT PARTNERSHIP
04:06:45
PRESENTS IN THE AREA OF CLIMATE, URBAN
04:06:46
FOREST, WATER CONSERVATION, ENERGY
04:06:47
EFFICIENCYAND MANY OTHER COLLABORATION
04:06:48
EFFORTS WITH LOCAL AND REGIONAL
04:06:49
LEVELS. FINALLY, WE PROPOSE TO
04:06:50
COORDINATE TO CONTINUE TO MONITOR
04:06:51
LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY ISSUES AS THOSE
04:06:52
SUSTAINABILITY LANDSCAPES ARE RAPIDLY
04:06:53
CHANGING.THAT IS STAFF'S
04:06:56
RECOMMENDATION TO NOTE IN FILE THE
04:06:57
UPDATE AND PROVIDE FEEDBACK ON OUR
04:06:58
2022 PROGRAM FOR THESE AREAS. THAT
04:07:08
CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION, I AM
04:07:09
AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
04:07:10
>>THANK YOU, MICHELLE, FOR THE
04:07:11
EXCELLENT REPORT, VERY THOROUGH, AND
04:07:12
I'M GOING TO GO TO OUR COUNCILMEMBERS
04:07:13
TO SEE IF ANYBODY HAS ANY COMMENTSOR
04:07:14
STATEMENTS ABOUT THIS. COUNCILMEMBER
04:07:15
JANE?
04:07:25
>>YES, MICHELLE, ONE OF THE THINGS
04:07:26
THAT ANNOYS A NUMBER OF RESIDENTS
04:07:27
INCLUDING MYSELF ARE LEAF BLOWERS. CAN
04:07:28
I KNOW THE STATE HAS ADOPTEDA BAN ON
04:07:46
GAS POWERED LEAF BLOWERS BY 2026. I
04:07:47
KNOW THAT PALO ALTO IS DOING A PILOT
04:07:48
PROJECT TO SWITCH TO ELECTRICALLY
04:07:49
LOWER WHICH ARE MUCH QUIETER AND TURNS
04:07:50
OUT LEAF BLOWERS ADMIT AS MUCH
04:07:51
POLLUTION AS MANY PASSENGER CARS. JUST
04:07:54
ONE HOUR OF LEAF BLOWING. SAME APPLIES
04:07:55
TO GAS POWERED LAWNMOWERS. SO I WAS
04:07:56
WONDERING IF THE CITYIS THINKING
04:08:01
ABOUT, I KNOW SVP A FEW YEARS AGO HAD
04:08:04
A PROGRAM TO ENCOURAGE OR GIVE REBATES
04:08:07
FOR ELECTRICAPPLIANCES FOR GARDENING
04:08:15
WHICH WAS HORRIBLY UNSUCCESSFUL
04:08:16
BECAUSE I THINK THE TECHNOLOGY WAS NOT
04:08:17
THERE. SO I'M WONDERING IF YOU
04:08:22
CONSIDERED SOME SORT OF LEAF BLOWER
04:08:27
REBATES OR PILOTS IN ADVANCE OF THE
04:08:28
'26 BAND. AND THEN IT'S THE CITY GOING
04:08:33
TO AT ONE POINT HAD A LECTURE SERIESTO
04:08:44
EDUCATE THE PUBLIC ON VARIOUS TOPICS
04:08:45
AND DOING THINGS LIKE LECTURE SERIES
04:08:46
ON INDUCTION STONE FOR DECARBONIZATION
04:08:47
ORLONGER PLACEMENTS, WHATEVER IS
04:08:51
THERE. AND THENONE THING I WOULD LIKE
04:08:58
TO SEE IS, I THINK YOU ALREADY TALK
04:08:59
ABOUT THE SB 1383, THE RECYCLED
04:09:01
CONTENT OF PAPER, I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE
04:09:04
SURE THAT WE HAVE A COMMITMENTTO CORY
04:09:08
FREE PAPER IN THE CITYAND THEN IS
04:09:14
THERE ANY WAY THAT YOU CAN THINK OF TO
04:09:16
SWITCH FROM PAPER TOWELS TO ELECTRIC
04:09:21
HAND DRYERS? SOME OF THOSE THINGS ARE
04:09:22
REALLY GOOD, LIKE THE DYSON'S JUST TO
04:09:27
NAME ONE BRAND.REALLY DOING A GOOD JOB
04:09:33
OF LEAVING YOUR HANDS DRY. IT SAVES A
04:09:37
LOT OF PAPER AND A LOT OF RESOURCES.
04:09:42
>>OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS BY
04:09:43
COUNCILMEMBERS? BEFORE WE GO BACK TO
04:09:44
MICHELLE?OKAY. MICHELLE? YOU WOULD
04:09:53
LIKE TO COMMENT ON COUNCILMEMBER
04:09:54
JANE'S COMMENTS?
04:09:55
>>YES, THANK YOU. I WILL START WITH
04:09:59
LEAF BLOWERS. ONE OF THE AREAS
04:10:02
>>MICHELLE, YOU'RE GOING IN AND OUT.
04:10:09
MAYBE IF YOU SIT CLOSER TO YOUR
04:10:10
SCREEN? I DON'T KNOW. LET'S TRY THAT.
04:10:11
>>LET'S SEE.
04:10:26
>>ARE YOU FROZEN? IS SHE FROZEN?SHE IS
04:10:31
NOT MOVING. MAYBE TURNING OFF YOUR
04:10:32
SCREEN, MICHELLE?I THINK SHE IS FROZEN.
04:10:42
YES, SHE LOOKS FROZEN TO ME.
04:10:46
>>I CAN ANSWER THE QUESTION AND
04:10:51
CHIMING AS NEEDED. RIGHT NOW WE ARE
04:10:56
EXPLORING FOR LEAF BLOWERS THE
04:10:57
OPPORTUNITY TOHAVE PURCHASED A NUMBER
04:11:05
OF ELECTRICAL LEAF BLOWERS TO MAKE
04:11:06
THEM AVAILABLE IN OUR CITY TOOL
04:11:07
LIBRARY AND SO WE ARE WORKING TO
04:11:16
SOMETIME IN QUARTER ONE OF THE FISCAL
04:11:17
YEAR TO MAKE THAT AVAILABLE AS WELL AS
04:11:18
I KNOW MAN WELL WE DO HAVE SOME SORT
04:11:19
OF A PROGRAM THAT ALLOWS FOR US TO
04:11:20
MAKE REBATES AVAILABLE, BUT CAN YOU
04:11:25
COMMENT ON THAT? I AM SHORT OF THOSE
04:11:26
DETAILS RIGHT NOW.
04:11:27
>>YES. ON THE REBATES FOR ELECTRIC
04:11:28
LAWN EQUIPMENT, CURRENTLYCUSTOMER JANE
04:11:32
IS CORRECT WE HAD A PROGRAM IN THE
04:11:33
PAST THAT WASN'T SUCCESSFUL. WE DON'T
04:11:34
CURRENTLY HAVE A PROGRAM. WE ANTICIPATE
04:11:41
AS THE DEADLINE TO GET CLOSER AND SO
04:11:42
THE DISTRICT START DEVELOPING SOME
04:12:01
CRITERIA ON HOW THAT'S GOING TO WORK
04:12:02
WE ANTICIPATE WE ARE GOING TO START
04:12:03
DOING THE SAME THING IN THE INTERIM
04:12:04
CITY MANAGER I THINK WE ARE EXPLORING
04:12:05
DOING A LENDING PROGRAM FOR THE
04:12:06
LIBRARY PROGRAM AS A STARTING POINT
04:12:07
AND KIND OF BUILD FROM THERE. SO WE
04:12:08
HAD THE PREVIOUS ONE, NOT SUCCESSFUL,
04:12:09
WE ARE LOOKING AT WHAT COMES OUT OF
04:12:18
SOME OF THE DISTRICTS AND A FEW OTHER
04:12:19
ONES AND SEE HOW WE ARE GOING TO
04:12:20
PIGGYBACK ON THOSE PROGRAMS TO HELP
04:12:21
FACILITATE A REBATE, SO WE DO
04:12:22
ANTICIPATE TO HAVE SOMETHING IN THE
04:12:23
FUTURE.
04:12:24
>>THANK YOU. MICHELLE, I SEE OUR BACK
04:12:25
I DON'T KNOW IF THERE'S ANY OTHER
04:12:26
QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS
04:12:27
>>CAN YOU HEAR ME OKAY?
04:12:28
>>YES, GO AHEAD. SO FAR SO GOOD.
04:12:29
>>THANK YOUFOR JUMPING IN. ON TO POINT
04:12:44
OUT SO I DON'T KNOW IF THIS WAS
04:12:45
MENTIONED WHEN I GOT BUMPED OFF BUT WE
04:12:46
DID EXPLORE A PILOT PROGRAM FOR OUR
04:12:47
OWN PARTS AND MAINTENANCE GROUP, SO WE
04:12:48
GOT A 14 ELECTRIC LEAF BLOWERS THAT WE
04:12:49
TRADED OUT AND ADDED TO OUR
04:12:55
MAINTENANCE FLEET, SO TO SPEAK, AND
04:12:56
ONE OF THE WAYS TO PILOT THIS AND MAKE
04:12:57
IT SUCCESSFUL IN THE COMMUNITY IS TO
04:12:58
MAKE SURE THAT OUR OWN STAFF ARE USING
04:12:59
IT, WE UNDERSTAND WHAT THE
04:13:06
IMPLICATIONS OF SWITCHING OVER TO THE
04:13:07
TECHNOLOGY, SO THAT WAS ONE OF THE
04:13:08
THINGS WE WORKING ON FOR THE LAST YEAR
04:13:09
IS THE PARKS AND RECREATION
04:13:10
MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENTWITH THOSE
04:13:11
ELECTRIC BLOWERS. ANDI BELIEVE THE
04:13:24
EXPLORATION OF OUR REBATE PROGRAM IS
04:13:25
CERTAINLY NOT OUT OF THE QUESTION, AND
04:13:26
AS WE GET CLOSER TO THE MANDATE WITH
04:13:27
ELECTRIC LEAF BLOWER STATEWIDE, MUCH
04:13:28
MORE ADOPTION INTEREST WILL BE THERE
04:13:30
AND REBATES ARE OFTEN TIMES A DEMAND
04:13:31
AND THEN SUPPLIED KIND OFACTIVITY, AND
04:13:36
SO LOOKING AT DOING A LOT OF EDUCATION
04:13:37
AROUND THAT, HAVINGCITY PARKS AND
04:13:41
MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS USING THEM IS
04:13:58
GOING TO MODEL THAT
04:13:59
EXCEPTIONS ACCEPTANCE AND ADOPTION.
04:14:00
AND THEN AS FAR AS THE LECTURE SERIES
04:14:01
IS CONCERNED, WE HAVE HAD SEVERAL
04:14:02
WORKSHOPS. WE HAVEN'T CALLED IT
04:14:03
ELECTRIC SERIES SO TO SPEAK YET
04:14:04
BECAUSE WE HAVE DONE IT BASED ONDEMAND
04:14:06
AND THE TOPICS AT HAND. WE HAVE HAD EV
04:14:07
WORKSHOPS AS PART OF OUR LECTURE SERIES
04:14:14
THOSE COME IN THE SPRING AND FALL OF
04:14:15
THE LAST FISCAL YEARS. WE EXPECT TO
04:14:16
CONTINUE TO DO SO FOR EBF OPTIONS AS
04:14:17
THE GOVERNOR 2035 (INAUDIBLE) WITH EVS
04:14:22
AS THE PRIMARY VEHICLE IN CALIFORNIA
04:14:23
AND WE HAVE ALSOEXPLORED INDUCTION AND
04:14:30
THERE ARE SOME EXCITING PROJECTS THAT
04:14:31
WILL BE SHARING MORE ABOUT THE
04:14:41
BEGINNING OF THE YEAR AND SO WE WILL
04:14:42
BE REALLY EXCITED TO SHARE SOME THE
04:14:43
PARTNERSHIP WE HAVE AS FAR AS
04:14:44
COMMUNITY AND PARTNER RELATED
04:14:45
WORKSHOPS AND CLASSES ON BUILDING
04:14:46
ELECTRIFICATION, HOME ELECTRIFICATION,
04:14:49
ESPECIALLY (INAUDIBLE). SO LOOK FOR
04:14:50
THOSE IN OUR SUSTAINABILITY. AND LET'S
04:14:53
SEE. REPLACEMENTS, WE ALSO TALKED
04:14:58
ABOUT WHAT TYPES OF TOPICS WE CAN
04:14:59
BRING INTO OUR WORKSHOPS THROUGH WATER
04:15:04
CONSERVATION AND WE ARE EXPLORING THAT
04:15:05
WITH WATER CONSERVATION STAFF. AND THEN
04:15:09
CORY FREE PAPER WE HAVE BEEN EXPLORING
04:15:10
THAT WITH OUR PROVIDER, OUR VENDOR,
04:15:14
AND THERE HAS BEEN CONSIDERATION OF
04:15:24
THE TRANSITION, CERTAIN DISPENSERS MAY
04:15:25
OR MAY NOT FIT THE TYPE OF PAPER THAT
04:15:26
COMES UNBLEACHED, BUT WE'RE IN THE
04:15:32
PROCESS OF EXPLORING WITH OUR VENDOR
04:15:33
HOW TO CHANGE OUT THE DISPENSERS FREE
04:15:34
OF CHARGE TO US SO THAT WE CAN START
04:15:37
PROVIDING ONLY CORY FREE PAPER TOWELS
04:15:38
WHERE AVAILABLEAND WHERE FEASIBLE.
04:15:41
ALONG THOSE LINESTHE NEW PAPER
04:15:51
REQUIREMENTS MAY ALSO SEE SOME CHANGES
04:15:52
IN ALL OF OUR (INAUDIBLE) ACROSS THE
04:15:53
CITY TO MEET A MINIMUM OF 30%TO MEET
04:16:10
CONTENT. SO IN ALL OF OUR WORK THIS
04:16:11
YEAR WITH PUBLIC WORKS IN ALL THE
04:16:12
DEPARTMENTS, A LOT OF THEM, A LOT OF
04:16:13
DEPARTMENTS ARE ALREADY 100% RECYCLED
04:16:14
PAPER CONTENT FOR PRINT PURPOSES BUT
04:16:15
WE WILL BE EXPANDING BEYOND PRINT AND
04:16:16
IT WILL BE IN ALL OF OUR PRODUCTS AND
04:16:17
WE HAVE NOT EXPLORED ELECTRIC DRYERS,
04:16:18
THOSE HAVE BEEN A COST SPECIFIC
04:16:19
CHALLENGE FOR REBATES BECAUSE MANY
04:16:20
BUSINESSESDON'T WANT TO INVEST IN THAT
04:16:27
CHANGE, SO CERTAINLY COULD EXPLORE
04:16:28
THAT FURTHER TO SEE IF THERE'S ANY
04:16:29
KIND OF APPETITE FOR THAT.
04:16:31
>>THANK YOU.
04:16:32
>>ANY QUESTIONS I MISS?
04:16:44
>>I THINK YOU GOT THEM ALL. WE'LL COME
04:16:45
BACK WHEN WE HAVE A LITTLE PROCESS
04:16:46
THING. THANK YOU FOR YOUR FORWARD
04:16:47
THINKING. I'M GOING TO GO TO THE
04:16:48
PUBLIC. IS THERE ANY MEMBER OF THE
04:16:49
PUBLIC THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON
04:16:50
THIS ISSUE?DO WE HAVE ANY E COMMENTS,
04:16:51
ASSISTANT CITY CLERK?
04:16:58
>>LET ME DOUBLE CHECK.THERE ARE NO E
04:17:03
COMMENTS.THERE ARE NO PUBLIC COMMENT
04:17:16
EMAILS.
04:17:17
>>THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WE ARE GOING TO
04:17:18
COME BACK TO THE COUNCIL NOW. WE HAVE
04:17:19
HEARD THE REPORT AND THE QUESTIONS, DO
04:17:20
WE HAVE A MOTION, COUNCILMEMBER HARDY?
04:17:21
>>JUST A MOTION TO NOTE AND FILEWITH
04:17:22
PROVIDED FEEDBACKESPECIALLY FROM
04:17:34
COUNCILMEMBER AGAIN.
04:17:35
>>SECOND.
04:17:36
>>WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO
04:17:37
NOTE IN FILE NOTING THE FEEDBACK FROM
04:17:38
THE COUNCIL. ALL RIGHT, ASSISTANT CITY
04:17:39
CLERK, A ROLL CALL VOTE, PLEASE?
04:17:40
>>
04:17:41
[CALLING ROLL]
04:18:10
>>THANK YOU, THAT PASSES UNANIMOUSLY,
04:18:11
THANK YOU SO MUCH, MICHELLE, FOR
04:18:12
JOINING US THIS EVENING AND PROVIDING
04:18:13
THAT VERY HELPFUL PRESENTATION, AND
04:18:16
THANK YOU AGAIN FOR YOUR FORWARD
04:18:17
THINKING AND WORKING WITH US ANDTHANK
04:18:37
YOU FOR THAT PRESENTATION AND CITY
04:18:38
MANAGER. ALL RIGHT. WE ARE GOING TO GO
04:18:39
NOW TO THE CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM, THE
04:18:40
SECOND ONE THAT WAS PULLED, ITEM 7J,
04:18:41
THAT WAS PULLED BY COUNCILMEMBER JANE,
04:18:42
THAT'S ACTION ON AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE
04:18:43
TO THE AGREEMENT FOR THE PERFORMANCE
04:18:44
OF SERVICES WITH WILSON IRRIGATION
04:18:45
ASSOCIATES FOR NOISE MONITORING
04:18:46
SERVICES, ADVANTAGE CEA TO DATA CENTER
04:18:47
AND OWENS CORNING FACILITY AND RELATED
04:18:48
BUDGET AMENDMENT. COUNCILMEMBER JANE,
04:18:50
COULD YOU TELL US WHY YOU PULLED THIS
04:18:51
ITEM?
04:18:52
>>YES. FUNDAMENTALLY THIS IS $86,000,
04:19:10
AND WE ARE NOT REALLY GETTING ANY
04:19:11
NOISE COMPLAINTS. SO IT'S NOT EXACTLY
04:19:12
CLEAR TO ME, THEY DID TWO WEEKS OF
04:19:13
NOISE STUDIES, THEY DIDN'T FIND
04:19:14
ANYTHING, THEY ACTUALLY DID A
04:19:15
FREQUENCY ANALYSIS, THEY COULDN'T
04:19:16
CORRELATE SPECTRUM FROM THE TWO DATA
04:19:17
CENTERSWHO THE NOISE OBSERVED AND
04:19:19
WHOSE SAMPLING LOCATIONS, SOIT JUST
04:19:23
SEEMS TO ME THATWE SHOULD PROBABLY
04:19:32
POSTPONE THIS UNTIL WE START HEARING
04:19:33
MORE NOISE COMPLAINTS BECAUSE IF WE DO
04:19:34
THIS MONITORING, MAYBE WE CAN APPROVE
04:19:43
THE BUDGET BUT WE WOULDN'T START IT
04:19:44
UNTIL WE GET SOME NOISE COMPLAINTS.
04:19:45
BECAUSEIF WE DON'T FIND ANYTHING THEN
04:19:51
WE HAVE WASTED $86,000. AND THEN I AM
04:19:52
ALSO DISCOURAGED THATTHE PUBLIC CAN'T
04:19:58
ACTUALLY LISTEN TO THESE NOISE MONITORS
04:20:05
OR REVIEW ANY OF THE DATA FROM THEM.
04:20:06
IT'S THE SAME COMPANY THAT DOES THE
04:20:07
NOISE MONITORS AT THE STADIUM ANDAT
04:20:16
THE STADIUM THE PUBLIC CAN LISTEN TO
04:20:17
THAT NOISE RECORDING WHEREAS FOR THESE
04:20:18
NOISE MONITORS THE PUBLIC CANNOT.
04:20:19
WHICH I THINK IS AN OVERSIGHT.I KNOW
04:20:21
THERE ARE DIFFERENT TYPES OF MACHINES,
04:20:25
SUMMER OWNED BY WILSON YEAR AGAIN THE
04:20:26
OTHER ONES ARE RENTED OR WHATEVER. SO
04:20:32
IT JUST DOESN'T SEEM TO ME LIKE IT'S
04:20:34
MONEY WELL SPENTAT THIS TIME. AND THAT
04:20:41
PERHAPS AS WE GET COMPLAINTS WE SHOULD
04:20:42
THINK ABOUT IT AGAIN.
04:20:43
>>VICE MAYOR TALL?
04:20:50
>>THANK YOU, MAYOR. SO I ALSO ANALYZE
04:20:51
SOME THE GRAPHSFOR THREE OR FOUR
04:20:54
LOCATIONS, BASICALLY.ANDSHERATON HAS
04:21:00
THE HIGHEST (INAUDIBLE). TO ME RIGHT
04:21:11
NOW IT'S MORE IMPORTANT IS ANALYTICS
04:21:12
OF WHAT THIS SOUND IS COMING FROM
04:21:13
VERSUS IF WE ARE NOT ABLE TO
04:21:15
(INAUDIBLE) AND IF THE SAME PROCESS
04:21:16
GOES AND WE DON'T FIND THE SOURCEWHERE
04:21:26
THE NOISES COMING FROM. THAT'S MORE
04:21:27
IMPORTANT. IF WE GIVE THIS CONTRACT,
04:21:28
WE HAVE TO ADD SOME MORE ANALYTICAL
04:21:29
OPTIONS THAT THEY NEED TO FIND OUTWHAT
04:21:32
CAN BE THE SOURCE OF THIS NOISE, NOT
04:21:33
JUSTRECALLING THE NOISE, BUT WHAT CAN
04:21:38
BE THE SOURCE. IS IT FREEWAY NOISE? I
04:21:42
SEE THAT COMING PICKING UP IN THE
04:21:43
MORNINGSDURING THE TRAFFIC HOUR AND
04:21:47
ALSO DURING THE EVENING TRAFFIC HOURS,
04:21:48
SO I WOULD LIKEEVEN IF WE APPROVE IT
04:21:57
AND IMPLEMENT IT LATER ON AS
04:21:58
COUNCILMEMBER JANE MENTIONED, BUT I
04:21:59
WOULD LIKE TO ADD SOME MORE ANALYTICAL
04:22:10
CLAUSES IN IT THAT THEY HAVE TO GET
04:22:11
BACK TO US WITH THOSE FINDINGS,
04:22:12
BASICALLY.
04:22:13
>>THANK YOU. SO WE HAVE ONE SO FAR THE
04:22:14
WANT TO NOT, COUNCILMEMBER JANE WANTS
04:22:15
TO NOT DO IT UNLESS THERE ARE
04:22:17
COMPLAINTS, AND THEN VICE MAYOR TO ALL
04:22:18
WANTS TO ADD MORE ON TO WHAT WE ARE
04:22:19
DOING FOR ANALYTICS. I AM JUST TRYING
04:22:23
TO KEEP TRACK. BECAUSE THIS WAS A
04:22:24
COUNCIL DIRECTED CONDITION OF
04:22:29
DEVELOPMENT BY ALL OF YOU. SO I JUST
04:22:30
WANT TO MAKE SURE. OKAY?
04:22:41
>>COUNCILMEMBER BECKER, EURONEXT.
04:22:42
>>AND I CLARIFY?
04:22:43
>>I THOUGHT YOU JUST DID.
04:22:44
>>WHAT I AM SAYING IS I AGREED TO WHAT
04:22:45
COUNCILMEMBER JANE IS SAYING THAT WE
04:22:46
APPROVE THE BUDGET AND DO IT AT A
04:22:49
LATER DATE WHEN WE GET COMPLAINTS. BUT
04:22:50
WHEN WE DO, WHENEVER WE DO IT AT THOSE
04:22:51
ANALYTICAL CLAUSES. THANK YOU.
04:22:53
>>I THINK THAT MIGHT BE EXTRA MONEY.
04:22:56
OKAY, COUNCILMEMBER BECKER.
04:23:00
>>I AGREE WITH COUNCILMEMBER JANE, HE
04:23:15
REALLY KIND OF LAID IT OUT PERFECTLY.
04:23:16
I KNOW I KIND OF MADE A MAYBE NEED A
04:23:17
LITTLE MORE CLARIFICATION IN THE
04:23:18
BEGINNING WHAT HE WAS TALKING ABOUT, I
04:23:19
DO KIND OF LIKE THE IDEA OF NO NOT
04:23:20
UNTIL WE GET THE COMPLAINTS BUT
04:23:21
APPROVING THE BUDGET TO HAVE THAT THERE
04:23:22
. SEEING THAT THERE HASN'T BEEN ANY
04:23:23
COMPLAINTS THAT'S KIND OFI GUESS IT'S
04:23:27
SOMETHING THAT WE DON'T WANT TO WASTE
04:23:28
THE MONEY ON, I GUESS BEING LITTLE
04:23:29
MORE FIDUCIARY. AT THE SAME TIME, I DO
04:23:41
LIKE KIND OF WHAT COUNCILMEMBER JANE
04:23:42
WAS ALSO SAYING ABOUT THE PUBLIC
04:23:43
SHOULD BE ABLE TO LISTEN TO THESE KIND
04:23:44
OF THINGS, I KNOW THIS IS SOMETHING
04:23:45
I'VE TALKED TO LISTENERS ON THE NORTH
04:23:46
SIDE ABOUT MONITORS THAT THEY SHOULD
04:23:53
BE ABLE TO HAVE THE SAME ACCESS AND I
04:23:54
THINK THAT IS SOMETHING WE SHOULD ALL
04:23:55
HAVE ACCESS TO SO IN THIS AREA THEY
04:23:56
SHOULD HAVE THE SIMILAR ACCESS. I'M IN
04:23:57
FAVOR OF THAT KIND OF ASPECT. BUT I
04:23:58
KIND OF WOULD LIKE COUNCILMEMBER JANE
04:24:02
TO REPEAT MAY BE WHAT HE WAS SPEAKING
04:24:03
ABOUT, THERE'S TWO THINGS YOU WANTED
04:24:04
SEE OR WAS IT JUST THE ONE.
04:24:11
>>THIS WAS DIRECTION FROM THE COUNCIL.
04:24:12
I THINK IT WAS LED BY COUNCILMEMBER
04:24:13
JANE IN THE FIRST PLACE.
04:24:14
>>IT WAS, YES.A NUMBER OF RESIDENTS
04:24:21
WERE COMPLAINING. NOW THEY'RE NOT
04:24:22
COMPLAINING. SO I DON'T SEE THE POINT
04:24:23
OF SPENDING MONEY TO DISCOVER
04:24:25
NOTHING.
04:24:26
>>WELL, WAS YOU THAT WANTED IT.I AM
04:24:28
POINTING THAT OUT BECAUSEYES, ALL
04:24:32
RIGHT. COUNCILMEMBER HARDY?
04:24:40
>>I LIKE THE POINT THAT COUNCILMEMBER
04:24:41
JANE WAS MENTIONING BECAUSE IF WE READ
04:24:42
THE REPORT VERY CAREFULLY IT SAID THAT
04:24:48
IT'S POSSIBLE BECAUSE WE COULDN'T
04:24:49
DETERMINE WHERE THE NOISE WAS COMING
04:24:50
FROM THAT WE HAD THE COMPLAINTS ON AT
04:24:51
THAT POINTTHAT IT MIGHT ALSO HAVE TO
04:24:57
DO WITH WEATHER PATTERNS AND HOW SOUND
04:24:58
TRAVELS DEPENDING ON DIFFERENT CLOUD
04:25:02
COVER AND THINGS LIKE THAT. SO I TOO
04:25:03
WOULD LIKE TO WAIT UNTIL WE HAVE SOME
04:25:08
COMPLAINTS SO WE HAVE SOMETHING THAT
04:25:09
WE ARE ACTUALLY MEASURING AND MAYBE
04:25:14
DETERMINE THE SOURCE. THANK YOU.
04:25:15
>>COUNCILMEMBER WATANABE?
04:25:20
>>THANK YOU, MAYOR. SO YES, I RECALL
04:25:21
THATIT SEEMED THAT THE ISSUE HAD, IT
04:25:29
WAS DETERMINED THAT A LOT OF IT HAD TO
04:25:30
DO WITH THE WEATHER AND THE COLD
04:25:31
WEATHER ANDNOW WE ARE COMING INTO THE
04:25:40
WINTER SEASON WHERE IT WAS THIS TIME
04:25:41
LAST YEAR WHEN IT SEEMED LIKE THE
04:25:42
COMPLAINTS ARE EXACERBATED, AND SO I
04:25:49
THINK IF THIS WOULD NOT BE A GOOD TIME
04:25:50
TO CANCEL THE CONTRACT BECAUSE AGAIN
04:25:51
THE WAY I RECALLTHE DATA THAT WAS
04:25:57
COLLECTED SHOWED THAT THE NOISE WAS
04:25:58
LIKE THIS TIME OF YEAR WHEN IT WAS
04:25:59
COLD ANDSO IT WOULD BE, I THINK IT
04:26:09
WOULD BE PRUDENT TO KEEP THE CONTRACT
04:26:10
IN PLACE FOR NOW OR JUST HAVE IT
04:26:11
AVAILABLE TO BE ABLE TO USE IT WHEN
04:26:12
THE NOISE, IT DOES HAPPEN AGAIN, IT'S
04:26:19
AVAILABLE THEN TO CAPTURE THE NOISE
04:26:20
AND DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT IT IS
04:26:21
WEATHER RELATED OR IF IT'S RELATED TO
04:26:22
SOMETHING ELSE. SO IF THAT'S THE WAY
04:26:23
THE CONTRACT CAN BEUSED, THEN I THINK,
04:26:31
THEN, IT IS MONEY WELL SPENT BECAUSE
04:26:32
AGAIN, IT WILL HELP DETERMINEOR BACK
04:26:34
UP WHAT HAPPENED LAST YEAR.
04:26:41
>>THANK YOU. I THINK THAT'S A QUESTION
04:26:42
EVERYONE ELSE HAS SPOKEN, THAT'S THE
04:26:43
QUESTION TO CITY STAFF IS CAN WE
04:26:44
ALLOCATE THE MONEYBUT KEEP THE
04:26:47
CONTRACT AT BAY.UNTIL THERE IS A
04:26:51
REASON TO USE IT.EVERYONE HAS SPOKEN.
04:27:25
CITY STAFF?
04:27:26
>>YOU CERTAINLY CAN ALLOCATE THE FUNDS
04:27:27
FOR THE PURPOSE OF NOISE MONITORING.
04:27:28
YOU DON'T HAVE TO. I DO WANT TO
04:27:29
COMMENT, THOUGH, THE TURNAROUND TIME
04:27:30
FOR INSTALLING THE HARDWARE AS WELL AS
04:27:31
HAVING THE EQUIPMENT INSTALLED OUT
04:27:32
THERE WITH NO CONTRACT IS GOING TO BE
04:27:33
ABOUT TWO MONTHS. WE MIGHT LOSE THE
04:27:34
WINDOW OF OPPORTUNITY IF THERE IS A
04:27:35
NOISE OR A SOUND THAT NEEDS TO BE
04:27:36
MONITORED FOR LACK OF HAVING THE
04:27:37
CONTRACT IN PLACEAND BEING ABLE TO
04:27:38
WORK WITH THE CONTRACTORS. IF THERE IS
04:27:39
AN INTEREST IN PROVIDING THE SAME DATA
04:27:40
ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE, THE WAY THAT WE
04:27:41
PROVIDE FOR THE STADIUM MONITORS, THAT
04:27:46
IS EXTRA SCOPE, I DON'T THINK THAT
04:27:47
IT'S INCLUDED AS PART OF THE COST THAT
04:27:48
WE HAVE BEFORE THE COUNCIL, SOWE WOULD
04:27:50
HAVE TO GO BACK TO THE CONSULTANT AND
04:27:51
SEE HOW TO GET THAT FOLDED INTO WHAT
04:28:00
THE COST OF A PERMIT WOULD BE.
04:28:01
>>THANK YOU FOR THAT CLARIFICATION. I
04:28:02
JUST WANTED TO KNOW WHAT OUR OPTIONS
04:28:03
ARE. THANK YOU.
04:28:04
IS THERE ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC THAT
04:28:05
WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE?DO
04:28:23
WE HAVE ANY WRITTEN COMMENTS ON THIS
04:28:24
ITEM?
04:28:25
>>I HAVE NONE, MAYOR.
04:28:26
>>OKAY, THANK YOU. GOING BACK TO THE
04:28:27
COUNCIL NOW FOR A MOTION. COUNCIL
04:28:28
MEMBER BECKER?
04:28:29
>>I WAS READY TO MAKE A MOTIONBUT I'M
04:28:30
KIND OF GLAD THAT (INAUDIBLE) WATANABE
04:28:33
RAY SOME POINTS AS WELL AS THE CITY
04:28:34
MANAGER. IT IS POSSIBLE IF WE MAKE
04:28:38
SOME KIND OF A MOTION.BUT WE STILL
04:28:48
HAVE THE CONTRACT. AM I CORRECT?
04:28:49
>>WE WOULD HAVE TO MAKE SURE THAT THE
04:28:50
CONTRACTOR IS WILLING TO PUT AT BAY
04:28:51
THEIR PRICING AND HOLD IT, AND SO
04:29:06
THAT'S OBVIOUSLY THERE OPPORTUNITY,
04:29:07
AND THEN I WANTED TO MANAGE
04:29:08
EXPECTATIONS THAT THE TURNAROUND TIME
04:29:09
IF WE DO ACTIVATE THE CONTRACT WOULD
04:29:10
BE ABOUT TWO MONTHS.
04:29:11
>>I WILL BE MAKING A MOTION. THANK
04:29:12
YOU.
04:29:13
>>COUNCILMEMBER JANE?
04:29:14
>>I DON'T REALLY UNDERSTAND IT BECAUSE
04:29:15
THE CONTRACT IS $22,000 TO MOVE THE
04:29:18
NOISE MONITORING EQUIPMENT. IS THAT
04:29:19
GOING TO TAKE TWO MONTHS TO MOVE THE
04:29:20
NOISE MONITORING EQUIPMENT? IT DOESN'T
04:29:21
REALLY ACTUALLY MAKE SENSE TO ME. AND
04:29:23
SOIF I'M GOING TO MAKE A MOTION I'M
04:29:28
GOING TO MAKE A MOTION TO DENY, WELL,
04:29:33
TO ALLOCATE THE MONEY BUT NOT TO SPEND
04:29:34
IT TILL WE GETTHREE NOISE COMPLAINTS.
04:29:35
>>I WILL SECOND THAT.SO UNDERSTANDING
04:29:48
THE THREE NOISE COMPLAINTS WOULD BE AT
04:29:49
LEAST TWO MONTHS BEFORE ANYTHING CAN
04:29:50
BE DONE ABOUT IT. LET ME GET A MAN WELL
04:29:52
.
04:29:59
>>THANK YOU, MAYOR. GOOD EVENING,
04:30:00
MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL. JUST
04:30:02
WANTED TOPUT A LITTLE MORE ON THE TWO
04:30:11
MONTHS. TWO KEY THINGS. ONE IS THE
04:30:12
CONSULTANT HAS TO HAVE THE EQUIPMENT
04:30:13
AVAILABLE, AND IF THERE IS NO CONTRACT
04:30:26
IN PLACE WITH THE SPECIFIC DATE TO
04:30:27
START WE WOULD HAVE TO WORK WITH THEM
04:30:28
WHEN THE EQUIPMENT IS AVAILABLE, SO
04:30:29
THAT'S ONE ITEM. THE SECOND ITEM IS
04:30:30
LIKE THE OTHER MONITORS, THIS MONITOR
04:30:31
WOULD ACTUALLY BE HARDWIRED
04:30:32
ELECTRICALLY. INTO A CITY POLE. SO
04:30:39
THAT'S GOING TO REQUIRE TWO THINGS.
04:30:40
ONE, TO GO THROUGH A PERMITTING
04:30:41
PROCESS, WE WILL WORK WITH THEM AS WE
04:30:42
ALWAYS DO TO GET THOSE OUT. BUT THEN
04:30:43
TWO, TO ACTUALLY DO THE WORK. SOWE
04:30:44
JUST WANT TO MAKE THE COUNCIL AWARE
04:30:45
THATYOU AND IF WE HAVE A CONTRACT IF
04:30:46
YOU WANT THEM TO EXECUTE THE WORK
04:30:47
UNTIL WE ACTUALLY EXECUTE THE CONTRACT
04:30:48
TO DETERMINE AVAILABILITY AND GO TO
04:30:49
THE PERMITTING PROCESS AND HARDWIRE
04:30:50
THE EQUIPMENT WE WON'T BE ABLE TO TAKE
04:30:51
ANY READINGS AND THAT IS GOING TO TAKE
04:30:52
SOME TIME. ANDREW, I DON'T KNOW IF I
04:30:53
MISSED ANYTHING.
04:30:54
>>LET'S GO TO DIRECTOR CRABTREE.
04:30:55
>>THANK YOU, JUST ADD ON TO THAT A
04:30:56
LITTLE BIT OR REITERATE SOME OF IT TO
04:30:57
MAKE SURE IT'S REALLY CLEAR, SO THE
04:30:58
EQUIPMENT THAT WE HAVE IN PLACE AROUND
04:30:59
LEVI STADIUM IS LEAST BY THE
04:31:00
CONSULTANTS THAT WE HAVE AS WELL AS
04:31:01
THEY ALSO PAY THE SUBCONSULTANT TO
04:31:02
MAINTAIN THE WEBSITE. SO THOSE ARE
04:31:03
THINGSTHAT ARE NOT IN THE SCOPE OF THE
04:31:04
CONTRACT THAT WE HAVE. THE CONSULTANT
04:31:05
HAD PROPOSED TO USE DIFFERENT KIND OF
04:31:06
EQUIPMENTTHAT DOESN'T REQUIRE
04:31:07
HARDWIRING TO THE CITY'S POLLS, AND SO
04:31:37
THAT'S A DIFFERENT TYPE OF THING.
04:31:38
THERE'S REALLY A COUPLE OF ISSUES
04:31:39
GOING ON HERE, BUT IF WE WANT TO GO
04:31:40
AHEAD AND MAKE THE BUDGET APPROPRIATION
04:31:47
WE CAN DO THAT AND THEN I THINK IT'S
04:31:48
REALLY WITH DIRECTION TO THE CITY
04:31:49
MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT UP TO
04:31:50
THAT AMOUNT BUT ALSO TO SEEK TO MODIFY
04:31:57
THAT CONTRACT TO DO A FEW THINGS. ONE
04:31:58
IS WAIT UNTIL WE'VE HAD A COMPLAINT
04:31:59
BEFORE WE BEGIN IMPLEMENTING ITAS TO
04:32:02
MET DIRECTOR CAN AID IT WAS JUST
04:32:03
EXPLAINING, IF WE GOWITH THE EQUIPMENT
04:32:13
IS ABLE TO HAVE ITS DATA BROADCAST PUT
04:32:14
ONTO THE WEB, THERE'S A LITTLE BIT
04:32:15
MORE TIME INVOLVED TO INSTALL IT, LIKE
04:32:19
A PERMITTING PROCESS AND MAKING SURE
04:32:20
THE ELECTRICAL, EVERYTHING IS DONE
04:32:21
RIGHT. SO THERE MAY BE A BIT OF A
04:32:23
DELAY, BUT WE WOULD WORK THROUGH THAT.
04:32:33
I THINK THE TWO MONTHS IS RELATED TO
04:32:34
OTHER, BIGGER ISSUES AS WELL,
04:32:35
PARTICULARLY AROUND THAT. WE WOULD DO
04:32:36
IT AS BEST AS WE COULD. SO JUST KEEP
04:32:46
THAT IN MIND, AND THEN SO WE WOULD BE
04:32:47
NEED TO GO BACK TO THE CONSULTANT AND
04:32:48
SAY WE WANT TO MODIFY THE CONTRACT TO
04:32:49
HAVE THE SORT OF FLEXIBLE START DATE
04:32:53
AND THEN POTENTIALLY ALSO TO USE THE
04:32:54
DIFFERENT TYPE OF EQUIPMENT INSTEAD OF
04:32:55
WEBSITE IF THAT IS THE DIRECTION OF
04:32:56
THE COUNCIL, AND WE MAY HAVE A
04:33:07
DIFFERENT PRICING AROUND THAT. SO
04:33:08
COUNCILWOMAN WOULD TAKE THAT INTO
04:33:09
CONSIDERATION AS WELL.
04:33:10
>>THANK YOU. THANK YOU. COUNCILMEMBER
04:33:11
JANE?
04:33:15
>>I'M SORRY, I AM A LITTLE CONFUSED. I
04:33:16
THINK THAT THIS EQUIPMENT THAT WE ARE
04:33:18
TALKING ABOUT HERE, YOU SAID IT WAS
04:33:22
GOING TO BE HARDWIRED AND PERMITTED
04:33:37
WHICH TAKES TIME VERSUS THE ONES AT
04:33:38
THE STADIUM ARE NOT HARDWIRED?
04:33:39
>>I'M SORRY IF I WAS NOT CLEAR. THE
04:33:40
ONES AT THE STADIUM ARE HARDWIRED.
04:33:41
WHEN THE CONSULTANT WAS PROPOSED IN
04:33:42
THE SCOPE THAT WE BROUGHT FORWARD IS
04:33:43
NOT HARDWIRED.
04:33:44
>>THEY DON'T NEED THE EXTRA PERMITTING
04:33:45
THEN.
04:33:46
>>RIGHT, BUT THEY DON'T HAVE THE
04:33:47
ABILITY TO CONNECT
04:33:49
>>BROADCAST.
04:33:55
>>IF WE WANTED THE BROADCASTING, IT
04:33:56
WOULD HAVE TO BE HARDWIRED. IS THAT
04:33:57
WHAT I AM HEARING?
04:34:05
>>YES.
04:34:06
>>OKAY, NOW I UNDERSTAND. THANK YOU.
04:34:07
>>OKAY. VICE MAYOR TALL?
04:34:08
>>THANK YOU, MAYOR.IF I RECALL,
04:34:12
SOMETIME BACK WE MOVED ONE OF THE
04:34:13
MONITORSTO ANOTHER DIFFERENT LOCATION.
04:34:21
SO IS THAT STILL PHYSICAL, LET'S SAY
04:34:22
WE FACE A PROBLEM OVER HERE AND CAN WE
04:34:26
MOVE THAT EQUIPMENT TO THE SIDE WE
04:34:38
THAT'S MY FIRST QUESTION. IF THAT IS
04:34:39
FEASIBLE, WHAT IS THE TIMELINE ON
04:34:40
THAT? HOW LONG WOULD IT TAKE? AND WHAT
04:34:41
WOULD BE EXPENSE FOR THAT? MAYBE
04:34:42
THAT'S A SOLUTIONFOR (INAUDIBLE).
04:34:44
THANK YOU. I'M NOT SURE WHO CAN ANSWER
04:34:45
THIS QUESTION.
04:34:49
>>CAN ANYONE ANSWER THIS QUESTION?
04:34:53
>>SO I GUESS I CAN START. WE CERTAINLY
04:34:54
COULD EXPLORE MOVING. THERE ARE
04:35:05
LOGISTICS AS ANDREW JUSTIN MANWELL
04:35:06
JUST CLARIFIED. I DO WANT TO GO BACK
04:35:07
AND SEE WHO, WHICH AGENCY PAID,
04:35:08
WHETHER WAS A STADIUM AUTHORITY OR THE
04:35:09
CITY. I KNOW THAT WE HAVE SOME
04:35:14
EXPENDITURES IN HER STADIUM AUTHORITY
04:35:15
FOR NOISE MONITORING AND I BELIEVE
04:35:16
THEY MAY BE RELATED TO THIS EQUIPMENT.
04:35:17
IF THAT'S THE CASE,THERE IS IN HER
04:35:22
AGENCY ISSUES THAT WE NEED TO BE VERY
04:35:23
CAREFUL ABOUT.
04:35:24
>>THE STADIUMARE PAID FORFROM THE
04:35:31
(INAUDIBLE).
04:35:32
>>OKAY. THAT'S A BARRIER FOR US.
04:35:33
>>BUT WHAT IS THE COST SAVINGS TO US?
04:35:40
(INAUDIBLE) IF YOU MOVE A MONITOR, IF
04:35:41
THAT IS DOABLE? IF THAT IS MORE
04:35:51
FEASIBLE, THAT'S WHAT I'M SAYING,
04:35:52
SOMETIME MORE FEASIBLE AND GIVE US
04:35:53
ACCESS TO ALL NINE RESIDENTS, IS THAT
04:35:54
GOOD? THAT'S MY POINT.
04:35:58
>>I THINK IT IS DOABLE, IT'S LOGISTICS
04:35:59
THAT WE NEED TO FIGURE OUT THAT WE ARE
04:36:08
NOT PREPARED TO SPEAK TO TONIGHT.
04:36:09
>>OKAY. WE CAN GET BACK TO THAT.
04:36:10
>>I WOULD LIKE US TO TAKE ACTION ON
04:36:11
THIS ITEM HERE. COULD THE COUNCIL
04:36:14
PLEASE MAKE A DECISION ON WHAT YOU
04:36:15
WANT TO DO WITH THIS ITEM? WE HAVE A
04:36:16
MOTION AND A SECOND?I VAGUELY REMEMBER
04:36:26
SOMETHING. COUNCILMEMBER JANE, DID YOU
04:36:27
MAKE A MOTION?
04:36:28
>>I DID MAKE A MOTION. BUT I WOULD
04:36:29
LIKE TO WITHDRAW MY MOTION AND ASK FOR
04:36:30
A CONTINUANCE.
04:36:31
>>TO HAVE TO GO THROUGH THIS AGAIN?
04:36:32
CAN WE JUST DISPERSE WITH THIS?
04:36:34
>>I DON'T SPEND THE MONEY.
04:36:36
>>OKAY.BUT IT WAS YOU WHO ASKED FOR
04:36:41
THIS IN THE FIRST PLACE.
04:36:42
>>YES. WE WASTED A LOT OF TIME.
04:36:43
>>THERE ARE NO COMPLAINTS, I DON'T
04:36:48
WANT TO WASTE A $6000 OF TAXPAYER MONEY
04:36:50
. YOUR MOTION IS TO CONTINUE THIS
04:37:00
ITEM, JUST CONTINUE IT.
04:37:01
>>TO GET MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE
04:37:02
BROADCASTING COSTS, MOVING, THE
04:37:03
TIMELINE.
04:37:04
>>YOU WANT TO SPEND MORE MONEY
04:37:05
RESEARCHING THIS THAN JUST PUTTING IT
04:37:10
ON HOLD.
04:37:11
>>MAYOR GILLMOR?
04:37:12
>>YES?
04:37:20
>>I JUST WANT TO GO BACK TO THE ACTUAL
04:37:21
SCOPE OF WORK ON TIMING JUST FOR MORE
04:37:22
CLARITY ON THAT. THE SCOPE OF WORK
04:37:23
ACTUALLY DOES DESCRIBE THAT THE
04:37:24
INSTALLATION WOULD REQUIRE SIGNIFICANT
04:37:26
COORDINATION. THE MONITORS ARE BULKY
04:37:41
AND REQUIRED AIRLIFT TO INSTALL AN
04:37:42
INSTALLATION TAKES 2 TO 3 WEEKS AFTER
04:37:43
THE REQUEST IS RECEIVED IN THE RENTAL
04:37:44
LIFT AVAILABILITY. SO I JUST WANT TO
04:37:45
ADD A LITTLE MORE CONTEXT AS TO WHY I
04:37:46
SAID TWO MONTHS, SO I COULD GO THROUGH
04:38:09
THE WHOLE PROCESS OF PERMITTING, PLUS
04:38:10
THEIR OWN DESCRIPTION OF THE TIMING
04:38:11
PLUS THE FACT THAT YOU HAVE TO BE
04:38:12
PENDING EQUIPMENT RENTAL AND I CAN
04:38:13
TELL YOU FROM MY OWN BENEFIT THAT
04:38:14
SOMETIMES THE EQUIPMENT IS NOT
04:38:15
AVAILABLE WHEN YOU WANT IT, SO THAT'S
04:38:16
KIND OF WHERE THOSE TIME FRAMES
04:38:17
HAPPEN. I COMPLETELY UNDERSTAND
04:38:18
WHATEVER POLICY DIRECTION THE COUNCIL
04:38:19
WANTS TO TAKE. MY PERSPECTIVE IS WANT
04:38:20
TO MAKE SURE WHEN WE DO GET A
04:38:21
COMPLAINT IF IT DOES TAKE A MONTH AND
04:38:22
1/2 OR TWO MONTHS, THAT'S NOT A
04:38:38
SURPRISE TO ANYONE AT THAT TIME. I
04:38:39
JUST WANT TO GO BACK TO THE SPECIFICS
04:38:40
SCOPE OF WORK I THINK THIS CONSULTANT
04:38:41
WAS VERY CLEAR IT'S NOT THE COMPLAINT
04:38:42
WE CAN GET A MODULE UP THE NEXT DAY,
04:38:43
WILL TAKE A NUMBER WEEKS FROM THAT
04:38:44
POINT WHERE WE SAY GO TO ACTUALLY
04:38:45
GETTING THE EQUIPMENT OUT. I JUST
04:38:46
WANTED TO PROVIDE THAT CONTEXT
04:38:47
STRAIGHT FROM THE SCOPE ALREADY
04:38:48
AVAILABLE IF ELSE THE DISCUSSION
04:38:49
TONIGHT.
04:38:50
>>WHAT I'M TRYING TO GET TO IS EITHER
04:38:51
THE COUNCIL MOVES ON WITH THIS ACTION
04:38:58
FIRES THIS GROUP EXPANDS THE SCOPE IF
04:38:59
THEY WANTED ALL ONLINE, OR PUTS THE
04:39:00
MONEY ASIDE AND WAIT STILL THERE SOME
04:39:01
COMPLAINTS. THAT'S ALL I'M TRYING TO
04:39:02
GET TO. BUT I HATE TO HAVE OUR STAFF
04:39:03
GO AND DO ALL THIS EXTRA WORK WHEN
04:39:04
THIS ALL STARTED BECAUSE THERE WERE NO
04:39:05
COMPLAINTS. I'M JUST TRYING TO GET TO
04:39:06
THAT. SO
04:39:07
>>IT DIDN'T START WHEN THERE WERE NO
04:39:08
COMPLAINT. IT STARTED WHEN THERE WERE
04:39:09
COMPLAINT FOR
04:39:10
>>
04:39:12
>>I'M SORRY.
04:39:13
>>IT'S GETTING LATE AND I AM HEARING
04:39:14
SO MANY DIFFERENT THINGS.I THOUGHT I
04:39:17
HEARD FROM YOU YOU WANT TO PUT ON HOLD
04:39:18
BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE ANY COMPLAINTS.
04:39:23
NOW IT'S DIFFERENT. GO AHEAD,
04:39:24
COUNCILMEMBER JANE, MAKE A MOTION. GO
04:39:25
AHEAD.
04:39:33
>>YES, I WOULD LIKE TO CONTINUE THIS
04:39:34
ITEM.
04:39:35
>>OKAY JUST TO CONTINUE IT.
04:39:36
>>I MAKE A MOTION TO CONTINUE IT TO
04:39:37
GET MORE INFORMATION.
04:39:38
>>OKAY.
04:39:40
>>TO JANUARY.
04:39:53
>>I WILL SECOND THAT WITH THE REQUEST
04:39:54
THAT INFORMATION ABOUT IF WE HAVE TO
04:39:55
MOVE FROM NORTHSIDE WHERE DID THE
04:39:56
LOGISTICS GO?
04:39:57
>>ARE YOU ASKING THAT WE TAKE OUT A
04:39:58
NOISE MONITOR AROUND THE STADIUM?
04:40:00
>>WE DID TAKE OUT IN THE PAST.
04:40:01
>>WE HAVE IT IN A WAREHOUSE SOMEWHERE?
04:40:04
OR MAKE NO. WE PUT IT AT A DIFFERENT
04:40:05
LOCATION.
04:40:09
>>YOU WANT TO TAKE A NOISE MONITOR
04:40:10
FROM THAT LOCATION AND PUT IT HERE.
04:40:11
>>PUT IT HERE TEMPORARILY. IF THAT CAN
04:40:14
SOLVE THE PROBLEM, LET'S SAY, THEN
04:40:22
WHENEVER WE HAVE AN ISSUE.
04:40:23
>>HAVE WE DETERMINED WE DON'T NEED AND
04:40:24
ON THE NORTH SIDE? WE MADE THAT
04:40:25
DETERMINATION?
04:40:26
>>WHEN WE MOVED EARLIER WE DID MAKE
04:40:27
THAT DETERMINATION.I DON'T KNOW THE
04:40:32
LOCATION WAS THAT BUT THEY MENTIONED
04:40:33
THAT LOCATION CAN SPARE A MONITOR.
04:40:39
>>I'M GOING WITH THOSE FINDINGS.
04:40:40
>>COUNCILMEMBER BECKER?
04:40:47
>>I HEREBY SMEAR CHAHAL'S CONCERNS
04:40:48
ABOUT THAT AND MOVING IT, BUT I DON'T
04:40:49
REALLY KINDA FEEL COMFORTABLE AFTER
04:41:03
GOING AND DOING A CURFEW I REALLY
04:41:04
DON'T FIND IT FEEL COMFORTABLE MOVING
04:41:05
ANYTHING FROM THERE. SO IF WE'RE
04:41:06
TRYING MAKE A FRIENDLY AMENDMENT TO
04:41:07
THAT?
04:41:08
>>I'M JUST ASKING FOR THE INFORMATION.
04:41:09
WHAT LOGISTICS WOULD BE? LET'S SAY A
04:41:10
TIME WHERE WE DON'T NEED IT AND WE NEED
04:41:17
(INAUDIBLE). IF THAT IS A TIME PERIOD
04:41:18
OF ONLY 10 DAYS, AT THAT TIME. IT'S
04:41:19
ONLY 10 DAYS AND WE CAN TEMPORARILY
04:41:20
MOVE IT OVERHEAD.I AM TRYING TO FIND
04:41:24
OUT SOME FINDINGS, WHETHER WE CAN DO
04:41:25
THAT AND WHETHER THAT CAN BE A
04:41:26
SOLUTION OR NOT.
04:41:27
>>NO ACTION.
04:41:38
>>NO, NO ACTION. I'M JUST TRYING TO
04:41:39
FIND OUT THE LOGISTICS AND DEPENDING
04:41:40
UPON THE ANSWERS WE CAN MAKE A
04:41:41
DECISION AT THAT TIME.
04:41:42
>>SOMETHING KIND OF LIKE AN OFF-SEASON
04:41:43
OR SOMETHING WHERE NOTHING IS GOING ON
04:41:44
THAT STADIUM.
04:41:45
>>THAT'S CORRECT.
04:41:47
>>OKAY, ALL RIGHT, COUNCILMEMBER
04:41:48
BECKER, ANYTHING ELSE?COUNCILMEMBER
04:41:50
WATANABE?
04:41:56
>>I KNOW OF NO TIME THAT ANY OF THE
04:41:57
NOISE MONITORS WERE MOVEDFROM THE
04:42:00
STADIUM AREA NORTH SIDE. THERE IS
04:42:06
ANOTHER MONITOR, I BELIEVE IT'S OVER
04:42:16
NEAR MCGREGOR IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY,
04:42:17
IT WAS INSTALLED TO CAPTURE AGAIN
04:42:18
AIRPLANE NOISE. BUT NO MONITORS WERE
04:42:19
EVER MOVED.BUT DIRECTOR CRABTREE, LET
04:42:28
ME ASK, THESE MONITORS ARE ALREADY IN
04:42:29
PLACE, CORRECTLY THAT WE ARE TALKING
04:42:30
ABOUT?
04:42:36
>>SORRY, FIRST, LET ME CLARIFY
04:42:37
SOMETHING I SAID TOO. THE ONES THAT WE
04:42:45
ARE PROPOSING IN THE NEW SCOPE ARE
04:42:46
HARDWIRED, THE ONES, THEY REALLY ARE A
04:42:47
DIFFERENT TYPE OF MONITORS THAT WE'VE
04:42:48
USEDBUT THE ONES THAT WE ARE TALKING
04:42:58
ABOUT OR PROPOSING UNDER THE CURRENT
04:42:59
CONTRACT WOULD BE HARDWIRED AS WELL AS
04:43:00
THE ONES THAT WE HAVE IN PLACE AROUND
04:43:01
THE STADIUM. WE HAVE FOUR AROUND THE
04:43:02
STADIUM, THEY HAVE BEEN THEREFOR A FEW
04:43:03
YEARS NOW. THEY HAVE NOT MOVED. WE
04:43:12
ADDED THROUGH A SEPARATE CONTRACT
04:43:13
UNRELATED TO THAT ANOTHER STADIUM BY
04:43:14
THE AIRPORT, ANOTHER MONITOR BY THE
04:43:15
AIRPORT FOR THE TIME BEING WE WERE
04:43:21
MONITORING THE AIRPORT ACTIVITIES
04:43:22
RELATED TO THE EXPANSION PROJECT THAT
04:43:23
WAS GOING ON THERE AND WE SUBMITTED
04:43:24
COMMENTS BASED ON OUR OWN DATA IN THE
04:43:28
REVIEW THAT WAS GOING ON FOR THAT
04:43:29
PROJECT. WE HAVE THAT AS WELL. WE DID
04:43:36
USE SOME OTHER MONITORS SHORT-TERM
04:43:37
LAST SUMMER AS WELL, BUT WE HAVE NOT
04:43:38
HAD A MONITOR COME IN AND BE MOVED. WE
04:43:42
EITHER PUT THEM IN AND OUT. ONCE
04:43:43
AROUND THE STADIUM, THEY ARE LEASTBY
04:43:47
THE OUR CONSULTANT AND THAT COULD TAKE
04:43:48
SOME TIME AS WELL FOR THEM TO GO AND
04:43:51
PROCURE THOSE IF THEY NEED TO.
04:44:00
>>OKAY. BUT JUST TO BE CLEAR, THE
04:44:01
MONITORS THAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT
04:44:02
RIGHT NOW THAT WERE INSTALLED TO
04:44:03
MONITORBY VANTAGE IN OWENS CORNING,
04:44:09
THERE ARE MONITORS ALREADY IN PLACE
04:44:10
THERE, CORRECTLY
04:44:11
>>NO.
04:44:12
>>OKAY.
04:44:13
>>WE DO NOT HAVE ANY AT THE MOMENT. WE
04:44:19
HAD SOME TEMPORARILY LAST SUMMER, WE
04:44:20
HAD SOME FOR A COUPLE WEEKS. WHEN THE
04:44:21
COMPLAINTS HAD COME IN. BUT THE REPORT
04:44:24
THAT WAS SHARED WITH THE COUNCILWAS
04:44:30
BASED ON THAT TEMPORARY MONITOR.
04:44:31
>>OKAY.
04:44:33
>>OKAY. THANK YOU. ASSISTANT CITY CLERK
04:44:37
, DO YOU HAVE THE MOTION?
04:44:48
>>THANK YOU FOR ASKING, MADAM MAYOR, I
04:44:49
WAS GOING TO CLARIFY THE MAKER OF THE
04:44:50
MOTION. WHAT I HEARD ORIGINALLY WAS TO
04:44:57
CONTINUE THIS ITEM TO JANUARY AND GET
04:44:58
MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE
04:44:59
BROADCASTING OF THE MOVING OF
04:45:00
EQUIPMENT AND THE TIMELINE. IS THAT
04:45:01
CORRECT?
04:45:02
>>CORRECT.
04:45:03
>>OKAY.SO WE HAVE A MOTION AND THE
04:45:04
SECOND ON THAT.ASSISTANT CITY CLERK, A
04:45:07
ROLL CALL VOTE, PLEASE?
04:45:12
>>
04:45:13
[CALLING ROLL]
04:45:42
>>THAT PASSES 5-0 PAGE 5-2. LET'S KEEP
04:45:43
GOING. NEXT WE HAVEACTION ON THE
04:45:55
WARBURTON AVE., CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
04:45:56
AREA PARKING ANALYSIS.
04:46:00
>>MCNAMARA? I WILL HAVE TO RECUSE, MY
04:46:03
PROPERTY IS CLOSE TO THAT.SO I WILL
04:46:07
RECUSE AND SOMEBODY TEXT ME I WILL
04:46:13
COME BACK.
04:46:14
>>OKAY, THANK YOU FOR THAT DISCLOSURE.
04:46:15
NOTING THAT FOR THE RECORD.CITY MANAGER
04:46:20
OR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR, I
04:46:21
DON'T KNOW WHO'S GOING TO TAKE THIS.
04:46:47
>>CRAIG MO BACK.
04:46:48
>>THANK YOU, DIRECTOR MO BACK. THANK
04:46:49
YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL, CRAIG MOBECK,
04:46:50
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS. WE PREPARED
04:46:51
A PRESENTATION FOR TONIGHT'S ITEM IN
04:46:52
THIS WAS BASED ON COUNCIL DIRECTION AT
04:46:53
A PREVIOUS MEETING DURING THE
04:46:54
DEVELOPMENT, SO I'M GOING TO HAVE
04:46:55
MICHAEL LEWIS, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF
04:46:56
PUBLIC WORKS, LEAD US THROUGH THE
04:46:57
PRESENTATION. THANK YOU.
04:46:58
>>THANK YOU, CRAIG. CAN EVERYBODY HEAR
04:46:59
ME?
04:47:00
>>YES, WE CAN. WELCOME.
04:47:01
>>GREAT. WE DO HAVE A PRESENTATION, IF
04:47:02
WE CAN PULL UP THAT PRESENTATION WE
04:47:03
WOULD APPRECIATE IT.OKAY. THANK YOU,
04:47:12
HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL, ASSISTANT
04:47:20
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS. I WILL BE
04:47:21
PRESENTING ON THE WARBURTON PARKING
04:47:22
ANALYSIS. NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE?
04:47:26
JUST A BIT OF BACKGROUND HERE, WHEN
04:47:27
COUNCIL APPROVED THE 12 UNIT TOWNHOME
04:47:46
PROJECT ON WARBURTON AVENUE, THE
04:47:47
RESIDENTS WERE CONCERNED ABOUT THE
04:47:48
LACK OF AVAILABLE STREET PARKING IN
04:47:49
THE IMMEDIATE AREA. FOLLOWING THAT THE
04:47:50
COUNCIL DID APPROVE A BUDGET DESIGN
04:47:51
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT TO
04:47:52
COMPLETE A PARKING STUDY FOR THE AREA
04:47:53
AND TO LOOK AT OPTIONS IF NEEDED. THE
04:47:54
PARKING STUDY THAT WE MOVE FORWARD WITH
04:47:55
WAS LOOKING AT PUBLIC STREET AS WELL
04:47:56
AS PRIVATE PARKING LOTS AS WELL. NEXT
04:47:57
SLIDE?
04:48:08
COMMUNITY FEEDBACK. THERE WERE THREE
04:48:09
COMMUNITY MEETINGS IN MAY AND DECEMBER
04:48:10
2019 AND ONE RECENTLY IN SEPTEMBER OF
04:48:11
THIS YEAR. THESE MEETINGS WE HAD
04:48:12
SEVERAL COMMUNITY MEMBERS ATTEND AND
04:48:28
THEY PROVIDED THE FEEDBACK WHICH IS
04:48:29
SUMMARIZED ON THE SCREEN IN FRONT OF
04:48:30
YOU. I WILL GO OVER THESE QUICKLY. SO
04:48:31
RESIDENTS EXPRESSED CONCERN WITH
04:48:32
LIMITED STREET PARKING IN THE AREA,
04:48:33
THEY DID HOWEVER MENTION THAT LINCOLN
04:48:34
STREET IS UNDERUTILIZED FOR PARKING
04:48:35
AFTER 6 PM MEANING THERE IS AVAILABLE
04:48:36
PARKING, COMMENTS ABOUT LARGETRUCKS,
04:48:37
THERE ARE RESIDENTSTHAT INCLUDE
04:48:40
PARKING RESIDENTS RESIDENTIAL AREAS
04:48:41
SUCH AS THE UNITED CHURCH AS WELL AS
04:48:42
THE TRADE MUSEUM. THE RESIDENTS ASKED
04:48:50
THAT WE CONTINUE CONSIDER CIVIC CENTER
04:48:51
AND THEY ALSO VOICED CONCERN ABOUT
04:48:52
ALSO NARROWING THE TO FIT IN DIAGONAL
04:48:54
PARKING. THEN FINALLY ONE OF THE
04:48:55
COMMENTSIS THAT SHOULD PROVIDE MORE
04:49:05
ON-SITE PARKING. THIS WAS DISCUSSED ON
04:49:06
THE DEVELOPMENT THAT I HAD MENTIONED
04:49:07
ON TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL.
04:49:08
THE NEXT TWO SLIDESIS INFORMATION
04:49:10
ABOUT PARKING OCCUPANCY, IF WE COULD
04:49:11
MOVE TO THE NEXT SLIDE.THE FINDINGS.
04:49:23
SO JUST BEFORE I GET INTO THIS, I
04:49:24
WANTED TO INFORM THE COUNCIL ABOUT THE
04:49:25
PROCESS WE WENT THROUGH TO CONDUCT THE
04:49:26
STUDY WE FIRST CALCULATED THE
04:49:27
INVENTORY OF PARKING SPACES AVAILABLE
04:49:28
IN THE AREA. WE COLLECTED PARKING DATA
04:49:33
AND LOOKED AT AND EVALUATED THAT DATA.
04:49:34
ON THE SCREEN IN FRONT OF YOU WE
04:49:35
SHOULD BE ABLE TO SEE A MASS,
04:49:43
BASICALLY AN EXHIBIT, A MAP OF THE
04:49:44
AREA IN WHICH WE CONDUCTED OUR STUDY.
04:49:45
WARBIRDS IN THE MIDDLE OF THE MAP,
04:49:55
READING LEFT TO RIGHT, (INAUDIBLE) ON
04:49:56
THE LEFT TOP TO BOTTOM, CIVIC CENTER
04:49:57
THE STREET ACTUALLY CONNECTING, I KNOW
04:49:58
WE ARE ALL FAMILIAR WITH IT BUT IT'S
04:49:59
CONNECTING WARBURTON TO LINCOLN, THE
04:50:00
LINCOLN KIND OF ON THE RIGHT SIDE,
04:50:07
GOING TOP TO LEFT, AND THAT IS
04:50:08
ADJACENT TO CITY HALL WHICH IS REALLY
04:50:09
THE ORANGE BUILDING.
04:50:16
SO IN SUMMARY, WE DID STUDY THE CIVIC
04:50:17
CENTER AND ALSO DON AVENUE (INAUDIBLE)
04:50:18
WHICH IS A STREET THAT CONNECTS
04:50:19
WARBURTON AS WELL. THE PARKING DATA
04:50:20
WAS CONDUCTED, COLLECTED TWICE DURING
04:50:34
A GIVEN DAY, WE DID THAT FOR THREE
04:50:35
DAYS DURING THE WEEK ON WEDNESDAY,
04:50:36
THURSDAY, AND FRIDAY. REALLY DID TRY
04:50:37
TO GET INTO THIS GRAPHIC, AND HAS
04:50:38
BESIDES BEING A MAP IT DOES SHOW
04:50:39
COLORS. THE COLORS SHOWN ON THE LEDGE
04:50:40
ON THE RIGHT INDICATE AVAILABILITYAS
04:50:43
CONCLUDED BY THE STUDY. THE GREEN
04:50:50
COLOR REPRESENTS WHERE YOU HAVE A
04:50:51
GREATER THAN 50% PARKING AVAILABILITY
04:50:52
OF THE LOS 30 TO UP TO 50%, ORANGES 15
04:51:02
TO 30 IN THE RED IS LESS THAN 15%. SO
04:51:03
AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE MAP WE DO HAVE
04:51:04
COLORS TO THE STREET AND COLORS FOR
04:51:05
THE RESIDENTIAL AREASAND ALSO COLORS
04:51:06
FOR THE REQUESTED NONRESIDENTIAL AREAS
04:51:19
THAT THE RESIDENTS HAD ASKED. WHAT
04:51:20
THIS GRAPHIC IS SHOWING ONCE AGAIN,
04:51:21
THIS IS THE MIDDAY., 11:01 PM. PRETTY
04:51:22
MUCH ALL LOCATIONS DURING THIS TIME
04:51:23
PERIOD HAS SOME PRETTY GOOD PARKING
04:51:24
AVAILABILITY.
04:51:25
SO WE GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE.SO THIS IS
04:51:40
THE SAME MATT BUT DIFFERENT COLORS.
04:51:41
WHAT THIS REPRESENTS IS THE LATE-NIGHT
04:51:42
PERIOD, THE 1 AM TO 3 AM, AND THIS IS
04:51:43
WHEN PEOPLE ARE PARKED FOR THE NIGHT
04:51:44
AND AS YOU CAN SEE HERE THERE'S MORE
04:51:45
RED, THE RED IS ACTUALLY ON CIVIC
04:51:46
CENTER AND DON AVENUE, WARBURTON
04:51:50
AVENUE THAT'S BASICALLY THE AREA
04:51:51
THAT'S LESS THAN 15%, CONSISTENT WITH
04:51:55
WHAT WE HEARD FROM SOME OF THE
04:51:56
RESIDENTS, IT IS NOTABLE THATLINCOLN
04:52:06
STREET IS MORE THAN 50% AND WE HAVE
04:52:07
SOME AREAS ON (INAUDIBLE) AS WELL ON
04:52:08
THE TRITON LOT IS GREEN AND THEN SOME
04:52:09
OF THE RESIDENTIAL AREAS ARE IN ORANGE
04:52:15
WHICH IS BASICALLY 30%. OVERALL THE
04:52:16
FINDINGS DID INDICATE THAT PARKING
04:52:17
PUBLIC STREET PARKING ON CIVIC CENTER
04:52:19
AND WARBURTON WAS NOT AS READILY
04:52:20
AVAILABLE AS WE WOULD ALL LIKE.IF I
04:52:24
CAN GO TO THE NEXT LIKELY
04:52:30
OPTIONS TO CONSIDER. I'M LOOKING AT
04:52:31
THE SITUATION, WE ROLLED UP HER
04:52:40
SLEEVES, TO LET THE COMMUNITY
04:52:41
FEEDBACK, WE HAVE IN FRONT OF YOU FIVE
04:52:42
OPTIONS THAT WE LOOKED AT. WE LOOK AT
04:52:43
ADDITIONAL PARKING ENFORCEMENT,
04:52:48
EVERYTHING THAT CAN BE DONE THAT CAN
04:52:49
HELP WITH YOU CAN BASICALLY PARK THERE
04:52:50
LONGER THAN 72 HOURS, LARGER VEHICLES,
04:52:54
CARS THAT ARE PARKED ILLEGALLY,
04:52:55
DIAGONAL PARKING IS ONE OPTION THAT
04:52:56
WAS PRESENTED, WE TOOK A SERIOUS LOOK
04:53:01
AT THAT, DIAGONAL PARKING LOT, LEAVES
04:53:02
A FAIRLY WIDE STREETAND THAT'S BEEN
04:53:07
PART OF SOME OF THE DISCUSSIONS.
04:53:08
RESIDENTIAL PERMIT PARKING WHICH IS
04:53:09
BASICALLYEACH UNIT WOULD GET A CERTAIN
04:53:10
AMOUNT, YOU WOULD GET A PARKING PASS
04:53:17
FOR THAT UNIT, THAT TYPE OF THING, AND
04:53:18
THEN TIME-LIMITED PARKING WHICH IS
04:53:19
BASICALLY TO OUR PARKING, ENCOURAGES
04:53:21
HIGHER TURNOVER. ULTIMATELY WE DID, WE
04:53:23
ARE RECOMMENDINGDIAGONAL PARKING BE
04:53:28
CONSIDERED FOR CIVIC CENTER DR.
04:53:31
DIAGONAL PARKING BE CONSIDERED FOR
04:53:32
CIVIC CENTER DR. IF WE WERE TO SEE THE
04:53:33
PREVIOUS, THAT AREA IS RIGHT IN THE
04:53:34
MIDDLEOF THE AREA THAT SHOWING RED AND
04:53:40
ON TOP OF THAT DIAGONAL PARKING ON
04:53:41
LINCOLN, I THINK THE CONCERN WOULD
04:53:43
HAVE THIS PEOPLE ARE PARKING THERE
04:53:45
TODAY AND IS NOT LIKELY THAT THEY
04:53:58
WOULD WANT IT OR WANT TO USE THAT AS
04:53:59
WELL. SO JUST REAL QUICK, KIND OF WANT
04:54:00
TO GO OVER THE RECOMMENDATIONS
04:54:01
HIGHLIGHTED IN THE REDBOX AND OF
04:54:02
COURSE THE GRAPHIC ON THE RIGHT, WHICH
04:54:15
DOES SHOW CIVIC CENTER DR. CIVIC
04:54:16
CENTER IS BASICALLY ON THE BOTTOM AS
04:54:17
WELL AS ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE
04:54:18
PICTURE, AND THEN ON THE TOP, THE
04:54:19
STREET THAT HAS A CURVE IN IT, THAT'S
04:54:20
LINCOLN STREET AT CITY HALL TO THE
04:54:21
NORTH THERE OR ON THE TOP.OF THE
04:54:28
DRAWING. SO REALLY LOOKING AT DIAGONAL
04:54:29
PARKING, CIVIC CENTER DR., THIS WOULD
04:54:30
ADD APPROXIMATELY 25 SPACES, WHICH IS
04:54:31
ABOUT 27% INCREASE IN THE INVENTORY
04:54:37
FOR CIVIC CENTER SPECIFICALLY.
04:54:38
CURRENTLY WE ARE ESTIMATING ABOUT A
04:54:39
$300,000 TOLORI THE STREET WHICH IS
04:54:46
BASICALLY APPLYING A NICE FIELD COAT
04:54:47
AND THEN INSTALLING ROADWAY PARKING
04:54:48
STRIPING SIGNAGE.
04:54:49
WITH THAT, IF WE CAN GO TO THE NEXT
04:54:53
LIKELYI WILL CONCLUDE WITH STAFF
04:55:16
RECOMMENDATION THAT WE APPROVE THE
04:55:17
WARBURTON CIVIC CENTER PARKING OFFICE
04:55:18
AND TO DIRECT THE CITY MANAGER TO
04:55:19
INCLUDE A BUDGET PROPOSAL FOR COUNCIL
04:55:20
CONSIDERATION TO FUND A NEW PROJECT
04:55:21
FOR INSTALLING DIAGONAL PARKING
04:55:22
BETWEEN LINCOLN WARBURTON AS PART OF
04:55:23
THE BIENNIAL 2022-'23 AND '23 24BUDGET
04:55:30
PROCESS. THIS CONCLUDES MY
04:55:31
PRESENTATION AND I AM AVAILABLE FOR
04:55:32
ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS. THANK YOU.
04:55:33
>>THANK YOU, I APPRECIATE THAT. THANK
04:55:34
YOU FOR THE VISUALS ON THAT AS WELL.
04:55:35
IT REALLY IS HELPFUL TO SEE THE AREAS
04:55:36
THAT WE ARE HAVING THE ISSUES WITH.
04:55:37
COUNCILMEMBER JANE?
04:55:42
>>YES. MICHAEL.WHAT I SEE HERE TRYING
04:55:47
TO UNDERSTAND IF I UNDERSTANDTHE WHITE
04:55:52
BOXES ON SLIDE THREE, YOU HAVE THE
04:55:56
PARKING AVAILABILITY AT NIGHTTIME.
04:56:01
DOES THIS SHOW THAT THE UNITED
04:56:02
METHODIST CHURCH HAS 90% OF AVAILABLE
04:56:04
PARKING AT NIGHT?
04:56:09
>>LET'S GO WITH THE QUESTION.MICHAEL,
04:56:15
IF YOU COULD WAIT, WE'RE GOING TO GET
04:56:16
ALL THE QUESTIONS AT ONCE. GO AHEAD,
04:56:21
SIDES, WITH YOUR QUESTION.
04:56:22
>>MY SECOND QUESTION IS AS THE CITY,
04:56:27
THIS IS $300,000, SO IT'S $10,000 A
04:56:28
SPOT PARKING.HAS THE CITYTRIED TO
04:56:35
NEGOTIATE WITH ANY OF THE OWNERS, THE
04:56:37
COMPLEX IS ONLY15, IF I AM
04:56:41
UNDERSTANDING IT, 56%VACANT IN THE
04:56:47
MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT. DENNY'S IS 76%
04:56:48
MAKE, BANK OF THE WEST IS 95% VACANT.
04:56:54
SO IS THERE AN OPPORTUNITY TO USE THAT
04:57:00
PARKING FOR RESIDENTS AT NIGHT AND
04:57:01
THEN THE BUSINESSES DURING THE DAY?
04:57:04
>>COUNCILMEMBER HARDY?
04:57:11
>>I HAVE A SIMILAR THOUGHT WHEN I
04:57:12
LOOKED AT THIS, AND RECOGNIZING THAT
04:57:13
IT WAS MORE OF A PROXIMITY, BECAUSE
04:57:17
EVEN AT NIGHT, WHICH IS WHEN IT SHOWS
04:57:18
WE HAVE ALL THE PROBLEMS,LINCOLN IS,
04:57:24
HAS PLENTY OF PARKING AND I WAS TRYING
04:57:25
TO REMEMBER. I DON'T THINK WE LIMIT
04:57:30
THE TRITON PARKING AT NIGHT. I COULD
04:57:31
REMEMBERI MAYBE I SHOULD'VE LOOKED
04:57:44
WHEN I WAS THERE THE OTHER DAY BUT I'M
04:57:45
ASKING THE QUESTION, DO WE LIMIT OR DO
04:57:46
WE HAVE ANY SIGNS THAT SAYS YOU CANNOT
04:57:47
PARK IN THE TRADE MUSEUM AT NIGHT?
04:57:48
THANK YOU.
04:57:49
>>THANK YOU.ANY OTHER COUNCIL
04:57:51
QUESTIONS? I ALSO HAD THE COMMENT THAT
04:57:52
I THINK OUR PUBLIC PARKING LOTS ARE
04:57:53
OPEN AT NIGHTBECAUSE I KNOW THAT I'VE
04:58:03
SEEN A LOT OF PEOPLE IN THE
04:58:04
NEIGHBORHOOD PARKING IN PRICE AND AT
04:58:05
NIGHT. AND SO MY QUESTION IS SOME OF
04:58:06
THE COMMENTS ARE CAN WE MAKE
04:58:07
ARRANGEMENTS WITHPRIVATE PROPERTY
04:58:11
OWNERS AS THE CITY TO HAVE PARKING
04:58:19
AVAILABLE FOR OTHER PRIVATE PROPERTY
04:58:20
OWNERS, THAT'S A QUESTION, I WOULD
04:58:21
HAVE A REAL BIG QUESTION ABOUT THAT.
04:58:22
SO ANYWAYS,OKAY, IF THERE IS NO OTHER
04:58:25
COUNCIL QUESTIONS, THEN MICHAEL, IF
04:58:29
YOU WOULD MIND ANSWERING THE COUNCIL
04:58:30
QUESTIONS.
04:58:31
>>SURE, THANK YOU. SO COUNCILMEMBER
04:58:40
JANE HAD ASKED ABOUT THE UNITED
04:58:41
METHODIST CHURCH PARKING LOT, SO THAT
04:58:42
IS AN AREA THAT WE DIDDO PARKING COUNT
04:58:43
DATA ON. THE PREVIOUS COUNCIL
04:58:46
DIRECTION WAS REALLYIN A STUDY REALLY
04:58:57
ONLY ANALYZE THE OPTIONS FOR THAT WE
04:58:58
CONCLUDED WITHIN THE CITY'S CONTROL
04:58:59
MEETING THE PUBLIC STREET PARKING,
04:59:00
TYPICALLY YOU ARE EITHERINSTALLING NEW
04:59:03
DIAGONAL PARKING, METERING IT, WE
04:59:13
DON'T REALLY DO IT IN SANTA CLARA, WE
04:59:14
CAN TIME LIMIT IT, YOU'RE DOING
04:59:15
RESIDENTIAL PARKING, SO WE DIDN'T
04:59:16
APPROACH ANY PARKING OWNER
04:59:17
SPECIFICALLY FOR THAT IN TERMS OF
04:59:23
POTENTIAL SHARING OPTION. I THINK
04:59:24
THERE WOULD BE QUESTIONS AND POLICY
04:59:25
DECISIONS THAT NEED TO BE MADE
04:59:26
RELATIVE TO THE SPENDING OF CITY
04:59:27
DOLLARS TOWARDS PROVIDING PARKINGTO
04:59:30
PRIVATE PROPERTIES ON ANOTHER PRIVATE
04:59:31
PROPERTY.I KNOW SHARING PARKING IS
04:59:48
ALWAYS AN IDEAL SITUATION. IT'S
04:59:49
BECOMING MORE COMMONPLACE IN CITIES
04:59:50
WHERE PARKING AT A PREMIUM LIKE IN SAN
04:59:51
FRANCISCO. IN THIS AREA IN PARTICULAR,
04:59:52
WE DO HAVE AVAILABLE PARKING AT THE
04:59:53
TRITON AND THERE IS NO RESTRICTION
04:59:54
THROUGH THE NIGHTTIME USAGE THERE. WE
04:59:55
DID INSTALL SIGNAGE A COUPLE OF YEARS
04:59:56
BACKTO DISCOURAGE BAD BEHAVIOR BUT
05:00:05
THAT WAS THE EXTENT OF IT. RESIDENTS
05:00:06
CAN PARK THERE AND SOME OF THEM DO. I
05:00:07
THINK IT IS A PROXIMITY ISSUE TO SOME
05:00:08
DEGREE IN TERMS OF NOT WANTING TO WALK
05:00:09
A LITTLE FURTHER IN TERMS OFLINCOLN
05:00:10
AVENUE AND OTHERS. OBVIOUSLY EVERY
05:00:11
RESIDENTHAS THEIR STORYAS TO WHY THEY
05:00:22
DON'T PARK ON THE CAN. I THINK
05:00:23
RESIDENTS ARE HERE TO SPEAK TO THAT.
05:00:24
WE DID NOT TALK TO PROPERTY OWNERS IN
05:00:25
TERMS OF TRYING TO NEGOTIATE, THERE
05:00:27
ARE GOING TO BE ISSUES RELATED TO
05:00:28
LONG-TERM FUNDING, COORDINATING DAILY
05:00:29
PARKING NEEDS, HOW YOU MAKE SURE THAT
05:00:36
RESIDENTS ARE PARKING THERE, WHO IS
05:00:40
COORDINATING THAT, IS MANAGING THAT ON
05:00:41
A DAILY BASISGUYS ARE REALLY FREE AND
05:00:44
OPEN FOR EVERYBODY? ENFORCEMENT COULD
05:00:56
BE A BIG ISSUES TO BE CONSIDERED IN
05:00:57
LIABILITY AS WELL. AN IMPOSSIBLY
05:00:58
POTENTIAL PLANNING PERMIT ADJUSTMENTS,
05:00:59
I WOULD IMAGINE THE METHODIST CHURCH
05:01:00
AS A PLANNING ENTITLEMENTFOR A CHURCH
05:01:04
WITH THE AMOUNT OF PARKING ADD.
05:01:05
COMMENDING THAT WOULD REQUIRE
05:01:06
EVERYBODY'S AGREEMENT ON THAT.SO AS
05:01:09
MENTIONED, THERE ARE ALWAYS
05:01:10
OPPORTUNITIES. IN THIS SITUATION WE
05:01:16
DID INITIATE THAT FURTHER, WE LOOKED
05:01:17
AT TRULY TRYING TO PRESENT A SOLUTION
05:01:21
IS COMPLETE WITHIN THE CITY'S CONTROL
05:01:22
AND ONCE AGAIN THAT WE INVEST THE
05:01:24
MONEY THAT PARKING WOULD BE THEREFOR,
05:01:31
I WOULD SAY FOREVER, BUT IT WOULD BE
05:01:32
THERE FOR ESPECIALLY LONGER THAN THE
05:01:33
FUNDING COULD LAST, WE DON'T KNOW
05:01:34
THOSE NUMBERS AT THIS TIME.I BELIEVE I
05:01:53
ANSWERED HOPEFULLY ALL THE QUESTIONS
05:01:54
THERE, I KIND OF DID A LITTLE BIT OF
05:01:55
(INAUDIBLE).
05:01:56
>>THANK YOU, WE APPRECIATE THAT. I'M
05:01:57
GOING TO GO TO THE PUBLIC NOW. OUR
05:01:58
PUBLIC MEMBERS THAT HAVE BEEN WITH US
05:01:59
THIS WHOLE NIGHT, I APPRECIATE THAT,
05:02:00
WE'RE GOING TO START WITH JAMIE.
05:02:01
JAMIE? GO AHEAD. UNMUTE YOURSELF.
05:02:02
THERE YOU GO.
05:02:03
>>HI.CAN YOU HEAR ME?
05:02:04
>>YES, WE CAN, GO AHEAD.
05:02:05
>>I OPPOSE THIS PROPOSAL OF CONVERTING
05:02:06
CIVIC CENTER DR. TO DIAGONAL PARKING.
05:02:07
FIRST OF ALL, IT INCREASES THE CHANCE
05:02:08
OF HAVING A CAR BEING REAR-ENDED WITH
05:02:09
THIS ARRANGEMENT. THIS PROPOSAL IS
05:02:10
ALSO NOT GOOD FOR DELIVERY DRIVERSSUCH
05:02:16
AS FEDEX AND UPSCARDENAS NECESSITIES.
05:02:23
I SEE THE DIAGONAL PARKING DESIGN DOES
05:02:24
NOT ACCOUNT FOR DESIGNATED BUILDINGS
05:02:25
FOR SOME OF THE COMMUNITY LIKE SUCH AS
05:02:26
1700 CIVIC CENTER DR., SO DRIVERS WILL
05:02:27
EITHER HAVE TO DOUBLE PARK NEXT TO
05:02:28
DIAGONAL PARKED CARS, WHICH CAN BLOCK
05:02:30
THE TRAFFIC LANE BECAUSE THE STREET
05:02:33
HAS BECOME MORE NARROW. IF THEY DON'T
05:02:36
DOUBLE PART THEY WILL HAVE TO PARK
05:02:49
ACROSS THE STREET AND IT CAUSE THE
05:02:50
TRAFFIC TO DELIVER PACKAGES, WHICH IS
05:02:51
NOT SAFE FOR THEM. ANOTHER THING I
05:02:52
WANTED TO POINT OUT IS THE HIGH COST.
05:02:53
IT COSTS A TOTAL OF $300,000 AND ONLY
05:03:13
25 SPACES, MEANING $12,000 SPACE. I
05:03:14
DON'T THINK THIS IS GOOD WAY TO SPEND
05:03:15
OUR TAX DOLLARS. THEREFORE I STRONGLY
05:03:16
OPPOSE CONVERTING TO CIVIC CENTER DR.
05:03:17
TO A DIAGONAL PARKING ARRANGEMENT. I
05:03:18
AM DONE, THANK YOU.
05:03:19
>>THANK YOU, JAMIE.ELIZA?LIZA?
05:03:20
>>CAN YOU HEAR ME?
05:03:21
>>YES, WE CAN, GO AHEAD, PLEASE.
05:03:22
>>ADEQUATE QUESTION, MICHAEL, REGARDING
05:03:32
THE PROPOSAL, YOU HAVE A NICE COLOR
05:03:36
ORANGEIN RED. YOU HAVE WHAT WHEN YOU
05:03:49
TURN RED 1 AM TO 3 AM TO ORANGE OR
05:03:50
WHAT WOULD HAPPEN WHEN YOU ADDED THOSE
05:03:51
25 ADDITIONAL, 27 ADDITIONAL SPOTS?
05:04:03
WHAT ARE WE GETTING FOR OUR PROPOSAL?
05:04:04
WE ARE GETTING ANYTHING FROM THAT
05:04:05
POINT OF VIEW PUBLIC MEETING, I THINK
05:04:06
THE 1 AM CREATE A PROBLEM OR IS IT
05:04:07
STILL INSUFFICIENT?THAT'S REALLY ALL I
05:04:11
HAVE.
05:04:12
>>THANK YOU. IT'S A VERY GOOD
05:04:13
QUESTION. THANK YOU. IS THERE ANY
05:04:14
OTHER MEMBER OF THE PUBLICTHAT HAS A
05:04:16
COMMENT? SUNEEL, GO AHEAD.YOU CAN
05:04:37
UNMUTE YOURSELF. GO AHEAD.
05:04:38
>>CAN YOU HEAR ME?
05:04:39
>>YES, WE CAN. GO AHEAD.
05:04:40
>>GOOD EVENING, EVERYONE, THANK YOU
05:04:41
FOR ALLOWING ME TO SPEAK. FIRST THING
05:04:42
I WANT TO POINT OUT, THIS PROBLEM WAS
05:04:43
WORSE BEFORE PANDEMIC AND IS GOING TO
05:04:44
BECOME MUCH WORSE, ESPECIALLY IN THE
05:04:45
EVENING AND MORNING HOURS. MANY FORMER
05:04:48
NEW RESIDENTS ARE DONE. HOWEVER, AS
05:04:49
MANY OF US AS SAID ANY COMMENTS, I
05:04:50
OPPOSE THIS AS IT IS SIMPLY ON FACE
05:04:56
AND IT DOESN'T GIVE US MUCH PARKING
05:04:57
SPACE. BY THE WAY, THIS IS ALSO A VERY
05:04:58
GOOD EXAMPLETHAT IS HAS BEEN CAN STING
05:05:14
IT CONTINUOUSLY (INAUDIBLE) THIS ALSO
05:05:15
RAISES QUESTIONS ABOUT STUDIES THAT
05:05:16
ARE SUBMITTED WITH ANY NEW PLANS,
05:05:17
STUDIES ARE LISTED AND SHOWING NO
05:05:18
IMPACT ON THE NEIGHBORHOOD BUT THE
05:05:19
REALITY IS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT.IT IS
05:05:28
THE RESIDENTS THAT HAVE THIS. I ASKED
05:05:29
THE CITY TO MAKE SURE ALL FUTURE
05:05:30
DEVELOPMENTS INCLUDE PARKING FOR
05:05:31
RESIDENTS AND THEIR GAS, OFTEN GUEST
05:05:32
PARKING SPACES ARE COMPLETELY
05:05:38
OVERLOOKED AND EVEN THE BIG COMPLEXES
05:05:39
HAVE JUST 24 PARKING FOR 130 UNITS,
05:05:40
AND OTHER NEW DEVELOPMENTS EVEN HAVE
05:05:41
LESS PARKING.PLEASE KEEP IN MIND THAT
05:06:02
THERE IS ALREADY AN UPLAND PROPOSAL
05:06:03
FOR TALL BUILDINGS WITH 106 UNITS ON
05:06:04
15 CIVIC CENTER DR. AN EMPLOYEE ONLY
05:06:05
72 PARKING'S AND THAT IS ALREADY A
05:06:06
NIGHTMARE FOR RESIDENTS WHO ARE LIVING
05:06:07
HERE AND SAYING THEIR QUALITY OF LIFE
05:06:08
GETTING DETERIORATED FOR MANY YEARS.
05:06:09
ALSOTHOSE THAT ARE TALKING ABOUT
05:06:15
HOUSING SHORTAGES ARE JUST AFTER
05:06:16
MONEY. THE REAL PROBLEM WITH HOUSING
05:06:17
TODAY IS SPECULATION AND EVEN WALL
05:06:18
STREET FIRMS ARE IN IT AND AT ANY STATE
05:06:19
SOMEONE SHOULD COME UP WITH POLICIES
05:06:20
THAT REDUCE THE SPECULATION. LET THESE
05:06:25
FOLKS SPECULATE IN STOCKS AND OTHER
05:06:26
THINGS BUT NOT NECESSARY AT
05:06:27
NECESSITIES LIKE HOUSING.THANK YOU, I
05:06:33
THINK MY TIME HAS RUN OUT.
05:06:34
>>YES, I DID, RIGHT JUST THEN, RIGHT
05:06:35
WHEN YOU'RE FINISHED. THANK YOU SO
05:06:36
MUCH.HE HEINKEL GET AHEAD, PLEASE.
05:06:40
>>YES. MAYOR AND COUNCIL, THANK YOU
05:06:46
FOR ALLOWING ME TO SPEAK. AGAIN, I
05:06:47
THINK YOU ALL FOR STAYING INTO THE
05:06:49
NIGHT. IT'S REALLYVERY INSPIRING TO
05:06:53
SEE ALL OF YOU WORK SO HARD FOR US. MY
05:07:00
COMMENT IS THAT I DON'T THINK THAT
05:07:01
THIS IS A LONG-TERM COMPREHENSIVE
05:07:02
SOLUTION.IT ONLY GAINS 25 SPACES. TO
05:07:07
ME IT LOOKS LIKE A PATCH THAT CAN BE
05:07:08
EASILY UNDONE WHEN THE PROJECT IS
05:07:20
COMPLETED AND THERE IS ANOTHER PROJECT
05:07:21
RIGHT BEHIND OUR TRITON COURT
05:07:22
RESIDENCES, 1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.,
05:07:23
WHICH WE HAVE HAD HUGE PROBLEMS WITH
05:07:29
WITH CHARITY HOUSING, WE HAVE HAD TWO
05:07:30
MEETINGS WITH THEM, PUBLIC MEETINGS
05:07:31
WITH THEM, AND IT SEEMS LIKE THEY ARE
05:07:32
EXPERTS AND JUST BASICALLY EVADINGAND
05:07:37
AVOIDING ANSWERING QUESTIONS THAT TAKE
05:07:38
TWO OR THREE SECONDS TO ASK. IT WAS
05:07:39
VERY AMUSING TO WATCH THEM TALK. WE
05:07:40
HAD A ONE HALF HOUR MEETING AND THEY
05:07:41
SPENTTHEY HAD A GOOD 25 MINUTES TO
05:07:50
TALK AND THEY SAID BASICALLY VERY
05:07:51
LITTLE. VERY LITTLE OF CONSEQUENCE.
05:07:52
OUR PROPOSAL TO THEM WAS TO HAVEONE
05:07:53
PARKING SPACEHER BEDROOM. THEY HAVE
05:08:05
106 UNITS, THREE BEDROOMS, AND THERE
05:08:06
ARE PROPOSING 72 PARKING SPACES. THEY
05:08:07
BASICALLY REJECTED THAT PROPOSAL AND
05:08:12
REFUSAL TO ANSWER. WE KNOW WHAT THEY
05:08:13
ARE UP TO. MY FEAR IS THAT THIS IS
05:08:14
GOING TO BECOME BASICALLY A PATCH THAT
05:08:29
WILL START BLEEDING IN A VERY SHORT
05:08:30
TIME. THE OTHER THING I WANT TO POINT
05:08:31
OUT TO THE COUNCIL IS RESPECTFULLY
05:08:32
THAT PROPERTY MAPS THAT ARE BEING
05:08:33
SHOWN TODAY, THERE SEEM TO BE A FLAW
05:08:34
IN THEM BECAUSE THERE IS NO WAY OUR
05:08:35
GUEST PARKING SPOTS WILL BE OCCUPIED
05:08:51
AT 50% DURING THE DAY. THOSE ARE
05:08:52
FORECAST PARKING SPOTS, THEY ARE NOT
05:08:53
AVAILABLE TO THE PARK PUBLIC. NEITHER
05:08:54
IS THE UMC CHURCH. I AM NOT SURE WHILE
05:08:55
THOSE ARE ALL SHOWN AS GREEN SPACES
05:08:56
ARE 50% SPACES. I HAVE REASON TO
05:08:57
BELIEVE THAT SOME OF THESE PARKING
05:08:58
STUDIES ARE NOT ACCURATE. I WOULD LIKE
05:08:59
EVERYBODY TO CONSIDER THAT. THANK YOU
05:09:00
SO MUCH.
05:09:01
>>DEPOT, GO AHEAD, DEPOT.
05:09:02
>>HI MATT, CAN YOU HEAR ME?
05:09:03
>>YES, WE CAN.
05:09:04
>>I HAVE SIMILAR COMMENTSLIKE EON. I
05:09:05
NOTICED THAT(INAUDIBLE) PERSON, HOW IS
05:09:11
IT POSSIBLE, I DON'T KNOW AND SIMILARLY
05:09:18
(INAUDIBLE) AND IT DOESN'T ALLOW ANY
05:09:19
TALKING TO THE PUBLIC. FURTHERMORE
05:09:23
(INAUDIBLE) BECAUSE IT'S NOT A
05:09:24
COMPREHENSIVE SOLUTION. IT'S A SMALL
05:09:25
PATCH(INAUDIBLE) COMPLETELYCIVIC
05:09:35
CENTER DR. IF THAT PROJECT IS
05:09:36
APPROVED, IT HAS PARKING SPACE PER
05:09:38
UNIT THAT WILL ACTIVATE(INAUDIBLE). WE
05:09:45
REALLY NEED A CONFERENCE OF SOLUTION,
05:09:46
NOT A PATCH, THAT CAN BE UNDONE BY THE
05:09:47
PROJECTS(INAUDIBLE). THIS PROPOSALONLY
05:09:56
GAINED 25 PARKING SPACES AT THE
05:09:57
EXPENSE OF (INAUDIBLE) RIGHTS AT THE
05:09:59
RISK OF BEING VANDALIZED MORE EASILY.
05:10:09
(INAUDIBLE) REALLY HIDE (INAUDIBLE). I
05:10:10
BELIEVE THE COUNCIL SHOULD CONSIDER A
05:10:11
PROPOSAL THAT APPLIES TO NEW PROJECTS
05:10:12
AS WELLAND NOT APPLIES A BANDAGE TO
05:10:18
THE PROJECT FROM. THANK YOU.
05:10:19
>>THANK YOU. IS THERE ANY OTHER MEMBER
05:10:20
OF THE PUBLIC THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK?
05:10:36
CITY CLERK, DO YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS?
05:10:37
>>I DO.
05:10:38
>>OKAY. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO READ
05:10:39
THEM, PLEASE?
05:10:40
>>SURE. YOU COMMENT BY MORE TSO SHAFI,
05:10:41
IT STATES THIS PROPOSAL MAKES NO
05:10:42
MEANINGFUL IMPACT ON THE PARKING
05:10:43
PROBLEM THAT WE HAVE AT THE COST OF
05:10:47
THE SAFETY OF THE RESIDENTS. THE
05:10:48
PARKING LOT BELONGS TO THE METHODIST
05:10:49
CHURCH WHICH IS PRIVATE PROPERTY AND
05:10:50
NOT AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC. 1601
05:10:51
CIVIC CENTER DR. HAS 0.7 PARKING
05:10:52
SPACES PER UNITS, WE REQUESTED NEED TO
05:10:53
HOLD FOR PROVIDING NECESSARY AND
05:10:57
ADEQUATE PARKING FOR THE RESIDENTS.FOR
05:11:02
EXAMPLE, MAKE USE OF UNDERGROUND
05:11:03
PARKING, AND OF COMMENT. NEXT COMMENT
05:11:06
IS FROM DV. STATES THE FOLLOWING. I
05:11:19
OPPOSE DIAGONAL PARKING IT'S IT WILL
05:11:20
NARROW THE STREET AND MAKE IT ALL THE
05:11:21
MORE DIFFICULT TO SEE THE ONCOMING
05:11:22
VEHICLES COMING OUT OF THE PROPERTY.
05:11:23
THIS WILL INCREASE THE CHANCES OF
05:11:24
ACCIDENTS. END OF COMMENT.
05:11:52
THE NEXT COMMENT IS FROM JL.
05:11:53
>>I OPPOSE THIS PROPOSAL OF DIAGONAL
05:11:54
PARKING, FIRST OF ALL, EACH SPACE COST
05:11:55
$12,000 TO BUILD. TOO HIGH OF A CAUSE.
05:11:56
SECOND, BY BACKING OUT HIS ARISTA CARS
05:11:57
BEING REAR-ENDED. IT MAKES CIVIC
05:11:58
CENTER DR. A NARROWER STREET. I THINK
05:11:59
IT LOWERS THE QUALITY OF LIFE AND ADD
05:12:00
SAFETY RICKS FOR CIVIC CENTER DR.
05:12:01
RESIDENTS. THERE IS A PLAN FOR SPACES.
05:12:02
I PROPOSE ADDING MORE ON-SITE PARKING
05:12:03
TO PLAN DEVELOPMENT. THAT'S THE END OF
05:12:04
THE COMMENT AND THE END OF THE
05:12:05
COMMENTS ON THIS ITEM.
05:12:06
>>THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I'M GOING TO
05:12:07
GET HER CITY STAFF. I WILL THINK THERE
05:12:08
WAS AT LEAST ONE QUESTION THAT I
05:12:09
PICKED UP MICHAELABOUT WHAT WOULD
05:12:12
HAPPEN IF THE CITY IMPLEMENTED THE
05:12:13
ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES, HOW WOULD
05:12:14
THAT CHANGE THE COLOROF THE MAPS THAT
05:12:18
YOU SHOWED US. AND I DON'T KNOW IF YOU
05:12:19
HAVE THAT.
05:12:26
>>WE DO HAVE SOME OF THAT INFORMATION.
05:12:27
IF I CAN JUST KIND OF SUMMARIZE THE
05:12:28
COMMENTS AS I GO ALONG.THERE WERE
05:12:34
COMMENTS RELATED TO LOCAL COMMENTS IS
05:12:35
THE MAYOR MENTIONED TO IMPLEMENT THE
05:12:40
25 STATE CIVIC CENTER THE COLOR OF THE
05:12:41
MAP TURNED TO, WE DO BELIEVETHAT RED
05:12:44
IS A TURNKEY YELLOW AND THAT STREET,
05:12:52
THOUGH THAT STREET WOULD BE IN THE 39
05:12:53
TO 40% RANGE IN TERMS OF HOW MANY CARS
05:12:55
, ADDITIONAL CARS CAN BE PARKED IN
05:12:56
THAT AREA. I THINK WE ARE ONE OF THE
05:12:59
OTHER COMMENTS OR CLARIFICATIONS.
05:13:08
WHICH IS NOT REALLY A PART OF THE
05:13:09
STUDY IN TERMS OF THE FUTURE. I THINK
05:13:10
THAT'S MY POLICY DISCUSSION WITH THE
05:13:11
COUNCILCAN HAVE AS PROJECTS COME IN AS
05:13:19
WELL AS OUR CBB DIRECTOR POTENTIALLY
05:13:20
ADDRESS THAT IF NEEDED. THE WERE
05:13:21
CONCERNED REGARDINGTHE SAFETY, SO
05:13:40
STAFF BY DIAGONAL PARKING IS
05:13:41
IMPLEMENTED IN THE CITY, I WOULD BE
05:13:42
THE FIRST THING YOU DO IT. THIS WAS AN
05:13:43
EFFORT BY STAFF TO REALLY LOOK AT WE
05:13:44
HAVE IN FRONT OF US, WHAT AVAILABLE
05:13:45
RESOURCES WE HAVE IS BASICALLY THE
05:13:46
TRAVEL STREET.IT'S NOT THE WIDEST
05:13:47
STREET, BUT IT HAS SPACE TO ALLOW
05:13:48
DIAGONAL PARKING ON ONE SIDE OF THE
05:13:49
STREET. IT WILL BE ON BOTH SIDES
05:13:51
INCREASE PARKING SUPPLY. I THINK THE
05:13:55
MAPS ARE SHOWING THAT THE RED IS
05:13:56
INDICATING THE AVAILABILITY IS NOT
05:13:58
THERE IS MUCH AS WE WANTTO INCREASE
05:14:06
SUPPLIES, THIS IS ACTUALLY PART OF THE
05:14:07
DISCUSSION OF THE COUNCILWOMAN THAT
05:14:08
PROJECT WILL GO FORWARD.OF COURSE,
05:14:14
SOME RESIDENTS IN TODAY'S DISCUSSION,
05:14:24
THE FAVOR OF IT. IN TERMS OF LONG-TERM
05:14:25
SOLUTIONS IT DOES PROVIDE A LONG-TERM
05:14:26
SOLUTION BUT THIS IS NOT THE FULL
05:14:27
SOLUTION. I THINK ULTIMATELY YOU DO
05:14:28
HAVEREALLY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES THAT
05:14:32
HAVE BEEN THERE FOR SOME TIME AND
05:14:37
SUBDIVISION MY STAFF IS THAT MORE
05:14:38
PEOPLE ARE LIVINGPREVIOUSLY CLIMBED OR
05:14:44
AN ART FORAND WE ARE SEEING THAT IN
05:14:49
THIS PARTICULAR PART OF THE PUBLIC CITY
05:15:11
. ONE LAST NOTE, IN LOOKING AT UNITED
05:15:12
METHODIST CHURCH AS WELL AS THE
05:15:13
DENNY'S PARKING LOT AS A MENTION THE
05:15:14
NONRESIDENTIAL LOTS, INITIALLY WE
05:15:15
WEREN'T LOOKING AT THOSE BECAUSE THOSE
05:15:16
ARE REALLY PRIVATE PROPERTY, WE HAVE
05:15:17
NO CONTROL OVER THEY USE. CAN WE ARE
05:15:18
ONLY HANDLING IT'S IN THE RESIDENT
05:15:19
PROPERTYTAKE A SNAPSHOT IN TIME OF
05:15:20
WHAT IS THE PARKING LOT. IS THE
05:15:21
PARKING ON-SITE,OR VERY POOR? THEN IT
05:15:25
WOULD MAKE SENSE THAT PEOPLE ARE
05:15:26
PARKED ON THE STREET. SO THROUGH THE
05:15:36
DISCUSSIONS IN THE COMMUNITY MEETINGS,
05:15:37
RESIDENTS WERE SAYING WE SHOULD BE
05:15:38
LOOKING AT UNITED METHODIST CHURCH,
05:15:39
NOT NECESSARILY AS THE SOLUTION BUT
05:15:40
THEY BELIEVE THAT SOME RESIDENTS
05:15:44
(INAUDIBLE)TRITON IS A LOT AND AS I
05:15:49
MENTIONED EARLIER IS AVAILABLE FOR A
05:15:50
ROUGHFOR PUBLIC PARKING WHEN THEY MEET
05:15:54
TOO.
05:15:55
>>OKAY.ANSWERING ALL HIS QUESTIONS.I
05:16:14
THINK $300 FOR 25 SPACES A LOT OF
05:16:15
MONEY. I KNOW THAT INCLUDES CEILING AS
05:16:16
WELL AND I KNOW THAT WE ALREADY
05:16:17
PROVIDE THE CITY ALREADY PROVIDES
05:16:18
PARKING, FREE PARKING IN TRITON
05:16:19
PARKING LOT WHICH IS REALLY BIG
05:16:20
PARKING LOT FOR THE AREA. CAN I THINK
05:16:21
YOU ARE RIGHT IN TERMS OFTHERE'S A LOT
05:16:26
OF OLDER UNITS IN THE AREA AND THERE'S
05:16:27
A LOT OF PEOPLE LIVING IN THE UNITS,
05:16:31
THEREFORE THERE UNDER PART. ALL OF THE
05:16:32
OLD UNITS, BECAUSE THE COSTSWE HAVE IT
05:16:47
IN DIFFERENT AREAS OF TOWN, IT'S NOT
05:16:48
JUST THIS AREA OF TOWN. SO I AM
05:16:49
LOOKING AT WHAT IS OUR RESPONSIBILITY
05:16:50
IN TERMS OF THE CITYBESIDES PROVIDING
05:16:55
WHAT WE HAVE LIKE THE TRITON PARKING
05:16:56
LOT AND OTHER PARKING LOTS, PUBLIC
05:17:00
PARKING LOTS AND STREET PARKING, BUT
05:17:01
I'M CONCERNED ABOUT THE DIAGONAL
05:17:02
PARKINGIN THOSE DELIVERIES AND THOSE
05:17:15
TYPES OF THINGS AS WELL. I THINK
05:17:16
$300,000 FOR 25 SPACES, AND WE KNOW WE
05:17:17
ARE NOT GOING TO SOLVE PROBABLY
05:17:18
ANYWHERE NEAR SOLVING THE PROBLEM. I
05:17:19
DON'T KNOW IF THERE IS A DIFFERENT
05:17:20
APPROACH THAT WE CAN TAKE. THOSE ARE
05:17:24
MY CONCERNS, THOSE ARE JUST MY
05:17:25
THOUGHTS. COUNCILMEMBER PART.
05:17:27
>>YES, THANK YOU TO STAFF FORTHE THING
05:17:30
THE BRINGING THIS. I HAVE THIS IDEA
05:17:42
THAT IF IT'S 100% EMPTY AND ACTUALLY
05:17:43
SOLVES 100% OF THE PARKING PROBLEM.
05:17:44
BUT I THINKTHERE IS SOME MISSING DATA
05:17:46
HERE, MEANING HOW MANY SPACES ARE WE
05:17:51
ACTUALLY SHORT? HOW MANY SPACES DO
05:17:52
ACTUALLY NEED? AND WE SAY THAT
05:17:54
SOMETHING THAT'S AVAILABLE, HOW MANY
05:17:59
PARKING SPACES IS THAT. IT IS
05:18:00
SOMETHING LESS THAN.15WHERE YOU DO IT
05:18:05
TO THIS BOYFULL WE ARE TRYING TO SOLVE
05:18:12
THE PROBLEM OF REAL CARS.I DO
05:18:15
UNDERSTAND, IT'S HARD TO GET NEW
05:18:19
DEVELOPERSTO BEAR THE COSTS OF
05:18:24
EXISTING PARKING PROBLEMS, SO I DON'T
05:18:40
KNOW THAT THAT WOULD BE THE W. BEST
05:18:41
WAY TO DO IT BUT AT THE SAME TIME
05:18:42
WE'VE GOT TO FIX THIS PROBLEM KIND OF
05:18:43
IN A REAL WAY BY KNOWING WHAT THE
05:18:44
ACTUAL NEED IS IN TRYING TO ADDRESS
05:18:45
THE NEED. WE HAVE THE QUESTION OF 25
05:18:46
SPACES, HOW MUCH OF A PROBLEM DOES
05:18:47
THAT ACTUALLY ADDRESS. WE DON'T
05:18:48
ACTUALLY KNOW HOW MUCH THE PROBLEM
05:18:49
WILL ADDRESS. I THINK WE HAVE THIS
05:18:50
IDEA OF HOW OLD CHANGE COLORSMAKE THE
05:18:51
PARKING AVAILABLE BY PERCENTAGES, BUT
05:18:54
AT THE END OF THE DAY I THINK THAT WE
05:18:55
NEED START LOOKING AT THISIN A LARGER
05:18:59
WAY IN LOOKING AT THE NUMBER OF SPACES
05:19:04
, NUMBER OF CARS THAT WE ARE ACTUALLY
05:19:05
TRYING TO FIT IN HOW WE EXPECT THAT
05:19:06
NUMBER TO GROW, TO CHANGE AS NEW
05:19:07
DEVELOPMENTS COME IN.AGAIN, I DON'T
05:19:16
THINK THIS IS AN EASY PROBLEM.
05:19:17
>>SO THE RECOMMENDATION ON THIS IS TO
05:19:31
APPROVE THE PARKING ANALYSIS, WHICH
05:19:32
HAS BEEN DONE, AND WE SHOULD APPROVE
05:19:33
THAT. BUT ALSO TO FURTHER THIS TO THE
05:19:34
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET
05:19:35
PROCESSFOR FURTHER DISCUSSION. AN
05:19:41
ACTION. IS THAT IT?
05:19:42
>>MAYOR?
05:19:43
>>COULD YOU EXPLAIN?
05:19:54
>>I WOULD LIKE TO TRY TO ADDRESS
05:19:55
COUNCIL MEMBER PARKS. IN THE STAFF
05:19:56
REPORT ON PAGE 306, TABLE 2, THAT X
05:19:57
INCLUDES THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES
05:19:58
PER STREETTHE VARIOUS PERCENTAGES
05:20:01
THERE. SO THE PERCENTAGES SHOWN ON THE
05:20:02
SCREEN. TO SHOW THE COUNCIL THAT
05:20:09
ULTIMATELY THERE ARE 424 PARKING
05:20:10
SPACES ON THE STREETTHAT EXIST TODAY
05:20:23
AND ON CIVIC CENTER WE HAVE ROUGHLY 91
05:20:24
PARKING SPACES THERE, SO WE HAD THE 25
05:20:25
PARKING SPACES THAT INCREASING THE
05:20:26
PARKING SUPPLY BY 27%. THAT BEING SAID
05:20:30
, INCORPORATION AS PART OF THE STUDY
05:20:31
AND DISCUSSIONS WITH STAFF, WE DID
05:20:32
LOOK AT IF WE COULD ACCOMMODATE MORE
05:20:36
PARKING OUT HERE, WHAT WOULD BE A
05:20:37
BETTER NUMBER THAN 25?(INAUDIBLE)
05:21:02
TARGET A CERTAIN PERCENTAGE. I THINK
05:21:03
NORMALLY YOU WANT TO BE WITHIN THE 15
05:21:04
TO 29% AVAILABILITY FOR TURNOVER AND
05:21:05
IF YOUR STREETS ARE GREEN CHOSEN THE
05:21:06
MAP EARLIER THAT'S GREATER THAN 50%,
05:21:07
THOSE ARE NICE TREATS TO PARK ON. IN
05:21:08
THIS SITUATION I DON'T THINK WE HAVE
05:21:09
THE LUXURY OF TRYING TOSTRIKE THE
05:21:10
GREEN, I REALLY WE DO LISTEN TO WORDS
05:21:11
AND ORANGE KIND OF SITUATION THE 15%
05:21:12
TO 30% AVAILABILITY.I JUST WANTED TO
05:21:18
ADDRESS THAT QUESTION. WE DO HAVE THAT
05:21:19
INFORMATION OUR STAFF REPORT.
05:21:21
>>THANK YOU FOR POINTING THAT OUT.
05:21:24
COUNCIL?COUNCILMEMBER HARVEY.
05:21:25
>>AND LOOKING AT THE ALTERNATIVES
05:21:36
PROPOSAL AND I LISTEN VERY CAREFULLY
05:21:37
TO WHATMICHAEL SAID ABOUT THE REALITY
05:21:43
IS WE HAVE A CITY PARKING LOT WITHIN A
05:21:45
VERY SHORT WALKING DISTANCE RELATIVELY
05:22:01
AND IN SOME WAYS TIME SURPRISE IS NOT
05:22:02
USED MORE, ESPECIALLY ON (INAUDIBLE)
05:22:03
AVENUE. I KNOW THAT'S WHY ASKED THE
05:22:04
QUESTIONS LATE AT NIGHT, THAT'S WHERE
05:22:05
I PARKED. IF I HAVE TO BE THERE. SOI
05:22:06
WANT TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE
05:22:08
ANALYSIS, BUT I DO NOT WANT TO AT THIS
05:22:12
POINT SPECIFICALLY INCLUDE A BUDGET
05:22:16
PROPOSAL, BECAUSE THE CONCERN IS WE
05:22:22
HAVE OTHER OPTIONS THERE, AND I DO NOT
05:22:30
THINK IS NECESSARILY THE CITY'S JOB TO
05:22:31
PROVIDE MORE PARKING WHEN THERE IS
05:22:35
PARKING WITHIN A VERY SHORT DISTANCE
05:22:36
OF HIS HOME. SO I WOULD JUST LIKE TO
05:22:38
MAKE A MOTIONTO APPROVE(INAUDIBLE).
05:22:39
>>IS THERE A SECOND ON THAT? WE HAVE A
05:22:49
MOTION AND A SECOND TO APPROVE THE
05:22:50
ANALYSIS.ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER COUNCIL
05:22:53
COMMENTS ON THAT?ALL RIGHT. ASSISTANT
05:23:00
CITY CLERK? ROLL CALL VOTE?THANK YOU.
05:23:21
WE KNOW IT'S GETTING LATE AND I WANT
05:23:22
TO THANK EVERYONE FOR HANGING IN THERE
05:23:23
WITH US, ESPECIALLY OUR PUBLIC.
05:23:24
>>
05:23:25
[CALLING ROLL]
05:24:23
>>THAT PASSES WITH ONE ABSTENTION.
05:24:24
THANK YOU, MICHAEL, FOR YOUR
05:24:25
PRESENTATION ON THAT. THANK YOU VERY
05:24:26
MUCH.
05:24:30
OKAY. ITEM 11 WE DEFERRED, WE ARE DOWN
05:24:31
TO OUR LAST ITEM. ITEM 12. DISCUSSION
05:24:37
AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION ON
05:24:38
CONSIDERATION OF THE SALE OF THE
05:24:39
LOYALTY AND RENT PROPERTY CONTINUED
05:24:40
FROM OCTOBER 26.IS THAT MAN WELL?
05:24:48
>>IT IS MAN WELL.
05:24:49
>>THANK YOU FOR STILL BEING WITH US.
05:24:59
>>ON THIS ITEM, IT'S BEEN IN FRONT OF
05:25:00
THE COUNCIL A FEW TIMES, ACTUALLY
05:25:01
DON'T HAVE A STAFF PRESENTATION, I'M
05:25:02
HERE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS, I KNOW WE
05:25:03
ENTERED PROBABLY ABOUT 20 TO 25 WRITTEN
05:25:04
QUESTIONS IN THE PAST. SO I AM
05:25:05
AVAILABLE FOR ANYQUESTIONS. THE LAST
05:25:30
STAFF REPORT GAVE YOU CLARITY ON SOME
05:25:31
ADDITIONAL ITEMS. LET ME KNOW IF
05:25:32
THERE'S ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS I
05:25:33
WILL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER THEM.
05:25:34
>>YOU'RE LOOKING FOR POSSIBLE
05:25:35
DIRECTION. IS THAT WHAT THIS IS
05:25:36
ABOUT?
05:25:37
>>YES, OF COURSE THIS WAS AN ITEM
05:25:38
REQUESTED BY THE COUNCIL AND WE GAVE
05:25:39
FIVE DIFFERENT OPTIONS INCLUDING ONE,
05:25:40
IF THERE IS A SALE WE WOULD COME BACK
05:25:41
WITH YOU WITH KIND OF WHAT THE
05:25:42
APPROACH WOULD BE IN SOME SPECIFIC
05:25:43
ACTION ITEMS.THERE'S NO INTEREST IN
05:25:44
PURSUING THE SALE. WE WOULDN'T DO
05:25:45
ANYTHING, ANY OTHER ALTERNATIVE THE
05:25:46
COUNCIL WISHES.
05:25:47
>>COUNCILMEMBER BECKER.
05:25:48
>>THANK YOU, MAYOR. THANK YOU,
05:25:49
MANWELL. I STILL REMEMBER THE
05:25:50
PRESENTATIONS THAT YOU GAVE AND I
05:25:51
STILL REMEMBER ALL THE INFORMATION.
05:25:52
SEEING WHAT THE LAND IS ANDIF I SHOULD
05:26:00
BUILD A FIELD OF DREAMS WE FIND MANY
05:26:01
OF THE ALTERNATIVES THAT YOU CAN USE
05:26:02
THE LAND, I FEEL I'M READY TO MAKE A
05:26:03
MOTIONTO PROPOSE SELLING THIS LAND.
05:26:12
>>TO UNDERSTAND STAFF WHAT THAT MOTION
05:26:13
IS?
05:26:14
>>YES. OUR RECOMMENDATION IS THAT THE
05:26:15
COUNCIL HAS AN INTEREST TO SELL THE
05:26:16
LANDAND I WOULD GO BACK TO THE
05:26:18
SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATION, WHICH IS
05:26:25
DIRECT STAFF TO DEVELOP A STRATEGY FOR
05:26:26
THE SALE, THE LOYALTY AND RANCH
05:26:27
PROPERTY AND PRESENTED TO THE COUNCIL
05:26:28
AT A FUTURE MEETING. AS WE DISCUSSED
05:26:36
IN THE STAFF REPORT THERE ARE A FEW
05:26:37
STEPS WE NEED TO TAKE, WE HAVE TO DO
05:26:38
AN RFP TO SELECT A REALTOR OR BROKER,
05:26:39
WE WOULD HAVE TO LOOK AT THIS REQUEST
05:26:40
LAND ACTAND THAT WOULD BE THE FIRST
05:26:43
STEP IS THE PROPER IT PROPERTY THAT WE
05:26:44
HAVE TO TAKE I THINK THE ATTORNEY'S
05:26:45
OFFICE WROTE A LITTLE MORE DETAILED
05:27:10
PIECE OF THE STAFF REPORT. WE WANT TO
05:27:11
DO AN UPDATE SO THE COUNCIL KNOWS WHAT
05:27:12
THE CURRENT VALUE IS AND THEN THERE WE
05:27:13
CONTRACT THE COUNCIL AFTER AWARD. OUR
05:27:14
PREFERENCE WOULD BE IF THERE IS AN
05:27:15
INTEREST IN SALE WOULD BE OUR
05:27:16
RECOMMENDATION COME BACK TO DEVELOP A
05:27:17
STRATEGY AND COME BACK BECAUSE THERE
05:27:18
ARE SO MANY STEPS ASSOCIATED.
05:27:19
>>ABSOLUTELY. WHATEVER IS THE MOST
05:27:20
TRANSPARENT WAY TO GO WITH THE
05:27:21
RECOMMENDATION.
05:27:28
>>JUST TO CLARIFY, STAFF DOESN'T HAVE
05:27:29
A RECOMMENDATION, THAT'S JUST THE
05:27:30
ALTERNATIVE ONE UNDER THE
05:27:31
RECOMMENDATIONS IF YOU WANTED TO TAKE
05:27:32
THAT.
05:27:33
>>I WILL TAKE THAT, THEN. THAT SOUNDS
05:27:34
AS TRANSPARENT AS POSSIBLE.
05:27:35
>>YOU KNOW AN ALTERNATIVE ONE IS?
05:27:36
>>WHAT WAS THAT?
05:27:37
>>YOU KNOW WHAT ALTERNATIVE ONE IS?
05:27:38
>>YES, I KNOWWE ARE RECOMMENDING.
05:27:39
>>NO, JUST HOPING YOU WOULD READ IT.
05:27:45
WHAT THE MOTION IS? JUST SO IT'S CLEAR.
05:27:54
>>I WILL HOLD THIS UP FOR YOU REALLY
05:27:55
FAST.SORRY, I CAN'T LOAD THIS.I CAN'T
05:28:33
OPEN RIGHT NOW.
05:28:34
>>AND I SECOND THE MOTION AND I CAN
05:28:35
READ IT? I HAVE IT RIGHT IN FRONT OF
05:28:36
ME.
05:28:37
>>CAN YOU TELL US WHAT IS MOTION IS?
05:28:38
>>DIRECT STAFF TO DEVELOP A STRATEGY
05:28:39
FOR THE SALE OF THE LOYALTY AND RANCH
05:28:40
PROPERTY AND PRESENT IT TO THE CITY
05:28:41
COUNCIL AT A FUTURE MEETING.
05:28:42
>>THANK YOU. ANTHONY, THAT'S YOUR
05:28:43
MOTION.COUNCILMEMBER HARDY HAS
05:28:44
SECONDED IT. COUNCILMEMBER JANE?
05:28:46
>>I WAS GOING TO SECOND IT, BUT THAT'S
05:28:47
OKAY.
05:28:48
>>ALL RIGHT. COUNCIL MEMBER WATANABE?
05:28:50
>>THANK YOU, MAYOR. I KNOW THERE HAS
05:28:51
BEEN A LOT OF DISCUSSION, GOSH, FOR
05:28:55
MANY YEARS, IT SEEMS, BOUTS THIS PIECE
05:28:56
OF PROPERTY, ANDTHE DIFFERENT ISSUES
05:29:07
THAT IT HAS HAD IN THE APPRAISALS THAT
05:29:08
HAVE BEEN DONE AND THE CONCERNS WITH
05:29:09
SELLING THE PROPERTYAT THIS TIME
05:29:13
BECAUSE OF THE VALUE OF IT, AND ONE
05:29:17
THING, WHEN I THINK ABOUT LANDAND I
05:29:24
KEEP THINKING ABOUT WHEN ICOMMON THIS
05:29:32
ISSUE COMES UP EVERY TIME IT DOES, I
05:29:33
THINK ABOUT THE MOVIE GONE WITH THE
05:29:34
WIND. OKAY? THERE IS THE SCENE IN THE
05:29:35
MOVIE WHERE SCARLETT O'HARA'S FATHER
05:29:49
IS TALKING TO HER ABOUT THE VALUE OF
05:29:50
LAND AND THE QUOTE IS LAND IS THE ONLY
05:29:51
THING THE WORLD WORTH WORKING FOR,
05:29:52
WORTH FIGHTING FOR, WORTH DYING FOR
05:29:53
BECAUSE IT'S THE ONLY THING THAT
05:29:54
LASTS. TO METHIS IS AN ASSET THAT
05:29:55
BELONGS TO THE CITY. IT DOES HAVE SOME
05:30:02
VALUE IN TERMS OF I THINK IT'S USED
05:30:03
FOR GRAZING BY SOME LOCAL FARMERS.
05:30:07
THERE IS SOME BENEFIT TO THE CITY AT
05:30:08
THIS TIME, BUTBASED ON SOME OF THE
05:30:13
THINGS THAT HAVE HAPPENED UP THERE,
05:30:14
THE FIRE, I JUST DON'T, I DON'T SUPPORT
05:30:32
SELLING THIS PROPERTY RIGHT NOW.
05:30:33
HOWEVER, I DO HAVE A QUESTION THAT I
05:30:34
HEARD WHAT MANWELL SAID ABOUT GETTING
05:30:35
AN APPRAISAL AND PUTTING THINGS IN
05:30:36
PLACE TO GETTING AN APPRAISAL, SO WITH
05:30:37
THAT APPRAISALCAME IN WHERE IT WAS
05:30:38
BASICALLY THE LAST TIME WE HAD THIS
05:30:39
DISCUSSION, IT DOESN'T NECESSARILY
05:30:41
MEAN WE ARE GOING TO GO FORWARD AND
05:30:44
SELL IT. I WOULD IMAGINE.
05:30:50
>>OKAY.
05:30:51
>>WOULD YOU LIKE ME TO ANSWER THAT
05:30:52
QUESTION?
05:31:01
>>NO, I THINK WE ARE AT THE QUESTION
05:31:02
STAGE. I HAVEN'T GONE TO THE PUBLIC
05:31:03
YET. WE ARE AT THE QUESTION STATE.
05:31:04
PLEASE GET YOUR QUESTIONS OUT THERE.
05:31:05
COUNCILMEMBER PART?
05:31:06
>>I AGREE WITHTHE THOUGHT THAT THIS
05:31:15
LAND HAS VALUE. PEOPLE SAY THAT BUY
05:31:16
LAND BECAUSE THEY DON'T MAKE IT
05:31:17
ANYMORE.BUT THE OTHER THING I DON'T
05:31:26
LIKE IS I DON'T LIKE BUYING PROPERTY
05:31:27
THAT I HAVEN'T SEEN AND STEPPED ON AND
05:31:28
I DON'T LIKE SELLING PROPERTY THAT
05:31:29
HAVEN'T SEEN OR STEPPED ON AND I WAS
05:31:30
WONDERINGIF STAFF IS GOING TO GO TO
05:31:37
LOYALTY AND TO DO ANY WORK THERE I
05:31:38
WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF I CAN ACCOMPANY
05:31:39
STAFF ON A TRIP TO LITTLETON TO VIEW
05:31:40
THE PROPERTY.
05:31:43
>>OKAY, THANK YOU. I'M SURE THEY WOULD
05:31:44
LOVE THAT. I DON'T SEE A PROBLEM WITH
05:31:51
THAT. I SHOULD ANSWER FOR THEM. OKAY,
05:31:52
VICE MAYOR CHAHAL.
05:31:53
>>THANK YOU, MAYOR.IF STAFF CAN MAKE
05:31:59
ANY COMMENTS ABOUT THE LETTER WE GOT
05:32:00
FROM JOSHUA BUSCH, AND MY QUESTION, IF
05:32:04
IT IS LEGALLY PERMITTED, ISIF THE
05:32:07
(INAUDIBLE)THEOTHER COMMON ENTITY, ARE
05:32:14
WE ABLE TO SAVE SOME MONEY ON, SAY,
05:32:20
HIRING THE REALTOR OR WHATEVER MONEY
05:32:21
WE HAVE TO PUT INTO THE MARKET? ARE
05:32:23
THOSE STEPS OKAY?AND IF THIS AGENCY
05:32:28
WANTS TO BUY IT, WHAT WOULD BE THE
05:32:29
PROCESS?
05:32:35
>>THAT'S A SURPLUS LAND THAT QUESTION.
05:32:36
DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM
05:32:37
THE CITY COUNCIL?OKAY, STAFF, GO
05:32:39
AHEAD, YOU CAN ANSWER THE QUESTIONS.
05:32:44
>>I ADDRESS?
05:32:47
>>YES.
05:32:48
>>GO AHEAD, SUE.
05:33:04
>>SHOULD I ADDRESS THAT QUESTION
05:33:05
FIRST? OKAY. SO THE QUESTION OF
05:33:06
WHETHER OR NOT WE CAN TRANSFER IT TO
05:33:07
THE OTHER AGENCY AS EXEMPT SURPLUS IS
05:33:08
STILL SORT OF AN OPEN QUESTION BECAUSE
05:33:09
THE EXEMPT SURPLUS REQUIRES USTO SORT
05:33:12
OF DEFINE THE TERM TRANSFER, WHICH IS
05:33:13
AS YET UNCLEAR IN THIS CONTEXT. IF WE
05:33:14
ARE SELLING ITFOR RECEIPT OF CASH,
05:33:17
IT'S UNCLEAR WHETHER THAT WOULD
05:33:18
ACTUALLY QUALIFY AS A TRANSFER FOR THE
05:33:21
PURPOSES OF EXEMPT SURPLUSDECLARATION.
05:33:32
AND SO WE MAY STILL HAVE TO GO THROUGH
05:33:33
THE SURPLUS LAND:PROCESS EVEN IF WE
05:33:34
ARE SELLING IT TO ANOTHERPUBLIC
05:33:36
AGENCY. WE STILL HAVE TO GO THROUGH
05:33:37
THAT PROCESS TO FIGURE OUT HOW WE ARE
05:33:43
GOING TO DO THAT IF, IN FACT, THAT'S
05:33:44
THE WAY WE GO.WHILE WE MAY NOT HAVE TO
05:33:58
ENGAGE A BROKER, WE MAY STILL HAVE TO
05:33:59
GO THROUGH A NUMBER OF PROCEDURAL
05:34:00
STEPS IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THAT
05:34:01
TRANSACTION. DOES THAT MAKE SENSE?
05:34:02
>>YES, THANK YOU FOR EXPLAINING THAT.
05:34:03
SO BASICALLY EITHER WAY WE WILL HAVE
05:34:08
THE SURPLUS LAND THAT FORMALITIES
05:34:09
WHATEVER WE DO. IF WE GO DIRECT TO THE
05:34:10
PUBLIC WE MIGHT BE ABLE TO SAVE SOME
05:34:12
SALES COST OR SOMETHING. IS THAT
05:34:13
CORRECT TO SAY?
05:34:22
>>I'M NOT SURE EXACTLY HOW THE BROKER
05:34:23
WOULD WORK, BUT IT'S POSSIBLE THAT WE
05:34:24
COULD GET OUT OF THAT STEP OF IT. SO I
05:34:25
COULDN'T TELL YOU WHAT THOSE NUMBERS
05:34:26
WOULD BE.
05:34:30
>>OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS THAT STAFF
05:34:31
NEEDS TO ASK? I THINK COUNCILMEMBER
05:34:32
PARK WANTS TO GO VISIT IT. THE COUNCIL
05:34:39
SHOULD SEE IT IF THEY DON'T, IF THEY
05:34:40
HAVEN'T SEEN WHAT THEY ARE PROPOSING
05:34:41
TO SELL.
05:34:42
>>THERE WERE A COUPLE MORE QUESTIONS.
05:34:43
REGARDING THE VISIT, I THINK IF THERE
05:34:49
IS AN INTEREST FROM COUNCIL TO VISIT
05:34:50
THE PROPERTY WE WOULD BE HAPPY TO WORK
05:34:51
THAT OUT TO SEE HOW ANY COUNCIL
05:34:52
MEMBERS ARE INTERESTED AND PLAN A TRIP
05:34:54
AT SOME POINT SO WE CAN COORDINATE ON
05:34:55
THATIF COUNCIL IS MOVING FORWARD.
05:34:59
REGARDING THE STEPSCOUNCILMEMBER
05:35:05
WATANABE AND WHETHER YOU WILL SEE THIS
05:35:06
AGAIN, YES, YOU WILL DEFINITELY SEE
05:35:07
THERE WILL BEDIFFERENT ACTIONS THE
05:35:17
COUNCIL WILL HAVE TO TAKE ALONG THE
05:35:18
WAY BEFORE THEY ACTUALLY SELL THEIR
05:35:19
PROPERTY, WHETHER SURPLUS LAND ACT IN
05:35:20
MAKING DETERMINATIONS ALONG THAT
05:35:21
PROCESS, WILL PROBABLY DISCUSS WITH
05:35:22
YOU THE APPRAISAL AT SOME POINTS WITH
05:35:23
THE CURRENT VALUE ISAND WE NEED TO
05:35:49
HIRE A CONSULTANT OR REALTOR OR
05:35:50
COMBINATION OF BOTH TO HELP US WITH
05:35:51
THIS, YOU WILL BE SEEING CONTRACTS AND
05:35:52
ULTIMATELY YOU WILL HAVE A DECISION TO
05:35:53
MAKE WHETHER YOU SELL THE PROPERTY OR
05:35:54
NOT UNDER EITHER SCENARIO. SO THERE
05:35:55
WILL BE ADDITIONAL ACTIONS THAT WILL
05:35:56
NEED TO OCCUR BEFORE A SALE ACTUALLY
05:35:57
HAPPENS. SO THAT'S WHAT WE
05:35:58
(INAUDIBLE), ONE, IT'S NOT, IS
05:36:04
STRAIGHTFORWARD BUT REQUIRES STEPS IN
05:36:05
THE PROPERTIES, IT'S A COMPLICATED
05:36:06
PROPERTY FOR US BECAUSE THIS IS NOT AS
05:36:07
CLOSE TO THE CITY SO WE WILL HAVE TO
05:36:08
WORK THAT OUT AND WILL BE BACK TO THE
05:36:09
COUNCIL MORE THAN ONCE WITH ADDITIONAL
05:36:10
INFORMATION AND WRITTEN ACTIONS TO BE
05:36:11
REQUESTED.
05:36:14
>>OKAY, THANK YOU. NOW WE WILL GO TO A
05:36:15
MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC. MEMBER OF THE
05:36:16
PUBLIC THAT WANTS TO SPEAK ON THIS.
05:36:18
THIS IS ON THE ROYALTON PROPERTY.
05:36:23
SUNEEL, GO AHEAD, SUNEEL.
05:36:34
>>HI MATT, I JUST HAD A MINOR COMMENT
05:36:35
REGARDING PREVIOUS AGENDA ITEM.
05:36:36
>>WE ARE NOT ON THAT.
05:36:37
>>YES, I WANT TO POINT OUT SOMETHING.
05:36:43
THERE ARE MANY REEDY COMMENTS JUST TO
05:36:44
REFRESH ISSUE OR TECHNICAL ISSUE
05:36:45
BECAUSE THERE WERE 20 COMMENTS OR
05:36:46
SOMETHING AND I HEARD ONLY THREE. I'M
05:36:51
NOT COMMENTING ANYTHING ON THAT TOPIC
05:36:52
THOUGH.
05:36:53
>>OKAY, THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
05:36:55
WE WILL CHECK ON THAT. JOSHUA, GO
05:36:56
AHEAD, JOSHUA.
05:37:09
>>HI MIKE, THIS IS JOSH WITH THE STATE
05:37:10
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, AND I
05:37:11
APPRECIATE YOUR CONSIDERATION OF THIS
05:37:12
AGENDA ITEM AND THE SALE. THE STATE IS
05:37:13
STILL VERY MUCH INTERESTED IN
05:37:14
PURCHASING THE PROPERTYFOR THE BENEFIT
05:37:15
OF FISH AND WILDLIFE AND THE PUBLIC AT
05:37:16
LARGE AND COMBINING IT WITH OUR
05:37:17
EXISTING WILDLIFE AREA. WE WOULD BE
05:37:22
HAPPY TO ENTERTAIN YOUR STAFF AND WE
05:37:26
HAVE SOME REAL ON THE GROUND
05:37:27
EXPERIENCE UP THERE AS FAR AS
05:37:30
RESTORATION RECLAMATION AND GRAZING
05:37:42
AND WE WOULD BE HAPPY TO JUST BE
05:37:43
EITHER GOOD PARTNERS AND NEIGHBORS OR
05:37:44
TO EXPLORE PURCHASING THE PROPERTY.
05:37:45
THE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION BOARD IS AN
05:37:46
OVERSIGHT BOARD THAT PURCHASES A
05:37:47
PROPERTY FOR USAND THEY HAVE
05:37:48
EXPERIENCE LAND AGENCY CAN HELP GUIDE
05:37:49
USOR GUIDE YOU OR US THROUGH THIS
05:37:57
PROCESS IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO ENGAGE IN
05:37:58
THAT AS WELL. SO THANK YOU.
05:37:59
>>THANK YOU. EDWARD, GO AHEAD, EDWARD.
05:38:07
>>(INAUDIBLE) THIS DETAIL WORKING WITH
05:38:08
THE CITYAND THE NEXT FIVE OR 10 YEARS,
05:38:13
I KNOW A LOT OF PEOPLE IN CALIFORNIA
05:38:22
DUE TO THE HIGH COST OF LIVING AND
05:38:23
OTHER ISSUES IN CALIFORNIA, I KNOW THE
05:38:24
BIRTHRATE FOR REPLACEMENT RATE FROM
05:38:28
THE NEXT FIVE OR 10 YEARS IS GOING TO
05:38:29
BE MORE PEOPLE, ESPECIALLY WITH THE
05:38:30
BABY BOOMERS, THERE AREN'T GOING TO BE
05:38:35
ENOUGH PEOPLE TO REPLACE THE PEOPLE
05:38:36
THAT WERE HERE, SOI THINK WE HAVE A
05:38:40
POPULATION REDUCTIONESPECIALLY IN THE
05:38:44
NEXT 10 OR 15 YEARS, WE WILL HAVE TO
05:38:50
WORK WITH THE STATE ON THIS
05:38:51
(INAUDIBLE) IN THE FUTURE. THANK YOU.
05:38:54
>>THANK YOU. ANY OTHER MEMBER OF THE
05:38:55
PUBLIC?DO WE HAVE ANY COMMENTS ON
05:38:59
THIS, ASSISTANT CITY CLERK?
05:39:12
>>I HAVE ONE E COMMENT.
05:39:13
>>OKAY.
05:39:14
>>THIS IS FROM WHERE IT'S GONE. PLEASE
05:39:15
SELL THE LAND FOR BETTER CONSERVATION
05:39:16
OF WILDLIFE. END OF COMMENT.
05:39:20
>>OKAY. THANK YOU. BACK TO COUNCIL, WE
05:39:21
HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND ON THE FLOOR
05:39:25
TO LOOK AT OPTION ONE TO START
05:39:26
PURSUING THE SALE OF THIS PROPERTY.
05:39:27
CORRECT?ASSISTANT CITY CLERK? IS THAT
05:39:43
THE MOTION?
05:39:44
>>THAT'S CORRECT. ALTERNATIVE ONE,
05:39:45
DIRECT STAFF TO DEVELOP A STRATEGY FOR
05:39:46
THE SALE OF THE LOYALTY RANCH PROPERTY
05:39:47
PRESENTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AT A
05:39:48
FUTURE MEETING.
05:39:49
>>ANY COMMENTS FROM THE COUNCIL? I AM
05:39:56
JUST GOING TO SAY I AM NOT GOING TO
05:39:57
SUPPORT THE MOTION, BACK IN 2017 I
05:39:58
THINK OR '18 WE HAD AN OFFER FOR $10
05:39:59
MILLION ON THIS PROPERTY. THE CURRENT
05:40:00
APPRAISAL DURING THE PANDEMIC AND THE
05:40:03
LOWERING OF, THIS WAS EVEN BEFORE THE
05:40:04
FIRE WAS DOWN IN THE $4 MILLION RANGE.
05:40:06
THIS MEANS WE WILL BE SELLING THE
05:40:07
PROPERTYAT AN EXTREMELY REDUCED VALUE
05:40:29
BECAUSE IT'S AT THE WRONG TIME. AND I
05:40:30
WANT TO REMIND THE COUNCIL THAT THIS
05:40:31
PROPERTY BELONGS TO SILICON VALLEY
05:40:32
POWER IN THE RATEPAYERS. I DON'T
05:40:33
BELIEVE THAT WE SHOULD SHORTCHANGE THE
05:40:34
RATEPAYERS IF WE ARE SELLING THIS
05:40:35
PROPERTY AND I AM NOT AVERSE TO
05:40:36
SELLING IT, WE SHOULD GET FAIR MARKET
05:40:37
VALUE BUT NOT IN A DOWN MARKET. IF WE
05:40:42
WAIT A COUPLE OF YEARS IN THE MARKET
05:40:43
REBOUNDS WE MIGHT BE ABLE TO EVEN GET
05:40:44
CLOSE TO THAT $10 MILLION OFFER WE HAD
05:40:45
IN 2017. SO JUST AS NONE OF YOU WOULD
05:40:46
SELL YOUR PROPERTY, YOUR PERSONAL
05:40:51
PROPERTY IN A DEPRESSED REAL ESTATE
05:40:52
MARKET, I DON'T THINK THAT THE CITY
05:40:53
SHOULD SELL THIS PROPERTYFOR THE
05:40:54
RATEPAYERSIN A DEPRESSED REAL ESTATE
05:40:59
MARKET. I THINK WE ARE NOT DOING
05:41:00
JUSTICE TO THE RATEPAYERS FOR OUR
05:41:17
PUBLIC UTILITY. BECAUSE THE SALE OF
05:41:18
THIS PROPERTY, THE FUNDS ARE NOT GOING
05:41:19
INTO THE GENERAL FUND AND I JUST WANT
05:41:20
TO REMIND EVERYONE THAT THE CITY HAS
05:41:21
TO GET FAIR MARKET VALUE FOR THIS
05:41:22
PROPERTY. WHICH IS GOING TO BE
05:41:23
INTERESTING WHEN YOU'RE DEALING WITH
05:41:24
OTHER CO-GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES. SO I'M
05:41:25
NOT GOING TO SUPPORTMOTION ON THE
05:41:26
FLOOR. ASSISTANT CITY CLERK, A ROLL
05:41:27
CALL VOTE, PLEASE?
05:41:28
>>
05:41:29
[CALLING ROLL]THAT PASSES 4-3. THANK
05:41:49
YOU. OKAY. WE ARE ALMOST DONE WITH
05:41:50
THIS AGENDA.
05:41:51
>>MADAM CHAIR?
05:41:52
>>YES.
05:41:53
>>IN REGARDS TO THE COMMENT THAT WAS
05:41:55
MADE, I HAVEN'T REFRESHED MY IPAD HERE
05:42:02
AND THERE ARE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. I
05:42:13
NORMALLY AM REFRESHING THROUGHOUT THE
05:42:14
MEETING AND I HADN'T DONE IT RECENTLY.
05:42:15
SO I DON'T KNOW IF YOU LIKE ME TO READ
05:42:16
THOSE COMMENTS?
05:42:17
>>YOU HAVE ONLY BEEN HERE FOR NINE
05:42:18
HOURS.I DON'T KNOW WHY, ASSISTANT CITY
05:42:19
CLERK. I THINK IT'S PROBABLY IMPORTANT
05:42:32
THAT WE READ THE COMMENTS SINCE THE
05:42:33
PEOPLE TOOK THE TIME, EVEN THOUGH WE
05:42:34
TOOK NO ACTION ON THAT ITEM, I THINK
05:42:35
IT WOULD BE IMPORTANT TO READ THEIR
05:42:36
COMMENTS. SHOULD WE NOT, ASSISTANT
05:42:37
CITY ATTORNEY?
05:42:38
>>I THINK YOU CAN. YOU CAN READ THE
05:42:43
COMMENTS. IT'S JUST PUBLIC COMMENT
05:42:44
PERIOD
05:42:45
>>OKAY. SO GO AHEAD, ASSISTANT CITY
05:42:50
CLERK. DO YOU NEED ASSISTANCE READING
05:42:51
THOSE COMMENTS? SHOULD WE SPLIT THEM
05:42:52
UP?
05:42:59
>>THEY ARE PRETTY SMALL.
05:43:00
>>THANK YOU FOR BRINGING THAT TO OUR
05:43:01
ATTENTION. MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC. I
05:43:03
DON'T KNOW IF HE IS STILL WITH US OR
05:43:04
NOT.I DON'T SEE HIM. GO AHEAD, NORA.
05:43:16
>>A COMMENT FROM JAMES KIM, STRONGLY
05:43:17
OPPOSE THIS PROPOSAL, THE GAIN IN THE
05:43:18
NUMBER OF PARKING SPOTS IS MINIMAL AND
05:43:19
OUTRAGEDBY NARROWING STREET, POTENTIAL
05:43:36
VANDALISM IN CAR ACCIDENTS IS CARS
05:43:37
BACK OUT TO THE STREET. PLEASE LISTEN
05:43:38
TO THE VOICES OF THE RESIDENTS, THE
05:43:39
SOLUTION ASSOCIATED WITH
05:43:40
OVERSATURATION OF HOUSING IN OUR
05:43:41
NEIGHBORHOOD IS NOT DIAGONAL PARKING
05:43:42
BUT BY NOT ALLOWING CHARITIES HOUSING
05:43:43
TO MOVE FORWARDEND OF COMMENT. NEXT
05:43:44
COMMENT? MARIE'S COURT,, I'M IN THE
05:43:45
OWNER AND EXECUTIVE HOUSE, ELIMINATE
05:43:46
OURLOADING ZONE,DRIVERS NEED TO PARK
05:43:54
THEIR VEHICLE IN THE ROAD TO EXIT
05:43:55
DIAGONAL PARKING. THIS CREATES A
05:44:02
SITUATION FOR PEOPLE BEHIND THE
05:44:03
VEHICLE. KIDS CAN BE DIFFICULT TO SPOT
05:44:04
BECAUSE THEY ARE SHORTER THAN ADULTS
05:44:05
IN THEIRIN A RESIDENTIAL AREA. NEXT
05:44:07
COMMENT FROM BRIAN LUCIANO,THE CIVIC
05:44:17
CENTER HOMEOWNERS WE HAVE COME TO 100%
05:44:18
UNANIMOUS CONCLUSION THAT WE ARE NOT
05:44:19
IN FAVOR OF THIS NEW DEVELOPMENT.
05:44:20
WE'VE MADE OUR VOICES LOUDAND CLEAR ON
05:44:21
MULTIPLE MEETINGS. WHERE WE HAVE HAD
05:44:37
VERY LIMITED TIME TO SPEAK IF AT ALL.
05:44:38
WE ARE THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA, NOT
05:44:39
YOU. YOU ARE PAID EMPLOYEES. WE PAY
05:44:40
YOU. YOUR JOB IS TO LISTEN WAS. WE ARE
05:44:41
A DIVERSE AND INCLUSIVE COMMUNITY. IF
05:44:42
THIS GETS PUSHED FORWARD IT WAS
05:44:43
SUPPOSEDA DERELICTION OF DUTY. END OF
05:45:04
COMMENT. NEXT COMMENT, CRUISE, THIS IS
05:45:05
NOT THE SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM, THIS
05:45:06
PROPOSAL ONLY GAINED 25 PARKING SPACES
05:45:07
AT THE EXPENSE OF A NARROWER DRIVE.
05:45:08
IT'S NOT JUST A MATTER OF TRYING TO
05:45:09
SOLVE A PROBLEM TO BE ABLE TO FIX IT
05:45:10
WITH THIS DIAGONAL PARKING PROPOSAL.
05:45:11
MAKE OUR COMMUNITY A BETTER PLACE TO
05:45:12
LIVE AND WORK I RESERVE THE CITY'S
05:45:13
QUALITY OF LIFE. WANT TO MOVE FORWARD
05:45:14
TO BEING PROGRESSIVE TO A SAFE AND
05:45:15
ORDERLYCOMMUNITY AND NOT REGRESSIVE.
05:45:54
NEXT, SHIRLEY BAY, STRONGLY OPPOSE
05:45:55
THIS PROPOSAL THAT WOULD MAKE A
05:45:56
NEGATIVE IMPACT ON THE PARKING PROBLEM
05:45:57
THAT WE HAVE AT THE SAFETY OF THE
05:45:58
RESIDENTS AND DRIVERS HAVING DIAGONAL
05:45:59
PARKING ON THE STREET MAKES THE ROAD
05:46:00
MORE NARROW RESULTING IN MORE TRAFFIC
05:46:01
AND HIGHER YOUR CHANCES OF ACCIDENTS
05:46:02
ESPECIALLY TO THE NEARBY RESIDENTS WHO
05:46:03
NEED TO DRIVE THROUGH THIS RESIDENCE
05:46:04
EVERY DAY. LEON LEE I STRONGLY
05:46:05
PROPOSE OPPOSE THE NARROW PARKING. IT
05:46:06
IS NOT A LONG-TERM SOLUTION TO THE
05:46:07
PARKING PROBLEM. ABANDONING A LOT OF
05:46:08
OTHER PROBLEMS NOT TO MENTION THE
05:46:09
DELIVERY DRIVERS LEFT TO PARK IN THE
05:46:10
MIDDLE OF THE NARROW ROAD TO FINISH
05:46:11
DELIVERY. I'VE SEEN THIS HAPPEN TONS
05:46:12
OF TIME IN SAN FRANCISCO THAT CAUSE A
05:46:13
LOT OF TRAFFIC AND EVEN ACCIDENT
05:46:14
SOMETIMES WE JUST SUPER DANGEROUS TO
05:46:15
DRIVERS AND PEDESTRIANS.
05:46:16
NEXT COMMENT, MARIA. I STRONGLY OPPOSE
05:46:17
THE PROPOSAL YOU WANT TO MAKE MORE
05:46:18
PROPOSAL TO THE STREET ALLOWS.WE WERE
05:46:19
A SAFENEIGHBORHOOD AND NOW IT IS GOING
05:46:22
TO POT FROM 13 MONTHS AGO. IT'S NOT
05:46:23
FAIR. PLEASE THINK OF WHAT THIS ORDEAL
05:46:24
IS DOING TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE
05:46:25
HOMEOWNER. END OF COMMENT.
05:46:26
ARE AAA. THIS IS NOT AN ADEQUATE
05:46:27
SOLUTION. PARKING SHOULD BE TAKING
05:46:28
MORE SERIOUS WHILEAND MADE TO PROVIDE
05:46:30
ADEQUATE PARKING FOR RESIDENTS. .7 IS
05:46:31
NOT ENOUGH, ESPECIALLY IN IN A
05:46:32
POPULATED AREA.
05:46:37
AND CHILDREN DOLL. I STRONGLY OPPOSE
05:46:38
THIS PROPOSAL. END OF COMMENT.
05:46:47
>>VANIA TWO. I STRONGLY OPPOSE THE
05:46:48
PROPOSAL. THIS PROPOSAL MEANS 25
05:46:49
PARKING SPACES AT THE EXPENSE OF THE
05:46:50
NARRATOR WERE CIVIC CENTER. WE BELIEVE
05:47:01
COUNCIL SHOULD CONSIDER A
05:47:02
COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD WIDE
05:47:03
PROPOSAL THAT APPLIES TO PROJECTS AS
05:47:04
WELL AS NOT JUST APPLY MANDATES TO THE
05:47:05
PROBLEM.
05:47:15
CFP, STRONGLY OPPOSE THE CHANGE TO
05:47:16
DIAGONAL PARKING. IT WILL NARROW THE
05:47:17
STREET AND IS DANGEROUS FOR
05:47:18
PEDESTRIANS. PLEASE AND SAW GREENLAND
05:47:19
RIGHT STOP SIGNS AT ALL CROSSROADS.
05:47:46
END OF COMMENT. PREPARE PARKING IN
05:47:47
FRONT OF THE SEVEN STORY BUILDING AT
05:47:48
1700 CIVIC CENTER NEEDS TO REMAIN
05:47:49
LOADING ZONE WITH YELLOW CURB. DOZENS
05:47:50
OF DELIVERIES ARE MADE SEVEN DAYS A
05:47:51
WEEK AT THIS LOCATION. THIS SIDE OF
05:47:52
THE STREET WITH DIAGONALLY PARKED CARS
05:47:53
WHICH WILL BE FILLED 24 SEVEN CAUSING
05:47:54
DELIVERY DRIVER TO CROSS THE STREET
05:47:55
WITH PACKAGES WERE SQUEEZED BETWEEN
05:47:56
PARKED CARS AND ENTER OUR BUILDING IS
05:47:57
NOT A SAFE OR GOOD IDEA. PLEASE
05:47:58
CONTACT PROPERTY MANAGER BRIAN. THANK
05:47:59
YOU. END OF COMMENT.
05:48:00
LAURA CHO. I OPPOSE THE ACTION ON THE
05:48:01
WARBURTON AVENUE, INSTALLING DIAGONAL
05:48:02
PARKING WOULD NARROW THE STREET AND
05:48:03
INCREASED SAFETY PROBLEMS AND IT COSTS
05:48:04
A LOT.
05:48:25
CINDY. I STRONGLY OPPOSE THE CHANGE TO
05:48:26
DIAGONAL PARKING. THIS IS NOT ADEQUATE
05:48:27
FOR THE SAFETY OF THE RESIDENCE. IT
05:48:28
WILL NARROW THE STREET AND CREATE MORE
05:48:29
DANGER FOR TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN. THE
05:48:30
REALITY IS THAT 0.7 SPACES IS
05:48:31
INADEQUATE FOR THIS LOCATION. THERE
05:48:32
HARDLY ANY AVAILABLE SPACES FOR TWO
05:48:33
BLOCKS. ADDING THE VOLUME OF CARS TO
05:48:34
THE SPECIFIC LOCATION. THE OBVIOUS
05:48:35
SOLUTION IS TO DEVELOP NEEDS TO
05:48:36
PROVIDE SPECIFICDEFICIENT PARKING.
05:48:38
>>AND THE REST I'VE ALREADY READ AND
05:48:39
THERE WERE SOME THAT ALREADY SPOKE.
05:48:40
THAT'S THE END OF THE COMMENTS.
05:48:41
>>THANK YOU VERY MUCH, ASSISTANT CITY
05:48:42
CLERK. I APPRECIATE YOU READING THOSE.
05:49:00
OKAY, NOW WE HAVE REPORTS OF MEMBERS
05:49:01
AND SPECIAL COMMITTEES. TO ANY COUNCIL
05:49:02
MEMBERS HAVE ANY REPORTS THEY WOULD
05:49:03
LIKE TO MAKE BEFORE WE CONCLUDE?
05:49:04
COUNCILMEMBER BECKER?
05:49:05
>>THANK YOU, MAYOR. YES, I WANT TO SAY
05:49:06
THIS EARLIER BUT THIS IS PROBABLY THE
05:49:07
BEST TIME WITHOUT THE CONTENT TIME
05:49:08
CONSTRAINT. I WILL BE AS QUICK AS
05:49:09
POSSIBLE. I KNOW EVERYBODY WANTS TO
05:49:10
GET HOME. THIS IS BASICALLY THE MET
05:49:11
LAST MEETING OF OUR YEAR. SO BASICALLY
05:49:12
LAST WEEK THERE WAS A NEW STORY THAT
05:49:13
WAS PRINTED BY ROBERT HALL, THE
05:49:15
BLOGGER. HE PRINTED BASICALLY
05:49:32
MISINFORMATION AND IT WAS ON TUESDAY,
05:49:33
DECEMBER 9, AND MISINFORMATION WAS
05:49:34
BASICALLY TAKING AN OPINION LETTER
05:49:35
THAT WAS READ FROM A RESIDENT WHO WAS
05:49:36
HERE ON THE PUBLIC RECORD DURING
05:49:37
TUESDAY NIGHT'S COUNCIL MEETING ON
05:49:38
DECEMBER 8 AND THIS LETTER, SORRY
05:49:39
DECEMBER 7 IN THIS LETTER WAS
05:49:40
PUBLISHED A DAY AFTERCOUNCIL MEMBERS
05:49:47
ACTUALLY CORRECTED THE FACTS OF THE
05:49:48
ACCUSATIONS, AND I WILL PROVIDE SOME
05:49:49
OF THE INSTANCES. THE FIRST INSTANCE
05:50:10
STATES THAT COUNCILMEMBER PARK WAS AT
05:50:11
LEVI STADIA ON A TOUR WITH
05:50:12
COUNCILMEMBERS HARDY AND CHAHAL.
05:50:13
COUNCILMEMBER PARK ON THE RECORD
05:50:14
VERIFIED THIS IS FALSE. THEREFORE THE
05:50:15
RECORD NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED. THE SAME
05:50:16
EXAMPLE, THERE IS STILL PRINTING OF
05:50:17
WHO PAID FOR FIELD ACCESS TICKETS.
05:50:18
THIS IS EXPLAINED BY THE TWO
05:50:19
COUNCILMEMBERS, IT WAS AN OPERATIONS
05:50:20
TOUR AND NOT PROPERLY REPORTED TO THE
05:50:21
PUBLIC BY HALL AND THE RESIDENT. THE
05:50:22
SECOND EXAMPLE OF ACCUSATIONS OF FALSE
05:50:23
INFORMATIONIS THAT I VOTED NOT TO
05:50:31
EXTEND THE FUNDING FOR POLICE. THIS IS
05:50:32
ENTIRELY FALSE, RECORDS SHOW THAT I
05:50:33
VOTED IN FAVOR PUBLIC SAFETY INCLUDING
05:50:59
POLICE WITH NO CUTS. THIRD COUNT OF
05:51:00
MISINFORMATION IS SAYING THAT THE 49
05:51:01
OR FIVE VOTED FOR CURFEW EXTENSION.
05:51:02
THE EDITOR MADE A NOTE OF THE TIME
05:51:03
CORRECTION BUT FAILED TO CORRECT THE
05:51:04
NARRATIVES OF THE 49ER FIVE BY PLACING
05:51:05
COUNCILMEMBER PARK IS ONE OF THOSE
05:51:06
VOTES. IN FACT COUNCILMEMBER PART
05:51:07
VOTED AGAINST THE BOAT. SO I DON'T
05:51:08
KNOW WHY NO CORRECTIONS WERE MADE
05:51:09
THERE. LASTLY IN THE FINAL EXAMPLE
05:51:10
WHICH WAS BASICALLY SAYING THAT THERE
05:51:11
WASN'T ALLOWED ANY PUBLIC PRESENTATION
05:51:12
BEFORE ALLOWING THE VOTEON THE LEVI
05:51:19
STADIUM CURFEW I THINK THIS IS VERY
05:51:20
MISLEADING BOTH THAT OUR COMMUNITY IS
05:51:21
SEEING AND THIS NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED
05:51:22
BECAUSE THE FACT IS THAT WAS ON AN
05:51:23
AGENDA, WAS PUBLICLY NOTICED,
05:51:24
THEREFORE THERE WAS THE ABILITY FOR
05:51:25
COMMENT TO VOTE. SINCE I THINK A LOT
05:51:26
OF OUR COUNCILMEMBERS DON'T GET A LOT
05:51:28
OF POWER GET SOME THESE THINGS AND
05:51:40
SOMETIMES LIES AND MISINFORMATION, IN
05:51:41
FACT MR. HALL IN THE PAST HAS IGNORED
05:51:42
DEMANDS FOR MINOR ATTRACTIONS. THERE
05:51:43
IS A TIME IN THE PAST WHERE HE DID
05:51:44
ASKED ME TO APOLOGIZE AND I DID
05:51:47
(INAUDIBLE) HE WILL SOON BE FOR SLANDER
05:51:50
ON A DAILY BASIS AND SO SEEING THAT I
05:51:59
SEE ALSO THAT THERE IS A CENSORING OF
05:52:00
COMMENTS TO CORRECT THAT RECORD TO
05:52:01
ALSO KEEP THATAND THERE'S NUMEROUS
05:52:03
INSTANCES WHERE SHE HAS BEEN MANY
05:52:08
TIMES ACCUSED OF CENSORING OPPOSITION.
05:52:09
THE FALSE NEWSTHE BLOG SPREADS TO OUR
05:52:11
COMMUNITYI THINK DAMAGE THE INTEGRITY
05:52:18
OF OUR LEADERSHIP IN OUR ENTIRE
05:52:19
COMMUNITY FUNCTIONS. IT IS DANGEROUS
05:52:24
THAT IT CASTS A BAD LIGHT ON THE CITY
05:52:25
AS A WHOLE AND CREATES MORE TOXIC
05:52:26
ENVIRONMENT THAN IT ALREADY IS. THIS
05:52:41
MISINFORMATION ALREADY DAMAGES
05:52:42
REPUTATIONS OF COUNCILMEMBERS WHEN
05:52:43
THERE IS NO (INAUDIBLE) BY THE COUNCIL
05:52:44
MEMBERS. AS I SAID, I DID CORRECT THAT
05:52:45
ISSUE WHERE I MADE A MISTAKE OF
05:52:46
MISSPEAKING AND I APOLOGIZE. I TOOK
05:52:47
THAT. I EXPECT MR. HALL TO DO THE SAME
05:53:18
THING IN HIS BLOG. LASTLY I LOOK AT
05:53:19
THIS NEWS THAT IS LOGGED IN GOING BACK
05:53:20
FIVE YEARS. I NEVER SEE ONE NEGATIVE
05:53:21
STORY BEING WRITTEN ABOUT MAYOR
05:53:22
GILMORE AND COUNCILMEMBER WATANABE.
05:53:23
AND THAT DOES CONCERN ME, HAVING NOT
05:53:24
ONE NEGATIVE STORY IN FIVE YEARS.
05:53:25
>>MAY I ASK WHAT POINT YOU'RE MAKING?
05:53:26
IT'S ALMOST 20 TO 12. WHAT IS YOUR
05:53:27
POINT, WHAT ARE YOU ASKING FOR? IS
05:53:28
THIS JUST YOUR COMMENTARY FOR THE END
05:53:29
OF THE MEETING?
05:53:30
>>THIS IS MY CLARIFICATION FOR FALSE
05:53:31
INFORMATION.
05:53:32
>>OKAY.AS I AM SAYING,FIGURING THIS
05:53:33
MORE AND MORE AS A POLITICAL HIT JOB,
05:53:34
HAS BEEN CREATING NARRATIVES
05:53:35
MISLEADING OUR PUBLIC WITH NO
05:53:36
ACCOUNTABILITY. MAYOR GILMORE, I OFTEN
05:53:37
SEE YOU SHARE SOME OF HIS BLOG STORIES
05:53:38
>>EXCUSE ME,
05:53:39
>>MAYOR GILMORE
05:53:40
>>WHAT IS THIS ABOUT?
05:53:46
>>THIS IS CORRECTING A RECORD.
05:53:47
>>CORRECTING WHAT RECORD?
05:53:48
>>IS CORRECTING A RECORD BECAUSE IT
05:53:49
SAYS BASICALLY CONCERNS OF YOU SHARING
05:53:50
FABRICATED STORIES AND ACCURATE
05:53:54
INFORMATION.
05:53:55
>>COME ON, ANTHONY.
05:54:08
>>WILL TAKE A MOMENT OF PROTECTED
05:54:09
CLASSES LIKE LB GT Q, RELIGIOUS OR
05:54:10
PEOPLE OF COLOR. SO I WOULD HOPE THAT
05:54:11
YOU DENOUNCE THOSE COMMENTS.
05:54:12
>>YOU KNOW WHAT, I'M SORRY, POINT OF
05:54:13
ORDER HERE.
05:54:14
>>NO, I AM ALLOWED TO DEFEND MYSELF.
05:54:15
>>POINT OF ORDER HERE.YOU KNOW WHAT,
05:54:53
COUNCILMEMBER BECKER, YOU HAVE
05:54:54
OFFENDED PEOPLE AT EVERY MEETING AND I
05:54:55
GUESS
05:54:56
>>YOU HAVE OFFENDED PEOPLE TOO.
05:54:57
>>WITH YOU OFFENDING ME AS WELL.
05:54:58
>>THIS IS GAS LIGHTING. YOU OFFENDED
05:54:59
ME.
05:55:00
>>I KNOW YOU LEARNED A NEW WORD, GAS
05:55:01
LIGHTING, YOU ARE USING IT A LOT.
05:55:02
>>IT IS WHAT IT IS.
05:55:03
>>IF THIS IS A FULL ON ATTACK GO
05:55:04
AHEAD. WE HAVE UNTIL MIDNIGHT, KEEP
05:55:05
GOING.
05:55:06
>>NO, IT'S VERY FUNNY HOW YOU GET TO
05:55:07
MAKE CERTAIN COMMENTS ANY OF THE
05:55:08
MEMBERS ON THE CITY COUNCIL. IT'S VERY
05:55:09
INTERESTING HOW YOU GET TO MAKE THE
05:55:10
RULES AS YOU GO. SO WHAT I AM SAYING
05:55:11
IS THAT SOMEONE MISINFORMATION ON A
05:55:12
DAILY BASIS AND I'M CORRECTING THESE
05:55:13
FACTS. I'M CORRECTINGTHAT
05:55:14
MISINFORMATION AND ALLIES. SO IN DOING
05:55:15
SO I SEE THAT YOU SHARE THE
05:55:16
INFORMATION AND I WOULD PLEASE HOPE
05:55:17
THAT YOU DENOUNCE THAT HATEFUL
05:55:18
RHETORIC THAT PEOPLE ARE SAYING, I
05:55:52
DON'T CARE IF YOU CRITICIZE ME FOR ME
05:55:53
BEING BOLD OR MY VOTES ON COUNCIL, BUT
05:55:54
DON'T QUOTE START SAYING RACIST OR
05:55:55
HOMOPHOBIC KIND OF THINGS AND WHEN YOU
05:55:56
SHARE THAT INFORMATION AND YOU START
05:55:57
TO SEE THAT
05:55:58
>>YOU ARE SO INSULTING. IT'S
05:55:59
EMBARRASSING AND INSULTING.
05:56:00
>>IT'S NOT INSULTING. YOU KNOW WHAT,
05:56:01
YOU DON'T HAVE TO DEAL WITH IT. YOU
05:56:02
DON'T. AND SO WHEN WE HAVE TO STAND UP
05:56:03
FOR OURSELVES AND SEE INFORMATION THAT
05:56:04
IS SHARED IN OUR COMMUNITY THAT IS
05:56:05
INACCURATE, LAST WEEK I WANT TO SAY
05:56:06
THIS, I THINK CITY MANAGER DEANNA
05:56:07
SANTANA FOR CORRECTING MR. ALL A FEW
05:56:08
TIMES THIS YEAR. I REALLY DO
05:56:09
APPRECIATE THAT. THERE'VE BEEN TIMES
05:56:10
WHERETHE CITY MANAGER HAS CORRECTED
05:56:11
OTHER REVENUE SOURCES. SO WHAT I AM
05:56:12
DOING IS CORRECTING THE SAME THING.
05:56:13
AND I KNOW YOU WOULD DO THE SAME THING
05:56:14
TOO IF SOMETHING WAS OUT THERE THAT
05:56:15
YOU FELT WAS AN INJUSTICE.SO I'M JUST
05:56:18
PUTTING THAT ON THE RECORD BECAUSE I
05:56:19
FELT IT WAS VERY UNFAIR THAT THINGS
05:56:20
ARE WRITTEN, SHARED TO THE PUBLIC, AND
05:56:21
THEN WE DON'T EVEN HAVE A SAY TO IT?
05:56:22
NO. WE HAVE A SAY, WE WANT TO CORRECT
05:56:23
THE RECORD. I'M STATING ON THE RECORD
05:56:24
CORRECTING IT. THAT'S WHAT I'M DOING.
05:56:25
AND WHEN YOU SHARE THIS INFORMATION IT
05:56:26
MAKES PEOPLE CALL ME AND SAY YOU ARE
05:56:27
DOINGTHESE THINGS. I NEVER DO ANY
05:56:28
THINGS, THIS IS FALSE INFORMATION TIME
05:56:29
CORRECTING THE RECORD. THANK YOU.
05:56:30
>>COUNCILMEMBER PART.
05:56:31
>>YES, I WHILE I AGREE WITHALMOST ALL
05:56:40
OF COUNCILMEMBER BECKER'S ASSERTIONS,
05:56:41
I ACTUALLY HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH THAT
05:56:45
BLOG CONTAINING LIES. IT'S NOT A REAL
05:56:46
NEW SOURCE. IF WE LOOK AT WHO SET IT UP
05:56:52
, THE STORIES, THE BACKGROUND SEEMS TO
05:56:53
BE THAT SOME PEOPLE ON THE CITY
05:56:58
COUNCIL AND FORMER CITY COUNCIL
05:56:59
MEMBERS HAVE SET UP THIS NEW SOURCE.
05:57:12
AND I WOULD HATE THAT IT STARTS
05:57:13
CORRECTING SOME OF THE LIES,
05:57:14
CORRECTING SOME OF THE THINGS THAT AS
05:57:15
AN STARTS TO BE TAKEN MORE SERIOUSLY.
05:57:16
WHAT DOES DISTURB ME IS WHEN
05:57:17
ORGANIZATIONS LIKE THE POLICE OFFICERS
05:57:18
ASSOCIATIONREFERENCES THE SITE AS
05:57:22
THEIR ONLY SOURCE, WHEN THE CITY USES
05:57:29
OR PROMOTES THIS BLOG, THIS BLOG AS
05:57:30
LEGITIMATE NEWS, I THINK THOSE ARE THE
05:57:31
REAL PROBLEMS. I THINK THAT I HAVE HAD
05:57:37
CITY STAFF AND CITY MANAGER TAKE
05:57:38
OFFENSE AT A LOT OF THINGS THAT I
05:57:39
DIDN'T EVEN SAY, LIKE I DIDN'T EVEN
05:57:40
SAY THAT.AND PEOPLE SAID, YOU ACCUSE
05:57:50
ME OF DOING THIS. NO NO NO NO. I DID
05:57:51
NOT ACCUSE YOU OF DOING THESE THINGS
05:57:52
AND IF YOU LOOK AT THE VIDEO AGAIN YOU
05:57:53
WILL SEE THAT THIS IS IN FACT NOT
05:57:54
TRUE. I THINK THATHAVING CONTROLLING
05:57:55
THE NEWS FOR CONTROLLING THE NARRATIVE
05:57:59
, IT'S AN AGE OLD, ONE OF THE OLDEST
05:58:00
POLITICALWEAPONSIN HISTORY. AND I
05:58:04
THINK THATIT'S GOT TO BE THERE, I
05:58:19
WOULD LIKE IT STOPPED, I WOULD REALLY
05:58:20
LIKE STAFF FOR TAKE THIS A LITTLE MORE
05:58:21
SERIOUSLY IF THEY HAVE A CODE OF
05:58:22
CONDUCT IN SUPPORT AND ACTUALLY WORK
05:58:23
FOR CITY COUNCIL AND SUPPORT CITY
05:58:24
COUNCILBUT IT'S VERY CLEAR THATIN THE
05:58:49
EXCHANGES, THE EMAIL EXCHANGES THAT
05:58:50
THERE IS SUPPORT FOR SOME OF THESE
05:58:51
FALSE NEW SITES AND SOME OF THESE
05:58:52
FALSE NARRATIVES. IT'S NOT JUST THE
05:58:53
BLOGS THAT ARE CREATING THESE FALSE
05:58:54
NARRATIVES, AND I THINK IF WE WANT TO
05:58:55
STOP THIS PROBLEM WE HAVE TO STOP THIS
05:58:56
PROBLEM LITTLE BIT CLOSER TO THE
05:58:57
SOURCE. BUT AGAIN, THIS BLOG IS NOT A
05:58:58
REAL NEW SOURCE AND I HAVE NO PROBLEM
05:58:59
WITH THAT CONTAINING LIES. IN FACT,
05:59:00
THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT I WOULD EXPECT. I
05:59:01
THINKTHE BIGGER ISSUE IS WHERE DO
05:59:02
THESE LIES COME FROM, WHAT IS, WHO IS
05:59:03
FEEDING THESE LIES TO THESE BLOG SITES
05:59:04
AND WHY ARE ORGANIZATIONS LIKE THE PLA
05:59:05
IN THE LAST ELECTION, WHY ARE THEY
05:59:06
BUYING INTO THESE UNTRUTHS AND USING
05:59:07
THEM AS WEAPONS TO ATTACKCITIZENS? AND
05:59:18
I THINK THESE ARE THE QUESTIONS WE WE
05:59:19
NEED TO ASK. BUT AS FAR AS THE LIES
05:59:20
THEMSELVES,I WILL SAY THIS, THEY ARE
05:59:22
VERY AMUSING.THANK YOU.
05:59:23
>>ARE YOU FINISHED? VICE MAYOR TO
05:59:28
CALL, YOUR TURN.
05:59:40
>>I DON'T THINK MAYOR, IT'S A LAUGHING
05:59:41
MATTER, BUT I WILL STILL BE VERY
05:59:42
BRIEF. IT'S NOT A LAUGHING MATTER, SO
05:59:43
NEWS, PRESS IS ONE OF THE STRONGEST
05:59:52
(INAUDIBLE) DEMOCRACY. AND IF WE KNOW
05:59:53
THATSOME LIES ARE BEINGBLATANTLY LIES,
06:00:01
IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF EVERYONEAND
06:00:07
MOST PEOPLE, LET ME TELL YOU, MOST
06:00:08
PEOPLE EVEN KNOWHOW THE LIESARE BEING
06:00:21
FRITTERED THROUGH THAT BLOG. NOBODY
06:00:22
SHOULD BE UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT
06:00:23
MOST PEOPLE DOESN'T KNOW ABOUT IT.
06:00:24
MOST PEOPLE KNOWHOW THIS BLOG IS BEING
06:00:25
USED, AND BUT COUNCILMEMBER BARDING
06:00:34
COUNCILMEMBER BECKER SAID IS
06:00:35
COMPLETELY TRUE. PUBLISH SOMETHING,
06:00:41
CRITICIZE SOMETHING, CRITICIZE IT BUT
06:00:42
DON'T SPREAD LIES. THE SPREADING LIES
06:00:47
DOES NOT HELP COMMUNITY, DOES NOT HELP
06:00:48
ANYBODY AND WHETHER AS A RESIDENT, AS
06:00:51
A MAYOROR AS A COUNCIL MEMBER OR AS A
06:00:57
VICE MAYOR DOES NOT HELP. SO IF THAT'S
06:01:00
THE PRACTICE, I DON'T KNOW.WHAT CAN BE
06:01:04
DONE OR WHAT SHOULD BE DONE ABOUT IT.
06:01:10
THANK YOU.
06:01:11
>>ANYONE ELSE WANT TO SPEAK? ANTHONY
06:01:12
YOU HAVE HAD YOUR TURN. ANYONE ELSE?
06:01:13
>>IS ANOTHER ITEM AFTER THIS.
06:01:18
>>THERE IS NO OTHER ITEM EXCEPT CITY
06:01:19
MANAGER REPORTS.
06:01:20
>>AND THAT IS ANOTHER ITEM THAT I
06:01:24
WANTED TO DO AS A COMMITTEE REPORT.
06:01:25
>>YOU HAVE TO DO IT HERE
06:01:28
>>I WAS GOING TO LET YOU SAY WHAT YOU
06:01:29
WANTED BUT
06:01:31
>>I HAVE NO WORDS.
06:01:32
>>OKAY.SO GO AHEAD.
06:02:02
>>LEADING OFF OF THAT, I SAID WHAT I
06:02:03
SAID, IT IS WHAT IT IS, WE ARE GOING
06:02:04
TO WORK THINGS OUT. THIS IS OUR FIRST
06:02:05
YEAR'S ACCOUNT TOGETHER, I THINK WE
06:02:06
HAVE A LOT OF THINGS, I THINK WE'VE
06:02:07
GONE THROUGH A LOT OF GROWING PAINS. I
06:02:08
WANTED TO SAY THAT IT'S BEEN A
06:02:09
PLEASURE TO BE HONEST TO SERVE WITH
06:02:10
ALL OF YOU THIS LAST YEAR. IT HAS. I
06:02:11
KNOW YOU MAY DISAGREE, MAYOR GILMORE
06:02:12
>>I WAS JUST GOING TO SAY WE ARE
06:02:13
ENDING THIS YEAR ON A VERY LOW NOTE. I
06:02:14
WANT TO SAY THAT, VERY LOW LOW NOTE.
06:02:15
>>I AM HOPING WE CAN CHANGE THAT RIGHT
06:02:16
NOW BECAUSEI SAID WHAT I SAID AND I
06:03:01
STAND BY MY STATEMENTS AND I THINK WE
06:03:02
HAVE A RIGHT TO BE RESPECTFULLY ABLE
06:03:03
TO STAND BY STATEMENTS STILL TREAT
06:03:04
EACH OTHER WITH RESPECT COUNCILMEMBER
06:03:05
PARKER COUNCILMEMBER HARDY WILL
06:03:06
DISAGREE ON A VOTE BUT WILL STILL GET
06:03:07
ALONG WITH EACH OTHER AFTERWARDS. WE
06:03:08
WILL STILL RESPECT EACH OTHER AND SAY
06:03:09
HI. I WILL CALL THEM OUT IF THERE IS
06:03:10
DISAGREEMENTS ON THINGS, WHICH THEY
06:03:11
WILL DO THE SAME THING TO ME. BUT I
06:03:12
WANT TO SAY SPENDING THIS WHOLE LAST
06:03:13
YEAR WITH YOU I FEEL LIKE TO SPEND
06:03:14
MORE TIME WITH YOU GUYS THAT I DO MY
06:03:15
OWN FAMILY AND I REALLY APPRECIATE
06:03:16
YOUR FAMILIES PUTTING UP WITH A LOT OF
06:03:17
THIS, GIVING UP THEIR TIME TO BE WITH
06:03:18
THEIR LOVED ONES, THEIR MOTHERS, THEIR
06:03:19
FATHERS, THEIR HUSBANDS, THEIR WIVES,
06:03:20
FATHERS, SONS, SO ON AND SO ON. I
06:03:21
APPRECIATE ALL THAT. ALSO WANT TO SAY
06:03:22
I VERY MUCH VALUE ALL OF STAFF'S WORK,
06:03:23
I APPRECIATE ALL OF YOUR HARD WORK
06:03:24
THAT YOU'VE DONEAND I KNOW YOU MAY NOT
06:03:25
THINK CERTAIN THINGS I SAID MAY BE PUT
06:03:26
YOU OFF, BUT I APPRECIATE EVERYTHING
06:03:27
YOU DO AND I REALLY APPRECIATE HOW
06:03:28
QUICK YOU ARE TO RESPOND TO A LOT OF
06:03:29
MY CONCERNS. AT THE SAME TIME, LIKE I
06:03:30
SAID, I VALUE ALL OF YOUR WORK. SO TO
06:03:31
EVERYONE OF YOU, WE ARE GOING TO WORK
06:03:32
THROUGH A LOT OF THESE DIFFERENCES IN
06:03:33
DETAILS AND I JUST HOPE IN THIS NEXT
06:03:34
YEAR YOU CAN START WORKING TOGETHER A
06:03:35
LITTLE HARDERAND START ABANDONING AND
06:03:36
A LOT OF THESE ACCUSATIONS AND START
06:03:37
FOCUSING ON THE REAL BUSINESS BECAUSE
06:03:38
LIKE EVERYONE SAYS TO ME THE COMMUNITY
06:03:39
IS WATCHING.SOUGHT TO SAY HAPPY
06:03:52
HOLIDAYS TO EVERYONE, MERRY CHRISTMAS,
06:03:53
HAPPY HANUKKAH, HAPPY KWANZAA AND A
06:03:54
VERY HAPPY NEW YEAR TO EVERY SINGLE
06:03:55
ONE OF YOU. AND I DO APPRECIATE
06:03:56
EVERYTHING THAT EVERYONE OF YOU DO
06:03:57
EVEN THOUGH WE MAY HAVE DISAGREEMENTS.
06:03:58
WE STILL ARE A FAMILY HERE IN SANTA
06:03:59
CLARA. SO THANK YOU. EMMA CONCERNED
06:04:00
WHEN ELSA WOULD LIKE TO SAY ANYTHING?
06:04:01
AGAIN,I THINK WHAT YOU ALL JUST DID
06:04:09
WAS SO LOW AND INSULTING. I'M
06:04:10
PERSONALLY INSULTED AND I JUST FIND IT
06:04:11
VERY HARD TOEVEN PUT INTO WORDS, I
06:04:31
KNOW I'M NOT THE ONLY ONE, OUR STAFF
06:04:32
IS INSULTED, OUR EMPLOYEES ARE
06:04:33
INSULTED, OUR PUBLIC IS INSULTED, AND
06:04:34
I REALLY HOPE THERE ARE SOME
06:04:35
SOUL-SEARCHING OVER THE NEXT MONTH
06:04:36
BEFORE OUR NEXT MEETING TO REALLY WORK
06:04:37
TOGETHER TO WORK FOR THE COMMUNITY AND
06:04:38
STOP ALL OF THIS NONSENSE AND REALLY
06:04:39
WORK TOWARDS A COMMUNITY, I DON'T KNOW
06:04:40
IF THAT'S POSSIBLE, I AM HOPING SO,
06:04:43
BECAUSE I THINK AGAIN WE'VE ENDED THIS
06:04:44
YEAR ON A REALLY LOW NOTE. CITY
06:04:47
MANAGER? REPORTS, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR?
06:04:57
>>NO, WE WILL RECONVENE ON JANUARY 5.
06:04:58
>>IS IT THE FIFTH WEEK
06:04:59
>>JANUARY 5, WE WILL HAVE A BRIEFING.
06:05:09
>>OH. I WAS THINKING THE 11TH. ALL
06:05:10
RIGHT. THE FIFTH. THAT LEADS US TO OUR
06:05:11
ADJOURNMENT. I THINK COUNCILMEMBER
06:05:12
JANE, YOU HAVE ASKED FOR TO READ THE
06:05:13
ADJOURNMENT, PLEASE GO AHEAD.
06:05:14
>>YES. I WOULD LIKE TO ADJOURN THIS
06:05:15
MEETINGIN MEMORY OF ALREADY ALL CORE,
06:05:21
AND VICE MAYOR RAJ CHAHAL. ALREADY
06:05:28
ACCOR WAS BORN IN 1927 AROUND 95 YEARS
06:05:29
AGO AND RURAL VERA ELLEDGE. SHE WAS
06:05:39
BORN TO A FAMILY OF LANDOWNING
06:05:40
FARMERS. SHE CAME TO THE US IN 1995
06:05:41
AND SETTLED DOWN IN SANTA CLARA. FROM
06:05:42
A YOUNG AGESHE BECAME COMMITTED TO
06:05:45
ENSURING THAT HER FAMILY HAD ACCESS TO
06:05:53
GREATER OPPORTUNITIES THAN SHE WAS
06:05:54
AFFORDED HERSELF IN THE AGRICULTURAL
06:05:55
VILLAGE SOCIETY IN WHICH SHE WAS BORN.
06:06:01
DESPITE ONLY HAVING THE OPPORTUNITY TO
06:06:02
GO TO SCHOOL UNTIL THE FIFTH GRADE,
06:06:03
SHE HAD INCREDIBLE FORESIGHT IN
06:06:04
APPRECIATING THE VALUE OF EDUCATION.
06:06:24
WHEN SHE WAS IN HER 20S AND GETTING
06:06:25
READY FOR HER MARRIAGE, SHE HAD A
06:06:26
SPECIAL REQUEST FOR HER FATHER. SHE
06:06:27
REQUESTED HER FATHER TO GET HER
06:06:28
MARRIED TO AN EDUCATED MAN. SHE KNEW
06:06:29
EDUCATION WAS THE KEY TO OPPORTUNITY.
06:06:30
LATER IN HER LIFE, VIEIRA COREHAD HER
06:06:36
OWN CHILDREN, A SON AND THREE
06:06:37
DAUGHTERS. AT THE TIME IN INDIA MANY
06:06:38
PEOPLE'S GOALS WITH THEIR DAUGHTERS
06:06:39
WERE TO GET THEM MARRIED AS SOON AS
06:06:40
POSSIBLE. NOT FOR HER. THE GOAL WAS TO
06:06:47
MAKE SURE EACH OF HER CHILDREN,
06:06:48
INCLUDING HER THREE DAUGHTERS,
06:06:49
RECEIVED A COLLEGE EDUCATION. INSTEAD
06:06:50
OF LIMITING HER DAUGHTERS, SHE
06:06:51
EMPOWERED THEM.SHE SPENT THE LAST 26
06:07:00
YEARS OF HER LIFE IN THE UNITED
06:07:01
STATES, SPENT MUCH OF THAT TIME AS A
06:07:02
RESIDENT IN SANTA CLARA. SHE COULD'VE
06:07:15
STAYED IN INDIA WHERE SHE ENJOYED A
06:07:16
COMFORTABLE LIFE, BUT INSTEAD SHE CAME
06:07:17
TO THE US TO BE THERE FOR HER FAMILY
06:07:18
SO THAT HER CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN
06:07:19
HAD A SHOT AT THE AMERICAN DREAM. AT
06:07:20
ONE POINTSHE WAS LIVING IN A SMALL
06:07:22
SANTA CLARA APARTMENT WITH SEVEN OTHER
06:07:23
FAMILY MEMBERS WHILE HER CHILDREN
06:07:38
WORKS MINIMUM WAGE JOBS DURING THE DAY
06:07:39
SHE BABYSAT HER GRANDCHILDREN AND
06:07:40
TAUGHT THEM PUNJABI. FROM A YOUNG AGE
06:07:41
SHE INSTILLED CONFIDENCE AND
06:07:42
GRANDCHILDREN BY ASSURING THEM THEY
06:07:43
ALL CAN DO SOMETHING GREAT.SHE LIVED
06:07:44
BOLDLY AND COURAGEOUSLY, IN MANY WAYS
06:07:46
WAY AHEAD OF HER TIME, HAD
06:07:51
IRREPLACEABLE OF HER FAMILY. IT IS
06:07:52
BECAUSE OF HER BOLDNESSTHE DEFIANCE OF
06:07:55
THE STATUS QUO SACRIFICES OF AN
06:08:00
IMMIGRANT THAT SHE SET HER FAMILY FOR
06:08:01
OPPORTUNITY.SHE LEFT FOR THE HEAVENLY
06:08:10
ABODE ON NOVEMBER 7, 2021, LEAVING
06:08:11
BEHIND THE FAMILIES OF HER THREE
06:08:12
DAUGHTERS AND SON INCLUDING NINE
06:08:13
GRANDCHILDREN AND ONE GREAT
06:08:14
GRANDCHILD. THROUGHOUT HER LIFE SHE
06:08:15
WAS A WOMAN WHO LED BY EXAMPLEAND
06:08:21
ENRICH THE LIVES OF THOSE AROUND. HER
06:08:22
LOVING MEMORIES WILL KEEP THE FAMILY
06:08:23
AND OUR COMMUNITY INSPIRED. SHE WILL
06:08:24
BE MISSED.
06:08:47
MOTION TO ADJOURN.
06:08:58
[ROLL CALL VOTE]
06:09:17
[MEETING ADJOURNED]