City of Santa Clara logo

Legislative Public Meetings

File #: 18-690    Version: 2 Name:
Type: Consent Calendar Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 5/11/2018 In control: Council and Authorities Concurrent Meeting
On agenda: 5/22/2018 Final action: 5/22/2018
Title: Action on Payment of Settlement to Austin Calhoun and his Attorney and Related Budget Amendment
REPORT TO COUNCIL
SUBJECT
Title
Action on Payment of Settlement to Austin Calhoun and his Attorney and Related Budget Amendment

Report
BACKGROUND
In November 2017, a Santa Clara County Superior Court jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff Austin Calhoun and against a City employee (who was acting in the course and scope of his employment with the City) in the amount of $1.766 million. The City is responsible for payment of this sum. As a result of the City's post-trial motions and further negotiations with the plaintiff, the amount due has been reduced to $1.55 million, which amount was within the City Council's settlement limits as previously authorized in closed session.

DISCUSSION
City Charter Section 1305 requires that appropriation for non-budgeted expenditures, such as the payment of a jury verdict, be approved by a five-vote majority of the Council. Staff requests approval of an appropriation from the Special Liability Reserve Fund, which is a reserve fund established to cover jury verdicts, settlements and payments of the City's insurance deductible in claims matters, to the Special Liability Insurance Fund. Staff further requests approval of payment of the sum of $1.55 million to plaintiff Austin Calhoun and his attorney.

After the verdict was entered, the City Council in closed session authorized the City Attorney to file appropriate post-trial motions and to enter into negotiations with the Plaintiff for settlement of the case, within certain limits. No report out of closed session was completed at that time because the settlement was not yet final as required by California Government Code ?54957.1(a)(3). The settlement has now been finalized and a copy of the Settlement Agreement and Release is on file with the City Clerk's Office. The case has been settled within the limits of authority granted by Council in closed session.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The action being considered does not constitute a "project" within the meaning of the C...

Click here for full text